Cuban Has Resisted Presidential Run, but Says a Trump Third-Term Bid Could Draw Him Into the Race
What Happened: Cuban, who supported Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, has been speculated as a possible contender for the 2028 race. He said that his decision to run will be influenced by Trump's potential attempt at a third term.
Speaking on a recent podcast, Cuban said, 'I'm not going to do it. I've said the only way I would do it is if Trump tried to run for a third term. Because then that's just changing everything, right? And that's a true threat.'
Trump has previously hinted at Vice President JD Vance, as a possible successor, but has also flirted with the idea of a third term.
In another interview in early August, Trump stated, 'I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, a record that they say won't be beaten unless I run again.'
When probed about his plans to run again, Trump responded, 'No, probably not. Probably not.'
Also Read: Mark Cuban Says His Children Struggle With the Downsides of His Wealth: 'Not That They Want To Be Poor, But It Sets An Expectation'
Cuban also shared his apprehensions about subjecting his family to the strains of a presidential campaign, referring to the 'grief and abuse' that accompanies a run for president.
'But other than that, I'm not going to put my family through that, you know?' Cuban added. He further explained that with his three children, ages 15 to 21, he would rather avoid the "grief and criticism" that often comes with a presidential run.
'When I'm 95 and taking – or 105 and taking my last breaths, right? I don't want to say, 'Well, gee, I ran for president. Maybe won, maybe didn't,'' he continued.
Why It Matters: The potential of a third-term run by Trump could significantly alter the political landscape, prompting Cuban to consider a presidential bid.
Cuban's decision underscores the impact of Trump's political moves on potential candidates and the broader political discourse.
The billionaire's reluctance to expose his family to the rigors of a campaign also highlights the personal sacrifices often required in the pursuit of public office.
Read Next
Mark Cuban Once Questioned Whether Donald Trump Is Really a Billionaire
Image: Sam Navarro-Imagn Images
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Cuban Has Resisted Presidential Run, but Says a Trump Third-Term Bid Could Draw Him Into the Race originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
36 minutes ago
California Democrats' push for redistricting faces a tight legislative deadline
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California Democrats are making a partisan push to draw new congressional districts and reshape the state's U.S. House representation in their favor, but to pull it off, lawmakers returning to the Capitol on Monday face a tight deadline and must still win voters' approval. Limits on federal immigration raids and advancing racial justice efforts are also among the hundreds of proposals the Legislature will vote on before the session ends in September. Here's a look at what's ahead for lawmakers in their last month in session: Lawmakers are expected to spend the first week back after summer break advancing the new congressional map at the urging of Gov. Gavin Newsom. The new map aims at winning Democrats five more U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterms and is a direct response to President Donald Trump's efforts to redraw Texas' map to help Republicans retain their control of the U.S. House. So far, California is the only state beyond Texas that has officially waded into the redistricting fight, although others have signaled they might launch their own efforts. California Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers, unveiled the new map Friday. State lawmakers in both houses will hold hearings on the map and vote to put it to voters in a special election in November. If voters agree, the new map would replace the one drawn by an independent commission that took effect in 2022. The new map would only take effect if Texas or another Republican-led state moves forward with their own mid-decade redistricting and would remain through the 2030 elections. Democrats said they will return the map-making power to the commission after the next census. The current effort is to save democracy and counter Trump's agenda, they said. State Republicans vowed to legally challenge the effort, arguing that voters in 2010 already voted to remove partisan influence from how maps are drawn. State lawmakers are contending with how to balance meeting the state's climate goals with lowering utility and gas prices. Those discussions have been colored by the planned closures of two oil refineries that account for nearly 18% of the state's refining capacity, according to air regulators. The Legislature will have to respond to those concerns when it debates whether to reauthorize the state's cap-and-trade program, which is set to expire in 2030. The program allows large greenhouse gas emitters to buy allowances from the state equivalent to what they plan to emit. Over time, fewer allowances are made available with the goal of spurring companies to pollute less. A large portion of revenues from the program goes into a fund that helps pay for climate, affordable housing and transportation projects. The program also funds a credit that Californians receive twice a year on their utility bills. Newsom wants lawmakers to extend the program through 2045, commit $1 billion annually from the fund for the state's long-delayed high-speed rail project and set aside $1.5 billion a year for state fire response. Many environmental groups want the state to update the program by ending free allowances for industrial emitters, ensuring low-income households receive a higher credit on their utility bills, and ending or strengthening an offset program that helps companies comply by supporting projects aimed at reducing planet-warming emissions. Lawmakers will vote on a host of proposals introduced in response to the escalation of federal immigration crackdowns in Los Angeles and across the state. That includes legislation that would make it a misdemeanor for local, state and federal law enforcement officers to cover their faces while conducting official business. The proposal makes exceptions for officers wearing a medical grade mask, coverings designed to protect against exposure to smoke during a wildfire, and other protective gear used by SWAT officers while performing their duties. Proponents said the measure would boost transparency and public trust in law enforcement while also preventing people from trying to impersonate law enforcement. Opponents, including law enforcement, said the bill would disrupt local undercover operations without addressing the issue because California doesn't have authority over federal agents. Another proposal would require law enforcement to identify themselves during official business. State Democrats are also championing several proposals that would limit immigration agents without warrants from entering school campuses, hospitals and homeless or domestic violence shelters. A first-in-the-nation state task force released a report in 2023 with more than 100 recommendations for how the state should repair historic wrongdoings against Black Californians descended from enslaved people. The California Legislative Black Caucus introduced a reparations package last year inspired by that work, but the measures did not include direct payments for descendants, and the most ambitious proposals were blocked. The caucus introduced another package this year aimed at offering redress to Black Californians. One of the bills would authorize universities to give admissions priority to descendants of enslaved people. Another would ensure 10% of funds from a state program providing loans to first-time homebuyers goes to descendants. A third would allow the state to set aside $6 million to fund research by California State University on how to confirm residents' eligibility for any reparations programs. Some reparations advocates say the proposals fall short. They say many of the measures are ways to delay implementing one of the task force's key recommendations: direct compensation to descendants of slavery.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Secret White House spreadsheet ranks US companies based on loyalty to Trump
Donald Trump has drawn up a scorecard for corporate America, ranking companies based on their loyalty to his administration. The highly unusual list ranks 533 businesses and trade organisations based on their efforts to champion the US president's 'one big beautiful bill', according to reports. Companies that have fared well deployed a variety of tactics – often trumpeting the benefits of an individual policy, such as Uber's celebration of Mr Trump's 'no tax on tips' proposal. The scorecard, which Axios said will aid decision-making on corporate requests, comes as part of Mr Trump's 'America First' agenda and protectionist policies. The chart allegedly ranks enterprises' levels of support as either strong, moderate or low based on a series of factors. Actions that affect a company's rating are said to include social media posts, adverts, press releases, video testimonials, attendance at White House events and other engagements related to 'OB3' – the administration's nickname for the president's set-piece tax and spending legislation. According to Axios, businesses seen as 'good partners' on the White House list include DoorDash, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Uber, AT&T, Cisco, Airlines for America and the Steel Manufacturers Association. AT&T recently announced 'plans to more quickly build fiber infrastructure thanks to pro-investment policies in the one big beautiful bill act passed by Congress'. Meanwhile Airlines for America – which represents major US airlines including United and Delta – lauded the bill's $12.5bn (£9.2bn) investment in air traffic control. The spreadsheet is said to be an evolving document, to which businesses' support for other presidential initiatives can be added. The ranking 'helps us see who really goes out and helps vs those who just come in and pay lip service,' an official told the news outlet. 'If groups/companies want to start advocating more now for the tax bill or additional administration priorities, we will take that into account in our grading,' the official added. It is not clear which businesses rank low on the list but those likely to have taken a hit may include clean energy companies, who heavily criticised the bill's rollback of green incentives. Mr Trump has also clashed with Wall Street in recent weeks. The president this week hit out at David Solomon, the Goldman Sachs chief executive, saying the bank had been wrong to predict that imposing US tariffs would hurt the US economy. Posting on Truth Social, Mr Trump said the investment banker should focus on being a DJ – one of his former hobbies – and 'not bother running a major financial institution'. The president has also butted heads with the leaders of JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America, claiming the banks had refused to accept more than $1bn in deposits. Mr Trump has signed an executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political grounds, in a move that could cause further headaches for the industry. The White House has made public a parallel list tracking the so-called Trump effect, referring to announcements of investments in US manufacturing, production and innovation during the president's second term. It comes as the president is increasingly seeking to exert control over corporate America through protectionist measures, offering tax relief to businesses that bring jobs back to the US and threatening to impose tariffs on those that do not. Business leaders have scrambled to pay homage to the president, offering the US government stakes in their companies and even bestowing personal gifts on the president in a bid to avoid sanctions. Last week, US chip manufacturer Nvidia agreed for the US government to take 15pc of the company's revenues generated in China as part of an agreement to restart exports to Beijing. The unprecedented pact came after Mr Trump barred sales of Nvidia's H20 technology in China earlier this year to boost his tit-for-tat trade war with Beijing, wiping billions of dollars from the $4tn company's value in the process. Tim Cook, the Apple chief executive, last week agreed to invest $100bn in American manufacturing after the president pledged to impose 100pc tariffs on foreign microchip imports. The tech giant's commitment to US manufacturing – as well as Mr Cook's gift of a glass plaque with a 24-carat gold base – earned the company a reprieve from Mr Trump. The president said: 'If you've made a commitment to build (in the US), or if you're in the process of building (in the US), as many are, there is no tariff.'
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
U.S. Marshals arrest Maryland man who hit D.C. cop with ATV
Metropolitan Police Department cars are parked near their headquarters in Washington, D.C. on Friday, August 15, 2025. U.S. Marshals on Saturday arrested a man accused of hitting a MPD officer with an ATV in March. The arrest, according to the U.S. Marshals, is part of President Donald Trump's federal takeover of the capitol's law enforcement. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 18 (UPI) -- U.S. Marshals arrested a 30-year-old man in Maryland over the weekend as part of President Donald Trump's federal takeover of Washington, D.C.'s law enforcement, saying he is accused of assaulting a Metropolitan Police Department officer in March. Gerard Stokes was arrested by members of the U.S. Marshals Service Special Operations Group and the Capital Area Regional Fugitive Task Force at 6:15 a.m. Saturday in Greenbelt, Md., the U.S. Marshals Service said in a Sunday statement. Authorities accused Stokes of hitting an MPD officer with an ATV on March 14. Police said the officers attempted to contact a group operating ATVs and dirt bikes near a gas station in the nation's capital. As the uniformed officers approached, "Stokes accelerated his ATV, raised the front tires in the air and aimed it toward the officers," the U.S. Marshals Service said. "One officer was able to move out of the way of the oncoming ATV, the other officer was struck head on by the ATV and drug approximately 15 feet across the gas station lot by Stokes who then fled the scene without stopping." The injured officer, who was transported to WHC Medstar, is still recovering from his injuries, the service said, adding that he has not returned to full duty. A July 15 search of Stokes' listed home in Greenbelt produced multiple rifles, shotguns, pistols and 720 rounds of 5.56 ammunition, authorities said. Stokes has a criminal history of robbery, aggravated assault and carrying a pistol without a license with a large capacity magazine. "This apprehension during this public safety surge proves that we are making a difference by getting ruthless and dangerous criminals off the street," U.S. Marshals Service Director Gadyaces Serralta said in a statement. According to the Marshals Service, the arrest is part of Trump's federal crackdown in the nation's capital. Trump earlier this month signed an executive order declaring a crime emergency in D.C. The American president has mobilized the district's National Guard for policing and Attorney General Pam Bondi has installed the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as the temporary police chief of the MPD. The federal takeover of D.C. is being challenged in courts and in the streets, where thousands protested nationwide over the weekend.
