logo
A judge refuses to toss states' lawsuit against Elon Musk and DOGE

A judge refuses to toss states' lawsuit against Elon Musk and DOGE

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has refused to throw out a lawsuit that accuses billionaire Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency of illegally accessing government data systems, canceling government contracts and firing federal employees.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled Tuesday that 14 states can proceed with their claims against Musk and DOGE. The states, through their attorneys general, sued in February over the defendants' alleged constitutional violations.
The states had asked Chutkan to temporarily block DOGE from accessing any data systems or terminating any federal employees. But the judge
denied that request
on Feb. 18. She found that there were legitimate questions about Musk's authority but said there weren't grounds to justify a temporary restraining order.
Chutkan agreed Tuesday to dismiss President Donald Trump as a defendant in the lawsuit, but she refused to dismiss the claims against Musk and DOGE.
The plaintiffs' attorneys argued that Musk's actions, including those carried out at his direction by DOGE personnel, are unconstitutional because he hasn't been legally appointed.
Chutkan wrote: 'The Constitution does not permit the Executive to commandeer the entire appointments power by unilaterally creating a federal agency pursuant to Executive Order and insulating its principal officer from the Constitution as an 'advisor' in name only. This is precisely what Plaintiffs claim the Executive has done.'
The Trump administration has maintained that layoffs are coming from agency heads and insisted that Musk hasn't been running DOGE's day-to-day operations.
Chutkan, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, previously oversaw the now-dismissed criminal election interference case against Trump in Washington.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum
Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

San Francisco Chronicle​

time24 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — Brazil's federal police said that messages found on the telephone of embattled former President Jair Bolsonaro show that at one point he wanted to flee to Argentina and request political asylum, according to documents seen Wednesday by the Associated Press. Bolsonaro is standing trial for an alleged coup attempt and on Wednesday police formally accused the former president and one of his sons of obstruction of justice in connection with his pending trial. The AP had access to the police investigation, which was sent to Brazil's Supreme Court. The Argentine government did not respond a request for comment from the AP. Silas Malafaia, an evangelical pastor who is a staunch ally of Bolsonaro's, was also targeted by police. He had his passport seized by investigators but was not formally accused of obstruction of justice. Brazilian federal police investigators said in a 170-page report that Bolsonaro had a draft of a request for political asylum from Argentine President Javier Milei's government dated Feb. 10, 2024. The former president saved the document two days after authorities searched his home and office as part of an investigation into an alleged coup plot. In a 33-page letter addressed to Milei, Bolsonaro claimed he was being politically persecuted in Brazil. 'I, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, request political asylum from Your Excellency in the Republic of Argentina, under an urgent regime, as I find myself in a situation of political persecution in Brazil and fear for my life,' the Brazilian leader wrote. On Feb. 12, Bolsonaro reportedly spent two nights at the Hungarian Embassy in Brasília, fueling speculation among critics that he may have been attempting to avoid arrest. Brazilian federal police investigators also said in their report that Bolsonaro's decision to ignore precautionary measures established for his house arrest and spread content to his allies 'sought to directly hit Brazilian democratic institutions, notably the Supreme Court and even Brazil's Congress.' ____ Sá Pessoa reported from Sao Paulo.

Trump's elections power grab
Trump's elections power grab

Politico

time25 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump's elections power grab

MAIL FAIL — Donald Trump has long been a critic of voting by mail, even falsely blaming the explosion of mail-in voting in 2020 for his electoral loss. This week he took his grievances to the next level: Trump said that he would soon be moving to ban the practice. In a lengthy Truth Social diatribe, Trump said he would 'lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT,' claiming no other country in the world uses mail-in voting. Trump continued, saying he would sign 'an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections. Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.' There's just one problem: the president's entire premise for his purported executive order is bunk. The U.S. is far from the only country to allow for vote by mail. The vast majority of Americans already vote on paper ballots, and voting machines are faster, cheaper and more accurate at tabulating those ballots than counting by hand. More important, the Constitution is clear on who has the power to regulate elections: the states and Congress, not the president. 'The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations,' the Elections Clause reads. 'It says nothing about the president of the United States being able to step in by waving a magic wand in the Oval Office,' Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat and one of the country's longest-serving chief election officers, told Nightly. It's not clear what form any prospective presidential order would take. In the Oval Office on Monday, Trump said 'the best lawyers in the country' are writing the executive order 'to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt.' The White House responded to a series of questions from Nightly on the forthcoming EO — including where the president's legal authority would come from — with a statement from spokesperson Harrison Fields that answered none of them, instead blasting Democrats having 'eroded faith in our elections.' When asked at a Tuesday press briefing about the White House's plans, press secretary Karoline Leavitt was vague on details, saying there will be 'many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill and also our friends in state legislatures across the country.' The mere assertion that he has the authority to issue national election policy by decree is a fairly audacious power grab, one that crosses a significant red line on elections — a line that Republicans have vigorously defended in the past. 'We used to at least pretend that we had some intrinsic fear of centralized power, especially presidential power,' said Stephen Richer, the former GOP Maricopa County, Ariz., recorder who became a Republican pariah for loudly standing up for the security of elections post-2020. 'And I think when you're talking about the means for installing federal officers, you should be doubly skeptical of any centralization of that power.' It's not hard to find examples of this skepticism. Sixteen Republican secretaries of state called Democrats' H.R. 1 — their sweeping elections legislation first introduced in 2019 — a 'unnecessary bill [that] federalizes and micromanages state election systems,' arguing Congress should not 'dictate a one-size-fits-all election policy to the states.' Similarly, fifteen Republican secretaries called in 2022 for Biden to rescind an executive order that directed federal agencies to register people to vote. 'If any adjustments need to be made, such adjustments are the province of Congress, not the Executive branch,' they wrote. The pushback thus far has been much more muted. When Trump issued an executive order earlier this year looking to dictate requirements around voter registration and mail balloting, Democratic-led states sued — and federal courts blocked key parts of that order as an attempt to usurp the constitutional powers of Congress and the states. Should Trump go ahead with trying to outright ban mail voting, Democrats expect the same result. 'I sure hope that the White House knows that the courts stand ready to significantly pare back executive orders where they step over the constitutional line, and we're going to be there as we were in round one,' Simon, the Minnesota Democrat said. While Republicans are not ringing the alarm bells about Trump's intentions, they too want to defend the states' reputation as so-called laboratories of democracy — and still want to gingerly remind the president of that line. 'Couldn't be more appreciative and supportive of President Trump's focus on election integrity,' Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson, who heads both the bipartisan National Association of Secretaries of State and the Republican Secretaries of State Committee, said in a statement, stressing he was speaking in his personal capacity and not on behalf of the organizations. But 'regarding specifics mentioned in the President's social media post, we will wait to see the details before commenting,' he continued. 'That said, election procedure decisions have and should continue to be made at the state level, and I trust President Trump will keep these important principles in mind as he crafts future executive orders.' Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at zmontellaro@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @ZachMontellaro. What'd I Miss? — DOJ goes 0-3 in requests to unseal Jeffrey Epstein grand jury materials: A federal judge rejected the Justice Department's effort to unseal grand jury transcripts and exhibits in the Jeffrey Epstein case today, writing that the government itself is the 'logical party' to make the Epstein files public and criticizing its motion as a 'diversion' tactic. 'The information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigation information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice,' U.S. District Judge Richard Berman, a Bill Clinton appointee, wrote in a 14-page opinion. Berman's decision is the third by a federal judge to deny nearly identical motions by the Justice Department to make public certain grand jury material in the cases of Epstein, the disgraced financier who died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, and his onetime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. — Pentagon says US will play a minimal role in Ukraine's security guarantee: The Pentagon's top policy official told a small group of allies Tuesday night that the U.S. plans to play a minimal role in any Ukraine security guarantees, one of the clearest signs yet that Europe will need to shoulder the burden of keeping lasting peace in Kyiv. The comments from Elbridge Colby, the Defense undersecretary for policy, came in response to questions from European military leaders in a huddle led by Joint Chiefs chair Gen. Dan Caine. Defense chiefs from the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Finland pushed the U.S. side to disclose what it would provide in troops and air assets to help Ukraine maintain a peace deal with Russia, according to a European official and another person briefed on the talks. — Gabbard to cut ODNI staff by nearly 50 percent: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced plans today to overhaul her office, cutting hundreds of staff and consolidating teams focused on countering malign influence and cyber threats. The move, dubbed ODNI 2.0, is the latest effort by the Trump administration to slim down the federal government, and comes after a wave of top-level departures at the ODNI's Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center earlier this year. According to a fact sheet released by ODNI, Gabbard has already eliminated 500 staff and reduced the office's size by 30 percent since she was sworn in to the role in February. The new plan would boost that number to over 40 percent and save more than $700 million annually. — Trump calls on Fed board member Cook to resign: President Donald Trump called on Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook to resign today after housing finance regulator Bill Pulte opened a new avenue of attack against the central bank. Pulte in recent days referred Cook to the Justice Department on allegations that she 'potentially [committed] mortgage fraud,' saying she had named two different properties as her primary residence on loan applications in 2021. Fed board members can be removed only 'for cause,' a provision that has not been fully litigated but has generally been interpreted to mean that the president can't fire a central banker over policy disagreements. — Fear of Trump funding 'wrench' escalates as Congress faces shutdown cliff: President Donald Trump's budget director has talked about attempting the ultimate override of Congress' funding prerogatives during the final 45 days of the fiscal year — and that time is now. With six weeks left until Oct. 1, lawmakers are staring down a government shutdown deadline alongside the threat of a 'pocket rescission,' a controversial White House tactic to cancel federal cash without the consent of Congress. It's also a ploy that the government's top watchdog, along with key lawmakers from both parties, say is illegal. 'The money evaporates at the end of the fiscal year,' White House budget chief Russ Vought said last month in defense of the gambit, adding it has 'been used before.' — Obama backs California effort to redraw districts in response to Texas: Former President Barack Obama is supporting California's mid-cycle redistricting effort as a 'responsible approach' to Republicans drawing new maps in Texas. Obama praised California Gov. Gavin Newsom's ballot measure proposal to redraw congressional districts and tilt at least five congressional districts in the state towards Democrats at a fundraiser on Tuesday for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. 'I believe that Governor Newsom's approach is a responsible approach,' he said, according to excerpts obtained by POLITICO. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time.' — Pentagon says US will play a minimal role in Ukraine's security guarantee: The Pentagon's top policy official told a small group of allies Tuesday night that the U.S. plans to play a minimal role in any Ukraine security guarantees, one of the clearest signs yet that Europe will need to shoulder the burden of keeping lasting peace in Kyiv. The comments from Elbridge Colby, the Defense undersecretary for policy, came in response to questions from European military leaders in a huddle led by Joint Chiefs chair Gen. Dan Caine. Defense chiefs from the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Finland pushed the U.S. side to disclose what it would provide in troops and air assets to help Ukraine maintain a peace deal with Russia, according to a European official and another person briefed on the talks. AROUND THE WORLD ARCTIC SABER-RATTLING — Russia's saber-rattling in the Arctic is forcing Canada to deepen military cooperation with its Nordic NATO allies — a marked policy shift away from the United States. Prime Minister Mark Carney has dispatched two top Cabinet ministers to Sweden and Finland this week in pursuit of new defense deals — including a look at Sweden's Saab Gripen fighter jet. Canada had previously decided on the Lockheed Martin F-35, a flagship export under President Donald Trump. But amid a trade war, at a time when other allies are turning away from the U.S. war plane, Canada is reconsidering its C$19-billion plan to buy a new fleet of F-35s. 'Clearly, there are trade tensions [with the U.S.], and we want to become closer to our friends,' Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said Monday as Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch formally welcomed her to Stockholm. MOSCOW'S HARD LINE — Moscow isn't shifting on what it considers to be acceptable security guarantees for Ukraine, a top Kremlin official said today. The comments by Moscow's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov undercut hopes that any progress has been made toward ending the Ukraine war since Russian President Vladimir Putin met with U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday in Alaska. Lavrov's remarks further indicate that the Kremlin has not softened on its maximalist positions on Ukraine: that it becomes a neutral rump state; drastically reduces its military; and abandons its NATO membership aspirations after Russia is finished with it. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP THE NEW AMERICAN SOUTH — In 1995, the rapper André 3000 declared that the cultural weathervane was pointing southward. A year later, his native Atlanta hosted the Olympics, one of the first signals that the South was beginning to see a reverse of the Great Migration that defined the region 50 years earlier. Since then, it has produced cultural touches such as Beyoncé, Mr. Beast and Bama Rush. The South's transformation into a major cultural hub was no accident. Over the last three decades, tax breaks, education incentives and growing cultural and economic clout have pulled more Americans and immigrants to the South. Amanda Mull reports on the region's transformation for Bloomberg. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Trump Plans Executive Order on Flag Burning, NewsNation Reports
Trump Plans Executive Order on Flag Burning, NewsNation Reports

Bloomberg

time25 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Plans Executive Order on Flag Burning, NewsNation Reports

President Donald Trump plans to issue an executive order on flag burning, NewsNation reported, a move that aims to crack down on burning the American flag without running afoul of a 1989 Supreme Court decision that ruled doing so was protected speech. Under the order, set to be signed Thursday, the Justice Department would review cases involving flag burning to see if charges could be brought that weren't specific to the flag burning itself, such as public nuisance or disorderly conduct laws, NewsNation said citing two unnamed administration officials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store