Three million workers are getting a pay rise. Here's how it could affect you
About 180,000 people will see their hourly rate increase from $24.10 to $24.95 from July 1 because of Tuesday morning's ruling by the industrial umpire, but its consequences extend far beyond those on the absolute lowest wages to all workers covered by an industry award.
The commission's pay panel said that pay for the fifth of Australian workers on industry minimum pay rates had gone backward since 2021 because of inflation, but that price rises had been brought under control. 'We are satisfied that the level of wage increase we have determined is sustainable,' it said in a statement.
In the case of modern awards, the benchmark C10 award rate of pay has declined by 4.5 percentage points relative to inflation as measured by the consumer price index.
But what does that mean for the economy? Which workers will this affect? And how much money will they get?
Nearly 3 million Australians will get a pay rise – and some workers will miss out
Australia's industrial system has minimum pay rules for 121 industries, from aviation to health and the law.
According to the federal government, up to 2.9 million workers have their pay set through those rules. That includes about 180,000 who are on the absolute national minimum wage, which is $24.10 and will be $24.95 when the increase starts on July 1.
The award system also includes workers on much higher pay, such as airline pilots earning almost $220,000.
Loading
The pay of all of those workers, who are concentrated in industries such as hospitality, retail and the service sector, will automatically rise by 3.5 per cent.
That means a childcare worker on the minimum hourly rate will get an extra 85 cents an hour, whereas the captain of a large airliner will get an extra $3.88.
Other workers will miss out. They include people whose pay is higher than award minimums, set through enterprise bargaining agreements, are self-employed, or in jobs that are too senior to be covered by an award, such as high-level managers and professionals.
The Fair Work Commission considered multiple factors – particularly living standards and inflation
Tuesday's decision announced by Fair Work Commission president Adam Hatcher said the pay panel had considered relative living standards, needs of workers, workforce participation, economic competitiveness and gender equality.
The commission also considered the Reserve Bank of Australia's assessment that the nation's inflationary episode was over, having spiked in 2022, and that said inflation had sustainably returned to the target band of 2-3 per cent.
'The continuation of this inflationary episode has meant that over the last three annual wage review decisions the Fair Work Commission has repeatedly deferred taking any action to reverse this decline in real wages out of the concern this might result in the persistence of higher inflation,' he said.
'The result has been that living standards for the employees dependent on modern award wages have been squeezed and the low paid have experienced greater difficulty in meeting their everyday needs.'
Hatcher said this was a key factor in the commission's decision to award a real increase in the minimum wage.
'We are concerned that if this opportunity is not taken … the loss in the real value of wages which has occurred will become permanently embedded.'
When was the last increase?
The Fair Work Commission sets the minimum wage every year before July 1. Last year, the commission announced a 3.75 per cent increase.
The commission's pay panel sets the minimum wage each year to give the lowest-paid workers an increase in income, balanced against factors including the jobs market, inflation and growth in the economy.
Inflation was factored into the FWC's decision. But views are split on whether wage rises will increase inflation
Chief executive of business group the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Andrew McKellar – who suggested the commission opt for a smaller a 2.5 per cent wage increase – said the increase was generous and risked increasing inflation.
'It is a bump above inflation and it comes on the back of stronger increases over the past two years,' he said. 'For businesses that are most vulnerable, particularly small and medium-size businesses in sectors like retail, restaurants [and] cafes … an increase of this magnitude will be very difficult for them to swallow.'
However, Australian Council of Trade Unions secretary Sally McManus, who wanted a 4.5 per cent increase, welcomed the decision as a 'great outcome'.
'3.5 per cent means [the Fair Work Commission is] starting to catch up again, and that makes an enormous amount of difference in terms of people's bills, people's ability to pay for the basics,' she said at a press conference in Melbourne.
'I do think that the government's argument that a real wage increase is economically sustainable was something the commission listened to, and I do believe that 3.5 per cent does fit with what the government was arguing, and that means that people are getting ahead.'
Workplace Minister Amanda Rishworth said the Fair Work Commission's decision was consistent with the government's submission.
'We argued for an economically sustainable real-wage increase for our lowest-paid workers,' she said. 'This decision will have a positive impact on workers … that rely on our award system.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
23 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce gives grim warning amid major push for work from home changes
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has warned Aussies are at risk of losing their jobs if they continue to work from home, amid the new boom in artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace. The Australian Services Union (ASU) argues that employers should be forced to give employees six months' notice before requiring they return to the office in a submission to the Fair Work Commission. The union is also arguing for the presumption that work from home requests be approved and that if an employer seeks to vary or pause work from home arrangements, the six-month notice period should apply. In auxiliary to the rule, an employer would be required to have genuinely tried to reach agreement with the employee to accommodate the employee's circumstances. The employer would be required, under the clause, to respond within 14 days of an office worker's request to work from home and is required to set out the business grounds, if refused. Appearing on Sunrise, Joyce took aim at the proposal. 'It's absurdity,' Joyce said. 'What you're doing there is encouraging people not to employ people. 'You can't just say you're going to work from home today or you won't have a job.' Barr challenged Joyce, saying a lot of people can work from home. Joyce replied: 'I think you got to be careful. 'It's not a myth, AI is coming. 'What you're doing is encouraging people to say 'ok, stay home for the whole week because you don't have a job anymore'. 'AI is coming into clerical work and remove jobs left, right, and centre. 'I'd be doing everything in your power to try and keep your jobs because if people can prove they don't need to come to the office, then the office can prove they can be replaced by AI. 'Be really careful in not being enthusiastic about not going to the office and getting to work.' Barr pressed Joyce on how to protect the jobs. 'I don't know whether you can, that's the problem. 'What you have to do is broaden the base of the economy, so there are alternate jobs to go to. 'But in our genius, we have decided to go to net zero and intermittent power, so we don't have an industrial base to absorb those jobs and that is one of the big problems we've got.' Barr then pressed Albanese minister Tanya Plibersek on businesses claiming there will be a net increase in jobs due to AI. Plibersek said: 'I think there will be different types of jobs. 'A lot of the repetitive work will be done by AI in the future and what we need to do is make sure there are good jobs available for Australians in new and emerging industries as well. 'We've got real capacity to develop some of those AI tools right here. 'The big data centres we're going to need to run some of these programs can be based right here and they can be powered by renewable energy. 'We have the cheapest form of energy available to us here in Australia. 'Solar, wind, we know it's the cheapest form of new energy.' Barr pressed Joyce on Aussies learning a trade, as AI can't replicate the work. Joyce said: 'You are dead right. 'They should because I can assure to my accountancy days, electricians overwhelmingly earn more money than people who have graduated with arts degrees or junior degrees. 'Doctors can go and make good money, no doubt about that. 'But AI won't be able to turn itself into a plumber or itself into an electrician or a chippy, so trades are a place where you can sustain a good level of employment. 'But if you are just in clerical work ... that's what its genius does, (it) replaces people but it doesn't have hands and it doesn't have feet.'

News.com.au
23 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Absolute priority': NAB underpays staff $130m
A big-four bank has revealed it will pay back workers $130m due to a payroll system problem at the same time that it announced an eye-watering profit. In its latest quarterly results, NAB announced a slight increase in third-quarter profits while pointing to a jump in operating expenses due to back paying workers. According to the bank, operating expenses were up 4.5 per cent on last year as it dealt with payroll issues estimated to come in at $130m for the 2025 financial year. The bank did not say how many employees need to be back paid. 'NAB payroll review and remediation is ongoing and total costs remain uncertain,' the bank said. The payroll review first began in 2019 and led to costs of more than $250m between 2020 and 2022. In 2020, NAB said it had underpayments to staff dating back all the way to October 2012. Moving staff to a new enterprise agreement in 2024 identified further payroll issues. As a result, NAB has initiated a broader review into payroll-related benefits. NAB group executive people and culture Sarah White said a dedicated team was continuing to investigate and resolve issues, remediate colleagues and ensure sustained future compliance. 'Paying our colleagues correctly is an absolute priority,' she said. 'We are sorry and apologise to our colleagues that this has happened and have commenced remediating those impacted.' Meanwhile, NAB reported a slight increase in third-quarter cash earnings on the back of improved margins and growth in both business and home lending. NAB made $1.77bn for the three months ending June 30, up from $1.75bn this time last year. NAB said business lending grew 4 per cent and Australian home lending grew 2 per cent during the quarter. Net interest margins increased 8 basis points. Expenses were also up 3 per cent on the back of higher staff costs, investment in new technology and remediation costs. Bank deposits were largely stable over the quarter but are up 6 per cent over the nine months to June 30. The major lender also booked a credit impairment charge of $254m in the quarter, mainly related to business lending in Australia and New Zealand as well as unsecured Australian retail portfolios. NAB chief executive Andrew Irvine said focusing on key priorities led to Monday's result. 'We remain optimistic about the outlook and are well placed to manage NAB for the long term and deliver sustainable growth and returns for shareholders,' he said.


Perth Now
23 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Absolute priority': Bank's $130m pay bungle
A big-four bank has revealed it will pay back workers $130m due to a payroll system problem at the same time that it announced an eye-watering profit. In its latest quarterly results, NAB announced a slight increase in third-quarter profits while pointing to a jump in operating expenses due to back paying workers. According to the bank, operating expenses were up 4.5 per cent on last year as it dealt with payroll issues estimated to come in at $130m for the 2025 financial year. The bank did not say how many employees need to be back paid. 'NAB payroll review and remediation is ongoing and total costs remain uncertain,' the bank said. NAB announced it has underpaid staff a further $130m. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire The payroll review first began in 2019 and led to costs of more than $250m between 2020 and 2022. In 2020, NAB said it had underpayments to staff dating back all the way to October 2012. Moving staff to a new enterprise agreement in 2024 identified further payroll issues. As a result, NAB has initiated a broader review into payroll-related benefits. NAB group executive people and culture Sarah White said a dedicated team was continuing to investigate and resolve issues, remediate colleagues and ensure sustained future compliance. 'Paying our colleagues correctly is an absolute priority,' she said. 'We are sorry and apologise to our colleagues that this has happened and have commenced remediating those impacted.' Meanwhile, NAB reported a slight increase in third-quarter cash earnings on the back of improved margins and growth in both business and home lending. NAB's quarterly profits came in at $1.77bn. NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia NAB made $1.77bn for the three months ending June 30, up from $1.75bn this time last year. NAB said business lending grew 4 per cent and Australian home lending grew 2 per cent during the quarter. Net interest margins increased 8 basis points. Expenses were also up 3 per cent on the back of higher staff costs, investment in new technology and remediation costs. Bank deposits were largely stable over the quarter but are up 6 per cent over the nine months to June 30. The major lender also booked a credit impairment charge of $254m in the quarter, mainly related to business lending in Australia and New Zealand as well as unsecured Australian retail portfolios. NAB chief executive Andrew Irvine said focusing on key priorities led to Monday's result. 'We remain optimistic about the outlook and are well placed to manage NAB for the long term and deliver sustainable growth and returns for shareholders,' he said.