logo
Little-known road rule landing Aussies $2k fines

Little-known road rule landing Aussies $2k fines

News.com.aua day ago

Aussie motorists have been warned of one seemingly minor driving habit that could cost them thousands of dollars in fines.
Significant penalties apply to those who flout the lesser-known road rule of leaving your car unlocked or your windows down after parking.
However, there is one group of motorists exempt from the rules concerning unlocked doors and window security.
In most states, there's a '3-metre rule' that dictates how far you can stray from your parked car without locking it. Essentially, if you move more than 3m away, you must lock your vehicle and secure the windows. Failure to do so could result in a fine.
And let's be honest; almost everyone's been guilty of leaving their car unsecured while going for that quick coffee run or dash into a shop, often without a second thought.
While leaving your car unlocked may seem a harmless oversight, there's a very good reason for the 3m rule.
Improving vehicle security helps prevent car theft and dishonest insurance claims, such as when a vehicle is left unlocked intentionally and a claim is made for an alleged theft.
Astor Legal's principal lawyer Avinash Singh explains: 'The reasoning behind the law is to prevent cars from being stolen and then used in more serious crimes,' he said.
'The use of allegedly stolen vehicles making it difficult for police to track down the offenders.'
Here is everything you need to know about this often-overlooked rule.
New South Wales
In NSW, it is illegal to leave a running car unlocked or with a minor inside while unattended. Additionally, drivers must not leave their vehicle unattended with the windows down unless the gap is two centimetres or less.
The fine is $114, but if the case goes to court, penalties can reach up to $2200.
Queensland
In QLD, it's illegal to leave your car unlocked when unattended. Similarly to NSW, you can't leave your vehicle unattended with the windows down unless there is a gap of five centimetres or less.
The maximum penalty is $3096, with a fine of $2669 if the car is unlocked with the keys inside.
Victoria
In Victoria, it is an offence to leave your vehicle unattended without properly securing it, which includes ensuring all windows are fully closed and the car is locked.
The on-the-spot fine is $117, with court penalties approaching $600.
Western Australia
WA follows similar rules to other states regarding vehicle security: you must ensure the doors and windows are secured when leaving your car unattended. The fine for failing to do so is $50.
However, there's a stipulation that if you're going to pay for parking, you don't need to lock the car and put the windows up.
Tasmania
In Tasmania, it's the law to switch off the car, remove the key from the ignition, and ensure that no minors (under 16) are left in the vehicle when unattended.
The rules also specify that the doors must be locked and the windows secured (defined as closed or open by up to 2 centimetres). The maximum penalty for leaving your car unlocked is just under $200.
Australian Capital Territory
In the ACT, you must secure your car when leaving it unattended, ensuring the windows are closed and the doors are locked. Failure to comply can result in a significant fine: 20 penalty units or $3200.
Where is South Australia?
South Australia is the only state that does not have this law. Regulation 23 of the Road Traffic (Road Rules — Ancillary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2014 explicitly exempts drivers in South Australia from needing to lock their doors if away from their vehicle.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hillcrest families react to court decision
Hillcrest families react to court decision

ABC News

time24 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Hillcrest families react to court decision

Nick Grimm: It was a tragedy at an end of year school celebration that devastated a small Tasmanian community. The deaths of six children in a jumping castle accident four years ago saw the operator criminally charged with failing to comply with a health and safety duty. Today, a court in Devonport has found the operator not guilty. Reporter Manika Champ has been at the courthouse. Manika, just remind us about the background to this case and the changes that have already been implemented. Manika Champ: Well, Nick, it was obviously, as you mentioned, an incident that shocked the nation. So it was December 16 in 2021 and the kids were all celebrating at an end of year celebration. It was a day that was supposed to be a lot of fun. Jumping castles, Zorb balls, all set up on the school oval. And now it was a sunny day and there wasn't actually much wind around at all. But we heard that there was a really freak wind gust that blew the jumping castle into the air and sent it across to the other side of the school oval. And as a result of that, six children died and three were seriously injured. Now, after this incident unfolded, WorkSafe investigated and then they brought charges against the jumping castles operator, who was Rosemary Anne Gamble, trading as Tas-Zorb. So she was charged with failing to comply with her health and safety duty. Now, she pleaded not guilty to that charge. And in November last year, she faced a two week hearing in the Magistrates Court here in Devonport. During that hearing, the prosecutors alleged that Ms Gamble didn't adequately anchor the castle. We heard that there were eight tether points and she only tethered it and pegged it to the ground at four of those eight points. But the defence argues that the wind gust was so unpredictable and out of the blue that no amount of pegs would have prevented what happened. So after this tragedy did unfold, the Tasmanian government quickly banned the use of jumping castles at all Tasmanian education department facilities. So from the date of this tragedy, no jumping castles have been able to be used at any Tasmanian school. Nick Grimm: So what has the court determined today? Manika Champ: So today Magistrate Robert Webster handed down his decision. Now, he ruled that he was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the charge against Ms Gamble had been proven. She was told that you're free to go and effectively found not guilty of that health and safety charge. And he wrote that the incident may have been unavoidable and he said that Ms Gamble could have done more or taken further steps. However, given the effects of the unforeseen and unforeseeable dust devil, had she done so, that would sadly have made no difference to the ultimate outcome. Nick Grimm: So what sort of reaction has there been to the determination? Manika Champ: As you can imagine, Nick, emotions have been running incredibly high here in Devonport this morning. There were at least a dozen family members inside the court when this decision was handed down. Georgie Birch, the mother of Zane, who died in the tragedy, said she was deeply disappointed in the Tasmanian justice system. Andrew Dodt, the father of Peter Dodt, also spoke outside court. Andrew Dodt: I've been broken for a long time and I think I'm going to be broken for a lot more. I thank you for walking the path with us, it was a very long path and I think we've still got a long way to go. I think our hopes are just shattered now, at the end of the day all I wanted was an apology for my son not coming home and I'm never going to get it and that kills me. Manika Champ: And Nick, that was Andrew Dodt, the father of Peter Dodt, who died in the Hillcrest Primary School tragedy. And as you can hear, those emotions were running incredibly high. Ms Gamble did also speak outside court after the verdict was handed down, where she spoke through a lawyer. In that statement, she said, I am a mother. I can only imagine the pain that other parents are living with each and every day. Every moment that goes by, I wish this tragedy never occurred and that the families that were torn apart were still whole. And of course, even though this is the end of the criminal case, we still have a lot more in this Hillcrest Primary School tragedy to come. So there will be a coronial inquest and we're expecting that we'll find out very shortly when that will proceed. There will also be a class action, which has already begun, and that is against the Tasmanian government, the Education Department and also the castle's operator, Ms Gamble. So this is the end of one part of this tragedy. It is still going to be a lot more to come from it. Nick Grimm: Manika Champ reporting.

Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt
Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt

ABC News

time33 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt

Climate activists who planned to release stench gas in an attempt to cause the evacuation of a Woodside annual general meeting in Perth's CBD have been fined $10,000 each. Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski had planned to release the gas at the meeting at Perth's Convention Centre in April 2023, to force the room to be evacuated. The meeting, which was attended by a few hundred people, saw Woodside executives and investors discuss its controversial climate targets. The District Court heard Stolarski had ordered canisters of gas and had them delivered to her home. Mazza went into the Convention Centre to release the gas but, the court heard, was "stopped in his tracks" when police arrested him and seized the canister he had. An earlier attempt to enter failed when a security guard didn't believe Mazza's false claim he worked in IT for the venue. Mazza was the principal offender, the court was told, with Stolarski aiding him by obtaining the gas, and Noakes helping through reconnaissance. The court heard Noakes went to the convention centre days before the meeting was scheduled, and gathered footage. He'd also provided Mazza with a beanie and jacket to disguise himself when Mazza sought go back into the venue after he was initially ejected. Stolarski had planned to let off homemade smoke flares outside the building. Stolarski's lawyer had said the trio's aim was to get media attention. Judge Craig Astill described them as "misguided, in how they go about trying to achieve their goals" with a history of "nuisance type offending". He told the court they'd pursued their "good intentions" in an "unlawful way". The judge said they "were trying to drown out" the voices of those attending the AGM who may have wanted to speak. The prosecutor said the gas had a strong, easily detectable odour and was toxic to inhale in high concentrations. The prosecutor had said that while it wasn't suggested the trio set out to hurt people, there seemed to be a lack of acceptance that their plan "did pose risks". He said a "substantial number" of people aged over 70 were at the meeting. The trio had pleaded guilty to attempting to create a false belief that would call for action from police or emergency services. They were initially charged with aggravated burglary, which was downgraded to creating a false belief and downgraded further to attempting to create a false belief. In sentencing today, Judge Craig Astill said although the plan "clearly failed", they were trying to "create alarm" by making those at the AGM think there was a gas leak. "You were prepared to put the safety of others at risk," he told Mazza, Stolarski and Noakes. Speaking to Mazza, who's now 33, he said he'd "started to appreciate the way you have been doing things isn't the way to do it". But Judge Astill said he didn't think Mazza or the others were remorseful. And he said the differences in their contributions to the crime "were marginal".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store