Microsoft and Amazon Capex in Focus Amid Potential AI Pullback
(Bloomberg) -- When the two biggest players in cloud computing report earnings this week, the amount the companies are spending will be just as interesting to investors as how much they are making.
Ahead of results from Microsoft Corp. on Wednesday, and Amazon.com Inc. on Thursday, there have been reports suggesting that both companies may be cutting back on their spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure.
That puts a spotlight on the capital expenditures announced in the latest earnings, which will offer insight into the outlook for AI demand and the broader consequences that might have for the economy.
'A slowdown in cloud computing or capex would scream economic caution and speak to recession fears in corporate America,' said Joe Tigay, portfolio manager of the Rational Equity Armor Fund. 'Any cutback in growth is hurtful to valuations, and would be damaging to the overall market. While multiples have come down a lot, we're not drastically cheap by any historical measure. If we are on a recessionary path, multiples will get a lot lower.'
Both Microsoft and Amazon have declined this year, largely tracking the market lower as tariff risks have amplified concerns about economic growth. Amazon is more than 20% off a February peak, while Microsoft hasn't hit an all-time high since July.
The four biggest spenders on AI infrastructure — Alphabet Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc., along with Microsoft and Amazon — are expected to spend more than $300 billion in their current fiscal years. The money plowed into AI-related investments had led to soaring stock gains in companies like Nvidia Corp., Super Micro Computer Inc., and Arista Networks Inc.
Recently, though, Microsoft and Amazon have been at the center of a shift in expectations around industry spending. Bloomberg News reported that Microsoft has pulled back on data center projects around the world, with some of the pause coming abruptly. TD Cowen analyst Michael Elias last week wrote that channel checks 'indicate material MSFT equipment order cancellations' for data center supplies with a 'long-lead time.'
Separately, Wells Fargo Securities wrote that Amazon's web services business is pausing some data center leases, although Kevin Miller, vice president of global data centers at Amazon Web Services, later wrote that there 'haven't been any recent fundamental changes in our expansion plans,' and that it continues to see 'strong demand for both Generative AI and foundational workloads on AWS.'
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Chairman Joe Tsai had warned in March of a 'bubble' in data center construction. The emergence of the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek scrambled forecasts for future spending after the newcomer claimed performance that was comparable to U.S. models despite costing less and requiring fewer chips. Investors are also increasingly looking for the AI investments to translate to growth in a more pronounced fashion.
Ned Davis Research closed its overweight recommendation on AI stocks last week, writing that the downturn in the group can continue, especially with the new risks created by the Trump administration's trade war.
'Higher policy uncertainty often leads to lower capex spending. We see no reason data center capex spending would be excluded,' wrote Pat Tschosik, the firm's chief thematic strategist. He added that 'AI spending is seen as discretionary and, just as companies pull back on capex in an economic downturn, they pull back on AI application development as well.'
Alphabet Inc. reported capex of $17.2 billion last quarter, slightly more than had been expected. It plans to spend $75 billion on capex this year.
The Google parent also posted better-than-expected operating profits for its Google Cloud business, even as sales slightly missed the analyst consensus. The company said there was more customer demand than company capacity for the cloud business, echoing comments made by all three cloud giants last quarter.
Microsoft results are expected to show net earnings growth of 9.7% and revenue growth near 11%. Amazon's revenue is seen rising 8.2% with net earnings soaring almost 40%. Both are expected to grow consistently in the coming years, a key reason why Wall Street is nearly uniformly positive on them. For both names, more than 90% of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the shares.
Jim Worden, chief investment officer of Wealth Consulting Group, is among those who retains a positive view on the pair.
'I don't think we'll see big reductions in capex, though there will likely be some discussion about being more efficient and how to best spend the money,' he said. 'Uncertainty is still really really high, but we've barely touched the surface for AI demand and use cases, so investors need to be patient and play the long game.'
ServiceNow surged 22% last week, capping a record weekly gain, after the software company issued an outlook for sales growth that topped analysts' estimates, suggesting that software demand remains resilient even as the economy reels from the threat of tariffs.
--With assistance from Subrat Patnaik.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
First Published: 29 Apr 2025, 03:44 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Senate GOP Seeks to Scale Back Food Aid Cuts in Trump Tax Bill
Bloomberg Updated 12 Jun 2025, 02:52 AM IST Senate Republicans plan to scale back cuts to federal food aid for the poor that their counterparts in the House used to help pay for Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package, a key senator said Wednesday. The Senate version of the tax legislation would exempt states that keep their food stamp payment error rates low from a new cost-shifting provision House Republican imposed requiring state governments to cover as much as a quarter of the cost of federal food stamps received by their residents, Senate Agriculture Chairman John Boozman said. Boozman, whose committee has jurisdiction over portions of the legislation covering federal food aid and farm subsidies, said the Senate version also would exempt parents of children younger than 10 years old from work requirements for food assistance. The House version of the tax bill imposes work requirements on parents once their children turn 7 years old. The House version of the legislation would require states to pay between 5% and 25% of the cost of benefits their residents receive through federal food stamps, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SN. States with lower payment error rates would pay a smaller share of food stamp costs. The new requirements for SN will be delayed to 2028 to give states time to adjust, Boozman said. The Senate version would exempt states with a payment error rate below 6% from the cost-sharing requirement, Boozman said. Republicans on the Senate Agriculture Committee considered the House version too burdensome on states, the Arkansas senator said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Amazon and Microsoft-backed startup to build Recycling Plant of rare earths in Canada, the 'rare minerals' that analysts say gives China upper hand in trade war with the US
Cyclic Materials , a startup supported by Amazon, Microsoft, and BMW Group, plans to invest $25 million in a rare-earths recycling plant and research center in Ontario, Canada, according to a statement reported by Bloomberg. The facility, set to begin operations in the first quarter of 2026, aims to bolster North America's supply of critical minerals amid rising global demand and China's dominance over rare-earth markets. Cyclic's technology extracts rare earths from end-of-life products like wind turbines, data-center hard drives, and electric vehicle components, addressing supply chain vulnerabilities highlighted by China's export restrictions in retaliation to U.S. tariffs, Bloomberg noted. The company already operates a demonstration facility in Kingston and a processing site in Arizona. What is the rare earth minerals tussle between US and China The rare earth minerals issue between the U.S. and China centers on a trade dispute over critical minerals essential for advanced technologies, including defense systems, electric vehicles, semiconductors, and renewable energy. China mines about 70% of the world's rare earth elements (17 metallic elements with unique properties) and processes over 90%, giving it significant control over global supply chains. They also produce 85% of rare earth magnets used in electric motors and other tech. 'Rare-earth elements are a $20 billion to $30 billion market globally, but they unlock multi-trillion-dollar industries,' Ahmad Ghahreman, CEO of Cyclic Materials, told Bloomberg. 'We are creating a secure, local supply for these critical metals.' The Kingston plant is designed to process 500 metric tons of feedstock annually, producing rare-earth oxides for magnets used in EV motors, wind turbines, and consumer electronics. Feedstock will be sourced from Cyclic's Arizona facility and a network of partners, with output supplied to companies like Solvay SA. The project aligns with Canada's push to become a hub for critical minerals, supported by government incentives and growing interest from automakers and tech giants. Cyclic's initiative could reduce reliance on Chinese rare earths, which account for over 80% of global supply, per Bloomberg. The research center will also develop advanced recycling techniques, positioning Cyclic to meet surging demand for sustainable mineral sources in industries critical to the green energy transition.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the United States has reached a trade agreement with China, including an easing of curbs imposed by Beijing on export of rare earth minerals and magnets that are key inputs for industries ranging from automobiles to electronics. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. He said China would supply 'any necessary rare earths' and magnets, while the US would make concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. The Trump administration had recently begun to clamp down on the presence of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!' Trump wrote, without elaborating. Bloomberg quoted a White House official as saying that the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, which, crucially, includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking, and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs (imposed by Trump in his first term, that the Biden administration persisted with). China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on American imports, the official said. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted that China seems to have gained the upper-hand after its rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Significantly, Trump said a final deal is subject to approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Chinese state media said earlier Wednesday that Beijing had reached a 'framework' for an agreement with the US during talks in London, but there was no official response from China on Trump's subsequent claims on Truth Social. Earlier, both the negotiating sides said they had agreed in principle to a framework for dialling down trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. After the meeting in London — the second time the two sides have met in the last couple of months, since Trump's sweeping tariff onslaught — there were indications of a reconciliation. What is beginning to get clearer after the second meeting is that this is perhaps not how the US imagined the trade war to unfold. China is beginning to dictate the direction of the bilateral talks, with the US almost seen as requesting for much-needed concessions on the resumption of supplies of critical inputs. In the first round of talks in Geneva, the US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had asked the Chinese to cut its tariffs in tandem with theirs, primarily because the Americans were facing the heat back home from the early fallout of the high tariffs, including empty shelves at grocery stories and surging prices of daily use commodities. In London, the US side is learnt to have specifically asked the Chinese to 'suspend or remove' restrictions on rare earths magnets, which had forced a supply-chain crunch. The London meeting follows a call between Trump and Xi on June 5, which was initiated by the White House — the first call since Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement. After the London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets 'being resolved'. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus… Once the Presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' the BBC quoted China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang as saying. Chinese export controls over rare earth minerals were high on the agenda of the meetings. While Beijing has not imposed an outright ban on the export of rare earth magnets, the process has been made very difficult; it could take a long time to source, posing shortage risks. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components like power steering systems, wiper motors and braking systems. China has a virtual stranglehold over these rare earth magnets. In May, talks held in Geneva led to a temporary truce after the tit-for-tat tariff increases by both sides, which led to duties that peaked at 145 per cent. Trump called the outcome of the talks in Switzerland a 'total reset', which brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30 per cent, while Beijing cut duties on US imports to 10 per cent. Both sides also agreed to a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. However, the US and China have since accused each other of breaching the deal. The US has said that Beijing has been dragging its feet on opening up exports of rare earth metals and magnets while the Chinese claim that Washington has restricted its access to American goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had said China had failed to roll back restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. In the run-up to this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences. The problem for the US is that the Chinese side has wrested some advantage, especially by leveraging its strategy of weaponing its dominance in key sectors. Rare earth minerals and magnets is one such area, where the US is now desperate for concessions. Both sides have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges, but the Americans clearly seem more eager for a reconciliation, given the impact of the Chinese blockade on its key manufacturing sectors. These Chinese trade blockades are already impacting companies in other geographies. Hamamatsu-based small car maker Suzuki Motors, for instance, said last week it plans to suspend the production of its flagship Swift compact hatchback due to China's rare earth restrictions, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be impacted. There are similar worries among other manufacturing entities across the world, including in the US. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
