India and Canada restore ambassadors as Modi and Carney look to turn page on assassination row
India and Canada are restoring ambassadors to each other's capitals as both countries appear content to move on from a diplomatic clash over the assassination of a Sikh activist on Canadian soil.
Canadian prime minister Mark Carney and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi met on the sidelines of the G7 and agreed that the two nations will name new high commissioners, as ambassadors are known between Commonwealth nations.
Mr Carney's office said they agreed to appoint new envoys to replace the ones both nations had withdrawn as the crisis grew.
The decision has been taken 'with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries,' the Canadian prime minister's office said in a statement.
The meeting took place despite protests against Mr Modi's visit to the country by members of Canada's Sikh community. Sikh protesters tore up Indian flags in downtown Calgary on Tuesday and showed posters of the Indian leader handcuffed, in a prison jumpsuit or behind bars.
New Delhi and Ottawa suffered a major breakdown in their bilateral relations in late 2023 after former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau accused the Indian government of direct involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh leader and Canadian citizen in British Columbia who advocated for the creation of a Sikh homeland – known as Khalistan – in India's Punjab region.
The dispute between the two nations worsened in October last year when both countries expelled a number of high-ranking officials. India was sent a diplomatic communication suggesting that the Indian high commissioner and other diplomats were 'persons of interest' in Canada's investigation into Nijjar's death.
Canada expelled six Indian diplomats, including India's high commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma, and consular officials from the country 'in relation to a targeted campaign against Canadian citizens by agents linked to the Government of India', said Canada's foreign affairs department, Global Affairs Canada.
The Indian foreign ministry retaliated by ordering the expulsion of six Canadian diplomats, including acting high commissioner Stewart Ross Wheeler, who was first summoned by India's External Affairs Ministry to protest Canada expelling Indian diplomats.
Canada was forced to suspend in-person services at all missions in India outside its embassy in New Delhi.
The Indian government has denied involvement in Nijjar's killing and accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists.
Symbolically turning a page on nearly two years of diplomatic enmity, Mr Carney and Mr Modi met on Tuesday in the scenic resort town of Kananaskis in Alberta in the Canadian Rockies, where they said they held a productive first bilateral meeting and that the talks between them had gone well.
Mr Carney said he hoped the meeting would "provide the necessary foundations to begin to rebuild the relationship, based on mutual respect, sovereignty, trust."
"I would describe it as foundational – as a necessary first step, a frank, open exchange of views around law enforcement, transnational repression," he said, speaking to reporters at a news conference.
Mr Carney also told Mr Modi that it was 'my great honour to have you here'. The Canadian leader eventually invited his Indian counterpart after mounting speculation in the Indian media that Mr Modi had been snubbed – in the event, Mr Carney said India was invited to attend due to its importance in global supply chains.
"Had an excellent meeting... India and Canada are connected by a strong belief in democracy, freedom and rule of law," Mr Modi said on X during his first visit to Canada in a decade.
India is Canada's top source of temporary foreign workers and international students, as well as an important market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Canada said it would stand up to Trump. Instead, it's taking cues from him
Steve Bannon calls it 'flooding the zone'. Donald Trump demonstrated it in his first weeks back in office, when he introduced over 100 executive orders. Regardless of their legal viability, the sheer volume of policy changes is the point. It is a political strategy to overwhelm institutions, courts and social groups, preventing effective opposition. In Canada, we are witnessing our own version of 'flooding the zone' from our new prime minister, Mark Carney, in coordination with provincial and territorial premiers. Carney is the former governor of the Bank of England. Prior to that, he was the governor of the Bank of Canada. He recently won the federal election by defeating a rightwing opponent Canadians feared would steer them too far towards Trump policies. Yet Carney's 'negotiations' with Trump have so far involved gentle reminders that Canada would never become the 51st state, as threatened by the US president, and capitulations to Trump's demand to strengthen our border security and increase defense spending. In reality, Canada is moving much closer to the authoritarian rule of Trump. Under the guise of 'elbows up' – a hockey reference calling on Canadians to fight back against Trump – massive corporate giveaways are taking place across the country. Characterizing Trump's tariff war as an emergency that demands drastic action, the province of British Columbia has passed Bills 14 and 15, expediting resource extraction and development. In Ontario, Bill 5 was whipped through the legislature in recent weeks, creating Special Economic Zones that the premier says will fast-track mining in the 'Ring of Fire' – a vast region of boreal peatlands rich in critical minerals. Federally, Carney has introduced an equally authoritarian legislative proposal called the Building Canada Act, which will grant to cabinet the extraordinary power to waive the application of almost any federal law in respect of projects it deems to be in the 'national interest'. He has also introduced omnibus legislation called the 'Safe Borders Act', which will weaken refugee protections and terminate potentially thousands of pending immigration permits and applications. Moreover, it is likely to be twined with the beefing up of police and border forces. Finally, the defense minister announced tens of billions of dollars in spending on new security infrastructure in line with Trump's new Nato priorities. These so-called 'emergency' levers being pulled in the national interest are a complete stunt. Besides a couple of thousand new security recruits – and a small surge of workers for an extremely short period of construction – there is no job creation here, no reduction in cost of living, no difference to Canadians at the grocery store. As ever, almost none of these dollars will 'trickle down' to the vast majority of people across the country. Moreover, the fast-tracking of resource extraction involves not only an assault on Indigenous jurisdiction and environmental regulations, but also on workers' rights and protections. Instead, let's look at who really gains from this concentration of new power in the executive branches, and who loses. In British Columbia, it's the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission line and Ksi Lisims LNG that's on the docket for approval at the moment. Its financial investors include Wall Street companies deeply embedded in Trump's inner circle. The Sisson Project in New Brunswick is operated by Northcliff Resources, which is mostly owned by the Todd Corporation based in New Zealand. New Brunswick recently brought the Sisson Mine back from the dead thanks to nearly $30m in cash to the project from both the Canadian and US governments. In Ontario, the Ring of Fire has been 'explored' by a number of companies, but it is primarily the privately held Wyloo mining company that stands to benefit from Ontario's decision in Bill 5 to exempt its Eagle's Nest mine from environmental assessment entirely. This – when combined with Ontario's bankrolling of the new all-season road through the peatlands that is necessary to get the minerals out – is a huge public subsidy to the company, owned by an Australian billionaire – cynically promoted as shoring up our national autonomy. Indigenous peoples across the country promise that this legislative bullying will generate a backlash of blockades and direct action on the land. To attempt to stem the damage, the Ontario government announced a $70m contribution to the Indigenous Participation Fund for First Nations to supposedly have more input in regulatory processes, and a tripling of the Indigenous Opportunities Fund, which provides loan guarantees to First Nations seeking to access financing to become proponents of resource extraction projects. The federal Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program has also been expanded to these same ends, doubling to $10bn. A common thread in this onslaught of new legislation is the creation of 'legal black holes' and the dangerous centralization of discretionary power federally within the privy council office and in provincial cabinet offices. Neither equity stakes nor more 'consultation' alter the balance of power in these startling new arrangements. What happens when these projects are contested, even despite extensive consultation and the availability of financing? If history is any indication, the needs of federal and provincial governments – citing 'critical infrastructure' for securing national interests – will surely take precedence over Indigenous rights. It is not only the tactic of 'flooding the zone' that is being replicated here, but the content of how the political emergency is being defined and solved. Who needs to become the 51st state when our own governments are ready to implement all the same policies of pillage and oligarchic power themselves? Shiri Pasternak is an associate professor in criminology at Toronto Metropolitan University. Dayna Nadine Scott is a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School and the Faculty of Environmental & Urban Change at York University. Both authors are members of the Infrastructure Beyond Extractivism research team, a collaboration between critical scholars and Indigenous land defenders across North America
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Family of UK embassy staff withdrawn from Israel as air strikes continue
The families of British diplomatic staff in Israel have been 'temporarily withdrawn' as Tel Aviv and Tehran continue to exchange fire. The Foreign Office said on Wednesday that family members of staff at the embassy in Tel Aviv and consulate in Jerusalem had been 'temporarily withdrawn as a precautionary measure'. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel, and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. Earlier in the week, Downing Street said the UK had no plans to evacuate British nationals stranded in Israel but had increased support in Jordan and Egypt for people making their own way out of the country overland. The decision to withdraw family members comes as Israel's air campaign against Iran entered its sixth day, with jets striking the Iranian capital Tehran overnight. Israeli military chiefs said the air strikes targeted a facility used to make uranium centrifuges, part of Iran's nuclear programme, and a factory building missile components. Tehran has accused Tel Aviv of attacking civilians, while a US-based group Human Rights Activists said on Wednesday that Israeli bombardment had killed 585 people in Iran, including 239 civilians. In response, Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel, killing at least 24 people. But its response appeared to diminish on Tuesday night, with only 10 missiles intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump is reported to be considering whether to deploy American forces in support of Israel's operations against Iran. Mr Trump met with top military advisers on Tuesday night to discuss the situation, shortly after a series of social media posts in which he described Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as an 'easy target'. The posts followed Mr Trump's decision to leave the G7 conference in Canada a day early to deal with what he called 'big stuff', triggering speculation that American forces might join Israeli strikes. Earlier, Sir Keir Starmer had insisted Mr Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved. In a statement on Monday, before Mr Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. British Typhoon fighter jets have also been deployed to the region, which Defence Secretary John Healey said on Tuesday was 'part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies'.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Carney comments on Trump leaving G7 early
He spoke as the gathering of world leaders in the mountain resort of Kananaskis finished without the traditional communiqué or an agreed statement on Ukraine. Asked at his closing press conference on Tuesday evening what it said for the G7 that Mr Trump decided to leave, Mr Carney replied that the President had an 'extraordinary' military crisis to manage. 'There was no problem,' he insisted. 'Mr Trump felt it was better to be in Washington, and I can understand that.' The Canadian PM was also challenged on why there had not been a joint statement on Ukraine signed by all seven leaders even though it had been one of the key topics of discussion and the war-torn country's President Volodymyr Zelensky had been invited to attend. Sources have claimed that the US opposed a joint statement on Ukraine while it tries to get Russia to agree to peace negotiations, while Mr Trump avoided meeting Mr Zelensky by leaving early. He pointed out that his 'chair's summary' at the end of the event stated: 'G7 Leaders expressed support for President Trump's efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' 'The language that's in my declaration, directly with President Trump, no adjustments, no adjustments from my fellow leaders,' Mr Carney said. Despite only attending the summit for a day, Mr Trump dominated the proceedings. He signed his trade deal with Sir Keir Starmer – but then dropped the documents on the floor and left the Prime Minister scrambling to pick them up. Mr Trump also raised eyebrows as soon as he arrived on Monday by saying it had been a mistake to remove Russia from what was the G8 a decade ago, and said it was 'not a bad idea' to add China to the group.
