St. Cloud Quarterly Business Report finds local growth despite tariff worries
The newest edition of the St. Cloud Area Quarterly Business Report, released June 26, found signs of healthy business activity for local companies, though business owners are still worried about impacts of national economic conditions at home.
Employment, wages and prices received for products all picked up this past quarter, the report found, which suggest some slight economic growth in the area. However, business owners' concerns about national economic conditions, namely tariffs, cast a shadow over the majority of survey responses.
King Banaian, a St. Cloud State University economics professor and director of the university's Center for Policy Research and Community Engagement, discussed the report's findings at Granite Innovations.
His presentation was titled "Negotiating the Wall of Worry." It addressed the theme of worry across much of the report.
"In terms of future conditions, I would say people are feeling good, but they're not super optimistic, but they feel like they're managing through whatever issues they see in the national environment," Banaian said.
Many business owners who participated in the survey used in the report were especially nervous about the impacts of tariffs, with 32% saying they did not know how tariffs would impact their business.
"Most of what we sell is imported directly or indirectly, and the constantly changing policies are making it very difficult for us and our clients to plan and navigate," a respondent cited in the report's review said.
New medical school: Construction almost complete at St. Cloud's new medical school
The Trump administration's new tariff rates are scheduled to restart July 8 after a 90-day pause, though there is a chance that the trade deal deadline could be extended, according to USA Today.
The majority of local business owners also plan to pass the costs of increased tariffs onto consumers, the report found, with 56% of respondents planning to pass most tariff costs onto consumers and another 22% planning to pass on all additional costs.
The report also found mixed responses on how tariffs may impact local businesses, with 37% of respondents expecting to be impacted negatively and 26% anticipating no impact at all. However, another 5% expect positive impacts, which Banaian said points to the diversity of companies in town, and this could be from business-to-business producers.
"When we talk to local businesses, they're aware of (tariffs), they're incorporating it into their plans, and they're not panicked about it," Banaian said. "They seem like they're in a place where they're willing to... muddle through."
The Quarterly Business Report also explored the anticipated impacts of a new Minnesota paid family and medical leave law that will take effect in January 2026. This law allows most workers to take up to 12 weeks of paid leave for the birth of a child, recovering from injuries or taking care of a parent in hospice.
Several lawmakers and business groups opposed the law due to concerns it could place stress on small business owners. A third of survey respondents said they've reached out to the government for guidance on the new policy and another third said they have reached out to state officials for relief.
Benton Solar: New solar facility could bring major investments, hundreds of jobs to St. Cloud area
Despite concerns about national economic conditions and policy changes, the report found signs of local economic success in its review of local economic indicators.
The Leading Economic Indicators, six measurements that are part of each quarterly report, hinted at slight growth over the past quarter and a growth of 1.1% in local private employment over the next four to six months.
Professional employment, the St. Cloud Stock Price Index and current economic conditions all improved, though initial claims for unemployment insurance increased and there was no change in new business incorporations.
As a result, Banaian said current conditions hint at a slight downturn in the future. He also believes a recession is less likely than he thought at the time of the last Quarterly Business Report, but he is not ruling out the possibility.
Despite the mixed signals, Banaian commended the optimism of local business owners and said it is understandable to be worried about tariffs and other economic conditions.
"I'm not telling people not to worry; I don't mean that," he said. "I mean that the economy can continue to grow even while worrying because markets are really efficient processors of information... there's a base of optimism in our local leaders that recognizes those concerns and says, 'I'm going to be okay.'"
Teagan King covers business and development for the St. Cloud Times. She can be reached at teking@gannett.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Journals
2 days ago
- Business Journals
St. Louis dining group to take over well-known Metro East restaurant
The owner of a St. Louis-area Italian restaurant plans to take over a well-known restaurant in Metro East.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Far the Median Income Goes in America's Largest Cities
As the cost of living continues to rise, many Americans may wonder how far their salary goes in the largest U.S. cities. While new data from GOBankingRates reveals the median income isn't enough to cover living costs in every major metro, you may be surprised by the locations where it is enough money. The median income in five major California cities — including the notoriously expensive Bay Area hotspots San Francisco and Oakland — covers each spot's living expenses. Find Out: Learn More: The GOBankingRates' research team analyzed the most populated U.S. cities, sourcing key factors like household median income, the cost-of-living indexes and average expenditure costs. Each city's monthly and annual cost of living was calculated using the average expenditure and mortgage costs. The average annual cost of living and median household income were then used to calculate the amount of coverage this income can cover in each location. Key Findings Los Angeles, not San Francisco, ranks as the least affordable city for median income earners. The median income is $80,336, covering just 79% of living expenses and resulting in a negative savings of $21,634 after this income pays the cost of living. Los Angeles, Miami and New York's median income covers up to just 85% of living expenses. These locations ranked as the top three cities with the least affordable median income, with every city experiencing negative savings after earnings covered living costs: Los Angeles ($21,634), Miami ($15,324) and New York ($14,598). Seven Texas cities, the most out of any state, were among the 45 cities where the median income covers 100% or more of living expenses. These include Dallas (#23), Houston (#26), Austin (#29), El Paso (#35), San Antonio (#38), Arlington (#39) and Fort Worth (#47). There are five surprising California cities where earning a median income does cover 100% or more of expenses: San Francisco (#8), Oakland (#9), Fresno (#13), Sacramento (#19) and Bakersfield (#31). Ranked from least affordable to most affordable, let's see how far the median income goes in America's largest cities. Find Out: See Next: 1. Los Angeles % of living expenses covered by income: 79% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$21,634 Household median income: $80,366 Annual cost of living: $102,000 Monthly cost of living: $8,500 Discover More: 2. Miami % of living expenses covered by income: 80% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$15,324 Household median income: $59,390 Annual cost of living: $74,714 Monthly cost of living: $6,226 3. New York City % of living expenses covered by income: 85% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$14,598 Household median income: $79,713 Annual cost of living: $94,311 Monthly cost of living: $7,859 4. Long Beach, California % of living expenses covered by income: 90% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$9,397 Household median income: $83,969 Annual cost of living: $93,366 Monthly cost of living: $7,780 5. San Diego % of living expenses covered by income: 96% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$4,430 Household median income: $104,321 Annual cost of living: $108,751 Monthly cost of living: $9,063 6. San Jose, California % of living expenses covered by income: 99.6% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: -$624 Household median income: $141,565 Annual cost of living: $142,189 Monthly cost of living: $11,849 Check Out: 7. Boston % of living expenses covered by income: 107% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $6,323 Household median income: $94,755 Annual cost of living: $88,432 Monthly cost of living: $7,369 8. San Francisco % of living expenses covered by income: 107% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $9,447 Household median income: $141,446 Annual cost of living: $131,999 Monthly cost of living: $11,000 9. Oakland, California % of living expenses covered by income: 113% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $10,972 Household median income: $97,369 Annual cost of living: $86,397 Monthly cost of living: $7,200 10. Tucson, Arizona % of living expenses covered by income: 116% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $7,425 Household median income: $54,546 Annual cost of living: $47,121 Monthly cost of living: $3,927 11. Detroit % of living expenses covered by income: 120% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $6,606 Household median income: $39,575 Annual cost of living: $32,969 Monthly cost of living: $2,747 Read Next: 12. Las Vegas % of living expenses covered by income: 120% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $11,958 Household median income: $70,723 Annual cost of living: $58,765 Monthly cost of living: $4,897 13. Fresno, California % of living expenses covered by income: 126% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $13,804 Household median income: $66,804 Annual cost of living: $53,000 Monthly cost of living: $4,417 14. Washington, D.C. % of living expenses covered by income: 128% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $23,449 Household median income: $106,287 Annual cost of living: $82,838 Monthly cost of living: $6,903 15. Seattle % of living expenses covered by income: 130% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $28,000 Household median income: $121,984 Annual cost of living: $93,984 Monthly cost of living: $7,832 16. Milwaukee % of living expenses covered by income: 131% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $12,217 Household median income: $51,888 Annual cost of living: $39,671 Monthly cost of living: $3,306 Try This: 17. Tampa, Florida % of living expenses covered by income: 134% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $18,029 Household median income: $71,302 Annual cost of living: $53,273 Monthly cost of living: $4,439 18. Portland, Oregon % of living expenses covered by income: 135% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $23,043 Household median income: $88,792 Annual cost of living: $65,749 Monthly cost of living: $5,479 19. Sacramento, California % of living expenses covered by income: 136% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $22,158 Household median income: $83,753 Annual cost of living: $61,595 Monthly cost of living: $5,133 20. Denver % of living expenses covered by income: 136% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $24,332 Household median income: $91,681 Annual cost of living: $67,349 Monthly cost of living: $5,612 21. Aurora, Colorado % of living expenses covered by income: 138% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $23,255 Household median income: $84,320 Annual cost of living: $61,065 Monthly cost of living: $5,089 Trending Now: 22. Philadelphia % of living expenses covered by income: 138% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $16,759 Household median income: $60,698 Annual cost of living: $43,939 Monthly cost of living: $3,662 23. Dallas % of living expenses covered by income: 139% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $18,847 Household median income: $67,760 Annual cost of living: $48,913 Monthly cost of living: $4,076 24. Mesa, Arizona % of living expenses covered by income: 139% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $22,024 Household median income: $78,779 Annual cost of living: $56,755 Monthly cost of living: $4,730 25. Phoenix % of living expenses covered by income: 139% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $21,646 Household median income: $77,041 Annual cost of living: $55,395 Monthly cost of living: $4,616 26. Houston % of living expenses covered by income: 141% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $18,162 Household median income: $62,894 Annual cost of living: $44,732 Monthly cost of living: $3,728 View Next: 27. Albuquerque, New Mexico % of living expenses covered by income: 141% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $18,975 Household median income: $65,604 Annual cost of living: $46,629 Monthly cost of living: $3,886 28. Atlanta % of living expenses covered by income: 141% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $23,810 Household median income: $81,938 Annual cost of living: $58,128 Monthly cost of living: $4,844 29. Austin, Texas % of living expenses covered by income: 143% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $27,264 Household median income: $91,461 Annual cost of living: $64,197 Monthly cost of living: $5,350 30. Jacksonville, Florida % of living expenses covered by income: 146% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $20,980 Household median income: $66,981 Annual cost of living: $46,001 Monthly cost of living: $3,833 31. Bakersfield, California % of living expenses covered by income: 146% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $24,346 Household median income: $77,397 Annual cost of living: $53,051 Monthly cost of living: $4,421 Discover More: 32. Charlotte, North Carolina % of living expenses covered by income: 148% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $25,308 Household median income: $78,438 Annual cost of living: $53,130 Monthly cost of living: $4,428 33. Colorado Springs % of living expenses covered by income: 148% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $27,147 Household median income: $83,198 Annual cost of living: $56,051 Monthly cost of living: $4,671 34. Raleigh, North Carolina % of living expenses covered by income: 149% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $26,946 Household median income: $82,424 Annual cost of living: $55,478 Monthly cost of living: $4,623 35. El Paso, Texas % of living expenses covered by income: 150% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $19,461 Household median income: $58,734 Annual cost of living: $39,273 Monthly cost of living: $3,273 36. Tulsa, Oklahoma % of living expenses covered by income: 150% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $19,424 Household median income: $58,407 Annual cost of living: $38,983 Monthly cost of living: $3,249 Be Aware: 37. Memphis, Tennessee % of living expenses covered by income: 151% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $17,313 Household median income: $51,211 Annual cost of living: $33,898 Monthly cost of living: $2,825 38. San Antonio, Texas % of living expenses covered by income: 151% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $21,284 Household median income: $62,917 Annual cost of living: $41,633 Monthly cost of living: $3,469 39. Arlington, Texas % of living expenses covered by income: 153% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $25,543 Household median income: $73,519 Annual cost of living: $47,976 Monthly cost of living: $3,998 40. Columbus, Ohio % of living expenses covered by income: 154% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $22,789 Household median income: $65,327 Annual cost of living: $42,538 Monthly cost of living: $3,545 41. Baltimore % of living expenses covered by income: 154% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $21,015 Household median income: $59,623 Annual cost of living: $38,608 Monthly cost of living: $3,217 For You: 42. Chicago % of living expenses covered by income: 155% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $26,708 Household median income: $75,134 Annual cost of living: $48,426 Monthly cost of living: $4,035 43. Indianapolis % of living expenses covered by income: 158% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $23,134 Household median income: $62,995 Annual cost of living: $39,861 Monthly cost of living: $3,322 44. Omaha, Nebraska % of living expenses covered by income: 161% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $27,605 Household median income: $72,708 Annual cost of living: $45,103 Monthly cost of living: $3,759 45. Kansas City, Missouri % of living expenses covered by income: 162% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $25,869 Household median income: $67,449 Annual cost of living: $41,580 Monthly cost of living: $3,465 46. Minneapolis % of living expenses covered by income: 163% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $30,927 Household median income: $80,269 Annual cost of living: $49,342 Monthly cost of living: $4,112 That's Interesting: 47. Fort Worth, Texas % of living expenses covered by income: 163% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $29,710 Household median income: $76,602 Annual cost of living: $46,892 Monthly cost of living: $3,908 48. Virginia Beach, Virginia % of living expenses covered by income: 164% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $35,473 Household median income: $90,685 Annual cost of living: $55,212 Monthly cost of living: $4,601 49. Wichita, Kansas % of living expenses covered by income: 168% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $25,418 Household median income: $63,072 Annual cost of living: $37,654 Monthly cost of living: $3,138 50. Oklahoma City % of living expenses covered by income: 172% Savings remaining after income covers living costs: $27,898 Household median income: $66,702 Annual cost of living: $38,804 Monthly cost of living: $3,234 Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed the most populated cities, as sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey. Cost-of-living living indexes were sourced from Sperling's BestPlaces. Using the cost of living indexes and the national average expenditure costs, as sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, the average expenditure cost for each location was calculated. Mortgage costs were determined using Zillow Home Value Index for May 2025 and the Federal Reserve Economic Data. Using the average mortgage and average expenditure costs, the average cost of living was calculated. All data was collected on and is up to date as of July 3, 2025. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on Here's How Far the Median Income Goes in America's Largest Cities Sign in to access your portfolio


Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Beyoncé's Houston Cowboy Carter tour stop brings $50M boost
Beyoncé didn't just bring the Texan flair to NRG Stadium — she brought a multimillion-dollar boost to Houston. Stunning stat: Queen Bey's June 28–29 Cowboy Carter Tour stop spurred more than $50 million in local spending, according to an analysis by Houston First Corporation. Houston was the only Texas stop on the tour, drawing fans from across the state — and as far as Mexico and the U.K. — to enjoy her hometown performance. What they're saying: "Beyoncé's concert stop here is the latest example of how major entertainment events of this caliber can be huge economic drivers for our city," said Michael Heckman, president and CEO of Houston First. "This type of mega-event is something we love to see because it not only generates buzz and excitement across town, it truly delivers for our economy." By the numbers: Hotel occupancy surged across the city compared to the same weekend last year — and so did revenue per available room and average daily rates. Hotels near NRG Stadium hit 79% occupancy, up from 61% last year. Downtown hotels reached 72%, up from 53%, and Uptown hit 78%, up from 58%. Plus, OpenTable reported a 43% increase in Houston-area reservations over the three-day stretch compared to the same period last year.