Supreme Court to hear Rastafarian prisoner's suit over shaved dreadlocks
The first four months of Landor's incarceration were uneventful. Then he was transferred to the Raymond Laborde Correctional Center in Cottonport, La. According to his lawsuit, he presented a copy of the 2017 decision to a guard, who threw it in the trash.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
After consulting the warden, two guards handcuffed Landor to a chair, held him down, and shaved his head to the scalp.
'When I was strapped down and shaved, it felt like I was raped,' Landor said in a statement last year. 'And the guards, they just didn't care. They will treat you any kind of way. They knew better than to cut my hair, but they did it anyway.'
The question the justices agreed to decide is whether the 2000 religious freedom law allows suits against prison officials for money.
Advertisement
The case is in an early stage, and courts have assumed that Landor's account of what happened to him is true. Officials in Louisiana have so far not disputed it.
Elizabeth B. Murrill, Louisiana's attorney general, agreed the conduct Landor described was appalling, but she said the 2000 law did not allow his suit.
'The allegations in petitioner's complaint are antithetical to religious freedom and fair treatment of state prisoners,' Murrill wrote in a brief urging the justices to deny review. 'Without equivocation, the state condemns them in the strongest possible terms.'
She added that 'the state has amended its prison grooming policy to ensure that nothing like petitioner's alleged experience can occur.'
Last month, the Trump administration filed a supporting brief urging the justices to hear Landor's case and to rule that he may pursue his suit.
Landor's case does not seem to be an outlier. At least five other Rastafarians have filed lawsuits in Louisiana saying their dreadlocks were forcibly shaved by prison officials.
Landor sued the warden and the guards under the 2000 law, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. When the case reached the 5th Circuit, the same court that had ruled that the law protected Rastafarian prisoners' dreadlocks, a different three-judge panel said that 'we
emphatically
condemn the treatment that Landor endured."
But that condemnation was all the relief the panel was willing to offer Landor. It ruled that he was still not entitled to sue the prison officials for money because the 2000 law had not specifically authorized such suits.
In his petition asking the Supreme Court to hear his case, Landor said the 5th Circuit's ruling was at odds with a 2020 decision interpreting identical language in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.
Advertisement
In that case, the court ruled in favor of Muslim men who said their religious rights had been violated when FBI agents put them on the no-fly list in retaliation for refusing to become government informants.
The court did not find the question of whether they could sue for money difficult. In a brisk nine-page opinion for a unanimous court in 2020 in the case, Tanzin v. Tanvir, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that 'in the context of suits against government officials, damages have long been awarded as appropriate relief.'
In Landor's case, the 5th Circuit ruled that the 2000 law, which applies to the states, was meaningfully different from the 1993 law, which, after the Supreme Court limited its sweep, applies only to the federal government.
The full 5th Circuit declined to rehear the panel's ruling. But nine judges in the majority urged the Supreme Court to clarify matters in the case, Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety, No. 23-1197.
Prison officials, Judge Edith Brown Clement wrote, 'knowingly violated Damon Landor's rights in a stark and egregious manner, literally throwing in the trash our opinion holding that Louisiana's policy of cutting Rastafarians' hair violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act before pinning Landor down and shaving his head. Landor clearly suffered a grave legal wrong.'
But whether he can sue prison officials for money, Clement wrote, 'is a question only the Supreme Court can answer.'
Zack Tripp, a lawyer with Weil, Gotshal & Manges, which represents Landor, said he hoped the answer was yes.
Advertisement
'Nobody should have to experience what Mr. Landor endured,' he said in a statement. 'A decision in Mr. Landor's favor will go a long way towards holding officers accountable for egregious violations of religious liberty, and ensuring that what happened to Mr. Landor does not happen to anyone else.'
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
RCMP union pushes for change to help force attract talent from U.S., other countries
OTTAWA — The union representing front-line RCMP members wants the force to ease requirements for foreign applicants to help attract experienced police officers from agencies like the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and counterparts in the United Kingdom and Australia. The RCMP currently requires that applicants be Canadian citizens or have permanent resident status in Canada. Applicants with permanent resident status must have lived in Canada as a permanent resident for three of the last five years. The National Police Federation says the RCMP should follow the lead of the Canadian Armed Forces, which in 2022 opened applications to permanent residents without any requirement on time spent in Canada. Federation president Brian Sauvé said he's "pretty sure we can attract some good talent" through a similar move by the RCMP. Sauvé compares the idea to federal immigration programs that seek to entice skilled workers to come to Canada. "If this government has identified public safety, border security and all that stuff as an imperative, we can do the same thing, right?" Sauvé said in a recent interview. "We have equivalency training. You can come from Manchester, you can come from New South Wales, you can come from, I don't know, the FBI. And we'll train you to be equivalent, to give you a job and put you in a role." The proposal is one of several ideas the police federation presented in a June report aimed at improving the RCMP's recruitment practices, funding model, training programs and procurement. The federation says independent reports over the past two decades have offered the federal government clear guidance on how to improve RCMP operations in these areas. "Yet time and again, these recommendations have been met with inaction or insufficient follow-through," the June report says. "As a result, long-standing issues persisted and were allowed to worsen." Public Safety Canada spokesperson Max Watson said the department is committed to working with the RCMP and others to ensure the force "is equipped to meet evolving public safety needs." The federation is calling for a streamlined and modernized RCMP application processing system, more training capacity and an increase in the cadet training allowance to about $1,200 a week from the current $525. The federation says it wants more flexibility for some new recruits, such as people from other law enforcement agencies, to make it easier for them to fit into the RCMP. For instance, the federation notes only serving or recently inactive police officers can apply through the RCMP's three-week experienced police officer program, provided they meet strict criteria. That excludes a large pool of well-trained public safety personnel, including members of the Canada Border Services Agency, provincial sheriffs, conservation officers and other law enforcement agents who may not meet the threshold, the report says. Forcing these candidates to repeat a full 26-week training program at the RCMP training depot "creates a barrier to recruitment and results in missed opportunities to bring skilled, experienced candidates into the RCMP," the report adds. It also says the federal procurement process is too slow and unresponsive to the urgent needs of modern policing, and drains valuable government resources. "Delays in rolling out life-saving equipment, including service pistols, body armour and body-worn cameras, threaten both officer safety and public trust," the report says. During the spring election campaign, the Liberals promised to recruit 1,000 more RCMP personnel to tackle drug and human trafficking, foreign interference, cybercrime and car thefts by organized crime. The Liberals also pledged to create a new RCMP academy in Regina and increase pay for cadet recruits. Watson acknowledged the promise to hire more Mounties and said Public Safety recognizes the importance of cadet pay in broader efforts to support recruitment and retention. The RCMP did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. The police force has been told to trim two per cent of its budget as part of a governmentwide cost-cutting exercise. Sauvé said he is "cautiously optimistic" the Liberal government will follow through on its commitment to strengthen law enforcement, set out in a May mandate letter. The RCMP provides policing services through contracts with all provinces and territories, except Ontario and Quebec. RCMP policing agreements cover much of rural Canada, all of the North and many towns and municipalities in contract provinces. The police federation acknowledges that some continue to ask whether the RCMP should shed its contract policing role across Canada and become more like the FBI by focusing on federal criminal matters. In March, before Mark Carney became prime minister, the Liberals published a paper outlining a new vision for the RCMP. It suggested the force concentrate on federal policing, reflecting its "essential mandate and where it is best placed to lead investigations." The federation flatly rejects the idea. "The RCMP's integrated pan-Canadian policing model remains one of its greatest strengths, due to its ability to leverage co-ordination, consistency and efficiency across all jurisdictions," the June report says. It argues that moving away from the current model "would create deep service gaps, duplication and costly public safety and economic inefficiencies with no evidence of better results." The federation calls for dedicated funding for federal policing, saying RCMP officers carrying out those duties must no longer be used to backstop vacancies in contract jurisdictions. "Federal assets should be used solely for federal mandates," the report says. "If federal members are redeployed for non-federal purposes, those services must be cost-recovered from contract partners." This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 9, 2025. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Texas GOP looks to make California enforce arrest warrants amid redistricting battle
Texas GOP officials on Saturday upped their calls for Democrats who fled the state for California to be arrested, unseated and brought back to the Lone Star State amid a redistricting battle. Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) filed a legal complaint in California urging local law enforcement to act on arrest warrants issued by the Texas statehouse for their colleagues who left the state ahead of a controversial redistricting vote. 'Texans are fed up with lawmakers who refuse to do their jobs and instead run away to states like California to exploit radical governors' broken political systems as a shield,' Paxton said in a Saturday statement. '[California Gov.] Gavin Newsom [(D)] may be comfortable with lawlessness and the protection of corrupt legislators, but Texas will not tolerate elected officials who defy the Constitution for political theater,' he added. Burrows said the legislature would not be able to conduct votes on disaster-relief funding with absent members and echoed Paxton's demand for lawmakers to be returned. The two have also encouraged Gov. JB Pritzker (D-Ill.) to force lawmakers to vacate his state. Texas Democrats fled on Sunday to blue states, including California, Illinois, New York and New Jersey, to delay a statehouse vote that would give Republicans five additional seats in Congress. Without a quorum, or the proper number of lawmakers present to hold a vote, legislation cannot be passed. The departure of state Democrats has made national news and President Trump has weighed in, suggesting the FBI 'may have to' get involved in returning them. The president has also said Republicans are 'entitled' to more seats in Congress, where the party holds a slim majority in the House. State officials in California on Friday announced it would hold a special election to redraw voting maps this upcoming November.
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Sunday shows preview: GOP redistricting fight heats up; Trump to meet with Putin
The Republican Party's redistricting efforts are heating up as the Texas legislature pushes for new congressional maps. President Trump has said that Republicans are 'entitled' to gain five additional House seats before the 2026 midterms, as the GOP hopes to retain its slim majority in the lower chamber. In response, dozens of Texas statehouse Democrats have fled the Lone Star State to blue states, denying the Texas legislature a quorum with the hopes of delaying a vote on the new maps. GOP lawmakers have requested that the FBI help return the Democrats to Texas. The lawmakers that left the state are also tallying $500 daily fines, while Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said he would prosecute the lawmakers if they attempt to raise campaign donations to cover the incurred costs of penalties. Some Texas Democrats have fled to California, while others have gone to other blue-leaning states like New York, New Jersey and Illinois. California Gov, Gavin Newsom (D) on Friday also announced that a special election will be held this November about redistricting. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) will be on NBC's 'Meet The Press,' where he will likely weigh in on the redistricting tit-for-tat and how the Democrats should respond. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) argued that Texas lawmakers will have to stay in other states for years to come, as he will keep calling new special legislative sessions to initiate the vote on the maps. 'That means they're not going to come back until like 2027 or 2028, because I'm going to call special session after special session after special session with the same agenda items on there,' Abbott told NBC News. On the foreign affairs front, Trump announced Friday that he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin next Friday in Alaska for talks about the Russia-Ukraine war. The president said that swapping territories will be discussed, a suggestion dismissed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky early Saturday. 'Of course, we will not give Russia any awards for what it has done,' Zelensky said. 'The Ukrainian people deserve peace.' Putin has reportedly presented Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff with a ceasefire proposal during their meeting in Moscow on Wednesday, a proposition that would entail Ukraine making territorial concessions in the Donbas region. European officials have created a counterproposal which would require a ceasefire to take place before any other action is taken. Vice President Vance, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Ukraine's top officials and European national security advisors held a Saturday meeting at the Chevening House in Kent, England, where they discussed the next steps to reach a peace agreement in Eastern Europe. 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace,' Lammy said Saturday on social media after the meeting. Vance will appear on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' where he will likely talk about the Saturday meeting with European officials and the efforts the administration is taking to get closer to a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. Those, along with other topics, are likely to be discussed on the upcoming Sunday shows: NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.); Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) and former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Kurt Volker. ABC's 'This Week': NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and former Ambassador John Bolton. CNN's 'State of the Union': Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). CBS' 'Face the Nation': Rutte; Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz); Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) and former U.S. surgeon general Jerome Adams. NBC's 'Meet the Press': Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D); Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and former Attorney General Eric Holder (D). Fox News' 'Fox News Sunday': New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D); Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R); Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) and Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.).
