REVEALED: How much North Wales Police spends on drones
That revealed that between 2020-2022, the force had four drones in their ranks, which cost £405,768 (Only started towards end of financial year 2020/21, so 2020/21 and 2021/22 costs included).
In 2022/23, that moved up to seven drones at a cost of £398,784.
In 2023/24, that figure was 11 drones at a cost of £488,229.
And this year, the total now stands at 15 drones used by the force, at a cost of £581,725.
The drones are used in a number of cases, for example, to track down missing people or to catch criminals red handed.
The FOI further reveals that North Wales Police operates a dedicated team of drone operators and additional pilots who have other primary roles.
It also adds that training a drone pilot costs around £1,000 with a course taking place over 13 days.
The Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales, Andy Dunbobbin, hailed the use of drones as an 'indispensable part of policing'.
He added that there are plans in place to continue investing in such technology to deal with 'challenges' face within policing.
READ MORE
Mr Dunbobbin said: "In recent years, the use of drones has become an indispensable part of policing and fighting crime.
"For example, they have proved effective in cases of missing persons, where drones are able to scan landscapes and reach remote locations faster and more effectively than traditional means.
"Prior to becoming Police and Crime Commissioner, I had a professional background in IT and the digital sphere and so I recognise how important it is to keep pace with changes in technology.
"My Police and Crime Plan for North Wales pledges to continue to invest in technology and digital skills to deal with the challenges we face in policing, both now and into the future.
"I fully support North Wales Police and their drone unit in making the most of drones and other developing technologies for the benefit of the public and in fighting crime.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sturgeon fails to be frank on education failures in new book
Over the past ten years, when I've been speaking about the state of Scottish education, or analysing the latest data on attainment or teacher numbers or classroom behaviour, lots of people have asked me variations of a simple question: how did we get here? Very often I have responded with the following explanation: Basically, Nicola Sturgeon was under pressure on education, and she went on a wee field trip to England, where people told her about a thing called the London Challenge. She listened, didn't understand, then came back up the road and decided we'd do the same things in Scotland. This, I should stress, was an obviously oversimplified explanation that I used to get a laugh from whatever room it was in, followed by a more detailed critique of the policy development process and the political implications. It was meant to be a joke. But it turns out that my depiction wasn't the caricature I thought it was – it seems instead to have been an exercise in unexpected realism. Read more: Keep up to date with our coverage on Nicola Sturgeon's memoir On page 255 of her new book, the former First Minister briefly deigns to address education issues when she tells us about visiting London in February 2015. This short visit to a single school, she explains, was 'instrumental' in the development of a policy direction that, by the end of the current parliament, will have wasted a full decade of potential progress at a cost of £1.75 billion of public money. Education pops up again a little later in the book during a section about getting 'Back on Track'. We are told about the decision to abandon a flagship Education Bill 'in favour of a non-statutory approach' to handing headteachers more autonomy. This was, allegedly, done because it would allow faster and more successful change, all without giving the opposition the chance to 'frustrate the legislation'. The reality from that time was that the government's own consultation on the Bill showed that there was little if any support for the changes the government wanted to impose. The decision to pull the Bill was, quite plainly, about avoiding a political humiliation. This thread, where everything would have been fine if it weren't for bad actors trying to stop her (because of course she couldn't possibly have just been wrong) continues when she discusses her decision to force standardised testing on schools. Read more Lessons to Learn: Once again, the reality is quite different from her presentation. As I proved at the time, the policy was based on almost no written evidence whatsoever – I fought a year-long FOI battle to force Sturgeon's government to release what material they had, and then discovered that it amounted to four unsolicited emails. What's more, although Sturgeon tries to present this policy as something that the other parties opposed, the truth is that both the Tories and Labour had been demanding the introduction of standardised testing, albeit for political reasons. When the policy was announced it was met with widespread opposition and condemnation from teachers and education experts – people who knew a lot more than Nicola Sturgeon and her circle of political advisers. Later, she frames the introduction of standardised testing as having been influenced by her 'sympathy' for the view that 'we had moved away from a rote approach'. The problem, if we're going to be speaking frankly, is that Nicola Sturgeon is a career politician who was a lawyer for five minutes in her twenties, so her views on the correct pedagogical approaches for literacy and numeracy are worth precisely nothing. And yet they set the direction of travel for the education policy of an entire nation. Unsurprisingly, the former First Minister declines to mention the specific and measurable targets for 'closing the attainment gap' that were included in the 2017 Programme for Government, which she says was the strongest of her period in office. There's a good reason for that: her government never, at any stage, even came close to achieving them. The closest that Sturgeon's book comes to offering an honest assessment of her education record is when she writes that her underlying problem was 'one of diagnosis' – even that isn't really true, because it still gives her too much credit. She didn't know enough to make any sort of diagnosis, and still doesn't seem to understand that fundamental point. At the launch of the book she went a little further, admitting that she didn't grasp the complexity of the issues she was tackling. But that's a cop out as well. Here's the truth: she had no idea what she was doing, and didn't even know enough to be able to recognise the things she didn't know, but dragged us along regardless. Acting from a position of ignorance, she pursued policies that have not only failed but have also been major contributors to the enormous problems currently facing schools, teachers, and pupils in this country. There are exceptions to these failures, the most notable of which is her decision to back the campaign for LGBT-inclusive education in Scottish schools. There are various other SNP politicians who might have been leader other than her, and without needing to name names I think we all know that many of them would have behaved very differently. Scotland became the first country on earth to introduce inclusive education and, as I have told her in person, Nicola Sturgeon should be proud of her role in that. But on the whole, and certainly with respect to the 'attainment gap', Nicola Sturgeon failed when it came to education. And now she has also failed to be frank about those failures. Having made this the central pillar of so much of her time and office, and promising that she would be judged on her record, Nicola Sturgeon's reflections on education are incredibly brief and a long way from honest. But what did you expect from a politician's memoir?
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Is JD Vance really Scots-Irish - and does it even matter?
Vance's claim to Scots-Irish heritage would connect him to America from the days before the revolution, which may explain why he's so keen to play it up. There's just one issue though - there's no real evidence it's true. Read More: Earlier this year Gordon Lyons of the the Democratic Unionist Party commissioned a report into Vance's ancestors in Northern Ireland but researchers were forced to admit they had "not established a conclusive family link'. Emails to Lyons, obtained via Freedom of Information, concluded "it has not been possible to establish conclusive proof of a direct Vance link back to Ulster at this stage". The vice-President was believed to be descended from Lancelot Vance, son of Scottish reverend John Vance, who died in the Siege of Derry in 1689. However, the Vance Family Association has been running a genealogical research project using DNA for more than a decade, and cast doubt upon the claim. Its president, Dave Vance, said there was no direct connection to "the John Vance who is popularly assumed by many genealogists to be the sole progenitor of all Irish Vances'. It appears then that Vance, who has been staying near Kilmarnock this week, is not as connected to Scotland as he might believe or claim. What is not in dispute, however, is heavy influence of the Scots-Irish community on Appalachia. JD Vance plays golf at Turnberry The term doesn't refer simply to those of Scottish and/or Irish descent but specifically to Protestant immigrants from the northern counties of Ireland, whose ancestors came there from Scotland. In the early 1600s King James VI of Scotland - James I of England - sought to solidify his rule over Ireland and encourage the spread of Protestantism. One method involved seizing land from the native Irish in Ulster, making it the property of the British Crown, and handing it over to Presbyterians from southern Scotland. It was, in effect, what would now be recognised as an ethnic cleansing in which the Crown sought to 'breed out' the native Gaelic population with poor protestants from Scotland, as well as Northern England and Wales. Those moving to Ireland did not own the land, instead operating as sharecroppers paying tithes to the Anglican Church of England rather than their own Church of Scotland. By the 1660s Scottish Presbyterians made up some 20% of Ulster's population, close to two-thirds of its British population, and that number would grow hugely at the turn of the century. A prolonged famine hit Scotland in the 1690s in which up to 15% of the population died of starvation, with 50,000 fleeing to Ulster between 1690 and 1710. By 1720 they represented the absolute majority in terms of population, but they continued to be shut out from political power by the Church of England. As a result many - at least a quarter of a million by the time of the American Revolution - emigrated to the American colonies in search of a better life. Many of them eventually settled in Appalachia, which shared geographical similarities with their former homelands. The Scots-Irish settlers brought with them their knowledge of crop rotation and the farming techniques which had been practiced in Ireland for centuries, adapting them to the rich soils of the region. Culturally, too, their contribution was foundational to the traditions of Appalachia. The fiddle, blended with the banjos played by slaves from West and Central Africa, became a key component of bluegrass as did traditional folk ballads and their narrative storytelling. Appalachian quilts mixed Scottish and Irish traditions with those of Native American, Amish and Quaker to create a style distinct to the region, while food staples like buttermilk and potatoes can also be traced back across the Atlantic. Then, of course, there's moonshine. A moonshine still (Image: Wikimedia Commons) As Mark Sohn wrote in his book Appalachian Home Cooking: History, Culture and Recipes: "For the Scots-Irish, whiskey-making was linked to freedom. They came to Appalachia in search of freedom, and they brought not only their whiskey-making knowledge but also their worms and stills.' During the prohibition era the limited road network in Appalachia made it easy to evade revenue officers, moonshiners swapping barley mash for maize corn to create a potent - and illegal - spirit. Kathy Olson, director of the Stephenson Center for Appalachia at Lees-McRae college said: "It would not be an exaggeration to say that the Scots-Irish made the defining contribution to Appalachian culture in terms of shaping the region's cultural identity as distinct from lowland American culture in terms of language, music, religion, and agriculture." Many Scots-Irish immigrants played a key role in the successful struggle for independence. The Battle of Kings Mountain, which took place in 1780 in North Carolina, was described by President Theodore Roosevelt as the "turning point of the American Revolution". It was fought and commanded by a number of Scots-Irish and Scots on the American side, including Joseph McDowell Jr, William Campbell, and James Johnston. Loyalist commander Patrick Ferguson, from Pitfour in Aberdeenshire, was killed in the battle. To this day, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee have the highest proportions of Scots-Irish ancestry in the United States and place names across the region reflect their Celtic origins. Virginia has a Glasgow and a Kilmarnock; there's a Kelso in Tennessee and an Elgin in South Carolina; while North Carolina has Aberdeen, Cumnock, Glencoe and Inverness. The list of notable Americans descended from Scots-Irish immigrants is huge. Edgar Allan Poe's grandfather, David Poe, was an emigrant from County Cavan, and the author spent time in Irvine as a child having been fostered by a Scottish tobacco merchant. His fellow horror scribe Stephen King is descended from Reverend James Pollock, who moved from Ireland to Pennsylvania in the late 18th Century, while Mark Twain's ancestors came to the United States from County Antrim. The former's home state of Maine isn't generally considered part of Appalachia, though the Appalachian mountains do stretch into it, but it's third most populous city is named Bangor. King devised a fictional analogue for the city, also with an Irish name, called Derry, the setting for his 1981 novel IT. In the world of music Billie Joe Armstrong of Green Day can trace his ancestry back to the members of the Armstrong clan given land in County Fermanagh; Elvis Presley's mother Gladys Mansell's family came to Ulster from Scotland; and Hank Williams' mother was of Scots-Irish descent. John Wayne's great-great-grandfather Robert Morrison arrived in America from County Antrim and was of Hebridean descent; while other actors with Scots-Irish roots include Steve Martin, Brad Pitt, and Burt Reynolds. Vance may well occupy the White House one day, but the Oval Office too has a long history of Scots-Irish occupants. Andrew Jackson's parents were from near to Carrickfergus; Teddy Roosevelt's mother was descended from people who emigrated from County Antrim; and Lyndon B Johnson's roots went back to Dumfresshire via Ulster. Trump famously shared his belief that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S but he, too, has Scots-Irish heritage. Obama told the Democratic National Convention in 2016: "See, my grandparents - they came from the heartland. Their ancestors began settling there about 200 years ago. I don't know if they had their birth certificates, but they were there. "They were Scotch-Irish mostly - farmers, teachers, ranch hands, pharmacists, oil rig workers. Hearty, small-town folks. Some were Democrats, but a lot of them, maybe even most of them, were Republicans - the party of Lincoln. And my grandparents explained that folks in these parts, they didn't like show-offs, they didn't admire braggarts or bullies." Those words were a none-too-subtle rebuke of Vance's boss, whose Scottish heritage is far more certain. Whether the country has to take the blame for the VP too remains a matter of debate.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scots child abuse inquiry launches hearings into deaf & blind schools
The inquiry says this section of hearings will cover 'physical, sexual, and emotional abuse including the abusive use of corporal punishment and restraint.' The old Donaldson's School for the Deaf, which was in Edinburgh, will be covered later in autumn 2025. St Vincent's is part of the Roman Catholic Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, and this is their fifth home that has been investigated by the inquiry. A pupil at the Edinburgh Royal Blind School was already convicted for rapes that took place during the 1980s, but these hearings are unlikely to cover this same case. Here's what you need to know about the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) Why was it set up? The inquiry was set up to investigate and raise awareness of the abuse of children in care in Scotland. It has allowed for victims and witnesses to submit anonymous evidence about abuse that has taken place in care institutions, with over 1300 witness statements gathered so far. Their intention is not just to investigate cases, but to also cover the effects of abuse on children and their families, and report findings and recommendations to the Scottish government. When was it set up? It was set up in 2015, and after a series of panel members quit the inquiry in its first six months, it was then taken over by Lady Anne Smith, who has since chaired it. It was originally planned to last until 2019, but has continued for nearly 10 years. How much has it cost? So far the SCAI has spent around £98 million, and may reach £100 million by next year. This remains the most expensive public inquiry in the country. Police Scotland have also disclosed that they have spent an additional £12.3 million in relation to the inquiry, bringing total costs for the Scottish government to over £111 million. These costs, along with complaints from earlier panel members and survivor groups, have created criticism for the way the inquiry has been handled. The Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse in Care) Act, which was passed in 2021, now allows victims to receive between £10,000 and £100,000 in compensation if the abuse took place in residential care before 2004. As of 2025 over £150 million has been pledged in compensation directly from institutions of abuse. What has it covered? The inquiry has investigated 117 institutions for cases of child abuse, and has published 14 case studies on their investigations. Some of these institutions include several private schools, such as Scotland's oldest boarding school Loretto in Musselburgh, and Dunblane's Queen Victoria School. It also covered abuse at Edinburgh Academy, including testimony from broadcaster Nicky Campbell of abuse he suffered while at the school. Across all investigations, the inquiry has covered abuse at religious care homes, voluntary organisations, specialist schools, healthcare establishments, prison services, and independent providers. Most recently, the SCAI has published reports on the Sisters of Nazareth nun run care homes, and the latest in private schools has been Merchiston Castle in Edinburgh. What has it found? Through the inquiry's lifespan they have uncovered and validated decades of previously unreported abuse. Some cases have also resulted in new criminal convictions. The inquiry's own research has also laid out the reasons for why the inquiry was needed. They say much of the research that has been conducted so far has been 'particularly sparse' and they outline how there is actually no Scotland specific data on incidence rates of child abuse, only UK-wide data. Previous inquiries like the Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales, which concluded with a final report in 2022, found that the issue of child abuse was 'endemic', and its incidence rate was much higher than previously thought. The Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry's witness support can be contacted by phone on 0800 0929 300 or by email here: talktous@
