Private sector must help achieve 'hunger free' India: G20 Sherpa
NEW DELHI: The country's G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant on Wednesday called for greater private sector participation to ensure "hunger free" India, saying the government alone cannot tackle the challenge.
Speaking at the launch of Malabar Group's expanded corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, Kant praised the jewellery company's "The Hunger Free World" project, which aims to distribute 70,000 daily meals to underprivileged people in fiscal 2025-26.
"If there are more groups like Malabar Group, we are able to transform the world. It requires continued collaboration between government, civil society, private sector and individuals," said Kant, former CEO of government think tank NITI Aayog.
Around 119 million people in India remain undernourished, with women and children bearing the heaviest burden, he said.
The government provides free rations to 800 million people through distribution centres, but ensuring nutritious food remains crucial.
"It is not just about providing food, it is important to ensure nutritious food," Kant said.
"It is also very important that private sector takes over this responsibility at the local level."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Pragmatic tariff adjustments with US can secure India's farm exports: NITI paper
New Delhi: India should grant more market access to American products that do not hurt Indian farmers—including apples, almonds and pistachios—for a mutually beneficial bilateral trading arrangement, according to a working paper by NITI Aayog. In turn, India could benefit from greater long-term market access for its shrimp, fish, rice, tea, coffee and rubber, the paper said as the two countries tried to wrap up a bilateral trade agreement. The paper supports a 'give and take' approach that will allow the US to lower its trade deficit with India, while also helping India to secure its farm exports. The paper, co-authored by member Ramesh Chand and senior advisor Raka Saxena, also suggests that India introduce market reforms in the farm sector and work with states in order to improve competitiveness of India's agriculture exports. Also read: Wheat procurement hits 29.7 million tonnes in 2025–26, highest in four years amid bumper crop 'India must pursue a pragmatic mix of tariff adjustments, strategic import liberalization and long-term competitiveness to safeguard its farm sector while preserving strong trade ties with the United States. With calibrated give-and-take, India can prevent large-scale disruption, avoid trade conflict and emerge as a more competitive and resilient agri-export economy," said the latest working paper from the federal policy think tank. It clarifies that authors' views are personal. India can consider lower tariffs on agricultural commodities where either domestic production is small or import does not compete with domestic production because of different quality grades and seasons, the report said, citing examples of US apples which sell at a premium price in India and products like almonds and pistachios, the demand for which is met through imports. Apples from the US now attract 50% import duty in India, while pistachios and walnuts attract 30%, the paper pointed out. The authors explained that India, which accounts for over 40% of US imports of frozen shrimp and prawn, its largest source of import, now faces a 26% tariff under the now-suspended reciprocal tariff plan, compared with the earlier zero-duty regime, potentially weakening India's price advantage if the tariffs are not averted. India is currently in trade talks with the US to avoid the tariffs announced on 2 April and suspended for three months to facilitate talks. Also read: India sets record grain production target of 354.64mt for 2025-26 Ecuador, with a lower share and lower unit value for the commodity per tonne, faces only a 10% tariff under the reciprocal tariffs, positioning it to gain from the shifting trade dynamics with the US, the report pointed out. 'As a leading supplier with over 40% market share, India stands to lose price competitiveness, especially against countries like Ecuador and Argentina, which now face only a 10% tariff. This shift could lead to reduced demand for Indian shrimp in the US unless exporters absorb part of the cost or reposition toward value-added or certified sustainable products," the report pointed out. Indonesia and Vietnam, however, stand to take a heavier hit from the reciprocal tariffs on shrimp at 32% and 46% respectively. The pause on reciprocal tariffs announced by the US has created a level playing field for now, but exporters are hoping for a permanent solution. 'We are confident that the negotiations between India and US for concluding a trade agreement would yield fruit quickly and allow import of shrimp into the US without any tariff barriers," said K.N. Raghavan, secretary general of the Seafood Exporters Association of India. Export of processed and value-added seafood has immense potential, Raghavan said, adding that more focus on this area with support from government will lead to higher exports. "We are confident that with support from government and related agencies, we will be able to double the present export turnover of $7-8 billion a year within the next five years," added Raghavan. The report said rice is the second-most important commodity exported by India to the US, commanding 27% share in its rice imports after Thailand, which controls more than half of all US import of rice. India exported rice worth $ 409 million to the US in 2024. India, now faces the threat of a 26% reciprocal tariff on rice, which would be an increase from the otherwise 0.6% tariff. This poses a moderate yet strategic challenge. India still retains a tariff advantage over Thailand, which faces a higher 36% rate. 'There is ample of scope as well as opportunity for semi-milled rice and basmati rice exports from India to US, if the trade deal is done keeping the interest of Indian farmers," said Satish Goel, president, All India Rice Exporters of India. Also read: India to revamp rice cultivation technique to save water, cut methane emissions Like exports, the composition of India's agricultural imports from the US has also undergone considerable changes during the last two decades. Edible fruits and nuts have emerged as a dominant item of agricultural imports followed by cotton and beverages and spirits. These three categories constitute 75% of total agricultural imports from US into India, the report said. By turning current challenges into reform opportunities, India can position itself as a global food power in the coming decades, the report said.
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
From Opinions Editor: Schools, colleges, universities and waterlogging
Last week, the NITI Aayog's CEO announced that India has become the world's fourth-largest economy. Though subsequent analysis showed that the head of the country's premier economic think tank had jumped the gun somewhat, there is very little doubt that India is on the cusp of notching a step up in the global GDP ladder. The challenge, however, was framed by developments in the country's financial capital barely a day after the NITI Aayog CEO's congratulatory announcement. An early onset of monsoon brought life to a standstill in Mumbai. Large parts of Maharashtra's capital, including a newly-built Metro station, went under water reminding policymakers that India's economy remains extremely vulnerable to climate risks. Reports show that the country has significantly decoupled economic growth from its carbon footprint – emissions have risen by about 4 percent compared to a compounded growth rate of about 7 percent from 2005 onwards. However, given the enormity of climate change, incremental changes aren't enough. Studies warn that the flooding problem is likely to get worse. What do Indian cities do to become hydrologically smart? What must be done to ensure that monsoon vagaries do not cause economic damage and loss of lives? Can construction in the mountains be sensitive to local ecologies? Is there a way to ensure development while also obviating landslides? The answers are not always easy. Very often they are framed in the ecology versus development binary. But does that fit in the aspirations of a young nation that's seeking to reap its demographic advantage? The go-slow-on-development alternative, for instance, might not fit in with the aspirations of a large section of India, who see prospects of upward mobility in the country's economic advancement. It would be terribly unfair to push such people to make difficult choices. And, yet the growing severity of the climate crisis underlines that we have no time to lose. About two weeks ago, the Supreme Court seemed to hold that there is no inherent conflict between sustainability and development. The trouble, however, is that the resolution to the environment-development predicament does not come in templates. They call for respecting the topographies of individual cities, factoring in the gradients of mountains, recognising the floodplains and courses of rivers, and acknowledging the catchment areas of lakes, streams and other aquifers. Can economic prosperity go hand-in-hand with respect for such environmental peculiarities? The answer must necessarily come from the country's educational institutes, from schools to universities to engineering institutes. This is not to say that the green imperative has been completely sidelined in the country's education system. In fact, in the past 20 years, considerable effort seems to have gone into introducing the problems of the environment in school and university curricula. However, while sectors such as technology, medicine, finance, engineering, law and even the arts are often seen as the primary career paths, sustainability is still seen as a niche field that's still evolving. Education about the environment has become another box to be ticked in a child's academic career, rather than being one of the ways by which she engages with the world. At the higher education level, environmental education is too often associated with green technologies – renewable energy, waste management, green vehicles. Though an important part of climate-ready curricula, the technology-centred approach isn't enough if a student in Delhi, for instance, remains oblivious to the links between pollution and the destruction of the Aravali range. Schooling in green building techniques would remain incomplete if the same Delhi student doesn't learn why the ITO area is amongst the first to be waterlogged after an intense downpour. And, any education in waste management has to make connections between daily use items in households – plastic bottles for example – and the burgeoning landfills outside several Indian cities, including the country's capital. For education to make a difference in increasing the resilience of our cities, towns and rural areas to climate vagaries, the first thing to do would be to increase the engagement of the learner with problems associated with the current crises. Why shouldn't the constant water logging problems of Indian cities be a part of the educational experience in schools, colleges and universities? Why should pollution be a matter of rote learning and not something that students have to encounter almost every few months? In other words, the country needs a generation – and not just a few people in niche professions — with sensitivity to air, water, land and forests to steward an alternative version of economic prosperity — one that does not come at the cost of ecology. It's time for the country's education system to step up. Till next time Kaushik
Mint
14 hours ago
- Mint
India's growth and urban planning: On different planets
Metro stations in Athens are like archaeological museums, featuring pottery shards and other artefacts discovered during excavations. Moscow's subway stops are like art galleries, grandiose and distinctive, adorned with ornate chandeliers and striking murals. Mumbai's recently inaugurated mid-town metro station, in contrast, turned into a water-world on 26 May, with the season's first downpour flooding its concourse and platforms. This embarrassing incident symbolizes problems with India's haphazard urbanization and its official approach to infrastructure build-up. More critically, it highlights laxity in recognizing the effects of climate change. Also Read: Seven reform pathways to bridge India's urban investment gaps What made the incident doubly disconcerting were proclamations by Niti Aayog CEO B.V.R. Subrahmanyam that the Indian economy had become the world's fourth-largest. The incongruity between that statement and the lived experience of Mumbai commuters and Indians coping with sub-par infrastructure elsewhere was striking. Yet, there was a common link between that statement and the flooding episode: Subrahmanyam seemed to have jumped the gun (we'll know if the Indian economy has overtaken Japan's only once the current year is over), a precipitate action like the metro station being pressed into service before it was made rain-proof. The episode also underscored the death of irony: officials attributed the flood to untimely monsoon downpours despite common knowledge that a coastal city like Mumbai witnesses heavy rainfall for four months every year. But it is not just Mumbai. The previous day saw Delhi reeling under the season's first cloudburst, with streets and underpasses flooded. A few days earlier, unseasonal May rainfall flooded large parts of Bengaluru's extended city, damaging property and causing large-scale economic losses. City after city in India suffers from the same problems every year, and yet the political or administrative classes seem either helpless in solving such well-known problems or incapable of preventing their recurrence. Also Read: Urban renewal: Indian cities need a governance overhaul It is also a fact that climate change has altered weather patterns, but authorities do not seem to have taken this into their calculations. Mumbai's monsoons, for example, are getting increasingly erratic in terms of both timing and precipitation. Yet, infrastructure projects—whether it is roads or metro station walls—routinely fail to take this into account. This anomaly sits uneasily with India's growing urbanization: about 40% of the population lives in urban areas, with many experts claiming that the number may be closer to 50% or even higher. This data uncertainty has arisen because a large section of the urban population resides in informal shelters, invisible to the formal gaze but most vulnerable to urban failures. Every city depends on this section for the delivery of multiple services, but is typically blind to their income, education, housing or health needs. Worse, they are not covered by any labour laws and usually do not have any rights. In the triangulation between various interest groups in an urban settlement—the entrepreneurial class and those employed in the formal sector, the political class, bureaucrats, municipal authorities and real estate developers—this section usually gets the short end of the stick. With little or no access to water, waste collection mechanisms, modern sanitation systems or health facilities, this cohort suffers the harshest impact of climate change and extreme weather events. Yet, the country's big-budget urban build-up seems to ignore their needs. Also Read: Urban renewal: Indian cities need a governance overhaul A Niti Aayog report titled Urban Planning Capacity in India ascribes the continuing urbanization crisis to a lack of urban planning. 'For this reason, as the state and city governments continue to solve urban issues in a firefighting mode, urban areas struggle to achieve 'basic services for all'… India's urban story may be lauded globally or suffer irreversible damages in the next 10-15 years depending on corrective policy measures and actions taken at the beginning of this decade." Written in September 2021, the lack of any remedial action since then is already manifesting itself across multiple malfunctions, collapses and avoidable disasters. The report also points to a lack of qualified urban planners in the state planning machinery: against 12,000 town planners required at all levels then, there were less than 4,000 sanctioned posts, with half of those lying vacant. What the report fails to mention, though, is that state governments have largely outsourced urban planning to real-estate developers and infrastructure contractors. Projects are designed, finalized and executed based on interests divergent from user interests. This was amply evident in Mumbai over the past 36 months after the city's municipal corporation, under guidance from the state government instead of formal urban governance structures, unleashed multiple construction projects that choked city traffic and worsened air quality. The Smart Cities mission was conceived about 10 years ago, though there is still little clarity about what makes cities 'smart' and whether any city has actually become any smarter. Problems of urbanization in India have also been well documented along with solutions. The smart thing would be to implement some of those suggestions immediately, especially those that will make cities not only more empathetic, but also more resilient to economic downturns and extreme weather events. The author is a senior journalist and author of 'Slip, Stitch and Stumble: The Untold Story of India's Financial Sector Reforms' @rajrishisinghal
