logo
How to stop scrolling in bed as night-time phone use linked to insomnia

How to stop scrolling in bed as night-time phone use linked to insomnia

Yahoo01-04-2025
Many people are in the habit of using a screen last-thing at night. In fact, a YouGov study on sleep found that a whopping 87% of Britons look at their phone or tablet within an hour before bedtime.
But if you're someone who struggles with sleep, you might want to rethink your digital evening habits, as scientists in Norway have found that in-bed screen time increases the risk of developing insomnia by 59%.
The study, which surveyed around 45,000 students, found that scrolling at night can have disastrous consequences for your sleep, causing an average loss of 24 minutes of kip per night.
And while it's easy to assume that lack of sleep is exclusively linked to the negative effects of social media, the study found that any kind of screen activity can disrupt sleep - whether that's reading news articles on your phone or flipping through a book on your Kindle.
Commenting on their findings in the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry, the Norwegian team said they "found no significant differences between social media and other screen activities."
If these findings have encouraged you to set some fresh boundaries with your tech, there are a few things you can do to reset your nighttime habits. We asked a tech addiction expert to share their top tips.
Science on habit formation tells us that healthy behaviours are built on repetition. Chartered psychologist Dr Manpreet Dhuffar-Pottiwal says that setting a consistent time to put away devices each night is one of the most effective ways to nix screen use.
"Digital features on smartphones like 'Night Shift' or 'Do Not Disturb' hide distracting notifications, which can help to automate this transition,' she says.
"By cutting off screens an hour before bed, you allow your brain to transition into rest mode naturally. It disrupts the dopamine-drive cycle of 'just one more scroll', encouraging your brain to associate evenings with relaxation and not stimulation."
In his bestselling book Atomic Habits, habit researcher James Clear says that making bad habits less convenient can make them less appealing to our brains.
"Since the mere presence of a smartphone, laptop or tablet next to your bed can exert an unconscious influence on you, it's a good idea to charge your devices in another room," says digital detox coach Colin Corby. "This creates friction, giving you time to consciously interrupt any automatic screen-based habits, like unlocking your phone and scrolling on social media.
"If you need your smartphone in your bedroom for the alarm function, try placing it on the other side of the room. Keep a notepad by your bed to jot down any urgent thoughts or forgotten appointments," he adds. This way, you can drift off safe in the knowledge you'll add them to your phone calendar in the morning.
When it comes to breaking deep-rooted habits, relying on sheer willpower alone can be tough. Draining the colour from your smartphone could be an effective way to wean yourself off using it.
"Setting your phone to greyscale (black and white) mode dulls the visual appeal of apps, making them less enticing to your brain," says Dhuffar-Pottiwal. Both iOS and Android devices offer this function.
"Over time, setting this nightly this boundary reinforces the idea that your bed is for rest, not stimulation," she notes. A 2022 study backs up this theory, reporting that undergraduate students who changed their phones to grayscale significantly reduced their screen time by an average of 37.9 minutes each day.
When the urge to scroll hits, Dhuffar-Pottiwal recommends substituting it with a relaxing activity that engages your senses differently. "Try listening to a sleep meditation using a non-smart device, practicing the 4-7-8 breathing technique (inhale for four seconds, hold for seven and exhale for eight), or jotting down worries in a 'brain dump' journal,' she advises.
While nighttime scrolling often starts as an well-natured attempt to unwind, it can often backfire by flooding the brain with stress-inducing content or endless dopamine loops. 'Replacement rituals fulfil the same psychological need for distraction or comfort but without the sleep-disrupting side effects,' explains Dhuffar-Pottiwal.
'For example, journalling externalises anxieties, while rhythmic breathing activates the parasympathetic nervous system, promoting lower cortisol levels. These activities signal to your body that it's safe to rest, paving the way for deeper, more restorative sleep.'
Read more about insomnia:
Why can't I sleep? (Yahoo Life UK, 8-min read)
I've had insomnia since I was 18 and it's affected my whole life (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read)
This Powerful Sleep Method is Helping People Beat Insomnia For Good (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI Assistants Are Just Alexa All Over Again
AI Assistants Are Just Alexa All Over Again

Gizmodo

time6 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

AI Assistants Are Just Alexa All Over Again

Hundreds of billions of dollars have been poured into the development of artificial intelligence models and the infrastructure needed to support them, all with the promise that AI will eventually take over everything. But in the average person's day-to-day life, AI has yet to serve as much more than a slightly smarter Siri. According to new data collected by polling firm YouGov, even though companies have made a big to-do about infusing smart assistants with AI brains, people have barely changed how they interact with the tools. YouGov asked people how they interact with their smart assistants like Amazon's Alexa (upgraded to the AI-powered Alexa+ earlier this year), Google's Assistant (recently turned into a more conversational assistant with the help of Google's Gemini AI), and Apple's Siri (still dumb, but they're working on it) now that they've gotten their AI upgrade. The answer: they give the assistants the most basic of tasks and not much else. According to the survey, 59% of people use their smart assistant to check the weather, 51% use it to play music, 47% ask it to look up answers to questions, and 40% use it to set alarms and timers. Notably, these are all things that these devices could functionally do more than a decade ago when they first started making their way onto our phones and into our homes via smart speakers. As for the more advanced features that companies would absolutely love for users to adopt, the real-world interest still isn't there. Just 19% of people use their AI assistant to control internet-connected devices in their home (RIP to the Internet of Things). Less than one in 10 people interact with third-party actions like Alexa Skills, which was supposed to be like an app store for smart speakers, but never caught on. Much to the dismay of the corporate overlords who provide these assistants, only 14% of people do any shopping through their AI helper. AI assistant-supported shopping has been projected to be a $30 billion industry in the next decade. It's off to a rough start, reasonably enough! So the question for the tech companies that insist AI companions are still the way, there's a big, looming question: Why don't these things stick? The biggest hurdle is one that you'd think smarter features may address, but simply hasn't put a dent in: 42% of people simply don't see the need to use a smart assistant. Among those who do use them, though, there's still an issue of a communication barrier between human and machine. More than one in four said their biggest challenge in using a smart assistant is the AI not understanding their request. Another 12% said the assistants have accuracy issues, and 10% said the tools just are 'not as smart as I expected.' To that end, the most desired feature of smart assistants is not the ability to hold a conversation or complete multi-step tasks; it's to better understand speech. Seems like a simple ask, but much like the smart assistants they make, it also seems like one that tech companies just can't understand.

The Diet That Can Provenly Reduce Cancer Risk
The Diet That Can Provenly Reduce Cancer Risk

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Diet That Can Provenly Reduce Cancer Risk

The impact of diet on cancer risk is increasingly supported by scientific studies. Now, a new large-scale study from the U.S. provides additional evidence: Certain low-meat diets are directly linked to a significantly lower risk of various types of cancer—in some cases, reduced by almost half. FITBOOK nutrition expert Sophie Brünke interprets the study results. Study with More Than 79,000 Participants A recent study by Loma Linda University in California provides new insights into the relationship between plant-based diets and the risk of various cancers. As part of the 'Adventist Health Study-2,' 79,952 adults in the U.S. and Canada were observed over an average of 7.3 years. The results suggest that a low-meat diet can reduce cancer risk. They were published in August 2024 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. At the start of the study, none of the participants had cancer. Researchers analyzed the health data of the subjects during the study and recorded around 7,300 newly diagnosed cancer cases. The data were evaluated concerning different dietary patterns—including meat-based, vegetarian, vegan, and pescatarian diets. Vegetarians had up to a 45 percent lower risk of stomach cancer compared to regular meat eaters. The risk of lymphomas was also reduced by 25 percent. Vegans showed a 24 percent lower overall risk for all observed types of cancer. Particularly among younger men, the risk of prostate cancer was 43 percent lower for those following a vegan diet. As this is an observational cohort study, no causal relationship can be proven. The authors note that other factors, such as body weight, lifestyle, or medical care, could also influence the results.1 A Study from 2022 Supports These Findings According to the World Health Organization (WHO), cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. However, 30 to 50 percent of all cases are preventable through preventive measures, including a healthy diet.2 A large-scale study by the University of Oxford in 2022 observed meat and fish eaters as well as vegetarians over eleven years. They discovered which dietary pattern—whether low or high in meat—can demonstrably reduce cancer risk.3 For their study, the scientists used data from 472,377 Britons from the UK Biobank, a biomedical database and research resource. Participants were divided into three categories based on questions about their diet: Regular meat eaters (eat meat more than five times a week, 53 percent of participants) Occasional meat eaters (eat meat five times or less a week, 44 percent of participants) Pescatarians (eat fish, just over two percent of participants) Vegetarians and vegans (eat neither meat nor fish, just under two percent of participants) At recruitment, none of the subjects had cancer. Subsequently, the medical records of the participants were observed for eleven years. Other factors such as age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, and sociodemographic status were also considered. Which Type of Diet Reduces Cancer Risk? After an average of 11.4 years, the medical records of the study participants were evaluated. A total of 54,961 cancer cases were identified. Based on the dietary habits of the subjects, it was found: Compared to regular meat eaters, the cancer risk was two percent lower for those with a low-meat diet, ten percent lower for pescatarians, and 14 percent lower for vegetarians. Risk for Specific Cancers Also Decreases The annual number of new cases of all cancers is 493,250 (as of 2019/2020).4 In the United Kingdom, where the study was conducted, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer are the most common types of cancer. In Germany, men most frequently develop prostate cancer, followed by lung and colorectal cancer, while women most frequently develop breast cancer, followed by colorectal and lung cancer. Among the subjects, there were 5,882 cases of colorectal cancer, 7,537 cases of postmenopausal breast cancer, and 9,501 cases of prostate cancer. A clear correlation between cancer incidence and diet was observed. Also interesting: How Diet Can Affect Menstruation–Positively or Negatively Colorectal Cancer People with a low-meat diet had a nine percent lower cancer risk for colorectal cancer compared to those who regularly consumed meat. This result aligns with a study published in 2015, which found that a higher intake of processed meat is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer.5 According to the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), red meat also increases the risk. Whole grains and dairy products, on the other hand, have a risk-reducing effect.6 Breast Cancer Women who followed a vegetarian diet had an 18 percent lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer compared to regular meat eaters. As the study authors explain, this could also be due to the generally lower average body weight of vegetarians. The WCRF warns that being overweight or obese in adulthood can increase the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Furthermore, according to the WCRF, there is evidence that consuming dairy products and non-starchy vegetables may reduce the risk of breast cancer.7 Prostate Cancer Compared to regular meat eaters, pescatarians and vegetarians had a 20 percent and 31 percent lower risk, respectively, of developing prostate cancer. The study leaders suggest that, in addition to diet, other factors may play a significant role, such as whether a person undergoes cancer screening. This also applies to other types of cancer. The WCRF states that there is evidence that a high consumption of dairy products and a calcium-rich diet may increase the risk of prostate cancer.8 Limitations of the Study Whether the observed correlations depend solely on diet cannot be definitively assured, according to the scientists. Other factors, such as personal lifestyle, etc., may have influenced the results. Additionally, about 94 percent of the subjects were white, so it cannot be assumed that the same correlations can be found in other ethnic groups. It is also important to emphasize that abstaining from meat or following a low-meat diet does not automatically mean that a person is eating healthier. How Much Meat Should Be on the Plate? The study confirms once again: A balanced and low-meat diet, primarily consisting of vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, can reduce health risks such as cancer risk. While a purely pescatarian or vegetarian diet has a stronger effect, those who do not want to completely give up meat can still benefit their health by limiting the amount. A large-scale umbrella review from 2024 analyzed study data from 2000 to 2023, which focused on vegetarian and vegan diets. Here, too, it was confirmed: A diet free of meat reduced the risk of developing cancer.9 Scientifically tested dietary principles, such as the nutrition circle of the German Nutrition Society, can be used as guidelines for a low-meat diet. These food-based dietary recommendations were updated in 2024. Per week, one to two servings of fish and meat of 120 grams each can be enjoyed. Two weekly servings of sausage of 30 grams each are also allowed.10 Grace, P., Abris, David, J, Shavlik., Roy, O, Mathew. et al. (2024). Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition ↩︎ Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). Cancer. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ Watling, C.Z., Schmidt, J.A., Dunneram, Y. et al. (2022). Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants. BMC Medicine. ↩︎ Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland für 2019/2020. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ Bouvard, V., Loomis, D., Guyton, K. Z., et al. (2015). Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. The Lancet Oncology. ↩︎ World Cancer Research Fund. (WCRF). Colorectal Cancer. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF). Breast Cancer. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF). Prostate Cancer. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ Capodici,A., Mocciaro, G., Gori, D. et al. (2024). Cardiovascular health and cancer risk associated with plant based diets: An umbrella review. Plos One. ↩︎ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung. DGE-Ernährungskreis. (accessed on July 15, 2024) ↩︎ The post The Diet That Can Provenly Reduce Cancer Risk appeared first on FITBOOK.

Apple's FineWoven successor might be called TechWoven.
Apple's FineWoven successor might be called TechWoven.

The Verge

time8 hours ago

  • The Verge

Apple's FineWoven successor might be called TechWoven.

Posted Aug 20, 2025 at 4:17 PM UTC Apple's FineWoven successor might be called TechWoven. Pictures from leaker Majin Bu show what appears to be iPhone 17 Pro Max case boxes with the new texture. It looks like of like the texture on Amazon's fabric Kindle cases. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Jay Peters Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jay Peters Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Rumors Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All iPhone Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store