
California's primary care shortage persists despite ambitious moves to close gap
Reddy can't match the salaries offered by larger health systems — a difficulty compounded by a widespread shortage of primary care doctors.
The shortage is tied largely to the lower pay and relative lack of prestige associated with primary care, making recruitment difficult.
'It certainly is challenging to expose medical students early in their careers to the joys of this kind of integrated healthcare,' Reddy said. 'The relationships we build and the care we provide truly allow people to live longer with a better quality of life.'
Hoping to increase revenue so Acacia can afford to pay more, Reddy has signed the practice up for alternative payment methods with health plans that offer bonuses for meeting certain primary care goals tied to child vaccinations, blood pressure control, and screenings for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and mental health.
Such pay-for-performance arrangements are just one of many efforts by industry players and state officials to confront the problems plaguing primary care.
Medical students frequently opt against going into primary care, and that's not good for patients. People with regular primary care providers are more likely to get preventive care that avoids serious illnesses and feel more empowered to advocate for themselves. They're also less likely to encounter language barriers, resort to costly emergency room visits or forgo care.
Six years after the influential California Future Health Workforce Commission made a series of recommendations to plug a projected shortage of 4,100 primary care providers in 2030, a number of public and private initiatives have proliferated around the state to address the problem.
They include new residency slots, debt forgiveness, waived medical school tuition, new ways of paying doctors, expanded nurse practitioner roles, and a statewide target to increase primary care spending. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars have been allocated for some of these efforts.
But numerous academic experts and medical professionals believe those moves, while well intended, have been scattershot and insufficient.
'The pieces are there,' said Monica Soni, chief medical officer of Covered California, the state's Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplace. 'I am worried we started a little too late, and I think it's a little too siloed.'
A study published in 2022 by the California Health Care Foundation found that substantial progress had been made on some of those goals, including recruitment of students from low-income households and communities of color. A separate analysis from the foundation showed that, from 2020 to 2023, California jumped about 10 spots in a ranking of states by primary care residents and fellows per capita.
However, the latest state data show nearly 15 million Californians live in areas without enough primary care providers to meet patient needs.
State budget constraints and potential federal spending cuts, especially to Medicaid, could exacerbate shortages in areas already desperate for clinicians and dampen hopes of building a robust primary care system that state officials and virtually everyone in the industry agree would be a strong defense against serious — and costly — illnesses. Federal cuts could also hit medical training and hospital systems.
'Many of us are very scared about threats from both the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress,' said Kevin Grumbach, a family community medicine professor at UC San Francisco.
California's lack of primary care providers, including doctors, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, is most acute in rural parts of the state, particularly in the north and the Central Valley. Entire rural counties, including Del Norte, Madera, Tulare and Yuba, are designated shortage areas, according to state data. Some densely populated urban areas, including parts of Los Angeles, also confrontshortages.
Many Californians face months-long waits for appointments or have to travel long distances or go to emergency rooms for non-urgent medical needs, which means hours spent in crowded waiting rooms for unnecessarily expensive care.
In Chico, 90 miles north of Sacramento, the emergency room at the only hospital in town has seen a sharp increase in patients over the past decade, due in part to a lack of primary care providers in the area.
'People who don't have a primary care provider — which is a lot, because there are not enough — end up in the ER when they need routine care,' said David Alonso, a local internal medicine doctor. 'The ER then says, 'OK, you should follow up with your primary care provider,' and they're like, 'We don't have one.''
Yalda Jabbarpour, director of the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies, a health policy think tank, said failure to invest robustly in primary care has robbed the public of its benefits.
The field has historically been underfunded, accounting for less than 5% of national healthcare spending in 2022, according to the Milbank Memorial Fund, a national nonprofit focused on population health and health equity.
The consequences are clear. The U.S. spends significantly more per capita on healthcare than other industrialized nations, and yet Americans aren't any healthier. Chronic conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, arthritis and Alzheimer's, as well as mental illness, account for 90% of the $4.5 trillion spent on healthcare every year.
Medical students, often faced with staggering educational debt, are increasingly choosing higher-paid specialties over primary care. The average salary of a family medicine physician is slightly over $300,000, compared with more than $565,000 for a cardiologist and over $763,000 for a neurosurgeon, according to one study.
'If you are going to pay over $300,000 to go to medical school, you want to be a neurosurgeon; you don't want to be a family practice doctor,' said William Barcellona, executive vice president of government affairs at America's Physician Groups, a Los Angeles-based professional association representing 360 medical groups and independent practice associations nationwide.
Barcellona said the Golden State's high housing costs also make recruiting difficult.
But it's not only pay that tempers enthusiasm for primary care. It's also burnout from so many unpaid hours spent recording details of medical visits in electronic health records; haggling with insurance companies for treatment authorization; answering phone calls and emails from patients; or searching far and wide — often in a healthcare desert — for specialists with the right expertise.
Debby Lee, the daughter of Hmong immigrants from Laos, experienced this kind of frustration firsthand.
Cultural and linguistic barriers faced by her family motivated her to pursue internal medicine. Lee worked part of her residency at a community clinic serving Hmong in the Sacramento area. She loved the patients, as well as her co-workers. But she was burdened by outdated technology that limited the number of patients she could see. 'I just saw myself kind of burning out being in that setting,' Lee said.
When the clinic invited her to stay, she declined, taking a job with a bigger health system.
Besides residencies, other efforts support primary care.
The Health Plan of San Mateo offers grants to help medical practices retain and add to primary care staff. In exchange, the practices — some single physicians serving patients in California's Medicaid program, Medi-Cal — must show they have increased their patient load and retained newly hiredproviders for five years.
The idea is to provide capital so doctors can hire the staff they need to run their practices efficiently, increase salaries, offer bonuses, and even take sabbaticals. Such efforts are consistent with one of the main thrusts of the 2019 workforce report: to increase investment in primary care.
California recently joined several other states, including Connecticut, Oklahoma and Rhode Island, in setting a target to increase primary care spending. So far, those policies have yielded mixed results.
Late last year, California's Office of Health Care Affordability set a target to make primary care account for 15% of total healthcare spending by 2034, more than double the current proportion. It imposes no requirements, relying on the goodwill of health plans to work with medical providers.
Greater spending on primary care would mean better pay and more people working in the field, said Richard Kronick, a public health professor at UC San Diego and a member of the OHCA board. 'That's a big change. Will it happen? I don't think anyone can predict the future with any certainty.'
Stephen Shortell, a professor emeritus of health policy and management at UC Berkeley, said 'some of that increase might occur, but at some point, it might need to be made mandatory.'
In its report, the workforce commission also cited the importance of alternative forms of primary care payment that offer extra cash for quality care. The affordability office has set targets to encourage such payment methods. The aim is to transform the system from one in which every medical service has a price tag to one that treats people holistically, and in which adherence to medical standards brings more money to doctors and their office staff.
Such arrangements are common among HMOs, though less so in primary care practices. Where they do exist, different health plans and other payers generally design them differently, which means primary care practices manage multiple payment models, adding to their administrative burden.
Reddy's family practice is participating in a one-year demonstration project launched in January intended to reduce that burden by having multiple insurers work together in one payment plan.
The project brings together three large insurers — Health Net, Aetna and Blue Shield of California — and 10 independent practices across the state with the goal of improving care while boosting revenue for the medical groups. It is administered by two industry groups, the Integrated Healthcare Assn. and the California Quality Collaborative.
On top of customary payments, either for services rendered or monthly per-member allotments, the medical practices receive bonuses for meeting targets or improving their performance on core measures.
Participating practices also receive monthly per-patient payments for 'population health management,' which means managing the collective health of their patients. And they can search a single platform to find all their patients covered by one of the three plans.
In addition to extra payments and fewer administrative hassles, the health plans pay for a 'practice coach,' whose job is to help primary care groups meet their targets and provide more seamless care.
The idea is to add more insurers and medical groups over time, said Todd May, Health Net's medical director for commercial health plans, who is among those driving the project. 'In addition to better outcomes, we'd like to see a stronger, more robust, and more satisfied primary care workforce,' he said.
Reddy hopes she can increase Acacia's revenue by 20%, thanks to the extra money from this and other pay-for-performance arrangements. That, she said, would enable her to raise pay for her staff and hire new clinicians.
For many years, her practice has limited the number of patients it has accepted. But after searching for the better part of five years, Reddy has hired a new doctor on a half-time basis, and another is coming on board this June.
'This is the most hopeful I have felt in decades,' Reddy said.
Wolfson and Sánchez write for KFF Health News, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. Phillip Reese contributed to this report.
Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
6 hours ago
- Associated Press
Covered California health insurance will cost more in 2026. Here's what's behind the increase
Californians who get their health insurance through the state's marketplace will see premiums increase by an average of 10.3% next year. Covered California officials on Thursday announced the first double-digit rate increase since 2018, saying it represents a 'confluence' of factors putting upward pressure on the market. Rising health care costs, the expiration of enhanced federal subsidies and policy-driven market uncertainty together are fueling the hike, Covered California Director Jessica Altman said. Insurers in recent years have expected health care costs to increase by about 8% each year. That makes up the bulk of next year's increase. But Altman said about 2% of the rate increase in the state's version of the Affordable Care Act marketplace is based on federal financial assistance that expires at the end of the year. President Donald Trump's signature spending and tax reform bill — the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — left out funding for enhanced premium tax credits used by more than 90% of Affordable Care Act enrollees nationwide. Congress enacted these subsidies during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure people had health insurance. Since then, Affordable Care Act enrollment has nearly doubled nationwide from 12 million to 24 million people. 'We've never been through a loss in affordability like the expiration of the enhanced tax credits,' Altman said. Congress could still decide to re-up the subsidies in September. If it doesn't, California will lose about $2.1 billion in enhanced tax credits for consumers. Double whammy for consumers Ariana Brill, a certified health insurance agent who helps people enroll in Covered California, said if the enhanced subsidies aren't renewed, consumers' pocketbooks will be hit twice next year. 'We'll see rates go up. We'll see assistance go down. And the net premium, the consumer's take home price, is going to go up considerably,' Brill said. Open enrollment typically starts on Nov. 1, but Brill said clients are already calling her with concerns about increases. A majority of her clients, about 2,600 of them, will have to pay significantly more for health care if Congress doesn't extend the enhanced subsidies, she said. If that happens, Brill said she expects some people to switch to less comprehensive, lower-cost plans to make ends meet. Others will drop coverage altogether. 'For most people, affordability is a huge part of their decision making. Very few of us have the luxury of buying things without looking at the price,' Brill said. State officials recently took steps to ease the potential loss of federal subsidies for the lowest-income Covered California members. The state will spend $190 million to maintain subsidies for people earning up to 150% of the federal poverty level (individuals earning about $23,000 or families of four earning about $48,000). Still, that investment is far short of the $2.1 billion the state stands to lose. Covered California's previous estimates indicate that 600,000 people could drop coverage as a result of lost subsidies and rising costs. That, in turn, could make health care even more expensive, experts say. That's because younger and healthier people tend to forego coverage first, leaving sicker and more costly people behind. To meet their needs, insurers have to charge more. 'With those lower utilization people leaving the marketplace, which leaves only the high cost users in the pool, it drives up premiums for those who are left,' said Matthew McGough, a policy analyst for KFF's Affordable Care Act program who co-authored a recent study looking at 2026 premium increases. More people seeking health care and higher prices are already the primary factor driving annual rate increases, McGough said. Some of that can be attributed to the aging population and widespread use of costly pharmaceuticals like Ozempic and Wegovy to treat diabetes and other chronic health conditions. But insurers nationally and in California have pointed out other factors contributing significantly to increased costs. These include tariffs on drugs and medical devices, enrollment and eligibility changes included in Trump's budget package, and inflation. Most insurers are assuming Congress won't extend the enhanced premium tax credits. Nationally, the median premium increase for next year is 18%, according to the KFF analysis. Loss of subsidies accounts for 4%, McGough said. 'It's definitely a significant factor this year and that along with the general environment of uncertainty are what is pushing these rates above what we've seen in the past few years,' McGough said. ___ This story was originally published by CalMatters and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.


Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Health Insurance Rates Could Rise in Florida in 2026
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hundreds of thousands of Florida residents could see their health insurance premiums soar by double-digit increases. Fourteen major insurers, including Molina Healthcare, AmeriHealth Caritas, Centene Venture Company and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, have proposed to increase the premiums for those on Affordable Care Act (ACA)-compliant plans in 2026. Florida is not the only state where such increases are happening, as these health insurance premium increases are "fairly routine," Kosali Simon, a health economist and associate vice provost for Health Sciences at Indiana University Bloomington, told Newsweek. Simon said that while companies proposing premium increases is not new, the "size of the increases insurers are asking for 2026 is larger than usual." Last year, the median proposed increase was 7 percent, and for 2026 that number is currently 18 percent, KFF data shows, with some states, like Florida, seeing "especially high" increases, she said. A spokesperson for Florida Blue told Newsweek it "shares the concerns rising health insurance rates may cause for our members, communities, and other stakeholders." "The premium increases, which are an industry-wide issue, are a necessary response to federal regulatory changes, including the scheduled expiration of premium tax credits at the end of 2025, as well as the rising cost and utilization of medical care and prescription drugs," they added. Newsweek reached out to Molina Healthcare, AmeriHealth Caritas, and Centene Venture Company via email for comment. Why It Matters The rise in health insurance premiums is being broadly driven by a number of factors, including the increased cost and use of health care services. Inflation also plays a role, as well as the cost of health care, labor and increasing demand for medications like GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, which ramp up prescription drug spending. However, while the increases are not new—insurers have been pushing up the costs of premiums for years—2026 is set to have the largest jump in cost since 2018, KFF data shows. The larger increase in 2026 is due to the fact that next year, enhanced tax credits are set to expire as President Donald Trump has not chosen to renew them. This means that out-of-pocket premium costs for ACA marketplace enrollees will increase by more than 75 percent, meaning many healthier enrollees could drop their coverage, which can, in turn, increase the cost of premiums. File photo: the exterior of the AdventHealth Clermont ER hospital in Clermont, Florida. File photo: the exterior of the AdventHealth Clermont ER hospital in Clermont, Florida. Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP What To Know Former President Joe Biden brought in temporary subsidies for those using ACA marketplaces and extended them to the end of 2025, helping more people have access to health care coverage. As the Trump administration has made no move to renew these subsidies, likely because they come at a steep cost to the taxpayer, they are currently set to expire at the end of the year, meaning premium costs for those using ACA marketplaces will soar. While there is still time for the administration to opt to extend the subsidies, "insurers may not want to take that gamble, and are increasing rates now," Simon said. This is because insurers are likely anticipating who will be buying health insurance. "The young and healthy may not be as likely to buy, and they help keep the costs for the insurers down, so this 'adverse selection' in insurance markets might be what's behind the premium increase," Simon said. In Florida, Molina Healthcare has said it wants to increase rates by just over 40 percent in 2026, which was more than any other plan. This would affect more than 90,000 policyholders. Meanwhile, AmeriHealth Caritas has proposed the second-highest premium increases, at an average price hike of 35 percent, impacting 55,000 policyholders Impacting more than 1.3 million Americans, Centene Venture Company has requested an increase of just over 18 percent. Florida Blue has also proposed to increase premium costs by nearly 27 percent, with some members seeing smaller increases, according to the local news outlet Creative Loafing Tampa Bay. Therefore, while these increases are happening across the country, compared to other states, "Florida seems particularly hard hit," Simon said. What People Are Saying A spokesperson for Florida Blue told Newsweek: "To support our members, we are educating them about the changes and providing personalized support – to help them navigate the enrollment process, understand their coverage options, determine if they qualify for financial assistance, and assist them with staying covered. We are dedicated to making high-quality health care more affordable and accessible to everyone." Mark Pauly, a professor of health care management at Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, told Newsweek: "The official government projections are for higher growth in medical spending nationwide, which translates into higher premiums, especially for exchange plans which are not allowed to have a large profit cushion. This high increase is a marked shift in a trend of health spending growth at the same rate as GDP—the share of health spending was the same in 2023 as in 2009." Pauly added: "The trends we are seeing of high claims growth are nationwide. There will be some variation across states but the trend will be common to all." Kosali Simon, a health economist and associate vice provost for Health Sciences at Indiana University Bloomington, told Newsweek: "For the majority of enrollees, especially those with federal premium tax credits, these price increases won't mean they have to pay more, as government subsidies adjust with benchmark plan prices." She added, "For those who don't qualify for subsidies, like many small business owners who buy through the exchange but have higher incomes, it's a problem. Those who have to pay more may drop coverage and become uninsured or have to cut back on other spending." What Happens Next The proposed increases are for the 2026 calendar year, and many are concerned about the impacts they will have on Americans. Pauly said higher premiums "will drive the middle income buyers of exchange insurance to take a chance and go uninsured or switch to a job that has health benefits."
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks Trump administration's broad birth control mandate exemptions
The Trump administration's religious and moral carve-outs to an ObamaCare requirement that all employer health plans cover contraception at no cost were blocked on Wednesday by a federal judge. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in Philadelphia issued a summary judgment that the rules were arbitrary, capricious and an overreach of the authority of the agencies that wrote them in 2017. Under the rules, essentially any for-profit or nonprofit employer or insurer was allowed to exempt themselves from following the birth control mandate on moral and religious grounds. The rules also let publicly traded companies obtain a religious exemption, but not a moral one. The Affordable Care Act required employer health plans to cover at least one of 18 forms of birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Religious groups and employers sued, and the Supreme Court in 2014 ruled 5-4 that the contraceptive mandate violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) rights of closely held corporations whose owners had religious objections. Subsequent agency actions tried to find a balance, but the Trump administration in 2017 issued a blanket exemption. The rules didn't require employers to apply for an exemption because the administration said that would be a violation of their religious rights. Pennsylvania, New Jersey and dozens of other states sued to halt that broad expansion of exemptions and accommodations. That lawsuit reached the Supreme Court in 2020, where the justices upheld the Trump rules on technical grounds but did not address the underlying merits of the case. The case was sent back to the lower court, where a religious group, Little Sisters of the Poor, joined the lawsuit alongside the federal government in asking for summary judgment. Beetlestone, an appointee of former President Obama, wrote that the Trump administration's religious rule did not accomplish what the agencies purportedly wrote it to do, which was to resolve a conflict between the contraceptive mandate and RFRA. But the rule exemptions to organizations that are 'unlikely, if ever, to be capable of maintaining a religious objection, raising further doubts as to any 'rational connection' between the Rule and remedying potential conflicts with RFRA,' Beetlestone wrote. The Little Sisters of the Poor will appeal the ruling in the coming weeks, according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit that represents the order. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.