Qatari emir visits Joint Operations Command, briefed on Iranian missile interception
LONDON: Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani visited the Joint Operations Command of the armed forces in the Al-Mazrouah area on Wednesday.
Sheikh Tamim toured the headquarters to review the systems utilized for monitoring as well as command and control, Qatar News Agency reported.
During the visit, a briefing was provided regarding the interception of a missile attack targeting Al-Udeid Air Base, which the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps launched on Monday evening.
The Joint Operations Command highlighted the precautionary measures implemented by the armed forces, emphasizing their efficiency and readiness to defend Qatar.
Sheikh Tamim expressed his gratitude and appreciation to everyone working in the military and security sectors. He was accompanied by Sheikh Saoud bin Abdulrahman bin Hassan Al-Thani, Qatar's deputy prime minister and minister of state for defense affairs, along with several senior military and security commanders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Qatari emir visits Joint Operations Command, briefed on Iranian missile interception
LONDON: Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani visited the Joint Operations Command of the armed forces in the Al-Mazrouah area on Wednesday. Sheikh Tamim toured the headquarters to review the systems utilized for monitoring as well as command and control, Qatar News Agency reported. During the visit, a briefing was provided regarding the interception of a missile attack targeting Al-Udeid Air Base, which the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps launched on Monday evening. The Joint Operations Command highlighted the precautionary measures implemented by the armed forces, emphasizing their efficiency and readiness to defend Qatar. Sheikh Tamim expressed his gratitude and appreciation to everyone working in the military and security sectors. He was accompanied by Sheikh Saoud bin Abdulrahman bin Hassan Al-Thani, Qatar's deputy prime minister and minister of state for defense affairs, along with several senior military and security commanders.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
The high stakes in maintaining the Iran-Israel ceasefire
The Gulf Cooperation Council foreign ministers met in Doha on Tuesday to express solidarity with Qatar a day after it was attacked by Iran. Although the missile attack did not cause any casualties or substantial material damage, it was unprecedented. It was the first military attack by Iran against Qatar and probably the first time Qatar was attacked in recent memory. The foreign ministers' gathering was the second emergency meeting in as many weeks. Under GCC rules, the Ministerial Council, the official name for foreign ministers' meetings, meets four times a year in regular sessions, but it can meet any time in emergency sessions. The previous meeting on June 16 was convened to discuss Israel's attack on Iran. At that meeting, the GCC ministers expressed support for Iran and roundly condemned the Israeli attacks — and Qatar was among the most enthusiastic supporters. Over the decades, Doha has cultivated a close rapport with Tehran, while maintaining good relations with the US, which maintains one of its largest military bases in the country. Qatar has frequently mediated between Iran and the US and, as such, Iran's missile attack on Monday was surprising. The foreign ministers unequivocally condemned Tehran's action and rejected its justifications. Under the Mutual Defense Treaty of 2000, the GCC states are committed to providing maximum support to any member subjected to external aggression, a commitment that was renewed on Tuesday, as the council stressed that the GCC countries' security is 'indivisible' and that an attack on one state is an attack on all of them. They also praised Qatar's ability to thwart the attack and eliminate nearly all the missiles Iran launched against it. Trump received high praise from the GCC ministers for arranging a halt to the 12-day Iran-Israel war Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg US President Donald Trump received high praise from the GCC ministers for arranging a halt to the 12-day Iran-Israel war. The sudden turnaround in America's approach to the conflict was as decisive as it was surprising. Trump gave a rare public rebuke of Israel's prime minister after Netanyahu violated the ceasefire — as has been his modus operandi on other similar occasions. The cessation of hostilities provides an opportunity to return to the nuclear talks between Iran and the US, which were hosted and facilitated by Oman and which were disrupted by Israel's attack on Iran on June 13. The US' success in stopping this war is testimony to the tremendous influence it has in this region and the diplomatic skills of Trump and his team, especially Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The president rarely gets praise for subtle diplomacy, but his muscular handling of this conflict has been effective. The nuclear negotiations, when they resume, can build on this momentum and America's newfound decisiveness. They will also be helped by the June 12 findings by the International Atomic Energy Agency regarding Iran's breaches of its commitments to the agency and the nonproliferation regime. The IAEA's decision to find Iran in noncompliance, the first in two decades, would anchor the talks in verified facts by an independent UN agency, not the accusations of an adversary, as Tehran has dismissed similar charges in the past. The talks now have a better chance of success as the US has probably re-ascertained that military action cannot end Iran's nuclear ambitions. This is an opportunity that should not be dismissed, because the alternatives are all bleak. The informal truce remains fragile and would become even more so if there were to be a lack of progress on nuclear diplomacy. A return to the Israel-initiated war would be futile in achieving an end to Iran's nuclear program and destructive to the regional path toward diplomacy, which the GCC embarked on with Iran in recent years. Similarly, if Iran decides to go nuclear (militarily), other states in the region could do the same, launching a nuclear arms race that could threaten both regional and international peace and security. It could also isolate Iran further, similar to North Korea, and impoverish its people, as funds for development would get diverted to military spending. The sanctions would remain, making it difficult for Iran to reintegrate into the international economy. Equally important, proposals for regional integration between Iran and the GCC states would probably have to be shelved. The cessation of hostilities provides an opportunity to return to the nuclear talks between Iran and the US Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg Building on Trump's success in arranging the Iran-Israel ceasefire, the GCC ministers called on him to use his influence to end the war on Gaza. The US should not support Israel's sadistic policies of siege, starvation and mass executions of helpless Gazans seeking the scraps of food dangled before them by Israel's agents, only to get mowed down in their scores every day. This deliberate extermination of innocent women and children will forever be a stain on Israel and those who support it or fail to stop it. The stakes in securing a sustained ceasefire could not be higher. The GCC ministers pointed to the possible disruption of supply chains if the conflict were to continue and stressed the need to safeguard passageways and waterways and secure energy supplies from the region, which possesses about half the world's supply of oil and a quarter of its gas supply. Success on the nuclear track would also help accelerate other diplomatic efforts, including Gaza and the overall Israel-Palestine conflict. GCC-Iran talks, bilaterally and collectively, could also move faster, bringing the region closer to peace, stability and shared prosperity. As close friends of the US, the GCC ministers cheered President Trump for the ceasefire deal and hoped for more successes. He will undoubtedly edge closer to his goal of getting a Nobel Peace Prize if he and his team continue on this path of successfully mediating regional conflicts.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Iran and the craft of politics
For decades, Iran's patience has not been merely a political tactic, it has been a way of life in how the country navigates crises, negotiations and power projection. But the recent war with Israel, which lasted for 12 days of unprecedented military escalation — including a US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and Tehran's retaliatory attack on the American Al-Udeid base in Qatar, followed by President Donald Trump's announcement of a ceasefire — tested this model in an unprecedented manner. The question now is: Is this model still valid or is it time for a fundamental shift in Tehran's political doctrine? Since the revolution in 1979, Iran has been known for a foreign policy approach that combines ideological pragmatism with long-term patience in managing complex challenges, especially under sanctions and international isolation. Many analysts have labeled this approach as 'strategic patience,' a term that describes not just the regime's behavior but also reflects deeper traits of the Iranian national character, rooted in its cultural and historical legacy. The metaphor of Persian carpet weaving is often invoked to describe this mindset: a slow, meticulous process that unfolds not under pressure but in accordance with an internal rhythm of precision and long-range vision. Just as crafting a Persian carpet can take years of detailed work, so too does Iran build its foreign policy, step by step, thread by thread, through cumulative, deliberate moves rather than sudden leaps. But the recent Iranian-Israeli war has changed many equations. For the first time, the confrontation moved beyond proxy battles to a direct exchange, with strikes hitting targets inside both Iran and Israel. The turning point came when Trump ordered a precise strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, reasserting America's role as a military actor, not just a distant negotiator. Iran's response was swift yet calculated: targeting the Al-Udeid base in Qatar, home to US forces, in what it described as a 'measured warning' rather than a declaration of war. This rapid and volatile escalation brings Iran's strategic patience face to face with a new geopolitical era Dr. Abdellatif El-Menawy This rapid and volatile escalation brings Iran's strategic patience face to face with a new geopolitical era — an era of precision missiles, drone warfare, real-time diplomacy and a shifting regional map that does not wait for anyone to finish weaving their political carpet. And yet, Iran's response did not appear impulsive. While the Al-Udeid strike was bold and direct, it came 72 hours after the US attack, following internal deliberations and calibrated messaging. Tehran signaled clearly that it was retaliating but not escalating. It remains within its familiar logic: punish without provoking all-out war, respond without crossing the point of no return. This dynamic echoes an old anecdote from the Iran-Iraq War. In 1980, an Arab politician reportedly warned his Iraqi counterpart during the early days of the war: 'Don't celebrate your initial victories too soon. A war with Iran is never short. This is a people who spend 10 years weaving one carpet, they will endure even longer in war.' It seems that Iran has not abandoned that long breath, even in the age of fast-moving conflict. The real transformation, however, lies not in Iran's military behavior but in how patience is being redefined within its strategic doctrine. Previously, patience served as a tool for negotiation and building leverage. Today, it has increasingly become a way of absorbing global chaos and delivering timed responses — carefully selected and publicly claimed, but tightly controlled. Looking back at Iran's behavior over recent years, one sees the same disciplined pattern: calculated delays in the nuclear talks, indirect power-building through regional proxies, and strategic ambiguity when it comes to responsibility for attacks. But the latest war laid these methods bare, putting them under a global spotlight at a moment when options are narrowing, margins are shrinking and pressure is mounting. So, the key question is no longer whether Iran has strategic patience but whether today's world still allows it to be an effective tool. Waiting is no longer a virtue in itself, but a component in a more agile, more assertive strategy Dr. Abdellatif El-Menawy It could be argued that Iran is not abandoning patience but rather redefining it. Patience no longer means abstaining from action, it means responding with precision, without falling into the trap of prolonged attrition. Waiting is no longer a virtue in itself, but a component in a more agile, more assertive strategy. Today, with Trump announcing a ceasefire, Iran emerges as a player that lost nothing essential: it responded militarily, maintained its deterrent image and benefited from a Qatari-mediated de-escalation that likely came with new diplomatic channels or concessions. In this, we see a new face of Iran's patience: assertive patience. Patience that enables a response, not only restraint. Patience that preserves control while wielding credible threats. But this approach is not without its limits. Domestic pressure is growing, the regional landscape is fluid and technological escalation leaves little room for slow maneuvers. That is why the question is no longer: Does Iran possess strategic patience? Rather, it is: Is the regional and global tempo still compatible with this model of slow, deliberate endurance? Perhaps the answer lies in adapting rather than abandoning. Iran may not be able to wait 10 years for every policy outcome, as the old carpet metaphor suggests. The craft remains, but the pace must evolve. Like the modern Persian carpet, sometimes produced in six months with new tools and techniques, Iranian strategy may need to integrate faster, more responsive tactics without losing its long-range character. Between the roar of missiles and the whisper of weaving needles, Iran remains a state that excels at survival. But the greater test now is not how long it can wait, but whether it can change while waiting.
