logo
Former cop sues police chief and town of Amherst

Former cop sues police chief and town of Amherst

CBC31-03-2025

A former Amherst, N.S., police officer is suing the town and the chief of police for defamation.
Mark Rushton, who filed his suit in Nova Scotia Supreme Court earlier this month, alleges accusations last year that he misrepresented his qualifications for his job have ruined his reputation and career and caused personal hardships.
Rushton resigned on June 6, 2024, just 10 days after being told a complaint had been made against him under the Nova Scotia Police Act. He worked for the Amherst Police Department for about a year as a constable and says in his lawsuit that his resignation was not related to the complaint, but rather was the result of a decision to move to the Annapolis Valley to be closer to his family.
According to his lawsuit, Rushton was served with the complaint on May 27, 2024, and it accused him of acting "in a disorderly manner" and having "willfully [made] a false or misleading statement in an official record."
When Amherst police announced the following month that they were conducting an internal investigation of one of their own officers, police Chief Dwayne Pike never identified Rushton by name in his public statements when he said they were investigating questions about an officer's credentials and qualifications.
But the Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service and court documents did identify him. The prosecution service launched a review of all cases Rushton handled during his time on the Amherst force, resulting in nine charges against seven people being dropped.
In his lawsuit, Rushton contends Pike's comments "tend to lower the reputation of the Plaintiff by right thinking members of society" and were "libellous and defamatory."
In an email, Laura Neilan, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Rushton, said she "looked forward to vindicating his reputation during the litigation process."
"We have not seen a shred of evidence to suggest that Mr. Rushton was dishonest during the interview process, or that he lacks the necessary qualifications to work as a police officer in Amherst," the email said.
Rushton worked as a military police officer in 2017 and served as a special constable with a town in Alberta before taking the job in Amherst.
Reputation, career 'have been destroyed'
Rushton said the Amherst department had his resumé and a full record of his training, which includes graduation from the Canadian Forces Military Police Academy and Dalhousie University's police leadership program.
His suit says there's nothing in the Police Act to suggest his military police training was inadequate and asserts that "his reputation and career have been destroyed as a result of Chief Pike's libellous statements."
Rushton says he's been unable to get a job with a municipal police force because any background check invariably leads to stories about his problems with the Amherst force.
He says he tried to resume work as a military police officer, but the force wouldn't accept him until after it conducted its own investigation into his credentials. He was able to land a short-term contract with them that expires this month.
Rushton says in the suit that he has lost custody of his children and been forced into bankruptcy because of his lack of steady employment.
"Chief Pike's statements were made with a reckless disregard for the consequences to the Plaintiff's reputation and livelihood and as such, they amount to bad faith, warranting both aggravated and punitive damages," the lawsuit says.
While no specific monetary amount is referenced in the suit, Rushton's lawyer said in its preamble that the case falls within a rule that limits damages to under $150,000.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man linked to multiple slayings found after absconding from CAMH
Man linked to multiple slayings found after absconding from CAMH

Toronto Sun

time19-05-2025

  • Toronto Sun

Man linked to multiple slayings found after absconding from CAMH

James Rushton, 43, who was found not criminally responsible for father's 2019 death, located by cops Monday James Rushton, 43, walked away from CAMH on Sunday, May 18, 2025, at Queen and Ossington in Toronto. Photo by Police handout The man found by police after walking away from a downtown psychiatric ward was responsible for the death of two people — including the 2019 stabbing death of his father. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account James Rushton, 43, absconded from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) at Queen St. W. and Ossington Ave. Sunday at around 3:30 p.m. He was located by police Monday afternoon and returned to custody. He was found not criminally responsible for the October 2019 second-degree murder of his father Thomas Denney, 62. According to media reports, police found Rushton at the time near King St. and University Ave. — incoherent and covered with blood — after repeatedly stabbing his father. Denney's murder came two years after Rushton was convicted of bashing his father's head with a rock, a crime for which he was sentenced to time served for his 200 days of pretrial custody. At the time of that May 2017 attack, Rushton had been released on a recognizance while facing charges from the previous November of robbery, failure to comply with probation conditions and possession of the proceeds of crime. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. He was also convicted in the 2000s for domestic violence against his sister and a former partner. In 2019, Rushton reportedly told arresting officers that his father was the devil and that he'd killed before. In 2005, he was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison on a manslaughter conviction after sucker-punching a man who allegedly pulled on a female acquaintance's blouse — with the judge noting he was under the influence of alcohol and cocaine at the time. His victim died after a single punch, court documents stated. Freed in 2008 on a statutory release, he was sent back to prison to complete his full term after he admitted to using crack. A 2008 parole board document, obtained by the Toronto Sun, highlights Rushton's history of drug- and booze-fuelled violence. bpassifiume@ X: @bryanpassifiume Read More

Man responsible for multiple deaths found after absconding from CAMH
Man responsible for multiple deaths found after absconding from CAMH

Toronto Sun

time19-05-2025

  • Toronto Sun

Man responsible for multiple deaths found after absconding from CAMH

James Rushton, 43, found not criminally responsible for father's 2019 slaying, located by cops Monday James Rushton, 43, walked away from CAMH on Sunday, May 18, 2025, at Queen and Ossington in Toronto. Photo by Police handout The man found by police after walking away from a downtown psychiatric ward was responsible for the death of two people — including the 2019 stabbing death of his father. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account James Rushton, 43, absconded from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) at Queen St. W. and Ossington Ave. Sunday at around 3:30 p.m. He was located by police Monday afternoon and returned to custody. He was found not criminally responsible for the October 2019 second-degree murder of his father Thomas Denney, 62. According to media reports, police found Rushton at the time near King St. and University Ave. — incoherent and covered with blood — after repeatedly stabbing his father. Denney's murder came two years after Rushton was convicted of bashing his father's head with a rock, a crime for which he was sentenced to time served for his 200 days of pretrial custody. At the time of that May 2017 attack, Rushton had been released on a recognizance while facing charges from the previous November of robbery, failure to comply with probation conditions and possession of the proceeds of crime. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. He was also convicted in the 2000s for domestic violence against his sister and a former partner. In 2019, Rushton reportedly told arresting officers that his father was the devil and that he'd killed before. In 2005, he was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison on a manslaughter conviction after sucker-punching a man who allegedly pulled on a female acquaintance's blouse — with the judge noting he was under the influence of alcohol and cocaine at the time. His victim died after a single punch, court documents stated. Freed in 2008 on a statutory release, he was sent back to prison to complete his full term after he admitted to using crack. A 2008 parole board document, obtained by the Toronto Sun, highlights Rushton's history of drug- and booze-fuelled violence. bpassifiume@ X: @bryanpassifiume Read More

B.C. minister's performance in key portfolio leaves much to be desired
B.C. minister's performance in key portfolio leaves much to be desired

Vancouver Sun

time16-05-2025

  • Vancouver Sun

B.C. minister's performance in key portfolio leaves much to be desired

VICTORIA — Public Safety Minister Garry Begg expressed no concern this week when news broke that the RCMP had interviewed Conservative MLA Elenore Sturko as part of a witch hunt for a whistleblower. Begg hadn't actually launched the investigation into the leak to Sturko that exposed the widespread diversion of safer supply drugs to the illicit market. The order was given by Glen Lewis, director of police services in Begg's ministry of public safety and solicitor general. But the investigation had no more enthusiastic defender than the minister himself. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'The director is fully within his role to act as he did,' Begg told reporters Wednesday. 'It was an appropriate request, an appropriate investigation. The director did exactly what he should have done.' It wasn't really a request. The section of the Police Act under which Lewis acted made it an order to the RCMP, not a request. Nor did Begg see anything wrong with police descending on Sturko to ask for the source of the leak. 'She was told right away that she was not the subject of an investigation,' the minister said. What about her concern that the investigation was intended to silence whistleblowers and intimidate the Opposition? 'She was, like I, a policeman for many years,' replied Begg. 'She knows how police do their business. I would be very surprised if she was shocked that the police wanted to talk to her.' So, this was OK in his view? 'I certainly approve of an investigation being conducted into the information that was provided to her — that's appropriate.' Begg said all this after the Premier David Eby had said the opposite. Eby defended Sturko. He agreed that the probe could intimidate whistleblowers and the Opposition. Also suggested police resources could be better applied to investigate pharmacies engaged in the diversion of safer supply drugs. Were the premier and his minister of public safety on the same page? 'I can't comment on what the premier has said,' Begg replied. 'I haven't talked to the premier about it.' There matters stood at mid-afternoon on Wednesday, following question period in the legislature. Then at 5 p.m. came an email with what were advertised as 'clarifying comments' from the minister. 'I've now had the opportunity to speak to the premier,' Begg began. 'We've discussed the issue, and I'd like my position to be clear.' One: 'What I approve of is an independent process, and the director of police services was operating under his authority.' Two: 'We support whistleblowers and whistleblower protections.' Three: 'It is our view that everyone should be focusing attention on investigating the pharmacies alleged to be involved in drug diversion.' Four: 'I fully agree Elenore Sturko was doing her job.' Begg said almost none of that to reporters a few hours earlier. Not that whistleblowers needed protection, not that there were better uses for police resources, not that Sturko was doing her job. Presumably his comments flowed from his session with the premier. Eby had offered a critical take on the leak investigation at a noon-hour news conference. He had repeated his comments in question period. On Sturko: 'It is important that the House recognizes that she was doing her job. I spent some time on the Opposition benches, I recognize effective Opposition work. This was certainly a case of that. She shouldn't get a phone call from police for doing her job.' On whistleblowers: 'We introduced legislation to protect whistleblowers. We support whistleblowers bringing forward information that can assist us all in understanding what's happening in the province on the front lines.' On the investigation: 'I'm extremely reluctant to weigh in on where police put their resources. But I really hope that there is more effort going into investigating these pharmacies rather than anything related to the member and what she did in this House.' On Lewis himself: 'I haven't talked to the director yet. The independent director has an important role to play in our system. That independence is part of it. The head of the public service will contact him and will understand the intention and what the plan was and so on.' The premier said all of that — and more — in question period. Begg was in the House when Eby said it. His desk is a few seats away from that of the premier. Yet when reporters talked to the minister after question period, he appeared not to have absorbed any of the premier's thinking. Was Begg not paying attention? Or is he just one of those NDP ministers, confined to a message box and unable to venture outside until authorized to say something different. Either way it wasn't a flattering performance by a minister in a key portfolio. No wonder Begg didn't make the cut when Eby appointed his first cabinet. It took his 22-vote victory in the last election, which secured the NDP majority, before he made it to cabinet rank. No wonder, too, that the premier decided to bypass the minister and get the head of the public service to communicate directly with Lewis on the rationale for this ill-advised investigation. vpalmer@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store