
5 Reasons You Should Build a Small Business, Not a Startup
Listen to this Article More info
0:00 / 4:26
In Silicon Valley, it seems that everyone's aspiration is to 'Be A Founder.' I chatted with Jon Westenberg, who thinks that most people should focus on building a small business instead of chasing the startup dream.
Why do you think Silicon Valley culture encourages startups over small businesses?
JW: Silicon Valley lives and breathes on VC money, and no fund is able to justify investment without the promise of a 100x return. I don't have any real criticism of that process or system. The angle that I come from is that while every VC firm needs to be funding high growth companies, not every entrepreneur should be trying to build one.
Do you think there are general differences entrepreneurs who aspire to be founders and those who want to be business owners?
JW: I think founder is a title that people want because it has connotations, it has prestige and it has that 'cool' factor. We've reached a point in entrepreneurship where startups are mainstream now. It's like a reality TV singing contest. This is an example I use all the time. When you read about the wannabes who go on X Factor or Idol, they'll always say that their life long dream is to be a singer. They never say their dream is to sing. And this is because what they really want is the success and the lifestyle and the glamour of being a singer. That's why they're jumping in front of a camera. If what they really wanted was to sing – they'd be out there every night playing gigs and building an audience and doing what they love.
Even though you'd advise most people to focus on building a small business, are there any situations when you believe that they should pursue a startup instead?
JW: I think if you want to achieve success in certain verticals, you can't operate as a small business. Uber, for example, are a sticky growth company that needed huge levels of funding to build their user base among drivers and riders. Facebook, Twitter, Vine – platforms like that can't grow as small businesses.
So, the first thing you'd consider is whether or not the business needs to scale in order to succeed.
JW: Starting a big, huge, fancy, sweating tech company isn't the be-all and end-all, and choosing not to do that doesn't make anyone stupid. In fact, going in the opposite direction is likely to make you happier, healthier, wealthier and a [lot] wiser.
I don't disagree that startups are the cause of a lot of heartbreak but you'll have to walk us through what you mean by 'it'll make you happier.'
JW: You Can Focus On Simplicity:You're literally building something small, within clear limits and boundaries. There's no giant pressure to add features, meaning you have the freedom to focus on the smaller things that matter deeply to you and your users.
People Matter More: When you stay small, you can spend more time with the people who really matter in your business. A small business is about people.
Keeping Things Personal Is Easier: I love seeing a personal touch in every business and every product. You can take the time to ensure that your users and customers are given a little magic every time.
Small Doesn't Mean Poor: Small means lower overheads, lower cash burn rate–and the chance to keep all profits within your own company and your own pocket.
You Don't Have To Stay Small Forever: If you do want to grow, you'll have a much better chance of doing it from a position of power with a successful, profitable smaller company.
If you're just talking about being profitable enough that you don't need investors, then that's called bootstrapping.
JW: I don't think that necessarily captures it. To me, bootstrapping just means funding a company yourself. Starting a small business means funding a company, setting boundaries and limits, understanding your product or service and what you want it to accomplish and working to a plan of meeting your limits. If you do that, you're not going to be a billionaire. But you could be a very happy millionaire. And to me, that's a pretty good option.
— By Cynthia Than
Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.
The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Inc. Magazine: Everything you need to start and grow your business. More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Analyst Warn AMD AI Hype May Outpace Reality
Aug 5 - Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is riding an 80% rally over the past three months, but Lynx Equity Strategies thinks the stock may be moving too fast for its fundamentals to keep up. Analyst KC Rajkumar raised concerns in a recent note, cautioning that AMD's rise largely rests on high expectations surrounding its MI350/MI355 GPUs and the upcoming MI400X. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with AMD. According to Rajkumar, many investors assume AMD has won key design wins with hyperscalers like Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Amazon Web Services, but he questions whether AWS has truly adopted AMD's chips. Without AWS, AMD could be leaning too heavily on Meta, he warned. Lynx isn't convinced about the near-term adoption of AMD's GPUs in data centers, despite some analysts forecasting over 30% revenue growth in 2025. The firm also doubts whether AMD's resumed MI308 shipments to China will deliver much upside, considering Beijing's restrictions on chip imports, already affecting Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA). Rajkumar sees downside risk, suggesting a $150 price target if consensus EPS for 2026 lands around $6. He believes AMD may have priced in years of growth that haven't materialized yet. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Best Stocks to Own: Workday Stock Could Add 8% in August
Workday Inc (NASDAQ:WDAY) stock is up 0.4% to trade at $226.12 at last glance, brushing off . The equity recently was turned away at its 100-day moving average -- a trendline that rejected an early July rally. While it still carries 12.5% year-to-date deficit, could be on the upswing soon, as seasonality seems to be on its side. The software giant is among the to own in August, per Schaeffer's Senior Quantitative Analyst Rocky White. The equity averaged a monthly gain of 8% and ended the month higher 80% over the past 10 years. A comparable move from its current perch would place shares above $244. An unwinding of pessimism among short-term options traders could create additional tailwinds for Workday stock. This is per the security's Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) of 1.75 that sits in the 97th percentile of readings from the past 12 months. It's also worth noting that premiums are affordably priced at the moment. This is per Workday stock's Schaeffer's Volatility Index (SVI) of 29%, which sits in the low 12th percentile of its annual range. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commanders' Terry McLaurin Drawing Trade Interest from Iconic Franchise
Commanders' Terry McLaurin Drawing Trade Interest from Iconic Franchise originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Washington Commanders are navigating a tricky situation with star receiver Terry McLaurin after he formally requested a trade on Thursday amid his drawn-out contract negotiations. McLaurin is entering the final year of his three-year contract and is due to make $15.5 million in 2025. A six-year vet with Washington, McLaurin is seeking a raise that would pay him near top-of-market value. After yet another 1,000+ yard season (his fifth straight) and his first All-Pro selection, it's obvious that he deserves it. However, if the organization continues balking at a new high-priced contract, it's worth investigating some trade options from around the league. One rumor that has began circulating involves one of the league's most iconic franchises: the Pittsburgh Steelers. Steelers writer Chris Halicke reports that Pittsburgh reached out to Washington inquiring about a trade involving McLaurin, although the full package was not disclosed. Halicke also learned some insight on how McLaurin feels about this potential career move. "In reaching out to the Commanders, the Steelers learned that McLaurin not only wants to be paid like a true No. 1 receiver, which is expected, he wants to be a true No. 1 receiver on whatever team he plays on in 2025 and beyond," Halicke said. In this case, the Steelers won't be much of a fit. Pittsburgh landed DK Metcalf in a trade with the Seattle Seahawks and immediately committed to his future as WR1 by handing him a four-year, $132 million contract. McLaurin is also said to be seeking a higher price than that - with $35 million APY being a target number. As a whole, the Steelers have been no stranger to blockbuster moves this offseason. After acquiring Metcalf and trading former No. 1 option pass-catcher George Pickens to the Dallas Cowboys, they finally landed future Hall of Famer Aaron Rodgers to be the next starting quarterback. Defensively, the team also dealt safety Minkah Fitzpatrick for All-Pro cornerback Jalen Ramsey in a swap with the Miami Dolphins that included tight end Jonnu Smith. A move to land McLaurin would certainly be another shakeup to Mike Tomlin's squad, but initial rumblings here have likely died down after considering the logistics. Not only is McLaurin going to demand a raise wherever he goes, it appears he also wants to prominently be featured in the offense. The easiest solution to both of those wishes is for Washington to give him an extension, but as his training camp "hold in" continues, only time will tell how this relationship evolves moving forward. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 3, 2025, where it first appeared.