MIT bans class president from graduation commencement after pro-Palestinian speech
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology banned the 2025 class president from Friday's graduation commencement ceremony after she delivered a pro-Palestinian speech during an event Thursday.
The university made the announcement on Friday without naming the student, saying that she delivered a speech at Thursday's OneMIT commencement ceremony that was not the one provided in advance.
"While that individual had a scheduled role at today's Undergraduate Degree Ceremony, she was notified that she would not be permitted at today's events," said university spokesperson Kimberly Allen. "MIT supports free expression but stands by its decision, which was in response to the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading Commencement organizers and leading a protest from the stage, disrupting an important Institute ceremony."
The speech was shared online by the Palestinian Youth Movement, which named the student as Megha Vemuri. Vemuri wore a Keffiyeh during the speech, and called out MIT for having research ties with the Israel army and "aiding and abetting" the country with its "assault on the Palestinian people."
Israel's war in Gaza has killed over 52,000 people since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants killed some 1,200 people in Israel and took 251 people hostage. Israel has received intense criticism from around the world, including from the United Nations, for its actions in Gaza, which include cutting off aid to the enclave.
"As scientists, engineers, academics and leaders, we have a commitment to support life, support aid efforts and call for an arms embargo and keep demanding now as alumni, that MIT cuts the ties," Vemuri said.
Her speech was met by cheers and applause from her fellow classmates, some of whom held up a Palestinian flag.
"Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza," Vemuri said. "We are watching Israel try to wipe out Palestine off the face of the earth, and it is a shame that MIT is a part of it."
Vemuri mentioned that the undergraduate body voted in favor of the university cutting ties with Israel, and faced "threats, intimidation and suppression coming from all directions, especially your own university officials."
"But you prevailed because the MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide," Vemuri said.
Vemuri then called on her fellow classmates to partake in the MIT tradition of turning their class rings that bear university mascot "Tim the Beaver."
"And as you lift it off your fingers, notice that the beaver is no longer facing you, it is now facing the world," Temuri said. "This is a world that we will be entering with an immeasurable responsibility. We will carry with us the stamp of the MIT name, the same name that is directly complicit in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.And so we carry with us the obligation to do everything we can to stop it."
NBC News has reached out to Vemuri for comment.
On Friday, MIT President Sally Kornbluth made her remarks at the commencement for the class of 2025, encouraging them to become ambassadors for scientific thinking and discovery. Kornbluth said that the university allows "a lot of room for disagreement, whether the subject is scientific, personal, or political," but encouraged the new grads to rely on the "beauty and power of the scientific method."
"I need you all to become ambassadors for the way we think and work and thrive at MIT," Kornbluth said.
Kornbluth did not mention any specific incident during her remarks, including the one involving Vemuri. It's not clear at this time if Vemuri was officially allowed to graduate from MIT.
Vemuri is not the only graduate who has been penalized for her political views.
Earlier this month, New York University withheld student Logan Rozos' diploma after he delivered an unapproved commencement speech to address what he called the 'atrocities currently happening in Palestine' during the Israel-Hamas war.
NYU condemned Rozos' speech, calling it an expression of "his personal and one-sided political views."
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine Braces for Putin's Retaliation
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A NATO official has echoed President Donald Trump's warning that his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will seek revenge for Ukraine's drone strikes on Russia's military airfields. Following his phone call with the Russian president, Trump said Putin "will have to respond" to the attack on airfields, which Kyiv said damaged 41 aircraft including heavy bombers and A-50 spy planes. As Trump's envoy has warned the strikes risked escalation in the war, an unnamed NATO official told The Moscow Times that Russia would take "retaliatory actions" against Ukraine for its "Spiderweb" drone operation. Experts have told Newsweek that, in response, Putin is likely to step up drone and missile attacks. Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin and the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry by email for comment. File photo: Russia's President Vladimir Putin sits at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence, outside Moscow, on June 4, 2025. File photo: Russia's President Vladimir Putin sits at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence, outside Moscow, on June 4, It Matters Ukraine heralded the strikes on Russian airfields as far away as Siberia as a blow to Russia's military capabilities. Pro-Russian Telegram channels have expressed anger at the lack of protection at the sites, but the comments by Trump and his envoy will add to anticipation over what Putin will do in response. What To Know Trump said on the social-media platform Truth Social on Wednesday that, during his phone call with Putin, the leaders had discussed Ukraine's attacks on airplanes. The U.S. president said Putin said "very strongly" that he would have to respond to Kyiv's drone attacks without specifying what this would be nor whether he had urged restraint. Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, had earlier told Fox News that Ukraine's attack on "part of their national survival system, which is their … nuclear triad," had significantly increased the risk of escalation. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Planet Labs PBC An alliance official told The Moscow Times before NATO's defense ministers meeting in Brussels that Putin will use the attacks to justify additional heavier strikes and stall negotiations. Cédomir Nestorovic, academic co-director at the ESSEC Institute for Geopolitics & Business, told Newsweek that, in response, Russia could launch massive drone attacks on Ukraine, but probably not the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile that Putin has boasted about, nor any nuclear missiles. Aurélien Colson, from the same institute, told Newsweek that Putin's response will be primarily military, but his options are limited to missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities. Zev Faintuch, head of research and intelligence at security firm Global Guardian, told Newsweek that Ukraine's attack might slow the massive aerial bombardments of the major Ukrainian cities. However, the only way to bring the Russians to the negotiating table would be to halt their advances on the battlefield, he added. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said Wednesday that Putin used his call with Trump, in which they also discussed the train derailments in Russia that Moscow blamed on Kyiv, to portray Ukraine falsely as uninterested in peace and as a bad actor. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields." A NATO official said to The Moscow Times: "There will certainly be retaliatory actions that Russia will take. And there will be defensive things that Russia will do." Aurélien Colson, academic co-director at the ESSEC Institute for Geopolitics & Business, said: "(Putin) will probably launch another larger air attack on Ukrainian cities and infrastructures, through missiles and drones," adding that "going nuclear at the tactical level is excluded," due to China's opposition to such a move. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said on Wednesday: "Putin's statements to Trump are also likely aimed at distracting from Russia's own disinterest in negotiations and continued preparations for a prolonged war effort." What Happens Next Amid speculation over how Putin might respond to his worst week of 2025, the Russian president told his senior officials on Wednesday that he was no longer interested in negotiating with Ukraine, saying, "How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?" Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of R. Politik, a political analysis firm focused on Russia, posted on X, formerly Twitter, that Western audiences may view Ukraine's attacks as strengthening Kyiv's negotiating position, but the effect "will likely be the opposite." Stanovaya said such attacks will only reinforce Putin's determination to dismantle the Ukrainian state and that he will respond "by becoming more hard-line and less compliant."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvard battle is Trump's ‘Mao moment': lessons from China's state-sanctioned university crackdown
During the 1966-1976 Cultural Revolution, Mao Zedong pushed for the closure of Chinese universities, seeing higher education as little more than a breeding ground for counterrevolutionary bourgeois intellectuals. After closing for a period, China's universities reopened on a limited basis from 1970, with selection criteria based on class background, revolutionary devotion and connections to the communist party. It was not until 1977 that the national university entrance exam (gaokao) was reinstated and a merit system put back in place. This period had been China's 'Mao moment' in higher education, but Mao's historic mistake appears to be repeating itself in the US today. Imperial China had a sophisticated system of examinations (kējǔ, 科举) for citizens to reach the status of civil servant, or mandarin. These tests date back to the 7th century, under the Sui dynasty (581-618), and lasted until 1905. Depending on the period, the exams lasted from one to three days. Candidates were locked in a room, identified by a number, and their tests were copied by a third party so that their identity could not be recognised by their handwriting. All this was to ensure a fair and impartial contest for candidates whose futures were at stake. MIT professor Yasheng Huang says that if he had to highlight one fundamental difference between China and other civilisations, it would be the existence of these imperial examinations. He adds that they were both a blessing and a curse. He also points out that they are directly to blame for the state's ongoing monopolisation of human talent in China. Put simply, the best and brightest became mandarins under this system. By depriving society of access to the best talent, the state also denied its people the chance of having any kind of organised religion, commerce or intelligentsia. For Huang, the imperial examinations were a significant cause of the decline of collective social action in China, one of the distinctive features of a civil society. This is reflected in the title of his 2024 book 'The Rise and Fall of the EAST', where EAST is not a compass point but an acronym for China's defining features: Exams, Autocracy, Stability and Technology. 'The 'Chinese phenomenon' is why this ancient civilization with a long history of more than 2,000 years has declined in the modern era. Why is it lagging behind the modern nations of the world?' This question was posed in 1991 by the Chinese politician and intellectual Wang Huning, in his book America against America. Ever since Deng Xiaoping came to power in 1978, it became increasingly clear to China that its progress depended on raising its population's education level, especially after the ravages of the Maoist Cultural Revolution. To do this, China created the C9 League in 2009. Composed of nine universities and similar to the American Ivy League, its members account for 10% of China's national research budget, 3% of its total number of researchers, and 20% of published studies. Leer más: When I spoke of 'barbarians' in my 2024 book China for the New Barbarians,(Nola editores, 2024), I did so to call attention to the fact that there is a certain ignorance when the West speaks about China. However, the Trump Administration's ongoing attacks against Harvard, one of the world's most renowned universities, can only be described as barbaric. Last week Harvard was barred from enrolling international students on the grounds of alleged leftist indoctrination and anti-Semitism. It has also revoked student visas and, as if that were not enough, it has demanded that universities hand over information on students who have participated in student protests. What the Trump Administration wants is for Harvard to cease foreign admissions, a move that would lock out 6,500 students. In addition to denying Harvard access to top international talent, it would also inflict enormous damage to the ever-weakening concept of the 'American spirit', made up of democratic values, freedom, generosity, equality of opportunity, universal education, courage and leadership. The measure has been temporarily blocked by a district judge, though this may not count for much – the Trump Administration has already set a precedent of disputing or ignoring court orders. The situation is so dire that Jerome Powell – the chair of the Federal Reserve who was appointed by Trump during his first term – has been unable to keep quiet. Addressing Princeton University students at the May 2025 commencement speech, he stressed that American universities are the envy of the world, and a crucial asset for the US to continue to lead in scientific innovation and economic dynamism. Powell has himself been a target of Trump's criticism. In response to Powell's refusal to lower interest rates – which he has kept between 4.25% and 4.5% to contain inflation – the president has called him 'Mr Too Late' and 'Major loser'. Leer más: The world watches in astonishment as the US federal administration attempts to dismantle the country's university system, which for decades has been one of the US' poles of attraction, and a bulwark of its economic and technological success. This was perhaps best expressed by Oriaku, a Nigerian taxi driver I met back in the nineties who ferried me and my colleague Juan Gordon around Lagos. He told us about his dream of sending his children to Harvard, and when Juan commented that this would be expensive he wisely replied 'if you think education is expensive, try ignorance.' 'Harvard, Harvard,' Oriaku continued, 'that's the only reason I work myself to the bone.' Moves are already being made elsewhere to pick up the slack and welcome academics. The Hong Kong government, for instance, has called on its universities to attract the foreign talent that the US now wants to reject. Meanwhile, the Chinese can only smirk: they already lived through Mao's brutal onslaught against their universities during the Cultural Revolution and know that it will bring no benefits. America is living through its own 'Mao moments', but we may soon be able rename them 'Trump moments'. Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en The Conversation, un sitio de noticias sin fines de lucro dedicado a compartir ideas de expertos académicos. Lee mas: 3 ways the government can silence opinions it disagrees with, without using censorship Can Trump strip Harvard of its charitable status? Scholars of nonprofit law and accounting describe the obstacles in his way Harvard is suing the White House: here's what Trump hopes to achieve by targeting universities Félix Valdivieso no recibe salario, ni ejerce labores de consultoría, ni posee acciones, ni recibe financiación de ninguna compañía u organización que pueda obtener beneficio de este artículo, y ha declarado carecer de vínculos relevantes más allá del cargo académico citado.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ben-Gvir calls for Gaza occupation after IDF recovers hostages' remains
Ben-Gvir and other politicians call for the return of hostages using any force necessary, as the people of Israel send hugs and condolences with broken hearts to the families of Judith and Gadi. Following the IDF's recovery of the bodies of Judith Weinstein Haggai and her husband, Gadi Haggai, from Gaza, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called on the IDF to occupy Gaza and encourage Palestinian emigration from the Strip in a Thursday social media post. "It is time to stop hesitating, authorize the IDF to implement the plans to occupy the Strip, enter with full force, dismantle Hamas, release the hostages, and encourage immigration. We must not miss this historic opportunity!" The national security minister said that the return of the bodies of the couple is both painful and good news. He stated that he feels the pain of the family and the Nir Oz community and sends them a hug in this painful time, and sends condolences from the bottom of his heart. He saluted the IDF and Shin Bet and continued that although the return of the bodies is a difficult moment, it is proof that military force can bring our loved ones home. He went on to state that surrender is not an option in the face of cruel terrorism. Many others sent their condolences while also calling for the return of all hostages, using any means necessary. Opposition head and Yesh Atid chair, MK Yair Lapid, sent his sincere condolences to the family and congratulated the IDF and Shin Bet on their operation. "We will not stop fighting until the 56 abductees are returned to Israel," he shared. "The State of Israel has a moral and national obligation to bring back all of our brothers and sisters, both living and deceased, and we will continue to act decisively until this mission is complete,' Defense Minister Israel Katz stated. National Unity head, MK Benny Gantz, posted that his heart goes out to the families and the entire Nir Oz community. He continued speaking of the determination of the IDF and Shin Bet to continue operating and not give up trying to find the hostages, dead or alive. Saying that, " is precisely our DNA as Israelis and as Jews. No one must be left behind." Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, shared his condolences with the Hagai-Weinstein and Nir Oz families. He saluted the soldiers in reserve and regular service, who are fighting to return all the hostages, living or dead. He continued, "Our commitment to the return of the kidnapped and Israel's security accompanies us every day. We will continue to do everything to bring everyone home." Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared in a statement the details of the special operation to retrieve the hostages. He went on to extend condolences from him and his wife to the families and to honor the commanders and fighters for their successful mission. He concluded, "We will not rest or be silent until we return all of our hostages home - the living and the dead alike." Israeli President Isaac Herzog posted, "The return of the bodies of the late Judy Lynn Weinstein Hagai and the late Gadi Hagai is a moment of deep pain, alongside comfort and the resolution of doubts." He ended, "We will continue to work with all our might to restore our sisters and brothers from hell – the living to rehabilitation and healing, and the dead to the grave of Israel. Until the last of them!" Democratic leader Yair Golan took to Twitter to say he shared the grief of the family and the entire Nir Oz from the bottom of his heart. He continued by saying his heart is with the 56 captives in Gaza and their families. He concluded, "We will not recover until they all return. We have to bring everyone back." Environmental Protection Minister Idit Silman (Likud) stated, 'This is our duty — to bring back all the hostages, both the living and the deceased. This is not mere rhetoric. Unity and mutual responsibility are the bedrock of our society's existence here, and it is our obligation to bring them all home.' Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana (Likud) posted on behalf of the Knesset that he shares the grief of the families and loved ones of the recovered hostages. He went on to say, "This operation, like its predecessors, emphasizes the State of Israel's commitment to returning all 56 of our kidnapped brothers and sisters who remain in captivity by terrorist organizations." Nir Oz shared the statement from Judith and Gadi's family. The family of Judith and Gadi conveyed their gratitude for the closure that they can now bury the bodies of their loved ones. They thanked the IDF and security forces that performed the rescue operation and have been fighting for the last year and a half. They also wanted to thank "everyone who supported, fought, prayed, and struggled on our behalf and for all the people of Israel." They also thanked the Trump administration, along with the Israeli government and the FBI, for all of their work and support. They concluded by saying, "However, our hearts will not be at peace until all 12 hostages from Nir Oz, and all 56 hostages overall, are brought back.'
