logo
Trump allies launch a bid to take control of a powerful Washington legal group

Trump allies launch a bid to take control of a powerful Washington legal group

NBC News07-03-2025

WASHINGTON — Two of President Donald Trump's allies have launched bids for leadership roles with the D.C. Bar Association, an under-the-radar effort that would give them more control over the influential legal group.
The push comes amid bar associations' confrontations with the Trump administration, and some federal attorneys have looked to their state groups for ethical guidance amid Trump's rapid reshaping of government.
Bradley Bondi — a lawyer who is Attorney General Pam Bondi's brother — and Alicia Long — a deputy to Ed Martin, Trump's interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia — are running for president and treasurer. The election runs from April to June, according to the organization's website.
While the general public may not pay much attention to bar associations, lawyers do. The nongovernmental groups decide who gets to be a lawyer — and who gets to stay a lawyer when misconduct allegations are involved. The D.C. Bar, as it is known, has more than 120,000 members, and, by virtue of its location, it is where a significant number of federal attorneys are licensed.
The effort to take control of the D.C. Bar follows warnings Trump administration officials have directed at bar associations, which lawyers inside and outside the government have suggested could play a role in slowing down legally questionable elements of Trump's agenda.
On one of her first days as attorney general, Pam Bondi warned career lawyers that they could be fired for refusing to carry out orders because of any personal objections. Meanwhile, the D.C. Bar maintains a confidential legal ethics hotline for members to submit concerns.
Bondi and Long each face one opponent. If elected, they would join the professional organization's 23-person Board of Governors. Though the D.C. Bar does not have a direct role in disciplining lawyers for misconduct, its board does recommend members to sit on the D.C. Board of Professional Responsibility, the disciplinary arm of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Disciplinary cases are brought forward by a separate Office of Disciplinary Counsel, which investigates and prosecutes ethical complaints against lawyers.
With Republicans in control of the House and the Senate, bar discipline could be one of the last remaining ways to hold Trump-appointed attorneys accountable. On Thursday, a group of Democratic senators wrote a letter to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel expressing 'grave concerns' about some of the highly unusual steps Martin has taken since he became interim U.S. attorney. The letter accused him of 'serious violations of professional conduct' and abusing his position. Martin did not respond to requests for comment.
Some Trump attorneys have faced sanctions in Washington for their actions. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred in Washington last year in the wake of his efforts to overturn Trump's 2020 presidential election loss; a committee of the Board on Professional Responsibility found that what it called his ' utter disregard for facts denigrates the legal profession.'
Jeffrey Clark — a former Justice Department lawyer whom Trump tried to make attorney general in the days before the Jan. 6, 2021, attack — appeared before the D.C. Board on Professional Responsibility last year and invoked the Fifth Amendment. A panel made a preliminary determination that he had committed an ethical violation and recommended in August that he be suspended from practicing law for two years. With Trump back in the White House, Clark is now acting administrator of the White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
And a Republican report issued in December by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, of Georgia, alleged possible coordination between House Jan. 6 investigators and the D.C. Bar to target an attorney who represented a former Trump White House aide. (The Office of Disciplinary Counsel dismissed that complaint last year.)
Bondi's and Long's bids quickly caused some alarm among attorneys in Washington. An email seen by NBC News and sent to dozens of Washington-area lawyers — and also shared on social media — described the duo as 'Trump/Pam Bondi loyalists' who were 'making a bid to take over the DC Bar' and encouraged recipients to pay attention and vote.
An attorney at a federal agency said the pro-Trump effort to win leadership positions at the D.C. Bar suggests the administration 'may be getting pushback internally' from lawyers who are concerned about potential professional consequences for carrying out Trump's agenda.
'They know this is a potential weakness,' this person added.
Bondi and Long did not respond to requests for comment. The D.C. Bar did not reply to a request for comment.
Bondi's opponent, Diane A. Seltzer, an attorney with a focus on employment law who already serves on the D.C. Bar's Board of Governors, said she decided to run because she saw it as the culmination of decades of bar leadership experience at a critical time in history.
'I want to be able to support the members of our bar in this time of governmental chaos,' she said. 'Our legal system needs a bar that understands and sees them and can support them in ways that will be helpful and keep everyone's energy up and keep people from giving up or burning out.'
The D.C. Bar does not control the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, but anyone can submit a complaint there, which is then heard by the Board of Professional Responsibility. The D.C. Bar seeks candidates for the Board of Professional Responsibility, but the D.C. Court of Appeals ultimately chooses the candidates.
There are fears among some Washington lawyers, however, that with Trump-supporting officials in place, the D.C. Bar might choose to ignore Court of Appeals rulings or orders from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
'I would never want to be president of a bar that could do that or that would do that,' Seltzer said. 'I wouldn't want to be president of a bar where those lines could be blurred and we would say, 'I am not going to follow what the Court of Appeals has decided or what the Office of Disciplinary Counsel has ordered.''
The disciplinary process can be protracted. Jennifer Kerkhoff Muyskens — a former assistant U.S. attorney in Washington who led the aggressive prosecution of anti-Trump protesters arrested en masse during Trump's first inauguration in 2017 — is only now facing a disciplinary hearing eight years later, accused of hiding exculpatory evidence from defendants.
The Trump administration has had a contentious relationship with bar associations, and Republicans have long accused them of having a left-wing bent — tensions that reached a boiling point in Trump's first term when the American Bar Association, the national bar organization, rated several of his judicial picks as ' not qualified ' for the jobs they were nominated for.
Project 2025 took aim at the American Bar Association in its policy road map for a future conservative administration, calling for the president to issue an executive order pursuing antitrust measures against it. In one of his first moves as president, Trump signed an executive order that said bar associations could be targeted for investigations over their diversity programs.
Last month, the American Bar Association lambasted what it described as the Trump administration's 'wide-scale affronts to the rule of law itself.' After billionaire Elon Musk, who is overseeing Trump's effort to reshape government, called for judges who have ruled against Trump to be impeached, the ABA said in a new statement Tuesday that it would 'not stay silent in the face of efforts to remake the legal profession into something that rewards those who agree with the government and punishes those who do not.' It added that such attempts at intimidation 'cannot be sanctioned or normalized.'
On Wednesday, Chad Mizelle, the Justice Department's chief of staff, punched back at the ABA, posting to X that 'they disguise their advocacy as work to 'promote the best quality legal education, competence, ethical conduct and professionalism, and pro bono and public service work in the legal profession,' but they never mention that they also work hand-in-hand on left-wing causes.'
He also wrote that the bar association's 'dedication to left-wing activism undermines justice' and that under the attorney general's 'leadership, DOJ is carrying out President Trump's executive orders putting an end to radical DEI programs, and we're all over the ABA's illegal and immoral diversity mandates for law school accreditation.'
In 2020, the ABA rated Mizelle's wife, Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, as 'not qualified' to serve as a U.S. district court judge in Florida. She was 33 at the time and the youngest person Trump had tapped for the lifetime appointment. She was confirmed to the seat in November 2020.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From friends to foes: how Trump turned on the Federalist Society
From friends to foes: how Trump turned on the Federalist Society

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

From friends to foes: how Trump turned on the Federalist Society

The world's attention last week was gripped by Donald Trump's abrupt fallout with the tech tycoon Elon Musk. Yet at the same time, and with the help of a rather unflattering epithet, the president has also stoked a rift between his Maga royal court and the conservative legal movement whose judges and lawyers have been crucial in pulling the US judiciary to the right. The word was 'sleazebag', which Trump deployed as part of a lengthy broadside on Truth Social, his social media platform. The targets of his wrath were the Federalist Society, an influential conservative legal organization, and Leonard Leo, a lawyer associated with the group who has, in recent years, branched out to become one of the most powerful rightwing kingmakers in the US. In his post, Trump said that during his first term 'it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. He openly brags how he controls Judges, and even Justices of the United States Supreme Court – I hope that is not so, and don't believe it is!' Founded in 1982, the Federalist Society is an important player in the conservative movement. Many conservative lawyers, judges, law students and law clerks are members of the group, attend its events or run in its general orbit. Republican presidents use its recommendations to pick judges for vacant judicial seats. In the days following Trump's Truth Social harangue, people in the conservative legal world, which is centered in Washington DC but spans law schools and judge's chambers across the country, are wondering what this rift portends. Is this a classic Trump tantrum that will soon blow over? Or does it speak to a larger schism, with even the famously conservative Federalist Society not rightwing enough – or fanatically loyal enough – to satisfy Trump? 'I don't think this will blow over,' Stuart Gerson, a conservative attorney and a former acting US attorney general, said. 'Because it's not an event. It's a condition … He thinks judges are his judges, and they're there to support his policies, rather than the oath that they take [to the constitution].' In recent months, Trump has been stymied repeatedly by court rulings by federal judges. His rage has been particularly acute when the judges are ones whom he or other Republican presidents appointed. The Maga world has turned aggressively against Amy Coney Barrett, for example, after the supreme court justice voted contrary to the Trump line in several key cases. The immediate cause of Trump's recent outburst was a ruling by the US court of international trade against his sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. In this case, his anger appears to have had less to do with the judges than with the fact that a group of conservative lawyers and academics, including one who co-chairs the board of the Federalist Society, had filed a brief in the case challenging his tariffs. Trump is probably also aware that the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), an anti-regulation, pro-free market legal group affiliated with Leo and the billionaire Charles Koch, has sued, separately, to stop the tariffs. John Vecchione, an attorney at the NCLA, noted that the Federalist Society is a broad tent, with conservative jurists of many different inclinations and factions, including free marketeers and libertarians who do not subscribe to Trump's economic nationalism. Members often disagree with each other or find themselves on different sides of a case. This February, a federal prosecutor affiliated with the group, Danielle Sassoon, resigned after she said the Trump administration tried to pressure her to drop a case. The 'real question', Vecchione said, is what diehard Maga lawyers closest to Trump are telling him. 'Are they trying to form a new organization? Or are they trying to do to the Federalist Society what they've done to the House Republican caucus, for instance … where nobody wants to go up against Trump on anything?' he said. 'I think that some of the people around Trump believe that any right-coded organization has to do his bidding.' A newer legal organization, the Article III Project (A3P), appears to have captured Trump's ear in his second term. The organization was founded by Mike Davis, a rabidly pro-Trump lawyer, and seems to be positioning itself as a Maga alternative to the Federalist Society. On its website, A3P claims to have 'helped confirm' three supreme court justices, 55 federal circuit judges and 13 federal appellate judges. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Davis recently asserted in the Hill that the Federalist Society 'abandoned' Trump during his various recent legal travails. 'And not only did they abandon him – they had several [Federalist Society] leaders who participated in the lawfare and threw gas on the fire,' Davis said. Although Leo was a 'a close ally' of Trump during his first term, the Wall Street Journal reported, Trump and Leo 'haven't spoken in five years'. Leo has responded to Trump's outburst delicately. In a short statement, he said he was 'very grateful for President Trump transforming the federal courts, and it was a privilege being involved', adding that the reshaping of the federal bench would be 'President Trump's most important legacy'. Yet this Tuesday, a lengthy piece in the Wall Street Journal – pointedly titled 'This Conservative Is Doing Just Fine, Thank You, After Getting Dumped by Trump' – argued that Leo is 'unbounded by the pressures of re-election or dependence on outside money', and is the 'rare conservative, who, after being cast out of Trump's inner circle, remains free to pursue his own vision of what will make America great again'. In 2021, a Chicago billionaire gave Leo a $1.6bn political donation, thought to be the largest such donation in US history. As a result, Leo has an almost unprecedented power in terms of dark-money influence. The article also noted that much of Leo's focus has shifted to the entertainment industry, where he is funding big-budget television series and films that channel conservative values. Vecchione thinks that Trump's tendency to surround himself with sycophants and loyalists will work against him. 'If you have a lawyer who only tells you what makes you happy, and only does what you say to do, you don't have a good lawyer,' Vecchione said. 'That's not a good way to get lawyers. Not a good way to get judges, either.'

Trump praises ‘great job' by national guard in calming LA protests, as mayor says troops are not in the city
Trump praises ‘great job' by national guard in calming LA protests, as mayor says troops are not in the city

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump praises ‘great job' by national guard in calming LA protests, as mayor says troops are not in the city

Update: Date: 2025-06-08T11:56:05.000Z Title: Trump praises national guard, though troops have not arrived Content: President Trump has praised the efforts of the national guard in calming the protests in Los Angeles, despite the city's mayor saying troops have yet to arrive. In a post on his social media platform TruthSocial, Trump said: Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest. We have an incompetent Governor (Newscum) and Mayor (Bass) who were, as usual (just look at how they handled the fires, and now their VERY SLOW PERMITTING disaster. Federal permitting is complete!), unable to to handle the task. These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED. Also, from now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests. What do these people have to hide, and why??? Again, thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!' However just an hour after Trump's post, Bass tweeted: 'I want to thank LAPD and local law enforcement for their work tonight. I also want to thank Gavin Newsom for his support. 'Just to be clear, the National Guard has not been deployed in the City of Los Angeles.' About 2,000 troops could be deployed to the city in California, after an immigration crackdown led to protests that have run into two days. The time in LA is approaching 5am, and it is still yet to be seen whether the unrest will run into a third day. We'll be bringing you the latest, including the political reaction to the protests and Trump's decision.

Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting
Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting

Economist

time42 minutes ago

  • Economist

Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting

DONALD TRUMP is making good on his threats. During his presidential campaign and first few months in office the president and his advisers suggested that they would retaliate against cities that resist the mass deportation of illegal immigrants. On June 7th Mr Trump ordered at least 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell protests that had taken place across the region for two days following several immigration raids, and the disorder that followed. The move is ostensibly meant to restore peace. But it is also a thinly-veiled message to Democratic-run places that retribution awaits those who would stand between immigrants and the administration's deportation machine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store