
B.C. falling behind other provinces on affordable child care, report finds
"It's astronomical," she told CBC News. "And nowhere close to the promised $10-a-day daycare, which the NDP has been saying for years would be coming our way."
She and her husband have spent years hunting for one of those coveted $10-a-day spots, which right now make up just over 10 per cent of the 160,000 licensed child-care spaces in B.C.
"I have found frustration and disappointment and an overall lack of care spaces in the City of Surrey," she said.
That's because Surrey has a lower proportion of $10-a-day sites compared to Vancouver. Surrey has 760 $10-a-day child-care spaces, while Vancouver has 3,800.
WATCH | Advocates say B.C. failing at $10-a-day child care:
Child-care advocates say B.C. is failing to provide $10-a-day spaces
19 days ago
Duration 2:01
B.C.'s minister of education and child care admits there is more work to do when it comes to affordable child-care options. As Amelia John reports, advocates have accused the province of failing on its commitment to universal $10-a-day spaces.
Rhea Hubbard, a director at Alex House, a non-profit organization that runs $10-a-day sites in Surrey, says the disparity is partially caused by the high number of for-profit private child-care centres in Surrey.
The B.C. government has prioritized non-profits in awarding $10-a-day subsidies. Hubbard, who works on non-profit child care with the Surrey Child Care Task Force, would like to see more government grants to help non-profits in Surrey establish new child-care spaces.
Kemp says she's frustrated the B.C. government has passed over private centres for $10-a-day subsidies, because parents desperate for a child-care spot will take the first option available to them.
"It makes me incredibly frustrated. I don't feel that other cities should have substantially more than Surrey has."
WATCH | Report reveals B.C. lagging behind rest of Canada on child care:
New report finds B.C access to affordable child care worst in the country
9 hours ago
Duration 2:36
A new report finds that B.C. is the worst-performing province when it comes to access to affordable child care spaces, with five of its cities topping the list for the most expensive median child care fees in the country. As CBC's Katie DeRosa reports, one Surrey mother says she feels like the province has abandoned its $10-a-day child care promise.
A new report from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives finds that despite leading the way on affordable child care five years ago, B.C. is now falling behind other provinces.
B.C. is "the worst performing province or territory in the entire country," said David Macdonald, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives who co-authored the report.
Out of 35 major Canadian cities, the report says five B.C. cities had the most expensive infant child-care fees.
Topping the list was Richmond with median fees of $46 per day, followed by Surrey, Vancouver, Burnaby and Kelowna.
Macdonald says B.C. has created a two-tier system with 10 per cent of parents receiving $10-a-day child care and others paying up to five times that.
"We now have six provinces and territories that are at or below $10-a-day for all spaces. Not just for a few spaces in select cities," Macdonald said.
Those six are Nunavut, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador, which have met or improved upon the government's 2026 target for $10-a-day child care, the report finds.
WATCH | Child care fees in Surrey among most expensive in Canada:
Surrey child-care fees some of the most expensive in Canada, survey finds
16 hours ago
Duration 7:14
An annual survey by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives on the federal child-care plan shows Surrey is failing to meet the $10-a-day target. Rhea Hubbard, who works on non-profit child care with the Surrey Child Care Task Force, says things are so hard, getting a $10-a-day spot is "like winning the lottery" for parents.
The report finds that median child-care costs are lower in provinces where the government has imposed fee caps.
For example, 12 cities in Ontario have median daily fees of $22 a day due to a new fee cap imposed by Doug Ford's government. And in five cities in Quebec, parents are paying slightly less than $10 a day.
Sharon Gregson, spokesperson for the Coalition of Childcare Advocates, says she's disappointed to see the NDP stall on the universal $10-a-day child-care promise that was a marquee plank of the party's 2017 and 2020 election platforms.
"Our provincial government has not only not lived up to its own promises. It's moved B.C. from being a leader to the back of the pack," Gregson said.
Education and Child Care Minister Lisa Beare was not available for an interview.
Her office said in a statement the report doesn't tell the full picture, failing to account for a key subsidy for lower- and middle-income families, which has lowered child-care fees by up to $1,250 a month for more than 35,000 children.
Another government subsidy — the Child Care Fee Reduction Initiative — has reduced fees by up to $900 a month at more than 144,000 spaces.
"The vast majority — 96 per cent — of licensed spaces are enrolled in either of these two programs," Beare said in a statement. "There are more than 17,000 $10-a-day ChildCareBC spaces and we're on track to meet our spring 2026 target of 20,000 spaces."
Kemp, the Surrey mom, says a fee cap model similar to Ontario's would be "fantastic." She would also like to see more transparency on how B.C. selects $10-a-day sites to level the playing field so that where you live doesn't determine how much families pay for child care.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
19 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney heads to Hamilton to meet steelworkers as U.S. trade talks continue
OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to be in Hamilton today to make an announcement related to the steel industry. It has been more than a month since U.S. President Donald Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum from 25 to 50 per cent, adding further economic insult to the two industries in Canada. Carney met with his cabinet virtually on Tuesday and told reporters before that meeting he doesn't think Trump will agree to any trade deals without including some tariffs. Carney will tour a steel company in the city and meet with workers during his visit to Hamilton. Carney and Trump have been negotiating a new economic and security pact since early May and last week Trump unilaterally pushed the deadline for reaching that from July 21 to Aug. 1. He told Carney in a letter on July 10 Canada will be hit with 35 per cent tariffs that day, with the White House saying the current plan is for that to apply only to those Canadian imports not covered under the existing Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Carney says negotiations with the U.S. are likely to intensify as that Aug. 1 deadline approaches. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 16, 2025.


Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, July 16: ‘Do Canadian businesses need more tax incentives and even lower tax rates than they already enjoy?'
Re 'Canada must match the tax incentives in Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' ' (Report on Business, July 10): Say what? Do Canadian businesses need more tax incentives and even lower tax rates than they already enjoy? Canadian businesses owe tens of billions of dollars in unpaid, uncontested taxes each year, and this debt to the public is growing. Moreover, Canada is already the king of corporate welfare: Its spending is among the highest in the developed world relative to population and GDP, and it has grown much faster than in most other major economies. This stands in stark contrast to Canada's comparatively low investment in social programs, setting it apart from European peers who prioritize social spending over business subsidies. Notably, business subsidies in Canada have increased by 140 per cent at the federal level since 2014. Calls for further tax breaks ignore the already generous environment Canadian businesses enjoy and the mounting public cost. Timothy Kwiatkowski London, Ont. Re 'The small-bore view of oil-pipeline critics' (Editorial, July 11): Experts at garden hose use are well aware that having an extra bucket at the ready is indeed an essential strategy. At some stage, however, there should be a run to the tap to mitigate the flow. It is fine to suggest pipeline investors are the ones to shoulder the risk, but such risk extends well beyond their pockets and into the lives of future generations. Peter Tobin Ottawa It was the Alberta NDP and federal Liberals who permitted and built the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. It was the B.C. NDP and federal Liberals who permitted the Coastal GasLink pipeline and LNG Canada export plant. And it may very well be the federal Liberals who permit and possibly build another oil pipeline to the West Coast – this time to one of the safest locations for an oil terminal in Prince Rupert – and a pipeline to a liquefied natural gas plant in Quebec. The antagonism, especially in Alberta, against Ottawa, Liberals and 'leftist radicals' feels little more than a divisive ruse to mislead a gullible sector of the public by power-seeking right-wing groups. Let's not go down a Trump-like path. Mike Priaro Calgary Re 'Money to burn' (Letters, July 9): The letter sounding the climate change alarm, and expressing distress about the state of the world our grandchildren will inherit, resonated with me. Since Prime Minister Mark Carney stated in his victory speech, 'It is time for ambition,' and that Canadians 'need to think big and act bigger,' then is this not the time to go full bore on decarbonization? Climate change is upon us with a vengeance, adversely impacting our air quality, lifestyles as well as our mental and physical health. The time to push the green agenda, not more oil and gas infrastructure, is now: The alarm bells are clanging! Our descendants are depending on us to get it right. L.H. MacKenzie Vancouver Re 'More money for Canada's military should mean more transparency and accountability' (Opinion, July 11): I am no economist. However, it seems quite clear that boosting spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 means that it has to happen over a possibly longer horizon than has been laid out, and we must aggressively grow the economy, hence revenues, or else taxes will have to be increased, the size of the civil service diminished, and program spending reduced. So let's get real and get to work as it's not possible to have your cake and eat it, too, and most importantly, Canadians know this. Desmond Pouyat Toronto I note many articles lately concerning Canada's proposed military budget. What about forming a firefighting army around military principles, which can be complete with a contingent of appropriate planes, helicopters and boots on the ground that can be rapidly deployed in numbers anywhere needed? Perhaps during our winters, they could be sent elsewhere to fight, and in doing so, will go some length to resurrect that Canadian reputation of providing willing, selfless assistance to those in need, even south of the border should fires break out there. Creative redeployment of our current firefighting expenditure in favour of this army would solve many problems. Evan MacDonald Markham, Ont. Re 'Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan CEO shakes up the fund's top leadership' (Report on Business, July 10): By my count, four women were promoted to new positions and one man was replaced. What's that sound I hear? Is that a glass ceiling exploding? Peter Shier Toronto Re 'Alberta to ban books deemed sexually explicit from school libraries' (July 11): Raise a hand if you think the books in school libraries are too 'sexually explicit.' That's what I thought. Teach students how sex works, then let them read the library books – all of them, before they are purged for whatever reasons that are embarrassing to Alberta school officials. Sex is normal and natural. That's how we all got here. Know about it. Do it. Get on with life. I really don't know why adult humans are so embarrassed by sex. Kathleen Moore EdD Toronto Re 'The very courageous six-year-old learning to ride a bike for the very first time' (July 10): When my six-year-old daughter told me she had ridden a friend's bicycle, I was skeptical. When my second daughter was the same age, I saw her get on a friend's bike and just ride it. No problem. Puzzle, solution: They'd both spent a lot of time riding scooters. They'd learned the body language of riding on two wheels. Riding a bicycle? No problem. Barbara Shaw Cambridge, Ont. I remember the bike stage for both our children very clearly. The best advice I can offer parents training their kids on first rides is this: Take the pedals off and put them on the shelf, then make sure the kids can touch the ground. It is also best to use a bike with handlebar brakes rather than pedal coaster brakes. (Forget training wheels: They only prop kids up and don't actually give them a sense of balance.) Push the kids slowly, in small increments; they very quickly learn balance. Soon they push off and go 50 metres coasting. My son and daughter were riding by the next day. Put the pedals back on and kids will combine their coasting with pedal motions. Brian Layfield Oakville, Ont. Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@


CBC
20 minutes ago
- CBC
City wants its departments to 'tighten the belt strings' as Windsor starts work on its budget
Windsor taxpayers will get a first glimpse of next year's taxes when city council meets in two weeks. And the city's treasurer warns it'll be a challenging budget that once again asks departments to put forward some options that could see internal budgets cut between 5 and 10 per cent. "We're sending the message that we do have to tighten the belt strings," said Janice Guthrie. "The mitigating measures we have put into place, some of those are drying up, so we are going to have to look deep." Councillors and taxpayers were shocked last summer when warned of a potential 12.9 per cent tax hike because of budget pressures. But that number went down after administration combed through some recommended service enhancements and cut costs. Council eventually passed a 3.07 per cent hike after losing the fight to save the city's tunnel bus service to Detroit, which Mayor Drew Dilkens decided to cut. Guthrie told council she'll bring forward a high-level budget report on July 28. "I can tell you the pressure this year was not as large as it was last year, but it's not far off," said Dilkens. "I'm not saying we're breathing a sigh of relief. We still made a commitment. I made a commitment to bring the budget in at or below the rate of inflation. That's still my goal." Dilkens will not be splitting council into public budget committees this year to search for savings like he did in 2025. "I spoke to every member of council and most of them actually said they didn't find it that helpful," he said. Guthrie has asked city departments — as well as agencies, boards and commissions that are funded with taxpayer dollars — to bring forward recommendations that cut costs by 5 to 10 per cent. That's been a standard practice for city departments in recent budget years, but it's new for the agencies, boards and commissions like Windsor Police Service, the Windsor airport and the library. "Are we sending the wrong message if we're pegging that at 5 and 10 per cent reductions?" Coun. Jo-Anne Gignac asked Guthrie during Monday's council meeting. Guthrie said it's a useful practice to outline where the pressures are, which can be used to ask Ottawa and the province for more money. "I think we have to ask for potential budget cuts just as city departments are subject to those cuts. I think we have to take a look at it now. It may not be something that will be recommended," said Guthrie. "And not necessarily in terms of service cuts, but perhaps alternative service, making sure that one of the messages is that we cannot continue to operate without support from upper levels of government." Holding the line 'extremely challenging' She said with inflation and tariffs, it will be difficult to run the city the way taxpayers expect at a cost they can afford. City staff warned council last year that holding the line on taxes at or below inflation has been an "extremely challenging process." "It is no longer possible to find sufficient savings within the city-controlled budgets to offset the annual budget increases without a significant impact to existing municipal services," wrote David Soave, a member of Windsor's budget staff, after the 2024 budget process. City staff expect to table the budget in the first week of 2026.