
Epsom: Report criticises council's 'culture of secrecy'
External auditors have called for more openness in a Surrey council's decision-making after some members described a "culture of secrecy".A critical report presented to councillors has raised a "significant weakness" in how it makes decisions.A recent change to the authority's constitution has also been criticised for not being publicly discussed, reports the Local Democracy Reporting Service.The council's Senior Leadership Team (SLT) said it would continue working to provide as much transparency as possible.
Quoting the Local Government Association (LGA) Peer Review from March 2024, the report said there was a "universal frustration and confusion around the lack of transparency through the decision-making process". It concluded there was "an immediate need to make it clear and transparent how decisions are made in a committee system".But no action seems to have been taken, with external auditors finding the council had updated its constitution in a way that "was not fully discussed in public meetings and not fully transparent", according to the report.
'Need for transparency'
In response, the council's management said: "The senior leadership team believes the council is transparent in its reporting and through committees."Regarding the issue of the constitution, it said it was "subject to advice and was not suitable for public discussion". Speaking for the senior management team, the director of corporate cervices told a meeting of the council's audit and scrutiny committee the team completely understood the need for transparency."We'll continue to work to provide that as much as possible," he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
08-04-2025
- BBC News
Cambridge sewage relocation works approved for Honey Hill
Plans to relocate a sewage treatment works to make way for new homes have been Water has permission to replace its current Cambridge facility, near Milton, with a new plant on land known as Honey Hill, close to government approved the new Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant, despite the examining authority recommending that consent should be withheld. A spokesperson from the planning inspectorate said communities would be involved in examining projects that may affect them. The water company submitted the plans in April 2023 after it was asked by the government to consider at the former plant site would be redeveloped as part of the North East Cambridge development, which is proposed to include around 8,000 new homes and new commercial buildings, said the Local Democracy Reporting government committed £277m to build the new sewage works and the overall cost was estimated at £400m. Plans for the new sewage works have been met with backlash from people in the a six-month examination process objections questioned why green belt land should be "sacrificed" to build the new sewage examining authority which looked at the application recommended a Development Consent Order should not be argued they did not think the case for the principle of the development had been "adequately justified in either infrastructure or wider policy terms".Steve Reed, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, a letter, he said the proposed development had been justified."The secretary of state considers that the relocation of the existing waste water treatment plant will unlock a long-held ambition to redevelop North East Cambridge and enable the delivery of thousands of new homes and new jobs in a highly sustainable location where development has been frustrated for decades by the presence of the existing waste water treatment plant," he said."Approval of development consent is consistent with the government's objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes and consistent with the achievement of sustainable development." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
03-04-2025
- BBC News
Waverley residents protest against council planning fees
Angry homeowners gathered outside a Surrey council to protest against unexpected infrastructure costs for work done to their 20 people have so far come forward to Waverley Borough Council with what they say are huge and unexpected community infrastructure levy (CIL) bills, according to the Local Democracy Reporting levies are fees issued by local authorities to help them deliver the required infrastructure when new developments are said they have been shocked by the short notice to come up with, in some cases, £70,000 for work they would have expected to be exempt from, and would have been if they'd filled out a form. Instead they say they have been pursued and threatened with court action if they do not Tuesday, residents protested outside the council's executive meeting and challenged the authority on whether it had any "genuine intent" to review its CIL is typically charged to developers as a contribution towards essential infrastructure; however a number of homeowners across Waverley have also faced the charge. In most cases the council said it had been correct in issuing the bills - despite anger from those who felt exception, it said, was the case of Steve and Caroline Dally who were billed £70,000 for a home extension and given no opportunity to argue their rest, the council said, were not as straightforward – with any long-term solutions not expected until at least May,Councillor Liz Townsend, portfolio holder for planning, said the council was committed to carrying out a discretionary review which could be requested by homeowners previously subject to CIL liability. Council leader Paul Follows said there were three categories of individuals in the such as Mr and Mrs Dally, who "may have had some fault of the council", and others who were "advised poorly… as part of their building project".He added: "And thirdly there are individuals that disagree with the concept of homeowner CIL but have been charged legally for it at this point of time and that's subject to a different discussion of whether we should charge homeowners or not."The council said it would be taking this final group into consideration in May when it was due to discuss potential changes to CIL.


BBC News
03-03-2025
- BBC News
Cash-strapped Woking Borough Council approves budget
A cash-strapped council in Surrey says a "transitional" budget has been approved for the upcoming financial Borough Council (WBC) effectively declared itself bankrupt in June last year with £2bn of debt as it was forced to cut new spending, axe non-statuary services and increase council tax by 10%.On Thursday, the council approved a "business as usual" budget separate from the council's legacy debt and borrowing will vote on council tax increases on Monday, with residents facing a potential 2.99% rise. The deficit on the business as usual budget for 2025-26 is £2.8m, which is expected to be covered by the government's Exceptional Financial council's balanced budget includes continued support for delivering core services, including housing, and a reduction in car parking council is still essentially spending above its resources, despite the level of cuts and savings made, according to the Local Democracy Reporting council has labelled the budget as one "the community can afford".