'I'm concerned there's someone out there - there are a lot of missing cats'
She then noticed a small wound and took the animal to vet Sinéad Bennett, who recognised the type of injury from a previous case. It was then confirmed there was a pellet lodged in Candy's body, millimetres from the spine.
Fortunately, the nine-month-old is recovering. Insurance worker Leigh, 40, said she saw a similar wound on two-year-old pet Molly.
Another X-ray confirmed the presence of an air rifle pellet. Leigh, from Winton, Salford said: "I don't understand it. I thought the first one might be a child in the garden by accident.
"I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt, but I really am concerned now there's someone out there. There's a lot of missing cats around my area, I'm worried they're the unlucky ones.
"We found our nine-month-old rescue kitten Candy in the morning and she was acting really odd. That pellet had gone to within millimetres of her spine, she was very nearly paralysed. She probably wouldn't have been able to get home.
"Molly was probably hit first but she didn't show any signs because she's tough as old boots." Leigh, who has seven rescue cats, added: "I'm frightened... we don't know how to keep them safe.
"What if someone has got a cat and they don't realise it's a pellet wound? We don't know who's doing this."
Vet Sinéad said: "It's unthinkable that someone could deliberately harm such gentle and well-cared-for animals. We're deeply shocked but grateful we were able to help. The cats' owners are truly devoted and attentive people. These cats are their family.'
MCR Vets sai in a statement: "In a previous case seen by Sinéad a few years ago, a cat that had been shot went missing for seven days before its devastated owners found it collapsed under a hedge.
"The pellet had ruptured its intestines, causing widespread damage. By the time the cat was brought in, much of the bowel was no longer salvageable.
"The surgery was extensive and life-saving, but the outcome could have been tragically different. Without intervention, the cat would have endured a slow and extremely painful death."
The incidents have been reported to Greater Manchester Police. The Manchester Evening News has contacted the force for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kneecap rapper to appear in court for alleged support of terrorist group
A member of rap group Kneecap is due to appear in court for allegedly supporting a proscribed terror organisation. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year. Demonstrations in support of the rapper have been organised outside Westminster Magistrates' Court in London where he is due to appear on Wednesday, as well as in Dublin. The Metropolitan Police has imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court can take place on Wednesday, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. In response the rap group described this move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome' and 'asked supporters to go out of your way to be compliant with all instructions issued, irrespective of how pitiful'. O hAnnaidh received a rockstar welcome when he appeared at the same court in June, supported by fellow bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and J J O Dochartaigh. He was greeted by a festival-like atmosphere for his first court appearance, with dozens of fans waving flags, playing drums and one supporter setting off a smoke canister. The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, was a 'wholly different thing'. O hAnnaidh is yet to enter a plea to the charge.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Face-recognition tech will be used without bias at festival, Met boss says
The facial recognition technology deployed at this year's Notting Hill Carnival has "significantly improved" from previous years and will be used without bias, the Metropolitan Police has said. Met Police chief Sir Mark Rowley said the live facial recognition (LFR) technology will help locate any dangerous individuals attending the carnival over the August bank holiday weekend. He was responding to concerns raised by 11 groups, who in a letter to the commissioner claimed the technology was a "mass surveillance tool that treats all carnival-goers as potential suspects" and has "no place at one of London's biggest cultural celebrations". It also said that LFR technology was "less accurate for women and people of colour" in certain settings. Sir Mark said that when the technology was used at the carnival in 2016 and 2017, it "did not build public confidence", but has since "significantly improved" and now performs to a "much higher standard". He added that the force has selected the algorithm it uses "with care" and knows how to use it in a non-discriminatory way. The letter, signed by groups including Liberty and Big Brother Watch, said there is "no clear legal basis" for Scotland Yard's use of LFR. The letter added: "Notting Hill Carnival is an event that specifically celebrates the British African Caribbean community, yet the MPS (Metropolitan Police Service) is choosing to use a technology with a well-documented history of inaccurate outcomes and racial bias." Rebecca Vincent, interim director at Big Brother Watch, said she is "deeply disappointed" that the Met "has chosen to dig its heels in" after the call to scrap the "Orwellian" technology. She added: "We all want criminals off the streets, but turning (the) carnival into a mass police line-up is not the way to do it." Around 7,000 police officers and staff will be on duty each day throughout the weekend. Police will use LFR cameras to identify individuals listed as wanted in the national police database. Meanwhile, a UK retail facial recognition system has reported its highest-ever monthly total of suspect alerts, its operators say. Read more: Facewatch said in July 2025, it sent 43,602 alerts to subscriber retail stores - the equivalent of more than 10,000 suspects flagged every week for the first time. The figures also represent a 134.8% increase compared to July 2024. Facewatch reported a total of 407,771 alerts over the 12 months leading up to 31 July, with current live data indicating that the upward trend is continuing into August.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 10 Midlands towns and cities named 'most dangerous'
Areas across the Midlands have been named as some of the most dangerous places to live with Stoke-on-Trent coming in at number 31 nationally. Experts have looked at crime rates across the UK, ranking towns and cities according to how much crime happens there. The total number offences committed in one area will always see cities such as London and Birmingham top lists due to their populations. But looking at crime rates rather than the number of offences by taking into account population sizes can give a better insight into crime across the UK. READ MORE: The 'cruel' Stoke-on-Trent criminal who cropped dogs ears for £450 in 'vile' acts READ MORE: King Charles to address nation at 7.30am tomorrow in historic move Across the Midlands, Nottingham has the worst crime rate with 118.4 offences per 1,000 people in the year to March - and is ranked at 24 nationally. This is followed by Leicester with 117.6 offences per 1,000 people Birmingham is ranked 25th, with 117.3 offences per 1,000 people. Meanwhile, Stoke-on-Trent came in at number 31 with a rate of 114.1 offences per 1,000 people. The areas in the Midlands with highest crime rates Nottingham - 22nd nationally Leicester - 24th Birmingham - 25th Stoke-on-Trent - 31st Derby - 48th Wolverhampton - 50th Coventry - 68th Sandwell/Walsall - joint 73rd Chesterfield - 85th The areas in Staffordshire with highest crime rates Stoke-on-Trent - 31st Cannock Chase - 158th Tamworth - 163rd East Staffordshire - 173rd Stafford - 199th Newcastle-under-Lyme - 208th Staffordshire Moorlands - 246th Lichfield - 248th South Staffordshire - 276th Get daily headlines and breaking news emailed to you - it's FREE



