EU probes 4 porn sites over failure to block minors – DW – 05/27/2025
The EU has launched investigations into four major porn sites over alleged failures to block minors from accessing adult content. Officials warn of possible mental harm and major legal consequences.
The European Commission opened formal investigations on Tuesday into four major pornographic platforms over suspected failures to prevent minors from accessing adult content.
Brussels says the four — Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos — are acting in violation of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA).
What is the EU investigating?
The Commission said the platforms do not have "appropriate and proportionate measures" in place and warned of possible mental and physical harm to young users.
"The online space should be a safe environment for children to learn and connect," said Henna Virkkunen, the EU commissioner responsible for digital affairs. "Our priority is to protect minors and allow them to navigate safely online."
All four platforms were classified as "very large online platforms" under the DSA — subject to stricter oversight — though Stripchat was recently removed from the list after reporting fewer than 45 million monthly EU users. The investigation will still cover the period when it qualified.
The Commission said the investigation aims to collect more evidence, including interviews and technical assessments, to determine whether the platforms are in breach of EU law.
What could the porn site investigation mean?
Violations of the DSA could result in fines of up to 6% of a company's global turnover or even an EU ban for repeated breaches.
How can the EU deal with Musk and his tech agenda?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
While the Commission noted that launching the probe does not prejudge its outcome, it emphasized the urgency of protecting children online.
Under the Digital Services Act, platforms are required to implement effective age verification tools to block access to pornographic content for minors, remove illegal material promptly, and provide simple mechanisms for users to report harmful or illegal content.
Pornhub's parent company, Aylo, said it is "fully committed" to child safety and compliance with the law, but argued that age verification should be handled at the device level, not by websites. The other companies did not respond to requests for comment.
The EU is also developing an official age-verification app and has invited public input, including from parents, as part of broader efforts to create binding guidelines for online child protection.
Edited by Sean Sinico
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
26 minutes ago
- DW
Trump's use of power raises alarm over state of US democracy – DW – 06/11/2025
President Donald Trump has deployed the military against protesters in Los Angeles and ignored federal court orders — moves that have prompted concern about the condition of democratic institutions in the United States. Tensions remain high in Los Angeles, California, where thousands of people have been protesting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. A curfew imposed by the city's mayor on Tuesday night brought some calm, but there are no signs of de-escalation. After deploying the National Guard, US President Donald Trump has now ordered the deployment of some 700 Marines — active-duty troops known for their rapid response and elite combat capabilities. According to a spokeswoman for the United States Northern Command, US troops will help protect federal buildings and personnel, including ICE agents. Since Friday, demonstrators have occupied the streets in Los Angeles, protesting ICE raids targeting individuals lacking proper immigration documentation. In some cases, masked ICE agents reportedly arrested people on the street. The crackdown reflects the Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration — and now the military has been called in by the president to assist. Presidential powers and the Insurrection Act Normally, the president cannot unilaterally deploy the National Guard within a US state; governors must authorize such deployments. California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressly rejected the need for the National Guard and has sued the Trump administration. Downtown LA under curfew after days of protests To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to deploy military forces without the governor's consent in cases of rebellion or civil unrest. Trump's decision to invoke that authority is considered highly unusual, given the importance placed on states' rights in the US federal system. Governor Newsom has accused Trump of abusing executive power and warned that his actions threaten democratic norms. "California may be first, but it clearly won't end here," Newsom said, "Other states are next. Democracy is next." Trump sidelining the judicial branch Trump has repeatedly clashed with the US judicial system during his first five months back in office. Early in his term, he authorized deportations that went forward despite federal court orders blocking them. Since March, more than 250 non-US citizens — whom Trump has labeled as terrorists — have been deported to El Salvador. Flights to El Salvador's infamous CECOT maximum-security prison reportedly continued even after a federal judge ordered them grounded. To justify the deportations, the Trump administration cited the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, arguing it allows for the removal of nationals from "hostile nations," without affording them a right to trial. The Trump administration claims those deported were affiliated with the transnational criminal group Tren de Aragua. In the US system, the judiciary is one of three co-equal branches of government, alongside the executive and legislative branches. The balance among them is foundational to US democracy— critics say Trump is eroding that balance. Six of the nation's nine Supreme Court justices are conservatives, three were appointed by Trump. Will the 'principles of democracy' win out in the US? What about the legislative branch? Trump has largely bypassed Congress since returning to office in January, issuing 161 executive orders as of June 10 — more than any president in a similar time frame since World War II. His orders, which do not require House of Representatives or Senate approval, have had sweeping effects, from LGBTQ+ rights to trade policy. "Trump will definitely go down in history as the one who took executive power to its limits," wrote Patrick Malone, a professor of public administration and policy at American University in an email to DW. Malone questioned the legality of the president's mass firing of federal employees in the name of efficiency, for instance. "The question of legality of what this president has done are going to be in the courts for years to come," Malone said. He warned that the US democratic institutions are under serious pressure. One underlying issue, he said, is that many US laws were written for a nation vastly different from the one that exists today. But Malone is optimistic: "Institutions are generally quite difficult to topple. Hopefully, the principles of democracy will ultimately prevail." This article was published in German and translated by Jon Shelton.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Call for offers: Media literacy experts in Tunisia
DW Akademie is seeking MIL experts to support and strengthen youth-led civil society organizations in Tunisia. The EU-funded project "MIL4Peace" aims to promote stability and peace by enhancing the capacity of civil society in Lebanon, Libya, and Tunisia to engage youth in conflict prevention and peacebuilding. The project focuses on empowering youth-led organizations with tools and methods in Media and Information Literacy (MIL) to foster inclusive youth participation, particularly in the digital space. As part of this initiative, DW Akademie is seeking MIL experts (f/m/d) to support and strengthen youth-led civil society organizations in these efforts in Tunisia. Download the complete call below. Apply by June 20, 2025!
DW
14 hours ago
- DW
US: Donald Trump makes broad use of presidential powers – DW – 06/11/2025
President Donald Trump has deployed the military against protesters in Los Angeles and ignored federal court orders — moves that have prompted concern about the condition of democratic institutions in the United States. Tensions remain high in Los Angeles, California, where thousands of people have been protesting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. A curfew imposed by the city's mayor on Tuesday night brought some calm, but there are no signs of de-escalation. After deploying the National Guard, US President Donald Trump has now ordered the deployment of some 700 Marines — active-duty troops known for their rapid response and elite combat capabilities. According to a spokeswoman for the United States Northern Command, US troops will help protect federal buildings and personnel, including ICE agents. Since Friday, demonstrators have occupied the streets in Los Angeles, protesting ICE raids targeting individuals lacking proper immigration documentation. In some cases, masked ICE agents reportedly arrested people on the street. The crackdown reflects the Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration — and now the military has been called in by the president to assist. Presidential powers and the Insurrection Act Normally, the president cannot unilaterally deploy the National Guard within a US state; governors must authorize such deployments. California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressly rejected the need for the National Guard and has sued the Trump administration. Downtown LA under curfew after days of protests To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to deploy military forces without the governor's consent in cases of rebellion or civil unrest. Trump's decision to invoke that authority is considered highly unusual, given the importance placed on states' rights in the US federal system. Governor Newsom has accused Trump of abusing executive power and warned that his actions threaten democratic norms. "California may be first, but it clearly won't end here," Newsom said, "Other states are next. Democracy is next." Trump sidelining the judicial branch Trump has repeatedly clashed with the US judicial system during his first five months back in office. Early in his term, he authorized deportations that went forward despite federal court orders blocking them. Since March, more than 250 non-US citizens — whom Trump has labeled as terrorists — have been deported to El Salvador. Flights to El Salvador's infamous CECOT maximum-security prison reportedly continued even after a federal judge ordered them grounded. To justify the deportations, the Trump administration cited the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, arguing it allows for the removal of nationals from "hostile nations," without affording them a right to trial. The Trump administration claims those deported were affiliated with the transnational criminal group Tren de Argua. In the US system, the judiciary is one of three co-equal branches of government, alongside the executive and legislative branches. The balance among them is foundational to US democracy — critics say Trump is eroding that balance. Six of the nation's nine Supreme Court justices are conservatives, three were appointed by Trump. Will the 'principles of democracy' win out in the US? What about the legislative branch? Trump has largely bypassed Congress since returning to office in January, issuing 161 executive orders as of June 10 — more than any president in a similar time frame since World War II. His orders, which do not require House of Representatives or Senate approval, have had sweeping effects, from LGBTQ+ rights to trade policy. "Trump will definitely go down in history as the one who took executive power to its limits," wrote Patrick Malone, a professor of public administration and policy at American University in an email to DW. Malone questioned the legality of the president's mass firing of federal employees in the name of efficiency, for instance. "The question of legality of what this president has done are going to be in the courts for years to come," Malone said. He warned that the US democratic institutions are under serious pressure. One underlying issue, he said, is that many US laws were written for a nation vastly different from the one that exists today. But Malone is optimistic: "Institutions are generally quite difficult to topple. Hopefully, the principles of democracy will ultimately prevail." This article was published in German and translated by Jon Shelton.
