JD Vance to meet with top Trump officials to plot Epstein strategy
The vice-president's gathering, first detailed by CNN, is reportedly set to include the attorney general, Pam Bondi; the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche; the FBI director, Kash Patel; and the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
Sources familiar with the gathering told CNN and ABC News that the officials will be discussing whether to release the transcript of the justice department's recent interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's associate and a convicted sex trafficker.
Two weeks ago the justice department sent Blanche, who is also one of Donald Trump's former personal lawyers, to interview Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison for sex trafficking and other crimes.
That meeting lasted two days and details from it have not been made public.
According to ABC News, the administration is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview as soon as this week.
On Wednesday, Alicia Arden, who filed a police report against Epstein in 1997 accusing him of sexually assaulting her, appeared at a news conference and implored the government to release all of the files related to the Epstein case.
'I'm tired of the government saying that they want to release them. Please just do it,' she said, adding that she would like to know what Blanche asked Maxwell during their meeting, and what Maxwell's responses were.
Maxwell, Arden said, 'should not be pardoned'.
'She was convicted of sex-trafficking children,' she added. 'This is a terrible crime.'
Arden was joined by her lawyer, Gloria Allred, who also said that the Trump administration should release the 'entire transcript' of Blanche's interview with Maxwell 'including all of his questions and all of her answers'.
Last week, Maxwell was quietly transferred from a Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas. Trump claimed to reporters that he 'didn't know' about the transfer.
The Trump administration has faced mounting pressure and a bipartisan backlash after the justice department announced it would not be releasing additional documents related to Epstein, despite earlier promises by Trump and Bondi that they would do so.
Epstein, who died in prison in New York in 2019 while awaiting federal trial, is the subject of countless conspiracy theories, in part due to his ties to high-profile and powerful individuals.
On Tuesday, the House oversight committee subpoenaed the justice department for files related to the Epstein sex-trafficking investigation and issued subpoenas for depositions from several prominent figures.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
They included the former president Bill Clinton; the former secretary of state Hillary Clinton; multiple former attorneys general, including Jeff Sessions, Alberto Gonzales, William Barr and Merrick Garland; and the former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller.
Axios pointed out that Trump's former labor secretary Alex Acosta was absent from the list despite his involvement in the 2008 plea deal with Epstein when Acosta was a top federal prosecutor in Florida. Axios noted that Acosta's boss during his time in Florida, Gonzales, is on the subpoena list.
At the news conference on Wednesday, Allred, who has represented multiple Epstein victims, said she believes that Acosta should also be subpoenaed, as well as Blanche and Bondi.
Allred said that she believes that 'victims and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell should be invited to appear before the House and Senate committees' to share their stories, how 'they were victimized by Epstein and Maxwell, the impact on them of these crimes, and how the criminal justice system has helped them or failed them'.
Maxwell, who was found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges in December 2021, is appealing her conviction to the supreme court, citing Epstein's plea agreement. This week, her attorneys also opposed the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the Epstein case.
'Jeffrey Epstein is dead,' her lawyers wrote. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is not. Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain.'
Maxwell also said last week that she was willing to testify before Congress if she was granted immunity.
The Democratic representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who has introduced a resolution in Congress that opposes Maxwell receiving a presidential pardon or any other form of clemency, told CNN on Wednesday that he believes the 'vast majority of Americans oppose any form of clemency for Maxwell, and we need to say that with one voice in Congress as well'.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment relating to the Vance meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British watch dealers hit by Trump's trade war with Switzerland
British watch dealers have been caught in the crossfire of Donald Trump's trade war after US tariffs on Switzerland wiped out demand for luxury timepieces. Sellers of second-hand Swiss watches said American customers were no longer buying from them after Mr Trump imposed a 39pc tariff on goods imported from Switzerland. Tom Bolt, who runs the watch dealership Watch Guru, said demand from US customers had been 'killed', adding: 'I have offered approximately £2.5m of watches in the last three weeks. Not one sale.' Mr Bolt warned that customers were 'just saying that until this whole tariff thing gets sorted out, they can't be doing it'. The tariffs, which rose from a previous rate of 10pc to 39pc earlier this month, apply to Swiss-made products, meaning buyers of used watches still have to pay them even if they order them from the UK or other countries. Adrian Hailwood, a watch industry expert and founder of The Watch Scholar, said: 'Even if I'm sending it from the UK, I have to say the origin of the goods is from Switzerland, and therefore they accrue a tariff. 'It doesn't matter where it's coming from in the world and this is why it really hits the pre-owned market. Once they're sold out of Switzerland, they could go to Australia, Japan, the UK – but if they're then being bought by US dealers or consumers, they have to pay tariffs because they're Swiss goods. 'The whole watch industry has been scratching its head as to what possibly can be done.' With a reputation for high-quality craftsmanship, Swiss-made watches have long been coveted by wealthy people across the world, with brands including Rolex, Omega and TAG Heuer. Manufacturers can only call their goods 'Swiss-made' if 60pc of the value of the final product was made in Switzerland. Americans are the biggest global customers of Swiss watches, making up about 17pc of Switzerland's total watch exports by value, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. However, Mr Trump has cited Switzerland's high trade deficit with the US as the reason why he has imposed such steep tariffs on the country. Jordan Beer, who runs the watch dealer Watches of Henley St, added: 'We've not exported one [watch] in the last two or three weeks to the US, which is relatively unusual for this time of year. 'I would say in general it's down from the US since all the tariffs started being floated around, regardless of whether it was 10pc on UK exports or [the recent higher tariffs on Swiss goods].' He added that Mr Trump's trade war was slowing the speed at which items make it through customs in the US and that he had been forced to warn customers of delays. Mr Bolt said he believed the high tariffs on Swiss watches could lead to an increase in goods being smuggled into the US. He said: 'What [customers will] do is, they'll say, 'Listen, send the watch to Hong Kong' because there's no import duties in Hong Kong. And the next time they're there, they'll pick it up and then they'll smuggle it back to their country.'
The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Brit woman whose ‘father-in-law turn lover tried to drown her' pleads for release of ‘best friend' as he's denied bail
A BRIT woman has pleaded for the freedom of her father-in-law who has been denied bail after allegedly attempting to drown her. Mark Gibbon, 62, has been accused of attempting to murder Jasmine Wyld, 33, by repeatedly holding her head underwater in a pool during a vacation in Florida. 6 6 6 Mr Gibbon, a wealthy lighting engineer, is claimed to have struck a relationship with Ms Wyld - who was once married to his son Alex. Both of them have denied the claims. Ms Wyld, who is now back in the UK, broke her silence to speak about the Brit grandad, whom she described as her "best friend", The Times reports. Speaking to a court in Florida via video link, she said: "I have always felt very safe around Mark and him being around my two children. "This has only come as a bit of a shock to me ... I can only sing his praises for what a fantastic grandfather he is." Ms Wyld previously told prosecutors she "could not breathe" and feared "she would drown", according to the Polk County Sheriff's office. It was her nine-year-old daughter who is said to have leapt into the pool to try to "save" her mother. Police reports said Mr Gibbon's alleged attack left her with scratches and bruising. The Brit grandad from Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, has been charged with attempted second-degree murder and two counts of battery. Ms Wyld spoke in favour of a motion submitted by Mr Gibbon's lawyer, calling for his release from custody. However, a Judge denied the request and said that Ms Wyld's testimony contradicts the sworn statement she gave on the day of the alleged drowning. They added: "Quite frankly, her testimony is of great concern to this court." Officials at Polk County Prison, where Mr Gibbon continues to remain in custody, previously refused to comment on his detention conditions for safety reasons. Neighbours in Beaconsfield described Ms Wyld as the Brit granddad's "girlfriend" - and said she was often seen at his £800,000 semi-detached home. One neighbour told The Sun: "Everybody is shocked by this." Another, who said she was Wyld's friend, recalled: "Jasmine used to stay here a lot with the children. But I don't want to say much more because she is a friend of mine." Family insiders claim tensions erupted years ago when Gibbon's son Alex allegedly found Wyld in his father's bed. 'About four years ago there was a big fall-out,' one source the Daily Mail. 6 6 'Alex went up the stairs and found Jasmine in his father's bed. They had a massive row. It's torn the family apart… there's been so much bad blood between Alex and his dad.' Alex, 32, and Wyld separated in 2021 but share two young children. The feud deepened when Alex was jailed for driving an £80,000 Porsche Cayenne into his father during a public row. He was released six months ago, and father and son no longer speak. Gibbon, who also runs hairdressing business Sage Hairdressing, allegedly pushed Wyld underwater during the Florida row after telling her she was not the main beneficiary of his will. He reportedly admitted pushing her but denied trying to kill her, claiming they had both been drinking, she slapped him, and the situation escalated. Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said: 'We expect vacationers to behave while they visit with us, just as we expect our life-long residents to do the same. 'Because Mr Gibbon couldn't control his anger, he may find himself spending a lot more time in Florida than he had anticipated.' If convicted on all charges, Gibbon could face up to 20 years in jail. 6
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US judge hears if Trump team broke law during LA Ice protests
A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday began hearing evidence and arguments on whether the Trump administration violated federal law when it deployed national guard soldiers and US marines to Los Angeles after protests over immigration raids this summer. The Trump administration federalized California national guard members and sent them to the second-largest US city over the objections of the California governor, Gavin Newsom, and city leaders, after protests erupted on 7 June when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) officers arrested people at multiple locations. California is asking Judge Charles Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to the state and to stop the federal government from using military troops in California 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer'. 'The factual question which the court must address is whether the military was used to enforce domestic law, and if so, whether there continues to be a threat that it could be done again,' Breyer said at the start of Monday's court hearing. The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act prevents the president from using the military as a domestic police force. The case could set precedent for how Trump can deploy the guard in the future in California or other states. Trump's decision to deploy the troops marked the first time in 60 years that a US president had taken such a step without a governor's consent. Critics say that Trump's actions in many ways reflect a strongman approach by a president who has continuously tread upon norms and has had a disregard for institutional limits. 'This is the first, perhaps, of many,' Trump said in June of the deployment of national guardsmen in Los Angeles. 'You know, if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country, but I can inform the rest of the country, that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force.' Many of the troops have been withdrawn, but Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, said on Sunday that 300 national guard troops remain in the state. The Trump administration last week extended the activation of troops in the LA area through 6 November, according to a court filing by Newsom. 'The federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation,' Bonta said in a statement. 'This dangerous move has no precedent in American history.' The hearing comes the same day Trump placed the DC Metropolitan police department under federal control and deployed the national guard by invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has said national guard units would take to the streets of DC over the coming week. The Department of Defense ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 California national guard troops and 700 marines. Most of the troops have since left but 250 national guard members remain, according to the latest figures provided by the Pentagon. The remaining troops are at the Joint Forces training base in Los Alamitos, according to Newsom. Newsom won an early victory from Breyer, who found the Trump administration had violated the 10th amendment, which defines power between federal and state governments, and exceeded its authority. The Trump administration immediately filed an appeal arguing that courts cannot second guess the president's decisions and secured a temporary halt from the appeals court, allowing control of the California national guard to stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold. After their deployment, the soldiers accompanied federal immigration officers on immigration raids in Los Angeles and at two marijuana farm sites in Ventura county while marines mostly stood guard around a federal building in downtown Los Angeles that includes a detention center at the core of protests. The Trump administration argued the troops were needed to protect federal buildings and personnel in Los Angeles, which has been a battleground in the federal government's aggressive immigration strategy. Since June, federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the US from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops and farms. Some US citizens have also been detained. Ernesto Santacruz Jr, the field office director for the Department of Homeland Security in Los Angeles, said in court documents that the troops were needed because local law enforcement had been slow to respond when a crowd gathered outside the federal building to protest against the 7 June immigration arrests. 'The presence of the national guard and marines has played an essential role in protecting federal property and personnel from the violent mobs,' Santacruz said. After opposition from the Trump administration, Breyer issued an order allowing California's attorneys to take Santacruz's deposition. They also took a declaration from a military official on the national guard and marines role in Los Angeles. The Trump administration's attorneys argued in court filings last week the case should be canceled because the claims under the Posse Comitatus Act 'fail as a matter of law'. They argued that there is a law that gives the president the authority to call on the national guard to enforce US laws when federal law enforcement is not enough. Trump federalized members of the California national guard under Section 12406 of Title 10, which allows the president to call the national guard into federal service when the country 'is invaded', when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government' or when the president is otherwise unable 'to execute the laws of the United States'. Breyer found the protests in Los Angeles 'fall far short of 'rebellion'. 'Next week's trial is not cancelled,' he said in a ruling ordering the three-day, non-jury trial. During the month the protests took place, tensions heightened between Trump and Newsom. The California governor compared the president with failed dictators and Trump entertained the idea of having Newsom arrested.
