
Iran's supreme leader looks more deluded than defiant
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, has made his first public comments since the ceasefire with Israel took hold. Khamenei, who has ultimate authority over all major decisions in the country, has not been seen or heard from in more than a week. His pre-recorded speech, aired on state television, is meant to put an end to rising speculation about his fate after he went into hiding at the start of the conflict. In the televised address, the Iranian leader hailed his country's 'victory' over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the United States.
The Iranian leader was eager to tell anyone who would listen that the US bombing of his country's nuclear sites 'did not achieve anything'
Defiant as ever – and with his trademark habit of being entirely divorced from reality – the Iranian leader was eager to tell anyone who would listen that the US bombing of his country's nuclear sites 'did not achieve anything'.
That, to say the least, is something of an understatement. US forces struck three nuclear sites with huge bunker-busting bombs, with US president Donald Trump claiming the attacks had 'obliterated' the facilities. Khamenei was dismissive of Trump's claims.
'Anyone who heard his remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words – they could do nothing,' the 86-year-old Iranian leader said.
Khamenei had an alternative reading of events, in which Iran apparently 'delivered a heavy slap to the US's face' – a reference to an Iranian missile attack on a US military base in Qatar on Monday, which led to no casualties. The Americans were give advance notice of the Iranian plans. Trump himself mockingly described the Iranian action as 'very weak', claiming that 13 of the 14 missiles fired had been intercepted. Even so, according to the Ayatollah's rewriting of recent history, the Americans are now on notice that Iran is ready to respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East.
What's Khamenei's game? Few will be convinced by his bid to minimise the national humiliation that his regime suffered during the 12-day war with Iran.
Just as implausible is the idea that Iran has emerged 'victorious' from this conflict, and in a position of strength to reek revenge if attacked by its enemies at some future point.
Khamenei's televised remarks were delivered from an undisclosed location in front of a brown curtain. He was seated between an Iranian flag and a portrait of his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Despite the show of bravado, he remains at a secret location reportedly somewhere in the capital Tehran. Communications are kept to a minimum for security reasons. It is the first time since Khamenei assumed absolute power in 1989 that he has been forced into hiding during a war – reflecting the real fear and worry in his inner circle.
The supreme leader cuts something of a diminished figure. It is hard to project power and authority from a secret bunker, and no one can be sure anymore how much real control Khamenei wields.
His main priority remains to stay alive. High-ranking military officials and nuclear scientists were targeted by Israel in the opening stages of the conflict. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, did not rule out targeting Khamenei directly. President Trump hinted that the Americans knew exactly where Khamenei was hiding, but said that a decision to kill the Iranian leader had not been made.
This latest television address by the Iranian leader is meant to project a sense of business as usual. He must know – his fellow countrymen and women certainly do – that everything has changed. It is anything but business as usual. That is why the country's supreme leader is reduced to delivering the occasional recorded video message on television from a secret location. Khamenei can spit fire and vengeance all he likes, but even he cannot be sure what the future holds for him or his nation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Joy Reid campaigns for Iran to get 'nuclear energy' in cringe-worthy panel appearance
Fired ex-MSNBC host Joy Reid mistakenly blasted the US for trying to stop Iran obtaining nuclear energy during her latest CNN appearance. Speaking on Newsnight earlier this week, Reid defended the country following the attacks on their nuclear sites by President Donald Trump over the weekend. The left-wing commentator said: 'Why on earth is the United States bombing a country that did not attack us, what on earth are we doing there at all. 'Why is it there is this arrogance in the west and in the United States to say that we get to decide who can have nuclear energy.' Trump's bunker buster bombing campaign was actually aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons, not nuclear power. Reid then added: 'The bottom line here is the way we know that Iran did not have nuclear weapons, if they had nuclear weapons Israel would not have attacked them. 'The reason they're trying to get nukes is because an expansionist power in their region keeps threatening them and actually bomb[ing] them.' CNN host Abby Phillip interrupted, saying: 'Joy, this is not just about nukes. It's also about Iran being a state sponsor of terrorism and chaos and violence and death around the world.' The panel then decided into chaos over her remarks, with attorney Arthur Aidala slamming her for backing Iran. He said: 'Joy the fact that you are backing a country that slaughters homosexuals, that slaughters people for their religious beliefs. It's crazy, it's nuts.' In response, she said that LGBTQ people weren't allowed to serve in the US military under President Trump. Trump has banned transgender service personnel, but gays, lesbians and bisexuals are free to serve. Clearly angered, Aidala continued: 'But they can live, they can get married they can have children. We're not killing them!' U.S. stealth bombers dropped 12 deep penetrator bombs, called bunker busters, on the Fordo nuclear facility and two on the Natanz site over the weekend. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the attack as a success, but a US intelligence report has since emerged that seems to discredit that. According to the preliminary report, it was found that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months. At a Pentagon briefing on Thursday, defense officials laid out details that bolstered their argument that the attack had wiped out the key sites. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said: 'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated, This was an historically successful attack.' Reid's remarks this week come after she said she was disillusioned with the Democratic party to the point she was just 'hanging on'. She told The Breakfast Club podcast on Tuesday that she believes the current Democrat line-up is fueling Trump's agenda by failing to provide opposition. 'I've been a Democrat since I was old enough to vote, but I'm barely hanging on,' Reid told The Breakfast Club podcast on Tuesday. 'At this point, the party is not bigger than the future of my kids. I have three children, that have to live in this country as black people, and fascism doesn't work for me. 'I'm not willing to cede the country to Trumpism and MAGA simply because I'm clinging to this party.' Reid added that the party desperately needs a new leader, and a fresh ideology. She blasted Trump as having 'no actual talent' - but he still beat the Democrats. 'You have to blow up the whole Democratic Party,' she said.


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump rejected invitation to Bezos wedding
Donald Trump rejected an invitation to Jeff Bezos's star-studded Venetian wedding. Mr Bezos, the tech billionaire, was reportedly trying to cosy up to the US president, in what could be seen as an attempt to fill the position of 'First Buddy' vacated by Elon Musk. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the 61 year-old, who is preparing for his lavish three-day wedding in Venice, had spoken twice to Mr Trump in the last few weeks. As part of his charm offensive, Mr Bezos extended an invitation to his upcoming nuptials with Lauren Sanchez, the journalist. White House officials confirmed to the WSJ that the invitation had been offered. Mr Trump was not expected to attend the Venice ceremony owing to scheduling conflicts, however. Mr Trump's daughter Ivanka, a friend of Ms Sanchez' is expected to attend, along with her husband, Jared Kushner. Donald Jr, the president's eldest son, is also going. In 2019, Mr Trump mocked Mr Bezos as 'Jeff Bozo' in a dig at the Washington Post, which the billionaire owned. However, the newspaper did not support Kamala Harris in last year's presidential election, breaking a liberal tradition going back decades. In February, the Post refused to run an advert attacking the administration that asked whether Donald Trump or Elon Musk was running the country. Earlier this year, Mr Bezos abandoned plans to display how much Mr Trump's proposed tariffs were costing Amazon customers on each transaction following a direct appeal from the president. Mr Bezos, the founder of Amazon and one of the world's richest men, appears to be trying to exploit Mr Trump's spectacular falling out with Mr Musk, which started at the end of last month. Dave Limp, chief executive of Mr Bezos's space company Blue Origin, has also held talks with Susie Wiles, the White House Chief of Staff, the WSJ reported. There are powerful business reasons for Bezos's approach, notably the possibility of government contracts for Blue Origin. Until now, Elon Musk's SpaceX has dominated the market, spectacularly outstripping Blue Origin in the race to become Nasa's main contractor since the US stopped using the Russians to ferry missions to the International Space Station.


Scotsman
38 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why 'first draft of history' has lots of bad news for SNP and Labour
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... News, wrote American journalist Alan Barth in 1943, is only the first rough draft of history, a phrase later wrongly attributed to Washington Post publisher Philip L Graham who, by then, was employing Barth as a leader writer. Soviet dissident writer Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn used newspaper extracts to illustrate the domestic backdrop to his brilliant, fictionalised account of the first weeks of the First World War on the Eastern Front, August 1914. And I recall a conversation with author Michael Fry about his history of Edinburgh, answering in the negative to his question if anything had surprised me. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Only afterwards did I remember it wasn't true because I was indeed surprised that he'd obviously gone to great lengths to write the whole thing without any newspaper sources. A history of Edinburgh without mentioning The Scotsman, Evening News or Dispatch? Who'd a-thunk it? John Swinney and Keir Starmer do not have their troubles to seek (Picture: Andy Buchanan/pool) | Getty Images Political contortions I digress, and the days of coffee house patrons reading early Scotsman editions in Georgian Edinburgh, of minor Russian aristocrats browsing Novoye Vremya for the latest trends, or Washington bureaucrats buried in Post editorials were long before the new era of constantly updated digital news in which all publishers and broadcasters operate. But the phrase about the first rough draft of history came back to me as I scanned The Scotsman's website for this column. It was a snapshot of the turbulent times in which we live, where old certainties are seemingly swept away as fast as the news updates expose their obsolescence, and circumstances contorting the two parties of government with their own contradictions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Elsewhere, The Herald was reporting the Scottish Government had given the Edinburgh International Book Festival a £300,000 bung to plug the hole created by last year's craven ending of fund manager Baillie Gifford as the headline sponsor, after climate activists put it under pressure because of BG's miniscule investments linked to oil and gas companies and Israel. 'The NHS can afford assisted dying, Starmer tells Streeting,' reported The Times, while also revealing the 'sulphurous' atmosphere within Labour about next week's vote on welfare reform, designed to save around £5bn a year by tightening eligibility for disability benefits. Implausible populism It is hardly surprising public bewilderment is reflected in low polling for the main parties of government on either side of the Border and more voters are instead turning to the populism of Reform or the Lib Dems' equally implausible 'be nice to everyone' approach, as leader Sir Ed Davey goofs about with yet another water-based activity. If, in the memorable words of Mike Tyson, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth, the punching is coming from global events well beyond their control. Sir Keir Starmer will be seeking emergency dental treatment unless he quells the growing welfare reform rebellion or is prepared for the potentially fatal embarrassment of a Conservative rescue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How does he square telling a new parliamentary party of MPs brought up on opposing 'Tory austerity' that they must accept cuts in welfare to afford higher defence spending? How can he reward Health Secretary Wes Streeting for his support on welfare, by telling him to find the money for assisted dying despite NHS budgets already burst from massive pay deals not seen since the 1970s and high inflation? Indeed, how can a Labour government retain the support of all public sector unions if, as seems unavoidable, the brief wave of wage increases ebbs while proceeding with the purchase of nuclear-capable F-35A stealth fighters, at £80 million each? Meanwhile, private investment shrinks with every fleeing non-dom. Compulsory redundancies Here, SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison is preparing public sector unions for ending the totemic rejection of compulsory redundancies, when until very recently her councillors were condemning Conservatives for making the same proposal to balance council budgets. But she must have signed off the £40m rescue package for Dundee University, where mismanagement has been taken to new levels, and where the University and College Union is opposed to, guess what, compulsory redundancies. It's reasonable to ask if jeopardy for bad management is removed to save jobs in one institution, but potentially at the sacrifice of posts in other areas not currently making the news. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At least Dundee University's senior management have fallen on their swords, but not so those responsible for the self-made crisis at the Edinburgh Book Festival? £300,000 is coppers in the grand scheme of things, but with public budgets under extreme pressure, what kind of message does it send when a weak, but high-profile private organisation throws away money because of hysterical, celebrity-backed pressure, only to be bailed out with taxpayers' money? It may be true that what we are experiencing is the just the ripple effect of global conflict, but they could be like the ripples in the sea before a tsunami arrives. Just because bombs are not falling on us does not mean we need not prepare for conflict, and there is no better illustration of the SNP's political contortions than its ban on supporting firms connected with munitions, and the failure of Scottish Enterprise to back a welding centre carrying out work for attack submarines, while the nationalised Ferguson Marine is building sections for Type 26 frigates.