Washington cements ‘high-capacity' magazine ban in landmark ruling
This story was originally published on MyNorthwest.com
The Washington Supreme Court has upheld the state's ban on high-capacity firearm magazines, reversing a lower court's previous decision.
The law was first passed in 2022, making it illegal to buy or sell magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. However, people who already own 'high-capacity magazines' can keep them, according to The Seattle Times.
In a 7-2 majority opinion, Justice Charles Johnson stated that large-capacity magazines (LCMs) are not considered 'arms' under constitutional definitions and are not necessary for self-defense. Six national gun rights groups had filed separate briefs during the lawsuit, hoping the Supreme Court would kill the ban.
Currently, 13 other states have similar bans on high-capacity magazines. The fight over the ban began in 2023 when the Cowlitz County Superior Court ruled that it violated both state and federal constitutional rights. Gator's Custom Guns, a Kelso-based gun retailer, argued that the state's ruling was not consistent with longstanding firearm traditions.
Former Attorney General and current Governor Bob Ferguson has previously voiced support for the ban. He claims that siding with the lower court's interpretation could threaten the state's broader authority to regulate guns, such as AR-15s and fully automatic weapons. He claimed that imposing 'sensible limits on military-style guns' is non-exclusive with the constitutional right to self-defense.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fewer than 1 in 4 Colorado voters support Medicaid cuts
(Stock photo by) Just 21% of Colorado voters want Congress to decrease Medicaid spending, according to a poll released Tuesday. Concerns about gutted health care access come as U.S. Senate Republican leaders work to push through a tax and spending bill that would cut Medicaid by an estimated $625 billion over the next decade. The poll zeroed in on the 8th Congressional District, which includes the northern Denver metro area and parts of Weld County. In the district, where 1 in 4 residents receive Medicaid benefits, 63% of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The 8th District is represented by Republican Gabe Evans, who voted in favor of the plan that would reduce federal Medicaid spending when it was brought to the U.S. House of Representatives in May. A spokesperson for Evans defended the vote, saying a proposed provision to institute part-time work requirements for some people to retain Medicaid eligibility would make 'the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse.' 'Congressman Gabe Evans has been steadfast in his support of protecting Medicaid for the vulnerable populations it was created to serve — pregnant women, kids, and disabled people,' said spokesperson Delanie Bomar in a statement Tuesday. Evans, who was elected to the House last year, represents one of the country's few congressional swing districts. According to the poll, 42% of voters in the district want to see increased federal Medicaid spending, 20% want it to stay about the same and 28% want it to decrease. Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for lower-income people and some with disabilities, serves more than 70 million U.S. residents. The poll of 675 registered Colorado voters was conducted by Broomfield-based firm Magellan Strategies on behalf of the nonprofit Healthier Colorado. It has a margin of error of 3.7%. 'Politicians are saying that they want to cut Medicaid to make it better, but the poll shows clearly that voters aren't buying what they're selling,' said Jake Williams, CEO of Healthier Colorado. 'It shows that there's real political peril for any candidate who votes to cut Medicaid.' Bomar pointed to the poll's findings that many respondents, especially those who are Republicans or unaffiliated, said Medicaid 'should only be for U.S. citizens or legal residents, with some calling for stricter eligibility enforcement.' Immigrants who are in the U.S. unlawfully are not eligible for federal Medicaid benefits, but Colorado and 13 other states provide some state-funded coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status. Under the proposed federal cuts, an estimated 7.8 million people, most of them citizens or lawful residents, would lose access to Medicaid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Some of the main reasons cited in the poll by respondents who said they have favorable opinions of Medicaid are the benefits it provides to low-income Coloradans, seniors, children, people with disabilities and single parents. 'The poll shows that Medicaid cuts would have devastating effects for both our health and economy here in Colorado,' Williams said. 'I also think it shows that Colorado voters aren't dummies.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SBC reassert opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling
DALLAS − The Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution supporting a concerted effort to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage approaches its 10-year anniversary. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination at its annual legislative assembly in Dallas is another step in the evangelical Christian group's focus on opposing LGBTQ+ rights. That intensified focus is a shift from abortion, which was long the fixation of SBC resolutions prior to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The 2022 overturning of Roe emboldened many within the Nashville-based SBC to then hope for the same with the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage. Resolutions are non-binding statements expressing the convention's views on social and cultural issues. Other resolutions at past SBC annual meetings have reasserted Southern Baptist opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, though this year's resolution was the most forceful articulation of their rebuke of the Supreme Court precedent protecting same-sex marriage. 'Legal rulings like Obergefell v. Hodges and policies that deny the biological reality of male and female are legal fictions, undermine the truth of God's design, and lead to social confusion and injustice,' the resolution said. Southern Baptist delegates, called messengers, overwhelmingly approved the measure. Whether the latest vote will move the needle on gay marriage remains to be seen. Last year, the SBC passed a resolution condemning the use of in-vitro fertilization, only to see President Donald Trump sign an executive order earlier this year seeking to protect IVF access and reduce its out-of-pocket and health plan costs. Reversing the Obergefell ruling is one of numerous issues related to sex, gender and marriage encompassed by the resolution. Among other things, the resolution affirms that there are only two genders, defines marriage as between a man and a woman, says families are designed for procreation and that human life is sacred 'from conception to natural death.' A strongly traditionalist voice in the SBC, Denny Burk, proposed the language in the resolution that messengers ultimately approved. Burk is the president of Louisville-based Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an advocacy group that was behind two well-known, cross-evangelical statements opposing LGBTQ+ rights. The first statement was the Danvers Statement in 1987 and the second was the Nashville Statement in 2017. 'It is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness,' the Nashville Statement said, which stirred widespread local controversy upon ratification. 'Approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.' The new resolution approved by the SBC is another iteration of the Nashville Statement, but more forcefully attacks the U.S. jurisprudence protecting the LGBTQ+ rights that evangelicals oppose. Liam Adams covers religion for The Tennessean, part of the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at ladams@ or on social media @liamsadams. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Southern Baptists call for repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
US extradites ISIS supporter who planned Oct. 7 mass shooting at New York Jewish center: DOJ
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice on Tuesday extradited an ISIS supporter living in Canada who had been caught planning a mass shooting attack on a Jewish center in New York that would have coincided with the first anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack. Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, 20, tried to travel from Canada to New York City on Sept. 4 in preparation to carry out the horrific attack on New York Jews – but was caught just short of the US border, according to the Department of Justice. Khan, also known as 'Shahzeb Jadoon,' was charged with attempting to provide material support and resources to ISIS. 5 Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, 20, tried to travel from Canada to New York City on Sept. 4 in preparation to carry out the horrific attack on New York Jews. Quebec Superior Court A plane carrying Khan, originally of Pakistan, touched down in the US on Tuesday afternoon, one day ahead of his scheduled first appearance on the charges before a US court. 'He planned to use automatic weapons to kill as many members of our Jewish community as possible, all in support of ISIS,' US Attorney Jay Clayton said in a statement Tuesday. 'Khan's deadly, antisemitic plan was thwarted by the diligent work of our law enforcement partners and the career prosecutors in this Office who are committed to rooting out antisemitism and stopping terror.' 'Thanks to their efforts, Khan will now face justice in New York.' US Attorney General Pam Bondi said Khan's case serves as a reminder that ISIS is still attempting to target Americans. 5 Bondi said Khan's case serves as a reminder that ISIS is still attempting to target Americans. US Court for the Southern District of New York 'The foreign terrorist organization ISIS remains a clear and present danger to the American people, and our Jewish citizens are especially targeted by evil groups like these,' Bondi said. 'The Department of Justice is proud to help secure this extradition, and we will prosecute this man to the fullest extent of the law.' Khan began sharing ISIS propaganda videos and expressing his support for the terror group in social media posts in 2023, according to the federal complaint. 5 Khan began spreading ISIS propaganda through social media in 2023. US Court for the Southern District of New York Khan was caught after he told undercover FBI agents that he and another ISIS supporter based in the US were plotting attacks on Jewish centers in America and were seeking assault rifles and other materials to make them happen, the Justice Department said. 'During subsequent conversations, Khan repeatedly instructed the [undercover agents] to obtain AR-style assault rifles, ammunition, and other materials to carry out the attacks, and identified locations … where the attacks would take place,' the DOJ wrote in a summary of the crime. 'Khan also told the [agents] that he had identified a human smuggler who would help him cross the border from Canada into the United States for the attack.' 5 Khan was caught after he told undercover FBI agents that he and another ISIS supporter based in the US were plotting attacks on Jewish centers in America. US Court for the Southern District of New York Khan also said in the messages that 'Oct 7th and oct 11th are the best days for targeting the jews' because 'Oct 7 they will surely have some protests and oct 11 is yom kippur,' according to the complaint. 'New york is perfect to target jews,' he wrote, because it has the 'largest Jewish population In america' and therefore, 'even if we dont attack a[n] Event[,] we could rack up easily a lot of jews.' 'We are going to nyc to slaughter them,' he said, sending along a photo of a targeted location, which has not been disclosed. 5 Khan also said in the messages that 'Oct 7th and oct 11th are the best days for targeting the jews.' US Court for the Southern District of New York Using three separate vehicles, Khan began driving to the US but was stopped around Ormstown, a town in the Canadian province of Quebec that is about 12 miles from the US border, federal authorities said. If convicted, Khan faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The case is being handled by the Manhattan federal prosecutor's office.
