logo
Russian Facebook VKontakte on fire as thousands of users accuse Trump of having dementia, call him a clown

Russian Facebook VKontakte on fire as thousands of users accuse Trump of having dementia, call him a clown

Economic Times7 days ago

Live Events
What did Donald Trump say about Putin?
Why are Russian bots turning on Donald Trump?
How are individuals reacting?
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Donald Trump's criticism of Vladimir Putin has sparked outrage online, but not among Americans. Following Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, ties between the United States and Russia became extremely strained; however, they improved after Donald Trump took office in January.The president of the United States has advocated for a ceasefire and urged his Russian counterpart to put an end to the conflict.After Donald Trump slammed Vladimir Putin for "killing a lot of people" in Ukraine, thousands of Russian-linked VKontakte accounts flooded with mocking posts.Thousands of posts on VKontakte, a Russian Facebook-like platform, have turned against Donald Trump, calling him a clown and accusing him of dementia.It represents a significant shift from earlier pro-Kremlin neutrality. According to insiders, Donald Trump's abrupt shift in tone may have rattled Moscow even more than it appears, as per reports.Donald Trump reacted angrily to Russia's weekend bombardment of Ukraine with missiles and drones, which Putin's military has been doing since the start of the full-scale invasion.Since Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday that Putin had gone "absolutely CRAZY!" and was "needlessly killing a lot of people" in Ukraine, nearly 1,000 negative posts about Trump have appeared on the Russian social media site VKontakte, as per a report by Newsweek.Donald Trump claimed that Putin "needlessly" killed a lot of people because "something has happened" to him. "And I'm not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever," he added.According to a report published on Tuesday by Agentstvo, an independent investigative Russian news outlet, the accounts, which are "in the interests of the Kremlin," have called Trump a "clown.'After President Trump criticized Putin on Sunday, pro-Kremlin bots stopped being neutral in their remarks about him, according to a spokesperson for the bot-tracking project Botnadzor.Donald Trump's comments about Putin were minimized by the Kremlin, but pro-Kremlin bots have begun smearing the American president.Putin may not be happy with Trump's abrupt change in tone, according to the online attacks, even though the U.S. president recently said their most recent phone conversation went "very well," as per a report by Newsweek.Trump was accused of "acting like a child" and "getting so mad early in the morning, as if he wasn't given what he wanted" in the Russian bots' comments."He's really lost his mind" and "wants to sit on two chairs" a Russian expression for attempting to play both sides, were other statements.One bot wrote, "Trump is the one who has lost his mind, not Putin. It seems that dementia, along with the presidential chair, is a genetic gift for every American president.While one bot called Trump a "showman," another called him a "clown.""What can you expect from a clown who threatens Russia instead of taking care of his own country?" wrote another.According to Agentstvo, pro-Kremlin trolls had previously been noticeably quiet when discussing Trump, sticking to neutral or cautious language.Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson for the Kremlin, dismissed Trump's comments on Monday as the result of "emotional overstrain."Since he harshly criticized Putin's actions in Ukraine, labeling him "crazy" and accusing him of killing civilians.Bots refer to Trump as a "clown," accuse him of dementia, and mock his emotional outbursts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions
Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high as persistent geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine, and the U.S. and Iran looked set to keep sanctions on both OPEC members Russia and Iran in place for longer. Brent crude futures rose $1, or 1.5%, to settle at $65.63 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose 89 cents, or 1.4%, to close at $63.41. "Risk premium has ramped up this week as the prospect of a Russia/Ukraine ceasefire as well as an Iranian nuclear deal now appear to have been pushed back for weeks if not months," analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note. Russia said work on trying to reach a settlement to end the war in Ukraine was extraordinarily complex and that it would be wrong to expect any imminent decisions but that it was waiting for Ukrainian reaction to its proposals. Russia is a member of the OPEC group that includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, and was the world's second biggest producer of crude in 2024 behind only the U.S., according to U.S. energy data. OPEC member Iran, meanwhile, was set to reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that would be key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer. Iran was the third biggest producer of crude in OPEC behind Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 2024, according to U.S. energy data. In Canada, wildfires burning in Alberta have affected more than 344,000 barrels per day of oil sands production, or about 7% of the country's overall crude output, according to Reuters calculations. In Europe, Euro zone inflation eased below the European Central Bank's (ECB) target last month on surprisingly benign services costs, underpinning expectations for further policy easing even as global trade tensions fuel longer-term price pressures. Central banks like the ECB use interest rates to keep inflation in check. Lower interest rates can spur economic growth and demand for oil by reducing consumer borrowing costs. But, in the U.S., Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said higher inflation from U.S. import tariffs could become evident quickly, but he said it would take longer to see a tariff-induced economic slowdown. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), however, revised down its forecast for global economic growth as the fallout from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy. U.S. job openings increased in April, but layoffs posted their biggest rise in nine months, suggesting that labor market conditions were softening amid a dimming economic outlook because of tariffs. The U.S. has asked countries to make their best offers on trade negotiations by Wednesday as U.S. officials ramp up efforts to deliver multiple agreements to Trump before a self-imposed deadline just five weeks away. WEEKLY US CRUDE DRAW SEEN Analysts forecast energy firms pulled about 1.0 million barrels of crude from U.S. stockpiles last week, reducing inventories for a second week in a row. That compares with an increase of 1.2 million barrels during the same week last year and an average decrease of 2.3 million barrels over the past five years (2020-2024). The American Petroleum Institute (API) trade group and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) release weekly U.S. oil inventory data on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, respectively. [EIA/S] [API/S] (Reporting by Scott DiSavino and Alex Lawler; Additional reporting by Michele Pek and Anjana Anil; Editing by Marguerita Choy and David Gregorio)

With Russia airfield attacks, Ukraine aims for strategic and symbolic blow
With Russia airfield attacks, Ukraine aims for strategic and symbolic blow

Business Standard

time31 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

With Russia airfield attacks, Ukraine aims for strategic and symbolic blow

While the full extent of the damage is still unknown, the operation shows how Kyiv has been able to adapt and evolve over the war using drones. Ukraine's drone attacks on airfields deep inside Russia on Sunday were strategic and symbolic blows that military analysts said were designed to slow Moscow's bombing campaign and demonstrate that Kyiv can still raise the cost of war for the Kremlin. After more than a year of planning, Ukraine was able to plant drones on Russian soil, just miles away from military bases. Then in a coordinated operation on Sunday, Ukrainian drones attacked five different regions in Russia. Some were launched from containers attached to semis, their flights captured on videos verified by The New York Times. Plumes of smoke billowed above one base. At another, strategic bombers were hit. Although the full extent of the damage is unknown, the attack, known as Operation Spider's Web, showed how Ukraine is adapting and evolving in the face of a larger military with deeper resources. Using drones, Kyiv has been able to push Russia out of much of the Black Sea, limit its gains on the front lines despite Ukraine's own troop shortages, and hamper Russia's ability to amass large concentrations of forces for major offensives. The operation on Sunday, along with extensive bombardments on Ukrainian cities by Moscow, also complicate ongoing efforts for diplomacy. Delegations from both sides met Monday for peace talks in Istanbul, with no breakthrough on a cease-fire announced. After the attacks, there were calls for a swift response across Russian media, and Ukrainians braced for retaliation even as they celebrated an operation that gave their beleaguered nation a much needed morale boost. Both sides have put out assessments that were not immediately verifiable. Ukraine said that 117 drones were used in the attacks and that 41 Russian aircraft were destroyed or damaged. Russian military bloggers played down the damage; the Russian Ministry of Defense said that Ukraine had attacked airfields in the Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan and Amur regions, and that Moscow had thwarted attacks at three of the bases. The New York Times verified videos that showed successful strikes at Olenya Air Base in the Murmansk region and Belaya Air Base in the Irkutsk region, and damage to at least five aircraft, four of them strategic bombers. Even with limited information, military analysts said the operation ranks as a signature event on par with the sinking of the Russian flagship Moskva early in the war and the maritime drone assaults that forced the Russian Navy to largely abandon the home port of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, Crimea. 'This is a stunning success for Ukraine's special services,' said Justin Bronk, senior research fellow for air power and technology at the Royal United Services Institute in London. 'If even half the total claim of 41 aircraft damaged/destroyed is confirmed, it will have a significant impact on the capacity of the Russian Long Range Aviation force to keep up its regular large scale cruise missile salvos against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure, whilst also maintaining their nuclear deterrence and signaling patrols against NATO and Japan,' he said in an email. Mick Ryan, a retired Australian general and fellow at the Lowy Institute, a Sydney-based research group, said that 'the proliferation of drones, open-source sensors and digital command and control systems means that long-range strike is now a commodity available to almost every nation state, and nonstate actor, with a few million dollars and the desire to reach out and strike their adversary.' Mr. Zelensky, in comments on Monday at a NATO meeting of Baltic and Nordic countries, said the operation showed Russia that it is also subject to serious losses, and 'that is what will push it toward diplomacy.' However, Mr. Ryan and other analysts cautioned that despite the nature of the attacks, they are unlikely to alter the political calculus of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who remains bent on achieving his war aims. The operation is part of an evolving campaign Behind Ukraine's operation was a basic goal: Kill the archer instead of trying to stop the arrows. It is part of an ever-evolving campaign by Ukraine to play offense rather than defense, by targeting Russian missile platforms on land, air and sea. In December 2022, nine months into the war, Ukraine executed one of its first ambitious attacks on Russian territory, targeting two airfields hundreds of miles inside the country using long-range drones. As the drone strikes expanded over the years, Russia adapted, building protective structures around fuel depots at the bases, bringing in more air defense assets and routinely repositioning its fleet. Ukraine needed a new plan if it hoped to inflict serious damage. They came up with 'Operation Spider's Web,' which Ukrainian officials said was overseen personally by Mr. Zelensky and managed directly by the head of the S.B.U., Vasyl Malyuk. The idea was to bring small, first-person-view, or FPV, drones close enough to the airfields to render traditional air defenses systems useless. The Ukrainians on Monday offered an unusually detailed public account of the operation. Over the course of many months, they said, dozens of FPV drones were transported into Russia; the scale of the operation could not be independently verified. Mr. Zelensky claimed they set up a base of operations at a warehouse close to a regional headquarters of Russia's domestic intelligence agency, known as the F.S.B. Once the drones were smuggled into Russia, they were packed onto pallets inside wooden transport containers with remote-controlled lids and then loaded onto trucks, the S.B.U. statement said. There was no indication that the drivers of the trucks knew what they were hauling, Ukrainian officials said. Mr. Zelensky said that all of the Ukrainian agents involved in the operation had made it safely out of Russia before the operation commenced, a claim that could not be independently verified. The Russian government, in a statement on Sunday, said that some of those involved in the attack had been detained. Ukraine planted drones inside Russia One video verified by The Times shows a drone approaching Belaya air base before a strike. Other verified footage shows two drones launched from containers mounted on the back of a semi-truck less than four miles away. They fly in the direction of large smoke plumes now rising from the base. Footage recorded shortly afterward shows the same containers ablaze, their tops beside them on the ground. Ukrainian officials said in their account that the transport crates were rigged to self-destruct after the drones were released. Another video verified by the Times shows drones flying less than four miles from the Olenya air base. The man recording it suggests that the drones had been launched from a truck parked just down the road. The Times could not confirm that the drones in the various videos were part of the assault. In its assessment, Ukraine said the 41 planes accounted for 34 percent of the strategic cruise-missile carriers at air bases across three time zones. The Times was able to verify that four TU-95 bombers and one Antonov cargo plane were hit. Russian military bloggers claimed the Ukrainian damage estimates were inflated. One influential Russian military blogger, Rybar, run by Mikhail Zvinchuk, put the number of damaged Russian aircraft at 13, including up to 12 strategic bombers. Another one, Fighterbomber, believed to be run by Capt. Ilya Tumanov of the Russian Army, said in a post on Monday that only 'a handful' of strategic aircraft were hit, but even such a loss was 'huge for a country that doesn't make them.' Col. Markus Reisner, a historian and officer in the Austrian Armed Forces, said that the best Western estimates suggest that Russia had slightly over 60 active Tu-95s and around 20 Tu-160 bombers. 'Replacing losses will be very challenging,' he said. Ben Hodges, a retired general who commanded the U.S. Army Europe, said the available evidence suggests that the operation put a 'real dent' in Russia's ability to launch large salvos of cruise missiles. 'The surprise that they achieved will have a shock on the system as the Russians try to figure out how these trucks loaded with explosives got so deep inside of Russia,' he said. The attack raises new risks Mr. Zelensky said the attack was not only designed to undercut Russia's ability to bombard Ukrainian cities but to increase pressure on the Kremlin to accept an unconditional cease-fire. 'It was the Russians who chose to continue the war — even under conditions where the entire world is calling for an end to the killing,' he said in his nightly address to the nation. 'And pressure is truly needed — pressure on Russia that should bring it back to reality.' There was no indication that the attack had changed the Kremlin's belief that it holds an advantage over Ukraine, counting on the weakening resolve of Kyiv's allies and its ability to grind down vastly outnumbered Ukrainian forces. There was also the risk that Ukraine's allies would be rattled by the attack and the general pattern of escalation in recent weeks as Russia steps up its own bombardments. But Mr. Ryan said the strikes also show how Ukraine is evolving so that it is less reliant on U.S. intelligence in the event of 'shut offs' like earlier this year. The operation, he said, demonstrates 'how success in war is biased toward those who learn and adapt the quickest.'

EU FTA to be comprehensive, not interim: Officials
EU FTA to be comprehensive, not interim: Officials

Economic Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

EU FTA to be comprehensive, not interim: Officials

Synopsis India and the EU are negotiating a comprehensive free trade agreement. It will not include an early harvest deal. Discussions are ongoing regarding Geographical Indications. Investment protection is also being discussed. Both sides are addressing concerns like the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism. India may impose retaliatory duties if the EU imposes a carbon tax. The India-EU free trade agreement (FTA) is likely to be a comprehensive one without any early harvest deal or a pact on Geographical Indications or an investment protection agreement, officials said. ADVERTISEMENT The two sides are also discussing if any exemptions or carve-outs can be given to India on the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) and officials said talks on the issue were going on. "The FTA will be a comprehensive one. These are dynamic issues," said an official. India and the EU aim to close the negotiations for the trade pact by the end of December. Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said the talks can be concluded earlier than that but there are certain sensitive issues on both sides that must be negotiations for an Investment Protection Agreement and an Agreement on Geographical Indications since June 2022 are also Delhi has concerns related to certain practices and regulations of the EU such as CBAM and EUDR while the bloc held that India's quality control orders were a challenge. "On CBAM, talks are going on," said another official. ADVERTISEMENT India has already said it will impose retaliatory duties if the EU imposes carbon tax on Indian goods. The EU's CBAM is expected to translate into a 20-35% tax on select imports into the bloc from January 1, 2026, and will impact the cement, iron and steel, aluminium, fertiliser, electricity and hydrogen sectors. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store