
Just 23% of Americans say Israeli military actions in Gaza are fully justified, CNN poll finds
Only 23% of Americans say Israel's actions have been fully justified, a 27-point drop from a October 2023 poll taken shortly after Hamas' October 7 attacks. Another 27% now say those actions have been partially justified and 22% say that they have not been justified at all. In October 2023, just 8% said Israel's actions were not justified at all.
This drop cuts across party lines but is far larger among Democrats and independents. Since 2023, the share of Democrats who say that Israel's actions have been fully justified has dropped from 38% to just 7%, the share among independents from 45% to 14%, and the share among Republicans from 68% to 52%.
Since this March, the share of Democrats and Democratic-leaning adults saying that the US provides too much military aid for Israel has risen from 44% to 59% while the share of Republican-aligned adults saying that has stayed steady at 24%. Democratic-aligned adults under the age of 35 are particularly opposed to US military aid to Israel, with 72% saying the US is doing too much, including 43% who say that the US should stop aid to Israel entirely and another 29% saying that it should reduce the amount of military aid.
Younger adults across parties express the most skepticism towards Israel. Just 1 in 10 adults under 35 say that Israel's military actions in Gaza have been fully justified while a third say that Israel's actions have not been justified at all. Younger adults are also most likely to say that Israel has used too much military force (61%) and that the US is doing too much to help Israel in its war with Hamas (56%).
People of color are similarly skeptical: 13% say that Israel's actions in Gaza have been fully justified, compared to 29% saying they have not been justified at all. Nearly 6 in 10 people of color. (57%) say Israel has used too much military force.
Americans are split on Israel's use of military force and American aid to Israel. Half of Americans say that Israel has used too much military force in Gaza (39% say the amount of force has been about right and 10% say it's been too little). A rising share says the US is doing too much to help Israel in its war with Hamas (42%, up from 34% in March of this year and 33% in January 2024), with 42% saying the US is doing the right amount to help and 14% too little. Americans who think the US is doing too much split evenly between reducing military aid (22% of all adults) and stopping it entirely (21%).
The rising share of Americans who express concerns about the extent of US aid to Israel comes amid broader questions about the nation's involvement in international affairs.
A majority (56%) say the US should not take a leading role in trying to solve international problems (43% said the US should take such a role), a change from March, when the public split roughly evenly.
Democratic-aligned adults in particular have shifted away from support for an active US role in the world. A majority of Democrats and Democratic-leaners (58%) said the US should take a leading role in solving international problems in March, weeks after the confrontation in the Oval Office between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump, and Vice President JD Vance led to a pause in US military aid to Ukraine. That portion is down to 44% now, a reversion to more familiar ground (42% of Democratic-aligned adults favored a leading role in 2004 and 37% said the same in 2015). This poll was fielded weeks after the US military struck three nuclear sites in Iran, an action that was deeply unpopular among Democrats.
The split among Democratic-aligned adults in the country's role in international affairs further divides the party's views on Israel. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning adults who say the US should not take a leading role generally, just 25% think Israel's military actions against Hamas have been fully or partially justified (compared to 61% among those who say the US should take a leading role), and they're about twice as likely to favor halting US military aid to Israel (37%, compared to 19% of those who say the US should take a leading role).
Before Trump was first elected, Republican-aligned adults were more supportive of the US taking a leading role (65% in 2004 and 54% in 2015), and the Republican Party has historically been more inclined toward US interventionism. After Trump made the end of US interventionism a key pillar of his presidential campaigns, the party has become split between more traditional hawks and isolationists, and Republican-aligned adults now split evenly on whether the country should take a leading role.
Reflecting the more traditional view, one Republican from North Carolina included in the poll writes that helping Ukraine defeat Russia is the most important issue facing the country. But other Republicans felt that US interventionism led to worse outcomes for American citizens, including one person from Pennsylvania who says that 'we help and worry about people in other countries before our own. I think we need to make our country and people great again before we can help others.'
Still, foreign affairs are top of mind for few Americans, with just 5% naming an issue related to foreign policy as the most important issue facing the country.
Americans remain broadly skeptical of Trump's handling of foreign affairs (40% approve to 60% disapprove, almost identical to April). In the aftermath of the US military strikes in Iran, the public also expresses doubt about Trump's handling of his role as commander-in-chief, with an approval rating of 40% and a disapproval rating of 59%, higher than at any point in his first term – including January 2020, when his disapproval rating stood at 53% shortly after he ordered the assassination of an Iranian military leader, Qasem Soleimani.
A majority of the public (53%) also say that Trump's foreign policy decisions have hurt America's standing in the world, compared to just 31% who say his decisions have helped America's standing (15% say they have not made any difference). One independent in Michigan responding to the poll writes that the most important issue facing the country is how 'the world is now viewing the United States. We were a beacon of hope at one time. Not anymore.'
While Republicans generally approve of Trump's handling of foreign affairs (86% approve) and his role as commander-in-chief (84%), a smaller portion (69%) say his foreign policy decisions have helped America's standing in the world (15% say they have hurt and 17% that they haven't made any difference). Democrats have a more uniformly negative view of Trump's handling of foreign affairs: 93% say they disapprove of his handling of foreign affairs, 91% how he handles his role as commander-in-chief, and 89% say his decisions have hurt America's standing in the world (with just 4% saying they've helped).
Several key figures in the Trump administration's handling of foreign affairs are viewed unfavorably by the American people, including Vance (45% unfavorable to 33% favorable), Secretary of State Marco Rubio (36% unfavorable to 24% favorable), and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (34% unfavorable to 17% favorable). Among Republicans, all three are broadly popular, though with sizable shares still unsure about their feelings on Rubio or Hegseth.
The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS from July 10-13 among a random national sample of 1,057 US adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among all adults have a margin of sampling error of ±3.5 percentage points.
CNN's Jennifer Agiesta and Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Eases Gaza Aid Curbs Amid International Outcry
Live on Bloomberg TV CC-Transcript 00:00A lot of international pressure had been building on Israel to do something about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Resume the passage of humanitarian aid. What do we know? What are the latest developments from the weekend in terms of what is being allowed in now? So, I mean, there does seem to be a change of policy there and we'll see how long it lasts, because as you know, we've been here several times before. So what we can see on the ground is air drops going in. And we know that Israel did some and then we had some coming in, I think from from Jordan as well, anyway. Yeah. And you have aid trucks coming in from both Egypt and Jordan. But I think all the aid groups unanimously are saying it's nowhere near enough. So definitely better than last week. But we're talking about a drop in the ocean relative to what's required. And remember, they're playing a lot of catch up here because you have this total blockade for a least two or three months. And it's been a trickle since then. But as you say, the international pressure, I think, has got to the point where it sort of becomes indefensible not to try and do something. Yeah. Is this going to have any bearings on the cease fire discussions which also collapsed towards the end of last week? I mean, to some extent, but I mean, in terms of the actual impacts on the cease fire and the terms and conditions that both sides want. I can't see a change of change there. And we keep coming up against again and again, you know, there's this sort of insurmountable clash, I would say, between what Hamas is asking for and what Israel is asking for. I don't see any change in that, at least at the moment. Yeah. Later today, the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is going to be meeting with President Trump to discuss trade deal, obviously, and amongst other things they're going to be talking about Gaza. The UK prime minister is also under a lot of pressure now because of President Macron's decision last week to recognise Palestinian statehood. Right. The UK have not said anything to that effect, but he has said that he wants to work with President Trump on pushing for a lasting ceasefire. How much leverage really does the UK Prime Minister have and also how much leverage in this instance does the U.S. have in terms of trying to procure that lasting ceasefire? Yeah, I mean, so starting with the UK on the U.S., I would say next to none, or at least I see no evidence whatsoever that there is any influence there. And that in terms of the sort of the second leg of that, which is the U.S. influence on Bibi, I mean, that waxes and wanes and it kind of depends on what's happening on the ground within Israel. And as you know, Netanyahu is in a more precarious position politically than he was, say, a couple of weeks ago. You know, he's lost his majority, obviously, in the Knesset. And to some extent, he will have to respond, I would suspect, with more thought to what's going on domestically than to the U.S. pressure. That's not to say he ignores what the U.S. is saying, but he's very sort of 5050 about whether he's going to respond in a positive way to what he's being asked to do. Yeah, And also, the U.S. seemed to be a little bit frustrated. And if you listen to the language that came out of Steve Wake of when those ceasefire discussions broke down, he said he doesn't think that Hamas are acting in good faith or in a cooperative manner. So even the U.S. are frustrated with how all this is going.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump pauses export controls to bolster China trade deal, FT says
(Reuters) -The U.S. has paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support President Donald Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with President Xi Jinping this year, the Financial Times said on Monday. The industry and security bureau of the Commerce Department, which oversees export controls, has been told in recent months to avoid tough moves on China, the newspaper said, citing current and former officials. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House and the department did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment outside business hours. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials are set to resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies. Tech giant Nvidia said this month it would resume sales of its H20 graphics processing units (GPU) to China, reversing an export curb the Trump administration imposed in April to keep advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands over national security concerns. The planned resumption was part of U.S. negotiations on rare earths and magnets, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said. The paper said 20 security experts and former officials, including former deputy US national security adviser Matt Pottinger, will write on Monday to Lutnick to voice concern, however. "This move represents a strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence," they write in the letter, it added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


UPI
43 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump, Starmer to meet in Scotland to talk trade, Gaza
President Donald Trump (R) shakes hands with Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain at the White House in Washington, D.C., on February 27. The pair are to meet Monday at Trump's Scotland golf course where they are expected to talk trade and the war in Gaza. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI. | License Photo July 28 (UPI) -- U.S. President Donald Trump is set to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday when the Western leaders are expected to discuss cease-fire plans for the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. Starmer is to travel to Trump's golf course in Turnberry where the American president on Sunday announced a new trade deal with the European Union. According to a statement from 10 Downing Street, Trump and Starmer are to have "wide-ranging" one-on-one talks, including on the implementation of the Economic Prosperity Deal that the pair signed on May 8 and which came into effect last month. Starmer is also expected to discuss with Trump "what more can be done to secure the cease-fire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has sought a cease-fire and hostage-release deal in the war in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza between Iran-poxy militia Hamas and Israel, but has repeatedly been met with obstacles. On Thursday, Israel and the United States recalled their negotiators, ending talks with Hamas that had initially sparked optimism that a deal could be reached. The Trump administration has blamed Hamas for the breakdown, with Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, stating the Iran-backed militia's latest response "clearly shows a lack of desire to reach a cease-fire in Gaza." "It's a shame Hamas has acted in this selfish way," he said in a statement. The Trump-Starmer meeting comes amid a deteriorating situation in Gaza where aid agencies are warning of starvation. Israel has announced a so-called tactical pause to fighting in specific areas to allow the delivery of aid between the hours of 10 a.m. and 8 p.m., local time, on Sunday. The announcement came as the Middle Eastern country is coming under mounting international pressure over its war in Gaza and its restrictions on aid entering the territory. According to the Save the Children charity, 133 people, including 87 children, have already died from malnutrition and starvation. Britain is among 30 nations that are calling for the war in Gaza to end, describing Israel's aid delivery model as "dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity." "We condemn the drip-feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food," the nations said in the joint statement, which calls on Israel to lift the restrictions on the flow of aid. "The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable. Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law." Britain, France and Germany separately over the weekend issued a statement calling for Israel and Hamas to end the conflict "by reaching an immediate cease-fire." Trump and Starmer are also expected to discuss the war in Ukraine. After the meeting, they will have a private engagement in Aberdeen, 10 Downing Street said. The meeting also comes ahead of Trump being received for a State Visit hosted by King Charles III at Windsor Castle from Sept. 17 to 19. It will be Trump's second State Visit after a previous trip in 2019 where he was hosted by the late Queen Elizabeth II.