Housing secretary 'doesn't know number of people on social housing list'
Scotland's new cabinet secretary for housing has told STV News she 'doesn't have the figure' of the number of people waiting for social housing in Scotland.
Màiri McAllan was asked the question during a visit to Wheatley Group development in Bathgate, West Lothian on Wednesday.
She admitted that she 'didn't have the figure,' which currently stands at nearly 250,000 people.
'I don't have that, I don't have that figure on me today, no', she told STV News.
'So in my office in parliament, I have a dashboard that demonstrates to me the number of people who are waiting, who are in temporary accommodation, unsuitable…it's not that I don't know it, I don't have the figure with me today.
'I think what they'll be more interested in is that I am now taking this brief into Cabinet with a direct line to the First Minister and that housing is one of his absolute priorities.
'That we are investing more than ever in the delivery of affordable homes, and that I am turning over every stone that I can to make sure that more homes are available to more people in Scotland, and I'll be making that my priority.'
McAllan took up her new position last week – the same day she returned from maternity leave – as the First Minister upgraded housing to a standalone capital position.
The Government Housing (Scotland) Bill is midway through its parliamentary passage, having cleared stage two last week.
McAllan's appointment was said to ensure government action is focused on 'tackling the housing emergency and providing energy efficient homes for the future'. STV News Nearly 250,000 people are waiting for social housing in Scotland.
Ms McAllan met with tenants from Wheatley Homes on Wednesday before being shown around the homes on-site.
The development, which contains 29 homes for social rent, including two and three-bedroom properties, has been funded by £3.1m through the Scottish Government's Charitable Bonds programme.
The visit comes after MSPs took evidence on the housing crisis last Thursday, with leading figures calling for the Scottish Government to prioritise the issue at a senior level.
At least 12 councils have declared local housing emergencies.
Argyll and Bute council was the first to do so in June 2023, followed by Edinburgh, Glasgow, Fife, and West Dunbartonshire councils.
The councils cited issues ranging from pressure on homelessness services, rising property prices and high levels of temporary accommodation.
The Scottish Government formally declared a national housing emergency on May 15, 2024.
In a new report titled 'Still Waiting', the Scottish Federation of Housing Association revealed that nearly 250,000 people across Scotland are currently waiting for a social home.
The group, while welcoming the £212m uplift for the affordable homes programme, has said that funding needs to go further, citing the 'devastating' experience of people stuck on waiting lists.
'This devastating research lays bare the consequences of our housing emergency', said SFHA Chief Executive Sally Thomas.
'We know that nearly 250,000 people in Scotland are on a waiting list for a social home: this report shows that they are often trapped in insecure, unaffordable housing which does not meet their needs and takes a significant toll on their physical and mental wellbeing.'
Steven Henderson, chief executive of Wheatley Group, said: 'Increasing the supply and maintenance of homes that are affordable, fuel efficient and of high quality has never been more essential in Scotland. It's central to what Wheatley stands for and does.
'Since 2021, Wheatley has committed to building around 3000 new affordable homes. Last year, we were recognised as the UK's largest builder of social homes over the past decade. But we know more can always be done, and even more homes need to be built, as demand for affordable housing continues to outstrip supply.
'This report outlines the challenges and hardship faced by people on waiting lists and the devasting impact it has on the lives of families.
'We are determined to use our scale and capacity to play our part in addressing the acute shortage of affordable housing in Scotland.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
12 minutes ago
- ITV News
Kim Leadbeater expects a majority of MPs to back ‘the most robust assisted dying bill in the world'
Kim Leadbeater told ITV News' Talking Politics podcast she was confident the bill would pass Kim Leadbeater has told ITV News' Talking Politics podcast she is 'positive and optimistic' that a majority of MPs will support 'the most robust assisted dying bill in the world' in this week's critical vote. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will get its crucial third reading and vote in the House of Commons on Friday, with MPs choosing to either pass it onto the House of Lords or kill it off. Despite a growing number of MPs declaring they will vote against the legislation in recent months, the Labour MP and architect of the bill said she expected 'some movement in both directions' in the next 48 hours but anticipated 'it will be relatively minor'. Speaking exclusively to the podcast, Leadbeater said: 'If that proves to be the case, it means we've still got a good majority and the bill will go forward." MPs have fiercely argued for and against a bill which will allow adults who are terminally ill, subject to safeguards and protections, to request and be provided with assistance to end their own life. ITV News understands - as of Wednesday evening - 152 MPs are planning to vote in favour, 141 plan to vote against it, 21 remain undecided, and 21 are due to abstain. The bill passed its first reading in the House of Commons with a majority of 55 votes (330 to 275) back in November, paving the way for months of scrutiny of the life-defining legislation. Leadbeater told podcast host Paul Brand: 'It's been a long journey, a tiring journey, but I'm feeling positive and optimistic, and hopefully we can get the bill over the line on Friday. 'Obviously lots of people are very clear about their positions, lots of people are very supportive of the bill, and there are people who are fundamentally against the bill, and I think in the middle there's potentially a small number of people who might change their mind either way, but if that proves to be the case, it means we've still got a good majority and the bill will go forward. 'So that's how I feel at the moment, but, you know, it's up to every MP to do what they feel is the right thing to do on Friday, and the debate will continue as it should.' Asked by Brand if she thought the vote would be tighter than November, Leadbeater replied: 'It's impossible to say, to be honest… I'm not keeping that close an eye on it, to be honest. 'But I think there'll be some movement in both directions. Certainly, a few colleagues have come out saying that they are going to support, having either abstained or voted against last time, and then other colleagues have done the same the other way. So, I think if there is any movement, it will be relatively minor.' She also defended the debate process, which saw significant changes to the original proposed legislation. 'Look, this is how we make laws. Are there things that I would change about the entire parliamentary process? Yes, there probably are,' she said. 'But if we start on pulling that thread at this stage, we've got a long way to go. So I think the bill has gone through a very robust process. 'If you think we started this back in November, so it's been a long period of time, the hours of scrutiny that it has had has been more than most government bills, lots of detailed exploration of the content, amendments looked at and tabled and taken and changes made, and that's quite right too. 'I've tried to engage with colleagues, whatever their views are, including on the bill committee, some very strong opponents of a change in the law, and I've tried to do that as collaboratively and as collegiately as I possibly can, and I think as a result of that, what Parliament will be presented with on Friday will be an even stronger piece of legislation and certainly the most robust assisted dying bill in the world." It has lost some support from the medical profession since it was first put to Parliament, with the Royal College of Psychiatrists saying in May that they could not back it.
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh's hosting of Tour de France start could cost city £1.7m from visitor levy
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Up to £1.7 million should be drawn from the city's financial reserves and put towards the 2027 Tour de France, according to plans set to go before Edinburgh councillors for sign-off on Thursday. Both the men's and women's races are set to begin in the UK in 2027, with the men's race beginning in Edinburgh. A report on unaudited council accounts for the last financial year contains an ask for up to £1.7m to be spent on the race from council reserves, with plans to backfill the spend with money from the city's upcoming Visitor Levy. The report does not specify what the money will be used for, but it says the council has been in 'confidential discussions' with the Scottish Government and VisitScotland about hosting the event. The SNP group has tabled an amendment to the unaudited accounts, which if approved by councillors would see the spending request denied. The 2027 running of the Tour de France will be the first time both the men's and the women's race start in the same country, where that country is not France. Edinburgh has never hosted any part of the race before, but it has come to the UK four times: in 1974, 1994, 2007 and 2014.
Coin Geek
an hour ago
- Coin Geek
UK passes updated data bill, without AI copyright provisions
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... After intensive debates, the United Kingdom parliament has finally passed the 'Data (Use and Access) Bill' (DUA Act), intended to simplify the use of and access to personal data for U.K. data regulators whilst easing the administrative burden of using personal data. The DUA Act builds on the Data Protection Act 2018 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the landmark European Union regulation on information privacy and data use—to modernize the U.K.'s data regime and facilitate more streamlined compliance processes without eroding the protections of the GDPR legislation. On June 11, the bill passed from the House of Lords to the Royal Assent stage—the final stage of the legislative process in the U.K., in which the King essentially rubber stamps bills that Parliament has approved. When it does get its Royal approval—at a date to be decided soon—the DUA Act will become law and herald in the most significant change to the U.K.'s data protection framework since GDPR. Key updates in the bill include expanding the scope for data processing under 'Legitimate Interests,' such as for direct marketing and security processing, reducing interruptive and ineffective cookie consent banners, and provisions to boost market research, product development, and technological innovation. The structure and remit of the U.K.'s information rights regulator, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), will also be 'modernized,' requiring it to consider the public interest in promoting innovation and competition alongside privacy and data protection. Another change involves streamlining the process of submitting a 'Data Subject Access Request' to make it more efficient for individuals and organizations to request information on how a company uses or stores its data. However, one key change the bill doesn't include is a much-debated amendment to force big tech firms and artificial intelligence (AI) companies to get permission and/or pay for U.K. content, as the government insisted that it was planning to address this topic in future AI and copyright legislation—after the conclusion of a consultation on the topic in February. The DPO Centre, a leading U.K. data protection officer and resource center, described the DUA Act as 'a targeted evolution of the current regime' rather than a complete departure from existing frameworks. The rocky road to Royal Assent The DUA Act's passage to Royal Assent was a long, bumpy road that started under the previous Conservative government with the Data Protection and Digital Access (DPDI) Bill, first introduced in 2022. The DPDI set out a range of provisions for how data can be accessed, used, and processed, including making it easier and clearer for organizations to use and re-use data for research purposes; clarifying the processes and safeguards for the re-use of personal data; and easing compliance burdens on organizations related to record keeping, breach reporting and responding to unreasonable information requests from individuals. However, the DPDI failed to pass before the 2024 general election, and in October 2024, the new Labour government introduced the revised DUA Act. The Labour bill retained much of the original content while removing some of the more controversial provisions of the DPDI, including one that would have allowed government oversight of the ICO's strategic priorities and another that required telecom providers to report suspected illegal marketing to the ICO. On May 12, the House of Lords—the Upper chamber of U.K. Parliament—voted by a 147 majority to amend the DUA Act, adding transparency requirements to ensure U.K. copyright holders have to give permission for their work to be used. The amendment would have forced tech companies to declare their use of copyright material when training AI tools so that they could not access U.K. content without paying for it—a proposal backed by prominent U.K. recording artists such as Elton John and Dua Lipa. However, a couple of days later, the House of Common—the lower (and elected) chamber of Parliament primarily responsible for producing legislation—rejected this change, with the government reasoning that it was already carrying out a separate consultation on AI and copyright and wanted to wait on the outcome. In an interview with BBC journalist Laura Kuenssberg, Elton John described the Commons' rejection of the amendment as 'criminal,' adding that if ministers went ahead with plans to allow AI firms to use artists' content without paying, they would be 'committing theft, thievery on a high scale.' The Commons' decision also resulted in an extended back and forth, known as a 'ping-pong,' between the two houses of Parliament, as amendments were debated, changed, and rejected, with the legislation bouncing from one chamber to another in the process. Ultimately, a compromise was struck, with the Commons rejecting the Lords' amendment on AI, but the government agreed to publish reports on its AI and copyright proposals within nine months of Royal Assent. Ben Seretny, Head of DPOs at The DPO Centre, says, 'The final version of the DUA Bill feels more like a careful update than a radical overhaul of the UK GDPR and Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) frameworks.' Commenting on June 12 on the bill's passage from Parliament, Seretny warned that 'while some areas are now clearer, others may introduce uncertainty.' In particular, he noted that the DUA Act gives the Secretary of State more power to decide which countries have data protection standards that are not 'materially lower' than the U.K.—a shift in language that he suggested may concern the European Commission, which is due to review the U.K.'s data adequacy status in December. In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI . Watch: Blockchain & AI unlock possibilities title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
