logo
New Mexicans without Real IDs rush to MVDs as real deadline nears

New Mexicans without Real IDs rush to MVDs as real deadline nears

Yahoo27-04-2025

A woman stomped out of the Santa Fe field office of the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Division on Friday morning, cursing and clutching a thick folder.
About an hour later, another man slammed through the front door of the office in a similar fashion.
They had both been told the same thing: They didn't have the right documentation and — even worse — they were going to have to make another visit to the office after collecting the right documents.
The clock is ticking.
Congress passed the Real ID Act in 2005, setting stricter identity verification requirements for driver's licenses and other identity documents used for federal purposes as a security measure in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. After years of setting and then delaying deadlines for Real ID enforcement, the federal government has warned the current deadline of May 7 is the official date when possession of the more secure identification cards will be required to board an airplane and enter federal facilities.
As the date approaches, some in New Mexico have been scrambling to gather their documents to get the cards. The requirements to verify one's identity are more stringent than those for driver's licenses in the past, requiring various approved records that provide proof of identity, age, Social Security number and residence.
Tasked with handling frustrated visitors at the office in recent weeks has been the agency's bureau chief, Ricardo Rodriguez, who on Friday morning was greeting people at the door in a suit.
He said sometimes people have documents with first and last names that don't match, which means they have to show other records — such as a marriage certificate, divorce decree or court order — that provide a clear trail to account for that. The most common issue, he said, is that people come in thinking they have everything they need and they're missing a document.
'Most people are understanding, and their visit goes smoothly,' Rodriguez said. 'But there are cases like that where they just bring mail and feel that it's going to be acceptable, or they think if they're angry enough that we're just going to go ahead and accept it. We can't do that, because we have to follow, you know, statute.'
Rush for Real ID
Across the state, the division's offices have been handling an uptick in customers.
The division issued more than 51,000 Real IDs in March, compared with about 36,000 in March 2024, according to data provided by the state Department of Taxation and Revenue. Last week, Motor Vehicle Division field offices were set to serve about 2,000 more people than they did the previous week.
While the average wait time statewide is four to five minutes, according to the agency, that average has increased to eight minutes in recent weeks.
Rodriguez said it has felt like 'going from zero to 100' in the past few weeks at offices in the region.
He believes the numbers of people will continue to increase in the coming weeks, right up until — and possibly even after — the deadline.
About 80% of drivers and other ID-holders in New Mexico already have Real IDs, Taxation and Revenue Cabinet Secretary Stephanie Schardin Clarke said in an interview, which means 20% — or about 300,000 New Mexicans — still don't.
'We have to keep in mind that some of them don't want a Real ID, don't need a Real ID or maybe aren't eligible to receive a Real ID,' Schardin Clarke said. 'Some subset of those 300,000, though — we need to make sure we reach them and make sure they're aware. We don't want them to be caught by surprise.'
She said her department has stepped up outreach to make sure New Mexicans know about the Real ID deadline in the final stretch, including news conferences, social media campaigns and ads.
Unlike some other states — such as Texas — New Mexico is continuing to offer standard driver's licenses as well for those who might not want or need to get a Real ID.
She noted there are some who have a passport and might not need or want a Real ID, some who have another type of identification — such as a military card — that will be accepted by the federal Transportation Security Administration, and others, such as immigrants without proof of lawful residency, who can receive a state-issued 'standard license' but are not eligible for a Real ID.
'We don't really have any way to break down that number,' Schardin Clarke said. 'But when someone comes into our office, we make sure they're aware, and we offer them both the Real ID and the standard driver's license, and then they choose which one to proceed with.'
She encouraged people to 'really spend some time looking at our website and making sure that your documents are fully compliant before you come in.'
'We don't want you to spend your time coming in and for us only to say the documentation you brought in today doesn't make you eligible,' she said.
Schardin Clarke pointed out anyone who is getting their Real ID at the last minute won't necessarily have to wait for it to come in the mail to use it if they opt for a mobile driver's license. The mobile IDs can be added to a digital wallet after an application has been approved, and TSA agents accept them.
Most flyers have Real IDs
A news release from the TSA earlier this month stated people who do not present compliant identification such as a Real ID or a passport at airport security beginning on May 7 'can expect to face delays, additional screening and the possibility of not being permitted into the security checkpoint.'
There were 10 people waiting for flights inside the terminal of the Santa Fe Regional Airport on a recent afternoon, and all of them had Real IDs. Most had renewed at some point in recent years and opted for the Real ID, although a few weren't sure if they had a Real ID or not until looking at their license and seeing the star in the corner.
An airport security agent said most people who pass through her line already have Real IDs. She estimated about 10% don't, and she said she reminds those people about the coming deadline.
A sign posted in front of the walk-through metal detector reminds flyers about the May 7 deadline, asking, 'Are you Real ID ready?'
The airport's security manager, Jimmy Gunn, said the agency's officers would have discretion over handling passengers without Real IDs, but he said the additional screening process involves calling a hotline to verify each person's identity individually, which can be time-consuming. In other instances, the verification process has taken up to 30 minutes per person, he said.
While frequent flyers have regularly faced reminders over the Real ID deadline for years now, he said, the occasional infrequent flyer — or someone who has a 10-year driver's license and hasn't had to renew in years — could cause delays for everyone.
'That's what these guys are worried about,' Gunn said, referring to the airport's security guards. 'We're small — we don't get that much traffic, but like the [Albuquerque] Sunport or these bigger airports, it could slow them way down.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC News suspends Terry Moran after journalist slams Donald Trump, calling him 'world-class hater'
ABC News suspends Terry Moran after journalist slams Donald Trump, calling him 'world-class hater'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ABC News suspends Terry Moran after journalist slams Donald Trump, calling him 'world-class hater'

ABC News has suspended veteran correspondent Terry Moran after he wrote a late-night social media post criticizing President Donald Trump and his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller. In the since-deleted Saturday night X post, Moran slammed Miller, saying he's "a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred," and called President Trump a "world-class hater." A spokesperson for ABC News confirmed Miller's suspension to Entertainment Weekly on Sunday. "ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others," the spokesperson said. "The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation." According to screenshots shared on social media, Moran's since-deleted X post read: "The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism. Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy. But that's not what's interesting about Miller. It's not brains. It's bile." He continued, "Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate." He then addressed the president, writing, "Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred [is] only a means to an end, and that end is his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment." Though Moran deleted the post soon after sharing it, he was swiftly and harshly condemned by Trump administration officials, including Miller, who argued that the "public meltdown" will inspire further distrust when it comes to "corporate press in America." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt weighed in as well, publicly calling for ABC to discipline Moran. "Last night, in a since-deleted post, so-called 'journalist' @TerryMoran went on a rampage against Stephen Miller and called President Trump 'a world-class hater.' This is unhinged and unacceptable," she wrote on X. "We have reached out to ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable."Later, on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Leavitt added, "Hopefully this journalist will either be suspended or terminated." Moran — who landed a rare Oval Office interview with Trump in April — has been with ABC News since 1997, covering major events including the Iraq war, 9/11, and multiple presidential elections. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'

The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts
GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Congressional Republicans are gearing up for a major test of how easily they can lock in cuts sought by President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he aims to have the House act swiftly on approving Trump's request for more than $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. That package is expected to hit the floor this week. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters. Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The request kick-starts a process that would allow Republicans to claw back funds for a list of programs on the administration's chopping block with just a simple majority in both chambers. That means Republicans wouldn't require Democratic votes in the Senate if they can stay mostly unified in greenlighting what's known as a rescissions package. But it's been decades since Congress has approved such a request to yank back funds previously greenlighted by lawmakers. Trump tried to use the same process to rescind funds in his first term but was unsuccessful, despite Republicans controlling the House, Senate and White House at the time. Republicans are bullish that this time will be different, however. '[Trump's] done this before, and they've got a great team, I think, in place,' Cole said. 'They've thought about these things a lot in the time in between his first and his second term.' 'They just seem to me to be much more sure-footed, and there's no question, the president has much more influence inside the Republican Party than he had during his first term,' Cole added. Still, some Republicans have expressed concerns about parts of the request. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) voiced opposition last week to cutting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), saying Wednesday that the idea makes 'no sense' to her 'whatsoever.' 'Given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives, it has literally saved millions of lives, and so I do not see a basis for cutting it,' she said. And not all Republicans are thrilled by the proposed cuts to public broadcasting in the plan, which calls for rescinding $535 million in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff.' However, Simpson said he still intends to support the overall package. 'I don't think in the long run, the rescissions are going to hurt them, because we're talking about the advanced appropriations and stuff like that.' 'What they're concerned about is, and should be, is the next year's appropriation process and stuff,' he continued. On its website, DOGE estimates that it's racked up $180 billion in savings as of June 3 through a combination of efforts like asset sales, contract cancellations and renegotiations, 'fraud and improper payment deletion, grant cancellations' and workforce reductions. And White House budget chief Russell Vought signaled further special requests to lock in more DOGE cuts could be on the way when pressed on the matter during a budget hearing last week, particularly as the administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the government have been tangled up in courts. But he also said it's 'very important' for this first package of cuts to pass, adding, 'If it does, it'll be worth the effort and we'll send up additional packages.' 'We are very anxious to see the reception from a vote standpoint in the House and the Senate,' Vought said, though he added, 'I'm less concerned about the House as I am in the Senate.' Some Republicans see the package introduced this week as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. In a statement promoting the package on the social platform X, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) on Friday touted the president's request as cutting '$9.4 BILLION in wasteful spending' while holding 'bureaucrats accountable to the American people.' The package would target dollars for items like migration and refugee assistance that the administration says support activities that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts they say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions. Funding would also be eliminated for the United Nations Children's Fund, U.N. Development Program and the U.N. Population Fund under the proposal, as well as the World Health Organization and 'portions of the U.N. Regular Budget for the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.' Democrats, meanwhile, have come out in strong opposition to the plan, accusing Trump of seeking political retribution and undermining foreign assistance efforts. They've also signaled trouble down the line when it comes time for both sides to negotiate a funding deal for fiscal 2026 — when Democratic support will likely be necessary to keep the government open in early fall. 'It's going to make it very difficult for us to do bipartisan bills if we believe that he's just going to send rescissions over for whatever they want or don't want in a bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill this week. 'They need Democratic votes.' There's been some GOP frustration over the administration's handling of the annual funding work as well, as lawmakers on both sides have pressed the White House for more information about its budget plans in recent weeks. 'If we're getting to the point where we are right now, where we have a [funding stopgap], where we don't really have spend plans that are meaningful, now we have the administration transferring to the Congress their desires with rescission,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a senior appropriator, said. 'I don't want to be a committee that no longer has a purpose. The role that we play is significant.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store