Nepal PM Oli to visit India in September amid rumblings over strained ties with New Delhi
"Preparations for the upcoming visit of the prime minister are underway. However, the date and the detailed schedules of the visit are yet to be finalised," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lok Bahadur Chhetri said.
However, sources at the Prime Minister's Office said that Oli will embark on his official visit to the southern neighbour on September 16.
The visit will be short this time, probably for two days, the sources added.
Oli, the chairperson of the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) - popular as the CPN-UML - had assumed the office of prime minister for the fourth time last July. He had chosen to visit China for his maiden foreign visit, breaking the tradition of visiting India as the first destination after assuming the post of prime minister.
Prime Minister Oli visited China in December last year at the invitation of his Chinese counterpart Li Qiang.
During his four day visit, the prime minister addressed a function at Peking University in Beijing and met President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Qiang.
Amid speculations by some sections of local media that he didn't receive any invitation from India for an official visit, indicating that his relations with New Delhi had soured, Oli on Thursday said he will be visiting India and that ground work is underway on both sides for the trip.
He, however, had not specified any timeframe for the visit at that time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Greece Creates Marine Parks That May Revive Turkey Tensions
(Bloomberg) -- Greece will establish two national marine parks in an effort to protect ocean wildlife, a move that could potentially strain ties with neighboring Turkey. The parks will be located in the Ionian Sea and in the Southern Cyclades, an island group in the Aegean Sea, west and east of the mainland, respectively. The Greek government's pledge to create a marine park in the Aegean Sea drew pushback from Turkey last year. The two countries have historically been at odds over sea borders and economic rights in parts of the eastern Mediterranean. 'These parks will be among the largest marine protected areas in the entire Mediterranean,' Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said Monday in a statement. They will allow the country to meet its target of 'protecting 30% of its territorial waters' by 2030, ahead of schedule, the premier added. The establishment of the two marine parks is meant to preserve ecosystems, restore balance and set a new standard for marine conservation, Mitsotakis said. 'Unilateral actions should be avoided in enclosed or semi-enclosed seas such as the Aegean and Mediterranean,' Turkey's Foreign Ministry said in a statement in response, adding that Ankara would announce its own projects 'aimed at protecting the environment in marine areas' in the coming days. The area in the Aegean Sea hosts threatened wildlife plants and species and will cover almost 9,500 square kilometers. The park in the Ionian Sea will extend over 18,000 square kilometers and will include locations used by endangered animals like certain sea turtles. 'They will be vast sanctuaries for life beneath the waves,' Mitsotakis said, adding that 'most importantly, inside these marine zones the hugely damaging practice of bottom trawling will be banned.' (Adds Turkish statement in fifth paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
As China exit ban shakes Western firms, an opportunity for India
Recent events have deepened the concerns of multinational firms operating in China. The practice of issuing exit bans, particularly for those with family ties in China or involved in commercial disputes, has been used as a tool by Chinese authorities for years. However, the latest incidents have elevated the risks to a new level particularly for foreign nationals travelling on business. Reports said two US citizens including a federal employee and a senior executive at Wells Fargo have been barred from leaving China. These cases are not isolated. Dozens of American citizens, many of them ethnic Chinese, are under similar exit bans in China, often with little transparency or legal recourse. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD John Kamm of the Dui Hua Foundation told The Washington Post that the number of such bans may be as high as 50, with new cases emerging monthly, typically tied to commercial or civil disputes. The Wells Fargo Incident: A turning point The case of Chenyue Mao, a managing director at Wells Fargo specialising in international factoring, has become emblematic of the growing tension. Mao, a US citizen born in Shanghai, entered China recently on a business trip and discovered upon attempting to leave that she was subject to an exit ban. Wells Fargo promptly suspended all employee travel to China and confirmed it was actively working through appropriate channels to secure Mao's return to the US, reports said. Mao's extensive professional history in global trade finance, including leadership roles in international financial organisations, highlights the potential diplomatic fallout. Her travel restriction, imposed without clear explanation, raises serious concerns about the predictability and safety of conducting business in China. Corporate fallout and diplomatic repercussions Multinational corporations, especially those with staff deployed in mainland China, are now reevaluating risk exposure. Some companies have already issued internal directives discouraging solo travel or advising employees to avoid China altogether, Reuters reported. The broader implication, however, is that firms are beginning to question whether operating in China is worth the geopolitical and personal risk. US government agencies have responded cautiously but firmly. The State Department reiterated its advisory urging Americans to reconsider travel to China due to arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including exit bans. Furthermore, senior diplomats have raised these cases directly with Chinese officials, with pressure mounting at high levels to ensure the affected individuals are allowed to return home. Mixed signals from Beijing China has long courted foreign investment, emphasising its openness to global business. Spokespersons from the Chinese Embassy in Washington have reiterated that China 'guarantees the safety and legitimate rights' of foreign citizens within its borders, provided they respect local laws. But China's growing use of exit bans, lack of judicial transparency and disregard for dual nationality protections run contrary to these assurances. A wake-up call for Western corporations The events surrounding Mao's detainment have triggered a reckoning among global business leaders. Veteran bankers and corporate executives who previously experienced China's regulatory environment with relative confidence now face a stark reality that no foreign passport offers guaranteed protection. For ethnic Chinese professionals, the risk is compounded by Beijing's refusal to acknowledge dual citizenship. In the words of a former US official, naturalised citizens are particularly vulnerable. The Chinese government views them as Chinese nationals first, giving the state leverage through family connections still in the country. Cases like that of a US government employee reportedly held in China for visa-related issues reinforce these concerns, especially as the person involved was travelling for personal reasons and not on official business. Eroding business confidence The chilling effect on global business sentiment is growing. The use of exit bans, especially against senior executives, threatens not only individual liberties but also the operational flexibility of multinational firms. As reported by The Economic Times, Mao's case has generated considerable alarm, especially in sectors reliant on frequent cross-border engagement such as finance, tech and manufacturing. China's ambition to remain a global business hub now faces a self-imposed challenge. Detaining business travellers, whether as part of internal investigations or diplomatic leverage, sends a contradictory message. While the country's leadership continues to court global investors, its practices increasingly alienate the very professionals it seeks to attract. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India: A stable and strategic alternative Amid this growing disquiet, attention is turning toward India as a more secure and strategically viable destination for Western companies. The appeal is rooted not just in India's demographic advantages or its burgeoning middle class, but in its political and legal transparency, favourable investment climate and robust institutional framework. Over the past few years, India has actively positioned itself as an alternative manufacturing and technology hub through initiatives such as Make in India and production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes. Western multinationals have already begun shifting parts of their supply chains to India, often citing regulatory stability and democratic governance as key factors. The timing could not be more opportune. While China's opaque legal environment deters inbound travel and long-term planning, India offers relative predictability. The recent instability in US-China relations only sharpens this contrast. Business leaders are increasingly factoring in not just cost efficiency but also geopolitical resilience when selecting regional bases. Building trust through rule of law Unlike China, India maintains an independent judiciary and relatively open media ecosystem, both of which contribute to a safer environment for foreign investors and professionals. Arbitrary detentions, opaque travel restrictions and politically motivated legal actions, which are key concerns in China, are far less common in India. This legal clarity provides assurance to international firms that their rights and those of their employees will be upheld. Furthermore, India's diplomatic relations with Western nations have been steadily improving. Strategic partnerships with the US, EU, Japan and Australia bolster its credibility as a long-term business ally. These alliances also create a security buffer that helps insulate foreign investors from the volatility seen in other emerging markets. In practical terms, firms looking to de-risk their Asia strategies are already exploring options to relocate regional offices or data centres from China to India. The software and electronics industries are leading the charge, but the trend is expanding into pharmaceuticals, textiles and financial services. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Companies previously hesitant to exit China entirely are now taking a 'China-plus-one' approach retaining minimal presence in China while building up operations elsewhere. India, with its skilled workforce, improving infrastructure and investor-friendly reforms is increasingly emerging as that 'plus-one.' Several multinationals are quietly moving critical roles out of China. Apple, for instance, has increased its iPhone production capacity in India. Likewise, Google and Microsoft have expanded their development centres across Bengaluru and Hyderabad. These aren't merely tactical decisions. They reflect a growing strategic consensus that long-term exposure to China carries reputational and operational risks that are no longer acceptable. The Wells Fargo episode, for all its uniqueness, has only intensified these conversations. Corporations now see India not just as a promising growth market, but as a secure geopolitical partner. A shift in the balance of power The detainment of American nationals in China, particularly high-ranking business professionals, has introduced a new layer of risk into an already complex geopolitical arena. While Beijing attempts to walk a fine line between regulatory control and economic openness, it risks alienating the very investors and professionals critical to its growth ambitions. In contrast, India offers a path forward for Western firms looking for stability, transparency and a reliable rule of law. As corporate leaders reexamine where and how they operate in Asia, the choice between risk and resilience is becoming clearer. And for many, India is emerging not just as an alternative, but as the new centre of gravity in the region's economic future. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China stood up to Trump, and it's not giving Europe an inch, either
Having forced the Trump administration into a trade truce through economic pressure and strategic defiance, China now appears to be playing the same kind of hardball with Europe. It has retaliated against trade curbs, accused Europe of protectionism, slowed exports of critical minerals and further embraced Russia, with China's top leader himself pledging support for Moscow just days before a summit of European Union leaders that China is scheduled to host this week. The moves are part of a tough posture that Beijing is taking in its trade and geopolitical disputes with Brussels. China wants Europe to lift heavy tariffs that it has imposed on Chinese electric vehicles and refrain from further restrictions on trade. EU leaders see Beijing as effectively supporting Russia in its war with Ukraine, and are also concerned that China is dumping artificially cheap products that could undermine local industries. Beijing has learned that it has leverage it can use against outside pressure. It stood up to the Trump administration's punishing trade war by demonstrating how dependent global industry was on China for its supply of critical minerals. And Beijing likely assesses that it is in a stronger position because Western unity is fracturing, analysts say, with President Trump's 'America First' foreign policy weakening the historical bonds between Europe and the United States. 'Beijing perceives that the global order is in flux,' said Simona Grano, a China expert at the University of Zurich. 'From its perspective, the United States is overstretched and preoccupied with multiple conflicts around the world and domestic polarization.' 'And with signs of division or fatigue within the trans-Atlantic alliance, the Chinese leadership sees more room to assert its interests, not least in trade, tech and security,' Grano said. That calculation has been evident in China's approach to the summit talks on Thursday, which will include its top leader, Xi Jinping, and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, as well as other senior European leaders. The two sides will be commemorating 50 years of diplomatic ties — the type of anniversary that ordinarily would be a chance for Beijing to showcase its partnerships. Yet each detail of the meeting appears to underscore China's view of the power dynamic. The summit is being held in Beijing even though it was Brussels's turn to host the rotating event. The meeting will only last one day, according to the European Union, despite having been billed earlier as a two-day affair. Expectations for any concrete results from the summit are low. The 27-nation European bloc is caught between wanting to cut a trade deal with the United States, which is putting pressure on the region to commit to taking a harder line on China, and the need to maintain stable ties with China. But Brussels has grown more confrontational with Beijing in recent years about a massive trade imbalance that amounted to over $350 billion last year, as well as Beijing's alignment with Russia. In a speech this month in the European Parliament, von der Leyen accused China of 'flooding global markets with cheap, subsidized goods, to wipe out competitors,' and of discriminating against European companies doing business in China. She also warned that China's support for Moscow in its war with Ukraine was creating instability in Europe. She said she planned to raise these concerns with Chinese officials at the meeting in Beijing. China is unlikely to be accommodating of such criticisms at the summit, if its recent muscle flexing is any indication. Mao Ning, a spokeswoman for China's foreign ministry, fired back at von der Leyen, saying it was the European Union's 'mind-set' that needed 'rebalancing,' not China's trade relationship with Europe. Earlier this year, China slowed exports of rare earth minerals to Europe, sounding alarms at high-tech firms across Europe and triggering a temporary shutdown of production lines at European auto parts manufacturers. And this month, China hit back at European Union curbs on government purchases of Chinese medical devices by imposing similar government procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. Despite its combative stance, Beijing cannot afford to push Europe too far. China needs European markets to absorb the glut of electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels its factories are making. Domestically, huge price wars have shrunk profits, prompting even Xi and other leaders to warn companies against engaging in 'disorderly and low-price competition.' And Europe's importance has only grown as the Trump administration tries to close off other markets to China. 'Europe remains an indispensable economic partner for China. But if Beijing overplays its hand, it could find itself more isolated,' Grano said. Still, China has remained defiant when it comes to its close relationship with Russia — which Beijing considers an invaluable partner in counterbalancing the West. Europe has long complained that Beijing's purchases of Russian oil and its supplying of dual-use technologies has enabled the Kremlin to prolong its war in Ukraine. China claims neutrality over the conflict, a position that has been met with deep skepticism in the West, in part because of the closeness of China and Russia. Xi called for Beijing and Moscow to 'deepen' their ties and 'safeguard' their 'security interests' when he met Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, in Beijing last week. And earlier this month, China's top diplomat, Wang Yi, privately told European Union officials in Brussels that it was not in Beijing's interests for the war to end because it might shift U.S. attention toward Asia, according to a European official briefed on the talks, who spoke to The New York Times on condition of anonymity to share details of remarks made in a closed-door meeting. Wang's remarks were first reported by the South China Morning Post. China has not commented on what Wang reportedly said. But Victor Gao, a former Chinese diplomat and vice president of the Center for China and Globalization, a Beijing-based think tank, argued that the assertion attributed to Wang did not make sense because China believes the United States is able to project its influence in both Asia and over the fate of Ukraine at the same time. Gao was dismissive of European criticisms of China's relationship with Russia, saying that the region should essentially mind its own business and focus on improving the lives of its people. 'From the Chinese perspective, they are not qualified as a geopolitical rival,' he said. 'They think too much of themselves.' China's strategy toward Europe is essentially to divide and conquer. It saw the European Union as hawkish and sought to minimize the impact of its policies while courting Europe's leading businesses, namely from Germany and France, Gao said. Hopes that Beijing will ever help Europe pressure the Kremlin to end its war have 'faded away,' said Philippe Le Corre, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis, who is no more optimistic that Brussels and Beijing will compromise on trade. 'There is no trust between the two sides,' he said.
