Cathay Cineplexes gets fresh demands to pay up $3.3m debt for Century Square, Causeway Point outlets
Cathay Cineplexes has three weeks to pay the full amount, or to secure or compound the above sums to the reasonable satisfaction of the landlord.
SINGAPORE – Embattled cinema chain Cathay Cineplexes has received more repayment demands – this time, a sum exceeding $3.3 million in rental arrears and for other items, owed to the landlords of its outlets at Century Square and Causeway Point.
These include two statutory demands received on July 15 for the payment of $86,142.31 and $643,064.36 owed for the lease of its Century Square outlet.
A third statutory demand was received the same day for the sum of $2.6 million, owed for the lease of its Causeway Point outlet, said its parent company, mm2 Asia, in a bourse filing on July 16.
Cathay Cineplexes has three weeks – by Aug 5 – to pay the full amount or to secure or compound the above sums to the reasonable satisfaction of the landlord, Frasers Centrepoint Trust.
If the cinema chain fails to comply, it shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts under the provisions of the Singapore Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, the company said.
mm2 and the Cathay Cineplexes board said they are seeking legal advice, and intend to engage with Frasers to explore all available options. This announcement comes shortly after the company received a statutory demand for $7.6 million from Linkwasha Holdings on July 9.
The amount owed was related to a loan Linkwasha extended to mm2, for the media company to partially finance its acquisition of the cinema chain from Cathay Organisation.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA
Singapore 2 weeks' jail for man caught smuggling over 1,800 vapes and pods into Singapore
Singapore Jail for man who fatally hit his daughter, 2, while driving van without licence
Singapore Primary 1 registration: 38 primary schools to conduct ballot in Phase 2A
Singapore ComfortDelGro to introduce new taxi cancellation, waiting fee policy
Singapore Here comes the sun: Less rain, more warm days in second half of July
Singapore Instead of overcomplicating COE system, Govt has ensured affordable transport for all: SM Lee to Jamus Lim
Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict
Linkwasha, a related entity of Cathay Organisation, extended a loan of $30 million to mm2, for the acquisition worth $230 million.
As at the date of the statutory demand, mm2 said it had repaid most of the loan, and that the outstanding amount, including interest, was $7.6 million.
On July 2, the cinema chain received a statutory demand from the landlords of its shuttered outlet in Jem shopping mall,
asking that it pay up arrears of around $3.4 million by the end of the month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
In Singapore, you don't just buy a car—you compete for the right to own one
SINGAPORE: 'Singaporeans are the most entitled people in the world. And we have the Certificates of Entitlement (COEs) to prove it.' Most probably said in jest, this remark recently caused a stir on LinkedIn, triggering insightful reactions from citizens across the city-state. Underneath the humour is a multifaceted, emotional discussion about how a small city-state manages one of its most prickly issues: car ownership. In the 'pressed-for-space' Singapore, roads aren't just about movement and flexibility; they compete with businesses, parks, homes, and public spaces. The question isn't whether Singapore can build additional highways, but whether it should. That's where the COE system comes in. Why cars come with certificates In 1990, Singapore instituted the Certificate of Entitlement system—a market-based allocation mechanism that requires potential automobile owners to bid for the right to own and use a vehicle for ten years. The objective is to limit the number of automobiles on the road and avoid the kind of urban gridlock that can be witnessed in capitals like Jakarta. Despite all the infrastructure development over the years, the Lion City just doesn't have the physical space for everyone to drive. And so, Singapore opted for guidelines over pandemonium. See also Jamus Lim Shares Heartwarming Hari Raya Wishes and Family Moments 'It's doing what it's designed to do' Detractors of the COE system frequently cite spiralling prices as an indication of a fragmented system. But defenders contend that this is exactly the point. The high cost of COEs discourages unwarranted car possession and guarantees that traffic stays controllable. In this interpretation, the system isn't a failure, but a complete success. As one commenter puts it: 'An open bidding system for a limited number of COEs means some people will be priced out. That's not a flaw. That's the function.' A question of fairness Still, the 'fairness' question is huge. Opposition MP Jamus Lim recently expressed concerns about the COE system's transactional character, saying that 'those with genuine needs may not have the purchasing power to meet those needs.' Several online users echoed the sentiment: 'Shouldn't a middle-class family in need of a car for school runs and groceries have greater priority than a billionaire buying their third Bentley?' 'Maybe,' the commenter acknowledges, 'but the billionaire isn't driving all three Bentleys at once.' If the objective is to lessen the number of cars on highways — not to produce a seamlessly impartial society — the system functions as envisioned. If we're responding to 'fairness,' then yes, the model may need an about-turn. But designing for fairness is not simple. As former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong once said, there are 'so many good arguments' for exclusions—infirmities, elderly family members, job requirements—that any system attempting to account for all would rapidly become unfeasible. Is there room for improvement? Some commenters provided suggestions: -A distinct COE grouping for families with young children or those taking care of elderly parents; -Higher COE tiers for the affluent possessing numerous automobiles—reflecting Singapore's liberal property tax structure; -Inducements for individuals who oblige themselves to limit their car use. -More investment in independent ride-hailing options that can be summoned on demand, reducing the necessity of personal ownership overall. One commenter asked, 'Isn't it also about pollution? Why allow billionaires so many cars when climate change is real?' Another mentioned how Singapore's Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system, soon to become more cutting-edge with satellite monitoring, is now a vital tool in handling road usage. See also Photos go viral -- WP MPs-elect at Istana and in Parliament The role of public transport What many netizens agreed on was the superiority of Singapore's public transport system. 'Sometimes taking the MRT is faster than a car in Singapore,' one commenter hooted, comparing it with what they went through on Jakarta's MRT. Undeniably, Singapore's transport system is top-notch. Perhaps that's the reason why the city's car-lite strategy has functioned better than most. Parroting Enrique Peñalosa, former mayor of Bogotá, one contributor reminded us: 'A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It's where the rich use public transportation.' Entitled or enlightened? Are Singaporeans 'entitled,' or just wrestling with an intensely multifaceted problem that impacts daily life, flexibility, family planning, and financial choices? As the feisty discussion on LinkedIn showed, there's no single answer. What's evident is that the COE system is more than just a mechanism for traffic administration. It's a mirror—reflecting the pressures between impartiality and competence, sustainability and ease, autonomy and regulation. Singapore may not have found the picture-perfect equilibrium yet. But at least, it's having the conversation.
CNA
5 days ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Is the cinema scene dead in Singapore?
Cathay Cineplexes operator mm2 Asia could cease its cinema operations in Singapore, due to ongoing financial challenges. What could this mean for the cinema scene here? Lance Alexander speaks with Dr Jinna Tay, Senior Lecturer, Communications And New Media, NUS.
Independent Singapore
6 days ago
- Independent Singapore
Will Cathay Cineplexes soon bid its final farewell amid millions in debt?
Photo: Google Maps/Ivan Lim SINGAPORE: Cathay Cineplexes may soon bid its final farewell, with owner and operator mm2 Asia announcing it is evaluating 'all available options'—including winding up the cinema business—to address the millions of dollars in financial challenges it is facing. In a bourse filing on Thursday (July 17), mm2 Asia said, 'The Group has been committed towards the continued operation of its cinema business in Singapore. However, such commitment requires the support from its landlords, which has not been meaningful despite the difficult operating environment for cinemas and the wider retail industry over the past years caused by, amongst other things, the COVID-19 pandemic.' Channel News Asia (CNA) reported that in the last three years, Cathay Cineplexes has closed six outlets across Singapore, including its West Mall outlet in February. Only four are still operating today. Before announcing its West Mall outlet closure, mm2 Asia received letters of demand from landlords of its Century Square and Causeway Point outlets, seeking S$2.7 million in unpaid rent and other costs . That figure has since risen to over S$3 million. More demands have come in this month. The landlord of its former Jem outlet is seeking around S$3.4 million in rental arrears, while Linkwasha Holdings is demanding repayment of S$7.56 million from a S$30 million loan Linkwasha provided in 2017, which helped fund mm2 Asia's acquisition of Cathay Cineplexes from Cathay Organisation. The company said that while it has repaid its loan over the years, the outstanding amount is now due by July 28. In a separate bourse filing on Wednesday (July 16), the company also proposed to extend the maturity date of a S$54 million bond deal originally due December 29, 2025, to December 30, 2031. mm2 Asia said it is reviewing all options in light of its recent receipt of various statutory demands and outlined three possible paths forward: To continue negotiations with Cathay Cineplexes' landlords with the aim of restructuring existing obligations consensually To pursue a scheme of arrangement under a court-supervised process to restructure the cinemas' debts while keeping operations running Or to pursue the winding up of Cathay Cineplexes In February, Cathay Cineplexes launched its 'Save Our Screens' campaign in a bid to keep its cinemas running. However, the move drew flak from cinema-goers who faced issues using their vouchers. mm2 Asia said it would make further announcements should there be any material developments regarding legal demands or lease-related matters. 'Shareholders are advised to exercise caution when dealing in the securities of the company and to refrain from taking any action in relation to their shares which may be prejudicial to their interests,' it added. /TISG () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
