USPS names new Postmaster General, Sen. Jon Ossoff issues statement
The Brief
David Steiner, FedEx board member and former Waste Management CEO, is set to become the next Postmaster General, sparking fears of USPS privatization.
Postal unions strongly oppose the appointment, citing conflict of interest. Sen. Jon Ossoff says he will review Steiner's record.
The Postal Service continues to face major financial losses, service gaps, and criticism over its 10-year modernization plan, Delivering for America.
ATLANTA - As the U.S. Postal Service enters a critical phase of transition and financial instability, the USPS Board of Governors has named David Steiner as the next Postmaster General, according to The Associated Press. The announcement was made Friday by Amber McReynolds, chairperson of the USPS' Board of Governors.
What we know
Steiner is the former CEO of Waste Management Inc. and currently serves on the board of FedEx, a direct competitor to the Postal Service in parcel delivery. While Steiner plans to resign from the FedEx board, his appointment has stirred widespread concern among postal workers and unions.
Amber McReynolds defended the selection, calling Steiner "the right person to lead the Postal Service at this time" and citing his "tremendous vision, experience and skill." She emphasized the board's intent to maintain USPS's universal service mandate while improving financial sustainability.
The appointment comes as USPS continues its 10-year modernization strategy, Delivering for America, launched under Louis DeJoy in 2021. DeJoy resigned in March following harsh criticism over mail delays and increased postage costs. The agency reported a $3.3 billion loss in the last quarter, though noted rising package revenue and falling transportation costs.
PREVIOUS: USPS Postmaster General Louis DeJoy resigns amid possible DOGE cuts, Georgia mail delays
What they're saying
Steiner said he was "honored to be asked to lead the world's greatest postal organization" and expressed support for the Postal Service's public mission. "I believe strongly in maintaining its role as an independent establishment of the executive branch," he said.
But union leaders are not convinced. Brian Renfroe, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, blasted the decision: "His selection isn't just a conflict of interest — it's an aggressive step toward handing America's mail system over to corporate interests." Renfroe's union represents over 200,000 active and retired letter carriers.
Mark Dimondstein of the American Postal Workers Union went further: "FedEx has a very different agenda than the public postal service. … That's the last type of person you would put in charge of this public institution."
Don Maston of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association urged Steiner to uphold the Postal Service's founding mission: "The Postal Service is not a business in the traditional sense — it is a national network that binds the country together."
Local perspective
Georgia has been especially hard-hit by ongoing mail delivery issues, and Sen. Jon Ossoff has been one of the most vocal critics of USPS leadership in Washington. In a letter to the Board of Governors, Ossoff said mail delays in Georgia have reached unacceptable levels, calling the agency's leadership "an abysmal failure."
"My constituents, and I cannot emphasize this strongly enough, are beside themselves at the consistent and recurring failure of USPS leadership to execute their basic mission in Georgia," Ossoff wrote.
Sen. Ossoff sent the following statement to FOX 5 Atlanta about Steiner's selection:
"I will review Mr. Steiner's record, but it's too early for me to pass judgment on his qualifications and how he'll approach the job. While I've urged the Board of Governors to move quickly, it's even more important that they get this right and that the next Postmaster General be up to the task."
USPS data released last month revealed Georgia's First-Class Mail service was 7.7% below the national average. Ossoff has also raised alarms about delays impacting Georgia veterans, including late prescription deliveries and missed VA appointment notices.
PREVIOUS STORIES
Sen. Jon Ossoff demands answers for mail delays affecting Georgia veterans
USPS postmaster general plans to step down, Georgia reaction
Georgia mail delays: Ossoff, Dejoy tangle during Senate hearing
Sen. Jon Ossoff seeks more control over postmaster general after mail issues
Ossoff: 'Further improvements' needed for Georgia's mail delays
By the numbers
Here's a breakdown of the numbers:
$78 billion: USPS annual operating budget
$3.3 billion: USPS loss last quarter
$2.5 billion: Considered "uncontrollable" expenses
220,000+: APWU members impacted by leadership changes
7.7%: Georgia's First-Class Mail service performance gap below national average
167 million: Number of addresses served by USPS
205,000: Letter carriers represented by NALC
The backstory
The Trump administration, with support from the Department of Government Efficiency led by Elon Musk, has floated ideas of USPS privatization or moving the agency under the Commerce Department. These moves, paired with the appointment of a private-sector executive from a competing company, have amplified fears that parts of USPS operations could be outsourced or dismantled.
McReynolds insisted the decision was made independently and that an international search firm, Egon Zehnder, conducted the executive search process. A statement from the board confirmed that the choice of postmaster general rests solely with the governors.
Why you should care
The Postal Service remains one of the country's most relied-upon public institutions, especially in rural areas and states like Georgia where broadband, pharmacies, and other services may be less accessible. With universal delivery hanging in the balance and privatization whispers growing louder, the agency's leadership will likely shape not just mail logistics, but public trust in one of the few services that still reaches every American.
Other Georgia Reaction
Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.) released the following statement on David Steiner's confirmation as the new United States Postmaster General.
"This change in leadership at USPS is long overdue. Georgians have been subjected to lost packages, poor customer service, and abject failure by the USPS for years," said Rep. Mike Collins. "It is my hope that under David Steiner's leadership, we can see a USPS that finally meets the needs of Georgians and fulfills its mission to our state and country. I'm looking forward to changes at the agency and will be following closely."
What's next
Steiner is expected to assume office in July, pending clearance. In the meantime, oversight from lawmakers like Sen. Ossoff will continue as pressure mounts to improve service performance. With the USPS at a pivotal crossroads, all eyes will be on whether the incoming postmaster can stabilize the agency without dismantling its foundational mission.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Three developers compete to redevelop two public housing complexes in Norfolk
A trio of developers showed off their portfolios to Norfolk residents and city officials Wednesday, hoping to land the chance to redevelop two of the city's deteriorating public housing projects. Earlier this year, the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority announced a timeline to submit redevelopment plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by the end of 2025. The process would tear down and replace the public housing complexes, which contain 1,056 units on 55 acres and were built in the 1950s. Construction could begin in 2027, according to a presentation from the housing authority. On Wednesday, three developers — Rhode Island-based Gilbane Development Co., New York's The NHP Foundation, and Georgia-based Paces Preservation Partners — presented their portfolios to the city in hopes of becoming the lead developer for Young and Calvert. The three firms boasted similar qualifications. All have experience redeveloping former public housing into mixed-income and affordable housing developments. All have experience with several types of financing structures. And both potential developers and and housing officials said they advocated for a build-first approach, where vacant units would be redeveloped first so current public housing residents could stay in their units and avoid displacement. Officials hope to avoid a repeat of the redevelopment of nearby Tidewater Gardens, where many residents were displaced and relied on Housing Choice Vouchers to find replacement housing in the region. Those residents and community groups later sued the city and the housing authority, arguing the entities failed to find adequate replacement housing. A 2021 settlement gave displaced residents more opportunities to move back to the redeveloped area. As new buildings opened, some residents moved back but others opted not to. Gilbane officials, who presented first, compared the redevelopment opportunity to Madison Yards, a huge mixed-use development in Madison, Wisconsin, that turned a government building into 270 apartment units, 608,000 square feet of office space, a hotel and more. 'We're very fortunate to be shortlisted for this amazing opportunity,' said Bobvala Tengen, a senior development manager with Gilbane. The NHP Foundation presented its work on the Park Heights master plan, a redevelopment plan for 17 acres of the Park Heights neighborhood in Baltimore. The NHP Foundation Senior Vice Present of Development Mansur Abdul-Malik said the redevelopment was a story of how the neighborhood was rising above disinvestment and a declining reputation. The community will include green buildings with solar panels, public art honoring figures from the nearby Preakness Stakes horse race and opportunities for home ownership, he said. 'We're building a place, a community,' Abdul-Malik said. 'Not just property.' Paces Preservation Partners officials said they would work with residents to help bring their needs to the new development. They showed off another Milwalkee redevelopment, Westlawn Gardens, that brought 958 housing units, a 10,000-sqaure-foot pharmacy and a 12,500-square-foot business incubator space to the city, along with community parks and gardens. 'My commitment to you all today is we will work for the betterment of the people in the city, full stop,' said Steven Bauhan, chief development officer for project partner The Paces Foundation. Norfolk officials have long sought to demolish three public housing complexes in the St. Paul's neighborhood near downtown and replace them with mixed-income housing. City Council members approved a plan in 2018, and began to demolish the 600-unit Tidewater Gardens in 2020. So far, two new apartment buildings are open and construction is ongoing on additional phases. Trevor Metcalfe, 757-222-5345,


News24
an hour ago
- News24
'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk
Trump says he is 'very disappointed' in Elon Musk after criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hits back on X, calling Trump 'ungrateful' and claiming he helped him win the 2024 election. Tesla shares drop 8% as public fallout between the two billionaires rattles markets. Tensions between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into public view on Thursday, as the US president said he was 'very disappointed' by his billionaire former aide's criticisms and Musk hit back in real time on social media. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after Musk slammed his tax and spending mega-bill as an 'abomination'. The world's richest man responded by live-tweeting on his X social media platform as Trump spoke on television, saying that the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming him for 'ingratitude.' Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 In an extraordinary rant as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sat mutely beside him, 78-year-old Trump unloaded on SpaceX and Tesla boss Musk in his first comments on the issue. 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump said when asked about Musk. The clash comes less than a week since Trump held a grand Oval Office farewell for Musk as he wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). South African-born Musk, 53, hit back minutes later, saying Trump's claims he had advance sight of the bill were 'false.' 'Whatever,' he added above a video of Trump saying Musk was upset about the loss of subsidies for electric vehicles. Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk then ratcheted up the public spat even further, saying the Republican would have lost the election without his support. He was the biggest donor to Trump's campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Tesla shares fell sharply on Wall Street, down 8%, after his comments, in a sign of the huge stakes for a falling out between the world's richest man and its most powerful. 'A little make-up?' A wistful-sounding Trump took reporters through the break-up with Musk on live television, in what at times sounded more like a therapy session than a meeting with a foreign leader. Trump talked about Musk's farewell appearance in the Oval Office on Friday, when he turned up with a black eye that he said was caused by a punch from his son. Musk, at the time, was also facing reports of drug use on the Trump campaign trail. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk, and even with the black eye. I said, you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup,' Trump said. 'But he said, 'No, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice. He wants to be who he is.' Trump said he could understand why Musk was upset with some of the steps he had taken, including withdrawing a nominee to lead the NASA space agency, which the tech tycoon had backed. Through it all, the visiting German chancellor sat silently. Merz had prepared to avoid a repeat of the ambushes that Trump unleashed on the Ukrainian and South African presidents in the Oval Office - but in the end it was Musk that the US president ambushed. At the center of the bitter row is Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending. The centrepiece of his domestic agenda, it aims to continue tax cuts from his first term - and could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Musk, however, called it a 'disgusting abomination' on Tuesday on the grounds that it will increase the US deficit. A day later, the magnate called for Republicans to 'kill the bill,' and for an alternative plan that 'doesn't massively grow the deficit.'


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.