Village of Kronenwetter voting hours extended to 9 p.m. due to 'technical issues'
KRONENWETTER − Voters in the village of Kronenwetter will have one extra hour to vote Tuesday after a court-ordered extension following delays due to technical issues earlier in the day.
Marathon County Clerk Kim Trueblood and Kronenwetter Village Clerk Jennifer Poyer filed a petition for an extension earlier in the day, 'after technology issues caused significant delays at the Kronenwetter Municipal Center,' according to a release from the Marathon County Clerk's Office.
Polling site officials switched to paper poll books around 10 a.m., but some voters left due to long lines, according to the release.
'We understand the frustration this caused for voters,' Trueblood said. 'Extending polling hours in the Village of Kronenwetter by one hour ensures that every eligible Kronenwetter resident has the opportunity to cast their ballot.'
All other polling sites in Marathon County will close at 8 p.m., according to the release.
Trueblood and Poyer will work with the Wisconsin Elections Commission to determine the cause of the issue, according to the release.
All 11 of Kronenwetter's wards vote at the same location. The village was using Badger Books to check voters in to the polling location. The village's Express Vote electronic voting machines are optional to use, according to the village website.
Election Day is Tuesday. Here's what Wausau-area voters need to know.
Erik Pfantz covers local government and education in central Wisconsin for USA TODAY NETWORK - Wisconsin and values his background as a rural Wisconsinite. Contact him at epfantz@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Wausau Daily Herald: Kronenwetter voting hours extended to 9 p.m. due to 'technical issues'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's move toward using the military on US soil is so fraught
The country hangs on a hugely significant precipice, as President Donald Trump moves toward making good on his long-running suggestions of an extraordinary step: deploying the military on US soil. About 700 Marines have now been mobilized to join the National Guard in Los Angeles to deal with demonstrations over federal immigration raids, CNN reports. The Marines were previously on 'ready to deploy' status. (It is still unclear what their specific task will be once in Los Angeles, sources told CNN. And like the National Guard troops, they are prohibited from conducting law enforcement activity such as making arrests unless Trump invokes the Insurrection Act.) But to hear the White House tell it, this show of force is not just the right thing to do but also a political winner. Responding to a poll showing 54% of Americans approved of Trump's deportation program, White House spokesman Steven Cheung wrote on X Sunday, 'And the approval number will be even higher after the national guard was sent to LA to beat back the violence this weekend.' But whether the American people actually want this military activation isn't nearly so clear. In fact, they've rejected such things in the past. The administration may be making a huge gamble on the American people's tolerance for a heavy-handed federal response. And while Americans might not have much sympathy for the demonstrators in Los Angeles who engage in violence or for undocumented immigrants, recent surveys have shown they often say Trump goes too far in his attempts to address such problems. There is something of an analog for the current situation. It came in 2020 when federal law enforcement suddenly moved to clear Lafayette Square, near the White House, of racial justice demonstrators, resulting in violent scenes. This wasn't the military, but it was controversial – in part because Trump then walked across the square with military leaders for a photo-op. (Then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper also resisted Trump's suggestions of using active-duty military at the time.) The American people did not like what they saw. A USA Today/Ipsos poll conducted a week later showed 63% of Americans opposed the use of rubber bullets and tear gas that day. It also showed Americans opposed deploying military forces in other states by 10 points, 51-41%. Similarly a CNN poll conducted by SSRS at the time asked a broader question – whether it would be appropriate for a president to 'deploy the U.S. military in response to protests in the United States.' Americans said this would be 'inappropriate' by a wide margin, 60-36%. All of which suggest Americans are predisposed to viewing such actions skeptically. These numbers come with caveats, though. The CNN poll question is a great window into how this could be received. But it's possible people's views have shifted or could shift with circumstances, including the role the Marines end up playing in Los Angeles. Back in 2020, the racial justice protests were relatively popular, and people didn't view them as particularly violent. Americans sympathized with the cause, believing George Floyd had been murdered by police. It's too early to tell how people view the demonstrators in Los Angeles. And the plight of the undocumented immigrants whom the administration is trying to deport is probably less sympathetic than the racial justice protesters' cause. (Clear majorities generally support deporting undocumented immigrants, who are in this country without authorization.) But when it comes to the administration's immigration crackdown, Americans have also expressed nuanced feelings. And the poll the White House cited this weekend is a case in point. In the CBS News/YouGov survey, which was conducted before Saturday's protests broke out in Los Angeles, Americans said they approved of Trump's deportation program, 54-46%. They also liked its 'goals,' 55-45%. But that's not quite the same as saying they approved of the administration's actions, full stop. The same poll asked whether people liked 'the way you think [Trump] is going about' the deportations. And there, Americans actually disliked his approach by double-digits, 56-44%. While independents were about evenly split on Trump's deportation program, they disliked how he's gone about it by 30 points, 65-35%. This is a dichotomy we see in lots of polling of Trump's deportation actions. Americans like the idea of mass deportation, but not so much the implementation. They like the president a lot on securing the border. But they like him significantly less on 'immigration,' and they like him even less when 'deportation,' specifically, is invoked in the question. One possible reason: Americans see the administration moving haphazardly. That could most notably be the case with things like deporting the wrong people and actions that have been halted by the courts, including ones in which judges have said people haven't been given enough due process. It's possible that people could come to sympathize with the cause of the Los Angeles protesters – if not the violent ones – at least to some degree. While Americans generally favor mass deportation, those numbers decline significantly when you mention the prospect of deporting otherwise-law-abiding people with jobs and those who have been in this country for a long time. (For example, a recent Pew Research Center poll showed Americans opposed deporting undocumented immigrants who have jobs, 56-41%, and they opposed deporting the parents of US citizen children 60-37%.) But the raids that set off the protests have been directed at workplaces generally – not necessarily at criminals or gang members. The Department of Homeland Security has claimed at least five of the people arrested during Sunday immigration sweeps in Los Angeles had criminal convictions or were accused of crimes. Through it all, the administration has made a rather Machiavellian political calculation: that however much people dislike the means, their support for the ends will carry the day. Maybe people say they don't like the lack of due process the administration has provided – or the wrong people getting sent to a brutal Salvadoran prison – but how much do they really care if the end result is lots of deportations? Similarly, the administration could be making the calculation that scenes of violence in Los Angeles could marshal support for a previously unthinkable step of deploying the military domestically against protesters – something Americans opposed by 24 points just five years ago. So much depends on what the Marines end up doing in Los Angeles and whether Trump invokes the Insurrection Act to allow them to engage in policing activities. But the Trump administration has clearly gone too far for people before as part of their deportation efforts. And the one big crackdown on protesters we have seen in the Trump era didn't go well. This would appear pretty fraught – not just practically, but politically.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bishop Budde hopes Pride Month can be ‘antidote' to ‘unnecessarily hurtful' rhetoric
Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde, who asked that President Trump 'have mercy' on LGBTQ children and immigrants during a prayer service he attended in January, says she hopes Pride Month celebrations this year help LGBTQ people heal from months of amped-up speech and policies targeting their identities. 'I pray that it is a really joyful, inspiring gathering where people feel safe, where they feel seen, where they feel supported, where they can laugh and learn,' Budde said about Pride in an interview with USA Today published Monday. 'Maybe it is a good antidote to some of the meaner rhetoric that has been unnecessarily hurtful. And just be a balm for people. We all need that.' Budde, the Episcopal leader for the Washington area, made national headlines when she used a prayer service following Trump's inauguration to make a direct plea to the president — who sat in the first pew of the National Cathedral with first lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance — on behalf of 'people in our country who are scared now.' 'There are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican and independent families, some who fear for their lives,' Budde said during the service. She said most immigrants, even those without proper documentation, were good neighbors, and the vast majority are 'not criminals.' She told ABC's 'The View' in the days following her sermon that she would welcome a one-on-one conversation with Trump but would not apologize, as he demanded in a lengthy post on Truth Social. 'I am not going to apologize for asking for mercy for others,' Budde said. Since returning to office in January, Trump has signed several executive orders directly targeting transgender Americans, including one he issued on his first day declaring that the U.S. recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female, and prohibiting spending on 'gender ideology.' Other orders aim to bar transgender people from serving openly in the military, end federal support for gender-affirming care for minors and ban transgender girls from participating in girls' and women's sports. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week that Trump has 'no plans' to issue a proclamation recognizing Pride Month this year. Budde told USA Today that Pride and its message of community and acceptance carries an 'urgency' with it this year. 'It feels as if there are some values, some accomplishments, some strides that are being called into question, and a fairly aggressive effort on the part of many to take away some of the things that have been so hard fought for,' she said. 'It's both a time of celebration and a reminder that this is who we are, and these are our beloved and this is who we stand with.' 'There seems to be a lot to be gained by keeping us divided and to project really false statements onto whole groups of people. That has not stopped, which is just worrisome and a bit heartbreaking,' Budde said. 'This is not, for me, a partisan thing. But I do want to constantly stand for and remind people of the values that are bedrock to me as a person of faith, but also to our country and to emphasize that we have far more in common with one another than we differ.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Union leader David Huerta faces felony charge after arrest at ICE raid
Union leader David Huerta faces felony charge after arrest at ICE raid Show Caption Hide Caption Families of Los Angeles workers detained by ICE want justice Families of the people detained in ICE raids in Los Angeles are calling for for justice for their loved ones. A prominent California union leader is facing a federal charge after he was arrested on Friday, June 6 during a confrontation with authorities at an immigration raid in downtown Los Angeles. David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California (SEIU), is facing one charge of felony conspiracy to impede an officer after he was arrested by federal officers on Friday, according to court records obtained by USA TODAY. Huerta remained in federal custody until Monday, June 9, when he was released on $50,000 bond, according to multiple reports. UPDATE: David Huerta had been released from custody. — SEIU California (@seiucalifornia) June 9, 2025 Crowds had gathered in downtown Los Angeles to demand for Huerta's release. Federal prosecutors allege that Huerta 'deliberately obstructed' agents from accessing a worksite suspected of employing undocumented immigrants by sitting in front of the business's only entrance gate for vehicles. SEIU California said Huerta was injured as he was detained by police. Following his arrest, Huerta issued a statement calling for people to stand together against injustice. "What happened to me is not about me. This is about something much bigger," Huerta said in a statement obtained by local news stations. "We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of justice." U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli reaffirmed federal prosecutors' allegations against Huerta in a post on X on Friday. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are − if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted. No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties,' he said. Live updates: Newsom sues over Trump's National Guard deployment in LA; 700 Marines also being sent Labor leaders demand for Huerta's release In a statement to USA TODAY on June 9, April Verrett, International President of the SEIU, demanded Huerta's release. 'SEIU refuses to be silent in the face of these horrific attacks on working communities. Standing in solidarity as a movement of working people is not new to us,' Verrett said. 'We demand David Huerta's immediate release and an end to these abusive workplace raids.' According to ABC 7, State Senator Sasha Renée Pérez condemned Huerta's arrest. "It is such a scary time right now, to watch this happen. I have people like my mom asking me 'If they can come for the president of our entire union so brazenly and attack him in this way then what does that mean for the rest of us?'" Perez said. Arrest comes before protests build through the weekend Huerta's arrest comes as the Trump administration continues to increase measures against anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles for what is expected to last 60 days, according to California's adjutant general. In a social media post, Newsom blamed Trump for the increase in unrest after three days of protests, saying, "we're suing him." 'Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority. This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic,' Newsom said in a statement. Contributing: John Bacon, Trevor Hughes and N'dea Yancey-Bragg, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.
