logo
Delhi HC restrains DDA from taking coercive action against Idgah committee

Delhi HC restrains DDA from taking coercive action against Idgah committee

Hindustan Times01-05-2025
New Delhi
The Delhi high court on Thursday restrained the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) from taking coercive action against the Shahi Idgah Management Committee, which is facing a recovery notice from the administrative body following its annual Ijtema congregation at the Eidgah Park near Delhi's Sadar Bazar.
On February 11, DDA issued a notice to the committee, seeking ₹12 lakh as booking charges for the religious function organised in December 2024, on the grounds that the parkland belonged to DDA.
Justice Vikas Mahajan, however, said DDA must not take coercive action until further orders, after the committee's counsel, Sanjoy Ghose, submitted that it filed a suit with the Delhi Waqf Tribunal, claiming that the park was on the Idgah land and seeking demarcation of the land where the Shahi Eidgah was situated. Ghose said the matter could not be heard due to lack of quorum and non-constitution of the tribunal and therefore, the committee had been rendered remediless.
'The problem is that the tribunal is not functional. Till that time, he (committee) has no remedy. It is a government land, but he is not encroaching upon it. It is a religious function, the recovery can come later on,' justice Mahajan said to DDA's lawyer.
'Having regard to the fact that the Waqf Tribunal is not functional, it is directed that the DDA shall not take any coercive action pursuant to notice dated 11/2,' the court said in its order.
The bench also issued a notice in the Shahi Idgah Management Committee's petition against the February 11 notice and fixed September 10 as the next date of hearing. In its petition, the committee had asserted that the park was part of the Idgah premises and DDA had no claim over it.
However, DDA's counsel submitted that a single judge, while previously dealing with the committee's petition against the installation of Maharani Lakshmi Bai's statute on September 23, 2024, had given a finding that the park was DDA's property. The counsel argued the religious function had been held on DDA land without prior approval. The committee had appealed against the single judge's decision before the division bench, but was not granted relief, the DDA counsel told the court.
Ghose, however, contended that the single judge had no power to rule on the issue of title of the park and the division bench had left open all contentions of the parties.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal
Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal

Business Standard

time36 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal

Delhi government on Tuesday announced the launch of the "Delhi Mitra" app, enabling people across the city to register their grievances with various departments and agencies. The decision was made in a cabinet meeting chaired by Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. After the meeting, Gupta posted on X that for a more effective redressal of public grievances, a single-window system will now be implemented, bringing the Delhi government, Delhi Police, DDA, MCD, NDMC, and Delhi Cantt on a single platform. "Delhi Mitra is not only a platform for complaints but also a digital bridge of trust between the public and the government," the chief minister stated. The app will enable the residents of the national capital to register their complaints with the government through mobile phones and WhatsApp as well. "They will receive updates on every stage of their complaint via messages. Moreover, it will also be possible to file complaints through WhatsApp," Gupta noted. Nodal officers will be appointed in every department to speed up the process and make it more accountable. Additionally, public grievance redressal officers from various departments will hold public hearings every Wednesday from 10 am to 12 pm, she said in the post. The chief minister emphasised that the initiative is not just a technological innovation but a commitment to ushering in a new era of public hearing culture, so that the voice of citizens are heard and solutions to their problems are guaranteed.

SC directs preservation of 12th-century monuments at Mehrauli Archaeological Park
SC directs preservation of 12th-century monuments at Mehrauli Archaeological Park

United News of India

time3 hours ago

  • United News of India

SC directs preservation of 12th-century monuments at Mehrauli Archaeological Park

New Delhi, Aug 19 (UNI) The Supreme Court today directed that historic monuments located inside Mehrauli Archaeological Park, including the 12th-century Ashiq Allah Dargah and the Chillagah of Baba Farid, must be preserved and asked the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to consider taking them under its supervision for repair and renovation. A Bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan was hearing appeals against a Delhi High Court order which had declined to protect the structures from proposed demolition by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). Petitioners argued that the centuries-old sites, of cultural and religious significance were wrongly treated as encroachments. Pulling up the DDA during the hearing, Justice Nagarathna asked: 'Why do you want to demolish it in the first place?' The authority responded that it was not targeting the dargah itself but unauthorised ancillary constructions around it. The Bench, however, underlined that while no fresh construction or alteration should be permitted, the ancient monuments themselves must be preserved. 'That monument has to be preserved. We are only concerned with the monument,' Justice Nagarathna observed. Advocate Nizam Pasha, for the appellants, submitted that the structures could not be dismissed as encroachments. He cited the ASI's report, which confirmed their antiquity, including an inscription recording that the tomb of Shaikh Shahibuddin was built in 1317 AD. The report also noted that the dargah and chillagah fall within the 200-metre regulated zone of Prithviraj Chauhan's citadel under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. Highlighting their continuing cultural significance, the ASI said devotees light lamps at the Ashiq Allah Dargah for the fulfilment of wishes and visit Baba Farid's chillagah to ward off evil spirits. The court also cautioned that heritage protection cannot be misused to shield illegal constructions. Referring to its earlier directions, Justice Nagarathna said: 'You cannot have temples in the middle of the road or on footpaths. There should be no construction around this monument.' Disposing of the appeals, the Supreme Court observed: 'The ASI should take under its consideration the supervision of the monuments in question in the matter of repair, renovation.' UNI SNG SSP

ASI should consider supervision of Mehrauli monuments: Supreme Court
ASI should consider supervision of Mehrauli monuments: Supreme Court

Economic Times

time10 hours ago

  • Economic Times

ASI should consider supervision of Mehrauli monuments: Supreme Court

Synopsis The Supreme Court has directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to consider supervising the repair and renovation of monuments within Delhi's Mehrauli Archaeological Park, including the Ashiq Allah Dargah and Chillagah of Baba Farid. This directive comes in response to appeals seeking protection of these historical and religiously significant structures from demolition. Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court on Tuesday said the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) should consider the supervision of monuments inside Delhi's Mehrauli Archaeological Park including the 13th century "Ashiq Allah Dargah" and "Chillagah of Baba Farid", the revered Sufi saint. The apex court was acting on two appeals for directions to the authorities to desist from demolishing or removing the dargah (shrine) and other surrounding historical monuments in Mehrauli or Sanjay Van. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan noted the top court on February 28 ordered no constructions, additions or alterations in the existing structures in the area without its permission. "Why do you want to demolish it in the first place?" the bench asked the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) counsel. The DDA's counsel said the authority was not against the dargah but there were several other unauthorised structures that had come up in the vicinity. "The question which really arises is, how much of it is the protected monument and how much of it is the encroachment," the counsel said. While the bench observed no further constructions should be carried out, it stressed on preservation of the monument. "That monument has to be preserved. We are only concerned with the monument," the bench said. The counsel for the appellants, who moved against a Delhi High Court order related to the matter, argued the monuments in question were not encroachments for they had existed in the area since 12th century. While referring to the ASI's status report, the appellants argued though the structures might not have been treated as a centrally protected monument, the ASI could supervise their repair and maintenance. The DDA's counsel, however, contended the authority was concerned only with demolition of unauthorised structures encroaching public land in terms of the orders passed by the apex court. "In the circumstances, we dispose of these appeals by observing that the ASI should take under its consideration the supervision of the monuments in question in the matter of repair, renovation," the bench said. One of the appellants sought protection of the religious structures inside the archaeological park from demolition. The ASI previously said the two structures inside the archaeological park bore religious significance as Muslim devotees paid daily visits to the shrines. An inscription, the ASI said, on the tomb of Shaikh Shahibuddin (Ashiq Allah) says it was constructed in the year 1,317 AD. The ASI said the tomb was close to the citadel of Prithviraj Chauhan and fell within the regulated zone of 200 metre according to the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. Any repair, renovation or construction work required a prior permission of the competent authority, it added. "Both structures are frequently visited. Devotees light lamps at the Ashiq Dargah for fulfilment of wishes. They visit Chillagah to get rid of evil spirits and bad omen. The place is also associated with the religious sentiment and faith of a particular religious community," the ASI report said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store