logo
Washington ambassador who quit after calling Trump ‘inept' says he was proved right

Washington ambassador who quit after calling Trump ‘inept' says he was proved right

Telegrapha day ago
A former ambassador to the US who quit after calling Donald Trump's administration 'inept' in leaked private emails has said he was proved right.
Lord Darroch resigned in 2019 after confidential cables criticising the US president's government were leaked to the media.
The long-serving diplomat described Mr Trump's administration as 'dysfunctional', 'inept' and 'divided' in a series of emails from 2017.
Mr Trump responded by calling Lord Darroch 'a very stupid guy' triggering a diplomatic row which eventually forced the British ambassador to step down from the post.
Lord Darroch doubled down on his comments at an Edinburgh Fringe show on Tuesday, arguing that the subsequent chaos of Mr Trump's premiership proved he was 'right'.
He told Ian Dale's All Talk show: 'If you're going to crash and burn on the basis of one piece of reporting that you've done, leaking, please God, make it a piece of reporting where all the predictions are right.
'I would say, if you read back that letter that was leaked, that was written after six months of Donald Trump and had a number of predictions about how the rest of his term would run, then you'd struggle to find anything that didn't turn out the way I had predicted it.
'So if that's the way to go out, it's better than the opposite.'
Lord Darroch added that he had 'already' decided to retire when the row broke out.
'I was six months off finishing anyway and I had had an extraordinary, lucky career', he said.
In an interview with BBC Newsnight in 2020, Lord Darroch said he knew his position was untenable when the emails became public but defended taking his plain-speaking approach.
'I never regret the terms in which I'd reported,' the former national security adviser said.
'I spent 40 years in the Foreign Office writing in these terms and people hitherto had thought it a strength and an asset. There is nothing unusual in reporting in clear and direct terms.'
Speaking at Fringe, he added that it had in fact been Lord Cameron, who appointed him to the post in January 2016, who requested that he write in a more frank manner.
He recalled the former prime minister saying: 'I'm fed up of reading all these letters to ambassadors which say, on the one hand, on the other hand, which are written in code. What you have to do is tell it like it is. Be clear and call out what you're seeing.'
'That letter, which was trying to give an accurate summary of how Trump's first six months had gone, was in part a response to Cameron saying tell it like it is. Don't write in code,' said Lord Darroch.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens more countries face higher taxes as Trump tariffs come into force
Dozens more countries face higher taxes as Trump tariffs come into force

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Dozens more countries face higher taxes as Trump tariffs come into force

New tariff rates, initiated under US President Donald Trump 's administration, came into effect on Thursday, marking a significant shift in global trade policy. These measures include proposed duties of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals, 100 per cent on computer chips, and 50 per cent on most copper, steel, and aluminium imports. The tariffs announced on 1 August, which apply to 66 countries, Taiwan, and the Falkland Islands, have resulted in billions of dollars in higher costs for companies and increased uncertainty for global exporters. Despite the economic pressures, global financial markets largely took the adjustments in stride, with Asian shares and US futures mostly higher on Thursday. Major trading partners, such as the UK, EU, South Korea, and Japan, have negotiated deals for lower tariff rates to maintain access to the substantial American market.

With its youth clubs idea, Labour might just have won the parent vote
With its youth clubs idea, Labour might just have won the parent vote

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

With its youth clubs idea, Labour might just have won the parent vote

Did you go to a youth club when you were a kid? I didn't, I was too much of a nerd. It was all brownies, after-school swimming training or sea scouts, for me – plus the 179 bus to Ilford Exchange shopping centre with my friend Roz to hang out over the railings and stare at boys. Youth clubs, going solely by what I'd seen on the telly in the 1990s, were cool, edgy places where people played table-tennis, started pirate radio stations and sometimes got pregnant (that's what happened to Leanne in Byker Grove, anyway). The thing is, I never got the chance to try my hand at going to a local youth club or community centre (or, some would argue, at being cool) because they all promptly disappeared. Thanks to the cuts to local authority funding made by the Tory government between 2010 and 2019, scores of youth clubs were closed. In London, where I grew up, as many as 30 per cent were shut down. And it didn't do us kids any good – in fact, a damning study that looked at the effects of the closures revealed that teenagers whose nearest youth club shut its doors actually went on to do worse in school. The decision to take away such a valuable resource – particularly in deprived areas – had a major part to play in increased rates of offending and worse GCSE results, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said at the time. And the kids that suffered the most from the Conservative government's decision to shut them all down (surprise, surprise) were those entitled to free school meals. Yet fast forward 15 or so years and a change of government and the topic of youth clubs is, once again, on the menu: but this time it (shhh, don't jinx it) actually might be positive. That's because the prime minister, flanked by the culture secretary, Lisa Nandy, has unveiled a raft of new plans – and, crucially, money – designed to help kids 'reconnect with their communities' and get them offline. Labour says the £88 million package – £30.5m of which will be channelled into the 'Better Youth Spaces programme', serving organisations in the most deprived areas – will support youth clubs and schools to offer more after-school activities (such as sport, art and music, outdoor activities, debating or volunteering). It will also enable organisations like the Scouts and Guides to deliver more in local communities. And even better is the fact that Keir Starmer and Nandy seem to have already seen off the inevitable snag of how to get teenagers into youth clubs in the first place. Because rather than ploughing the money into 'traditional' community halls – the type with drab posters warning about the dangers of drugs, a sad packet of digestives and a broken basketball hoop – the plans appear to include investment into an area in whichever way the area actually needs it. That means: climbing walls, outdoor sports and music lessons; perhaps even a funded minibus to transport kids from one area to another with more amenities. Labour have clearly got those 16-year-old voters in their sights... and good for them. The plans, which were revealed this week, actually seem to show some real-world understanding of the kind of dilemmas facing teenagers in 2025 (not least: social isolation). We already know that a plethora of young people are suffering from internet addiction and are at risk from malevolent influences like the manosphere and Andrew Tate; we've seen the widespread support – and grief – after the airing of So, when Labour say as part of their proposals that: 'Far from the default being outdoor activities, young people today are spending more and more of their time detached from the real world, either stuck in their bedrooms or behind a screen, throwing up huge challenges for them and their loved ones to overcome' – and pledge as a government to 'take bold action to give young people a better alternative, so they are supported rather than left behind' – as a parent who worries about this kind of stuff constantly, it's really quite refreshing. I would absolutely love my kids to get off screens and go outside to knock a ball around. I would relish them traipsing to a community centre nearby, where I'd know exactly where they were (even if not exactly what they were doing). I want them to have a risk-free space to 'vibe' in or to do whatever they call it in Gen Alpha. And I'd much, much rather that be in a dingy hall run by a youth leader or Akela, rather than the park or shopping centre or at the bottom of a field because someone stupid suggested we go 'cow-tipping', like I did. And crucially, I believe, so would they. There's pretty much nothing online that my children (aged nine and 13) wouldn't drop in a heartbeat if I told them one of their friends was coming round to play IRL, or suggested a day trip to town with someone they liked. Our neighbourhood in London is built on Quaker land, so there is no local shop, no pub, no off-licence within easy walking distance. If there was actually something to do, I doubt I'd ever see them again. But at least I'd know they were safe. I've had a small taste of what these kinds of community resources for kids could look like – my 13-year-old daughter has been taking herself off to a local sports club every Friday night, simply to 'hang out' on the grass enclosure inside the gates with her friends. Not only does she get to walk herself there and home (big tick for teenage independence), but while there, screens are – truly – forgotten. The last time she went and I asked her what she got up to, she said 'we played tag and then chased each other across the grass holding each other's legs, like wheelbarrows'. She also gets to stare at boys, just like I did. Plus ça change, I suppose. The big difference is that if these plans come to fruition, she'll have somewhere to do it, out of harm's way.

Trump claims ‘billions of dollars' now flowing into US after president's new tariffs come into effect
Trump claims ‘billions of dollars' now flowing into US after president's new tariffs come into effect

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump claims ‘billions of dollars' now flowing into US after president's new tariffs come into effect

President Donald Trump declared that billions of dollars are 'flowing' into the U.S. just minutes before the president's punishing new tariffs went into effect. Trump reignited his trade war last week, unveiling new rates between 10 and 41 percent on goods from more than 90 countries. After ordering a week-long delay on most levies just before his self-imposed deadline expired on August 1, the president's tariffs took effect just after midnight on Thursday. 'It's midnight!!!,' the president declared in block capitals at 11.58 p.m. on Wednesday. 'Billions of dollars in tariffs are now flowing into the United States of America.' Trump has repeatedly bragged about tariff revenues since he began ratcheting up import taxes on foreign goods on so-called 'Liberation Day' in April. The U.S. government collected almost $30 billion in tariff revenue last month, according to the Treasury Department – a 242 percent jump compared to last July. This is a developing story. More to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store