More than 220 UK MPs urge Starmer to recognise Palestinian state
LONDON : More than 220 British MPs, including dozens from the ruling Labour party, demanded Friday that the UK government formally recognise a Palestinian state, further increasing pressure on prime minister Keir Starmer.
The call, in a letter signed by lawmakers from nine UK political parties, came less than 24 hours after French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state at a UN meeting in September.
France would be the first G7 country – and the most powerful European nation to date – to make the move, already drawing condemnation from Israel and the US.
Starmer has come under rising domestic and international pressure over recognising Palestinian statehood, as opposition intensifies to the ongoing war in Gaza amid fears of mass starvation there.
'We urge you to officially recognise the state of Palestine at the conference next week,' the 221 UK lawmakers wrote in the joint letter, referring to a July 28-29 UN conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia in New York.
'Whilst we appreciate the UK does not have it in its power to bring about a free and independent Palestine, UK recognition would have a significant impact,' it said.
The signatories, from parties including the centre-right Conservatives and centrist Liberal Democrats, as well as regional parties in Scotland and Wales, cited Britain's 'historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council'.
They also noted the country's role in helping to create the state of Israel through the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
'Responsibility'
'Since 1980 we have backed a two-state solution. Such a recognition would give that position substance as well as living up to a historic responsibility we have to the people,' they added.
In the face of growing pressure on the issue, the UK government has maintained its longstanding stance that it supports a two-state solution to the conflict in the Middle East.
But it has insisted that the conditions are currently not right for formal recognition of a Palestinian state.
In a statement Friday following a call about Gaza with his counterparts in France and Germany, Starmer said he was 'working on a pathway to peace in the region'.
'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan,' he added.
A number of factors could deter Starmer from making the move, including wanting to avoid angering US President Donald Trump.
The American leader, who lands later Friday in Scotland for a five-day visit, dismissed Macron's announcement before departing Washington, saying it 'doesn't carry weight'.
The pressure around recognising Palestinian statehood has been building on Starmer's government, with nearly 60 Labour MPs reportedly urging Foreign Secretary David Lammy to make the move in a private letter earlier in July.
Meanwhile, Macron raised the issue during his UK state visit this month, publicly urging London to work with Paris on a formal recognition announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
UK defends online safety law after X slams ‘heavy-handed' censorship risk
LONDON, Aug 3 — The UK government yesterday defended a new online safety law following harsh criticism from social network X, saying it was 'demonstrably false' that it 'compromises free speech'. Under the law, which took effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography. But X said Friday that 'the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. 'Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' added the platform, formerly known as Twitter, saying regulators had taken a 'heavy-handed approach'. 'When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety',' added the platform, owned by billionaire Elon Musk. The government countered that it was 'demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression,' said a spokesperson. The law 'does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content,' said the government, adding 'platforms have had several months to prepare'. In the event of non-compliance, platforms are liable to fines of up to £18 million (RM103 million), or 10 percent of their global turnover, whichever is higher. — AFP
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Enabling genocide in Gaza
A mourner carrying the body of a victim killed by Israeli bombardment on the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis, during the funeral outside Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. — AFP A BRIEF pause in small portions of the targeted territory before the death knell sounds again. That's what Israeli concessions of a temporary 10-hour gap in its daily genocidal endeavours amount to. Far too few trucks delivering lifesaving aid are being permitted through the Zionist barriers, and the Jordanian/Emirati airdrops are seen as both grossly inadequate and somewhat risky. This past week, Israeli organisations B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights both belatedly acknowledged the ongoing genocide. This matters. A small but growing number of Israeli citizens, both Arab and Jewish, have been protesting against the atrocities being committed in their name. But, like the aid that is being allowed to go through, they are little more than a drop in the ocean. Much the same could be said about the Western allies that decry Israel's egregious actions without taking any measures to halt them. France's impending recognition of a Palestinian state has been greeted with horror by Israel and the United States, but wonders why Emmanuel Macron left it until the UN convenes in September. After all, more than 140 UN member states recognise a Palestinian state since 1988. Much of Europe has been reticent, however, despite the knowledge that it would not make much difference. Europe was instrumental in backing the Zionist project nearly 80 years ago, when a new colonial-settler state was established even as previous ones were beginning to be dismantled. There was a degree of absurdity in the notion that the recompense for the Nazi-led Holocaust lay in occupying Palestinian land, and that murdering or driving out many of its inhabitants was the obvious means of achieving this objective. But its sponsors have always forgiven Israel's deadly excesses. Token gestures have never made much of a difference, and the French vow of eventual recognition falls pretty much in the same category, while exposing the even more blatant hypocrisy of nations such as Australia and the United Kingdom, which occasionally spell out their horror at Israeli actions without offering to take any steps that just might interrupt the genocide. Ceasing to supply Israel with the means of perpetrating its deadly designs could be an initial step, but would even that make much difference as long as the US wholeheartedly backs its chief Middle Eastern protégé? Even Donald Trump's concession this week that 'those children look very hungry ... that's real starvation stuff', is meaningless unless the US stops facilitating the genocide. The so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation it has sponsored has served as a means of mass murder. There is little prospect of a reversal. Images of emaciated children from Gaza that echo the horrific visions of Auschwitz survivors are here to stay. Holocaust scholars such as Omer Bartov have left no doubt where they stand today, even if it took them long to recognise what seemed obvious in the immediate aftermath of Oct 7, 2023, when Hamas and its associates broke out of Gaza and faced little resistance in committing crimes that initially went uncontested, but eventually unleashed a genocide by those who had faltered in defending their kibbutzim, partly because they focused on backing the Zionist offenders in the West Bank. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is not expected to pronounce its verdict on whether Israel is committing genocide until late 2027 or early 2028, ie, after the killing is done and the ethnic cleansing is complete. What would be the point of that, beyond an acknowledgment that history will not absolve Isra¬el's collaborators? Its enablers range across the globe, but the Middle East stands out as a particularly egregious transgressor. And while India is one of the few nations in the Global South that deplorably stands solidly behind Israel's genocidal intentions, Pakistan is on the same page as Israel in proposing a Nobel Peace Prize for the US president. Pakistan was among the 30 or so nations represented in Bogotá this month at a conference intended to halt the genocide, alongside the likes of Qatar, Oman, Iraq, Lebanon and Turkey. Colombia and South Africa, though, have been the leading lights of the initiative. A few decades ago, India might have fit into that category. Once it stood out as a staunch defender of Palestinian rights, but today it prefers the Zionist narrative. What the future might hold for Palestine is uncertain, but any notion of resurrecting a two-state solution that was buried long ago by Israel and its western backers is absurd. A Palestinian-free Gaza Riviera along the lines proposed by Trump and backed by much of the genocidal Netanyahu cabinet might prove unachievable, but tens of thousands of lives could be lost in the process, long before the ICJ musters up the courage to acknowledge what is thus far this century's worst crime against humanity. — Dawn/Asia News Network
Malay Mail
21 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Top Israeli general says no pause in Gaza fighting without hostage deal
JERUSALEM, Aug 2 — Israel's top general has warned that there will be no respite in fighting in Gaza if negotiations fail to quickly secure the release of hostages held in the Palestinian territory. 'I estimate that in the coming days we will know whether we can reach an agreement for the release of our hostages,' said army chief of staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, according to a military statement. 'If not, the combat will continue without rest,' he said, during remarks to officers yesterday. Footage released by the Israeli military showed Zamir meeting soldiers and officers in a command centre. Of the 251 people who were kidnapped from Israel during Hamas's attack in October 2023, 49 remain in Gaza, 27 of them dead, according to the military. Palestinian armed groups this week released two videos of hostages looking emaciated and weak. Negotiations—mediated by the United States, Egypt and Qatar—to secure a ceasefire and their release broke down last month, and some in Israel have called for tougher military action. This comes against the backdrop of growing pressure—both internationally and domestically, including from many of the hostages' families—to resume efforts to secure a ceasefire in the nearly 22-month conflict. Aid agencies have meanwhile warned that Gaza's population is facing a catastrophic famine, triggered by Israeli restrictions on aid. Zamir nonetheless rejected these allegations out of hand. 'The current campaign of false accusations of intentional starvation is a deliberate, timed, and deceitful attempt to accuse the IDF (military), a moral army, of war crimes,' he said. 'The ones responsible for the killing and suffering of the residents in the Gaza Strip is Hamas.' Hamas's 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to a tally based on official figures. A total of 898 Israeli soldiers have also been killed since ground troops were sent into Gaza, according to the military. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed at least 60,332 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory's health ministry, deemed reliable by the UN. — AFP
