What does the world's first AI worm mean for you?
The Creeper program is generally considered the world's first computer virus. Born as an experiment in 1971, it infected computers and slowed operations to a crawl. Reaper was the world's first antivirus, designed to destroy it.
The battle has waged on ever since.
There was the Brain virus from 1986, which spread through floppy disks and flashed alarming messages of infection on home computers (while also slowing them down). Then came the Morris Worm, a self-replicating program created at Cornell University, as part of an unofficial experiment, in 1988. It swept the world, slowing computers down to such a degree that a single email could take days to send.
Fast-forward to 2024, and a new beast has emerged, from a joint experiment conducted by Cornell, the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology and the software company Intuit. Named Morris II, it is being called the world's first generative AI worm.
The self-replicating bug has shown the ability to spread rapidly through AI-powered email, and target generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
The way it creeps around is quite sinister. It essentially hides, somewhat like a shadow, in common chatbot and AI assistant prompts. When this prompt is issued by a generative AI model, and accepted by a user, it triggers a shadow instruction alongside. The shadow prompt may instruct the AI program to hand over data, alter code, or help the worm itself replicate.
Additionally, any time such a prompt is used to create an email or other such output, the worm spreads seamlessly to every recipient of that content.
Morris II isn't out there prowling yet. Researchers Ben Nassi, Stav Cohen and Ron Bitton created it in a controlled environment for the same reason many of their predecessors did this: to highlight levels of risk, and raise an alarm.
The really alarming thing, this time around, is that the worm may wreak its damage invisibly, without the user ever knowing it was there. It could also potentially 'learn' as it goes, finding new ways to infiltrate systems, and evade detection.
In a report released in April, cyber-security company Check Point Software has already noted that AI-driven malware could exploit vulnerabilities in real time, making traditional signature-based antivirus tools nearly obsolete.
This cat-and-mouse game isn't new. Traditional worms such as WannaCry, the ransomware that first appeared in 2017, cost billions in damages across hospitals, banks and governments, in this way. But AI raises the stakes
Track and shield
Unsurprisingly, security firms are already racing to harness AI to outsmart AI. Amid this race, consultancy firm McKinsey estimates that cybersecurity solutions, which companies around the world spent about $150 billion on in 2021, could soon be a market worth as much as $2 trillion.
Among the weapons emerging on the good side, in this battle, are virtual private networks or VPNs. In addition to anonymising a user's web-browsing data and providing a layer of security for information sent and received, companies such as ExpressVPN, Proton and Nord are evolving to offer clients solutions that will protect not just smartphones and computing devices but also smart TVs, appliances and home systems.
ExpressVPN, for instance, rolled out an 'AI shield' late last year that uses artificial intelligence to predict and neutralise zero-day exploits (which is when a new bug or vulnerability in a system is exploited, in the hours before it is fixed).
Traditional antivirus companies are responding to the shifting landscape too. Market leaders such as McAfee and Norton are working to provide advanced AI-led protection against AI-led threats, with a special focus on text messages, phone calls, email and web browser use.
We aren't at the point of dos and don'ts yet. It is still unclear what the threats may look like. But watch this space. It will pay to know all you can.
Because this time, it may not even take a click from you to change your world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
What does the world's first AI worm mean for you?
The Creeper program is generally considered the world's first computer virus. Born as an experiment in 1971, it infected computers and slowed operations to a crawl. Reaper was the world's first antivirus, designed to destroy it. The battle has waged on ever since. There was the Brain virus from 1986, which spread through floppy disks and flashed alarming messages of infection on home computers (while also slowing them down). Then came the Morris Worm, a self-replicating program created at Cornell University, as part of an unofficial experiment, in 1988. It swept the world, slowing computers down to such a degree that a single email could take days to send. Fast-forward to 2024, and a new beast has emerged, from a joint experiment conducted by Cornell, the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology and the software company Intuit. Named Morris II, it is being called the world's first generative AI worm. The self-replicating bug has shown the ability to spread rapidly through AI-powered email, and target generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini. The way it creeps around is quite sinister. It essentially hides, somewhat like a shadow, in common chatbot and AI assistant prompts. When this prompt is issued by a generative AI model, and accepted by a user, it triggers a shadow instruction alongside. The shadow prompt may instruct the AI program to hand over data, alter code, or help the worm itself replicate. Additionally, any time such a prompt is used to create an email or other such output, the worm spreads seamlessly to every recipient of that content. Morris II isn't out there prowling yet. Researchers Ben Nassi, Stav Cohen and Ron Bitton created it in a controlled environment for the same reason many of their predecessors did this: to highlight levels of risk, and raise an alarm. The really alarming thing, this time around, is that the worm may wreak its damage invisibly, without the user ever knowing it was there. It could also potentially 'learn' as it goes, finding new ways to infiltrate systems, and evade detection. In a report released in April, cyber-security company Check Point Software has already noted that AI-driven malware could exploit vulnerabilities in real time, making traditional signature-based antivirus tools nearly obsolete. This cat-and-mouse game isn't new. Traditional worms such as WannaCry, the ransomware that first appeared in 2017, cost billions in damages across hospitals, banks and governments, in this way. But AI raises the stakes Track and shield Unsurprisingly, security firms are already racing to harness AI to outsmart AI. Amid this race, consultancy firm McKinsey estimates that cybersecurity solutions, which companies around the world spent about $150 billion on in 2021, could soon be a market worth as much as $2 trillion. Among the weapons emerging on the good side, in this battle, are virtual private networks or VPNs. In addition to anonymising a user's web-browsing data and providing a layer of security for information sent and received, companies such as ExpressVPN, Proton and Nord are evolving to offer clients solutions that will protect not just smartphones and computing devices but also smart TVs, appliances and home systems. ExpressVPN, for instance, rolled out an 'AI shield' late last year that uses artificial intelligence to predict and neutralise zero-day exploits (which is when a new bug or vulnerability in a system is exploited, in the hours before it is fixed). Traditional antivirus companies are responding to the shifting landscape too. Market leaders such as McAfee and Norton are working to provide advanced AI-led protection against AI-led threats, with a special focus on text messages, phone calls, email and web browser use. We aren't at the point of dos and don'ts yet. It is still unclear what the threats may look like. But watch this space. It will pay to know all you can. Because this time, it may not even take a click from you to change your world.
The Hindu
21 hours ago
- The Hindu
Decoding the link between neuropsychiatric disorders and periodontal health
A new study has established a definitive link between neuropsychiatric disorders and dental health. This research represents a major milestone in modern medical diagnostics, unveiling the potential of salivary biomarker profiling as a non-invasive and highly predictive tool for disease detection. With this study, researchers have successfully demonstrated that changes in salivary Vitamin D and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) levels can serve as a dual diagnostic marker, effectively detecting both periodontal disease and neuropsychiatric conditions. The findings herald a potential shift in how healthcare professionals can approach disease prevention, diagnosis, and management—bridging the gap between oral health and mental well-being. What the study found Traditionally, periodontal disease has been diagnosed through clinical examinations and radiographic imaging, whereas neuropsychiatric disorders have relied on subjective assessments of symptoms. However, this study redefines disease detection by providing an objective, biochemical-based, and non-invasive diagnostic approach through saliva analysis. Researchers from the Department of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, conducted the study, which involved a comprehensive evaluation of neuropsychiatric patients from various tertiary medical centres, ensuring a diverse and clinically relevant patient population. A structured psychiatric assessment was conducted using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to categorise patients based on their psychological well-being. This tool effectively screened for somatic symptoms, anxiety, social dysfunction, and depression, allowing researchers to correlate mental health status with dental diseases through biological markers. Two biological markers, namely Vitamin D and BDNF, were quantified from saliva. Researches in the past have reported that vitamin D helps keep bones strong, supports the immune system, and protects brain health, while BDNF is important for nerve cell growth, brain function, and memory. The study revealed that these two markers are connected, and play a role in both mental health and oral health. The following key findings emerged: Correlation between psychological distress and salivary biomarkers: Patients with high GHQ-28 scores, indicating severe mental distress, had low levels of BDNF and Vitamin D in their saliva, reinforcing the hypothesis that systemic inflammation and neuronal health are intrinsically linked. Increased oral inflammation was seen with further depletion of salivary BDNF and Vitamin D, suggesting that dental diseases may aggravate mental illness. The study further confirmed that salivary BDNF and Vitamin D markers can serve as effective, non-invasive indicators for both periodontal and neuropsychiatric disease risk, allowing for early-stage intervention and prevention of both oral and neurological diseases. These findings reinforce the concept that oral and mental health are intricately connected, demanding an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to disease prevention and treatment. Towards a unified healthcare model This study paves the way for the future of healthcare, where dental, psychiatric, and systemic health professionals can collaborate to provide comprehensive, patient-centred treatment strategies. Some of these can include: Integration of salivary biomarkers into routine screening: Encouraging dental and psychiatric professionals to adopt salivary biomarker screening for dual disease detection. Personalised healthcare approaches: Merging biomarker-driven diagnostics with lifestyle-based interventions to improve treatment outcomes. Public health implications: Leveraging this study's findings to develop nationwide screening programs, particularly for high-risk populations such as individuals with chronic stress, metabolic disorders, and immunocompromised conditions. A holistic approach In addition to biomarker-based diagnostics, the study advocates a holistic approach to health, emphasising the role of lifestyle interventions in the prevention of dental and neurological diseases. Researchers have also worked on the effect of yoga practices and meditation on oral diseases and further highlighted the importance of yoga practices as powerful adjuncts in managing both mental and oral health. Yoga has been shown to reduce oxidative stress, enhance immune function, and regulate inflammatory pathways, which are crucial for both periodontal and mental health. It promotes better circulation, oxygenation, and tissue healing, which may aid in periodontal regeneration. Scientific evidence also suggests that meditation increases BDNF levels, improving cognitive function and emotional resilience. It plays a key role in stress modulation and reducing cortisol levels, which are implicated in periodontal tissue destruction and mental distress. Chronic stress and anxiety have been identified as major risk factors for both periodontal disease and neuropsychiatric disorders. Practicing yoga and meditation helps in balancing the autonomic nervous system, reducing pro-inflammatory responses, and improving oral hygiene behaviours. Based on these findings, future healthcare approaches should include early dental check-ups and preventive care, and must incorporate yoga and mindfulness practices, to improve both oral health and mental well-being. The path ahead This research represents a significant advancement in healthcare, changing the way oral and mental health are understood, diagnosed, and treated. By using saliva-based markers, personalised treatment approaches, and holistic wellness strategies, this study offers a new and innovative path toward better healthcare. As global research continues to unravel the systemic connections between oral and mental health, this pioneering study sets a new standard for future interdisciplinary investigations. The implementation of biomarker-driven diagnostics, coupled with evidence-based wellness practices, holds immense potential in creating a healthier, more resilient population. (Dr. Jaideep Mahendra is professor and head, department of periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. Email: jaideep_m_23@
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
How To Find Planet B, And Get There Alive
Earth will have a meltdown. What are our options? Tardigrades are little critters that were around before dinosaurs, and will eventually outlast us on Earth. They are so tough they can survive exposure to -272°C (cooler than liquid helium) and 150°C, which is quite a bit hotter than your pressure cooker. And Earth will be hotter than that in a few hundred million years – not entirely because of your car's tailpipe emissions. As our Sun grows older, it will expand, making Earth hot like Venus with its middle-age spread. So, we should start planning our escape now. But where can we go? Lisa Kaltenegger's book Alien Earths has useful pointers for wannabe galactic hitchhikers. As the founding director of Carl Sagan Institute at Cornell University, Kaltenegger is an authority, but she's got no recommendations, yet. Ideally, you wouldn't want to travel too far because you are – as The Matrix's Agent Jones put it – 'only human'. How long will you live – 100, 120 years? Unless you hit Star Trek's fantastical 'warp speed' – faster than light – you can't go far in that time. Voyagers 1 & 2 left Earth in 1977, and they won't get close to another star for 40,000 years. So, space travel's a bummer. Besides, space is mostly empty. Looking out the window will mean death by boredom. Step on the gas, and a 1mg speck of space dust could destroy your ship. So, speed and time are not on your side. Worse, your choice of space rock is a gamble. You have chosen it based on signs like the signature of its light, which tells you something about temperature on the planet's surface and the materials you'll find on it. Say, everything's perfect, and this planet circles our Sun's nearest neighbour, Proxima Centauri, which is about 40tn km away. You gather bag, baggage, family, and everything else that Moses took, and set sail on your ark. But…that light signal from Proxima took four years to reach Earth. Your data was already four years old. By the time you get there – cryofrozen, probably – in, say, 40,000 years, that planet may have ceased to exist. What then? The choice of your future home is complicated by other factors also, Kaltenegger shows. Maybe you're looking too hard for an Earth-like planet and missing some gems. You want oxygen? Earth had precious little in its atmosphere till cyanobacteria appeared over 2bn years ago. They could split water, use hydrogen and free up oxygen. That's how oxygen increased in air. If Earth formed at 12am, atmospheric oxygen touched 15% concentration only at 10pm. And now, a few seconds before midnight, it's at 21%. So, by looking for ready oxygen, you might miss some good candidate planets. Likewise, searching only for a planet with green plants might be a mistake. Plants on Earth are green because sunlight is strong and they absorb its red and violet wavelengths, while reflecting the green. But on a liveable planet around a red star – whose light has less energy – plants may need to absorb all the available light. Hence, their leaves could appear black! Our next 'Earth' will definitely need some getting used to. There's so much to figure out and fix. But we can't do that if we make this Earth unlivable in the next decade or two. Have you checked your car's tailpipe emissions? Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
