logo
PM ‘dancing to America's tune': Bihar's Tejashwi Yadav reacts to Trump's 50% tariff on India

PM ‘dancing to America's tune': Bihar's Tejashwi Yadav reacts to Trump's 50% tariff on India

Hindustan Times3 days ago
Amid the imposition of a 50 per cent tariff by US President Donald Trump, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi after Trump announced an additional 25 percent tariff on India(ANI)
Yadav criticised Modi's silence on the issue and said the Prime Minister has become "weak," accusing him of "dancing to America's tune."
Speaking to the reporters, the RJD leader said, "You all are witnessing how the government is functioning in this country. Trump imposed a 50% tariff. Trump has said 28 times that he brokered the ceasefire. The Prime Minister has not broken his silence yet. The PM still hasn't said that Donald Trump is lying. The PM has become so weak that he is dancing to America's tune. A 50% tariff will cause huge damage to the country, and no one is speaking about it. Everyone is silent. These people will damage the country and then go to Bihar and say, 'Look, we have become a Vishwaguru'."
On August 6, US President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India.
According to the order issued by the White House, Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States.
After the order, the total tariff on Indian goods will be 50 per cent. While the initial duty becomes effective on August 7, the additional levy will come into effect after 21 days and will be imposed on all Indian goods imported into the US, except for goods already in transit or those meeting specific exemptions.
Additionally, Yadav addressed the notice from the Election Commission (EC) regarding alleged duplicate EPIC numbers, stating that he had not received any notice from the Commission itself. He further noted that if two EPIC numbers were issued, it would be the issuing authority's responsibility.
"I have not received any notice from the Election Commission. I received one from the Patna Zila Nibandhan, and I am going to give a proper reply to that. The point is, if two EPIC numbers are issued, whose mistake is that? I mean, they make the mistake, and then demand an explanation from me? Has this ever happened before? I have always voted from one place. They won't have an answer for the reply I give," Yadav said.
Earlier on Wednesday, the Patna Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) again requested that RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav submit the details of the EPIC card he mentioned in the press conference on August 2.
He has been asked to deposit it by August 8 afternoon so that it can be thoroughly investigated.
In a letter, the Patna Electoral Registration Officer said that despite earlier requests, the desired documents and a copy of the EPIC card had not been submitted for verification.
"The details of the EPIC card mentioned by you in the press conference on 02.08.2025 were requested for thorough investigation, but till now, the desired documents and a copy of the EPIC card have not been provided from your level. Therefore, it is requested again that details should be made available to the undersigned by the afternoon of 08.08.2025 so that it can be thoroughly investigated," the letter said.
ERO had on Sunday asked the RJD leader to provide the details of the EPIC card he mentioned during his press conference, so that the matter can be thoroughly investigated. Tejashwi had first alleged that his name was not there in the new draft voter list released on August 1, and later he alleged that his EPIC number had been changed.
His allegations were refuted by the poll panel. Officials said they checked the records and found that his name is listed at serial number 416 of polling station number 204, which is located at the Library Building of Bihar Animal Science University. The official EPIC (voter ID) number listed is RAB0456228. But in his press conference, Tejashwi mentioned a different EPIC number.
Officials stated that the number mentioned in the PC or a similar one (RAB2916120) appears to be invalid.
"According to you, from your press conference quote, your import number is RAB2120. As per preliminary investigation import number RAB2916120 does not appear to be officially issued. Therefore, you are requested to kindly provide the details of the mentioned EPIC card (along with the original copy of the card) mentioned by you in the press conference held on 02.08.2025 to the undersigned so that it can be thoroughly investigated," the letter said. (ANI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan Suffers Rs 1,240 Crore Loss After Airspace Ban On Indian Flights: Report
Pakistan Suffers Rs 1,240 Crore Loss After Airspace Ban On Indian Flights: Report

India.com

time17 minutes ago

  • India.com

Pakistan Suffers Rs 1,240 Crore Loss After Airspace Ban On Indian Flights: Report

After India suspended the Indus Water Treaty on April 23 in response to the gruesome Pahalgam terror attack, Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian-registered aircraft. However, according to a local media report, Islamabad has suffered massive financial losses after the shutdown as the Pakistan Airports Authority (PAA) lost over Rs. 1,240 crore (PKR 4.1 billion) in over two months. According to ANI, Dawn reported the figure of losses, citing a statement by the Pakistan Ministry of Defence in the National Assembly on Friday. Furthermore, as per the report, the closure came into effect from April 24, when Islamabad withdrew overflight permission for all Indian-registered aircraft and those operated, owned, or leased by Indian carriers. The closure of airspace has backfired on the Pakistani economy. According to the Dawn, the revenue of PAA from overflying charges plunged between April 24 and June 30, nearly affecting 100-150 Indian aircraft daily and slashing Pakistan's transit air traffic by almost 20 percent. Also Read: '6 Pak Aircraft Were Downed During Operation Sindoor': Air Force Chief Pakistani Ministry Admits Financial Losses The Pakistani Defence Ministry has admitted the financial losses but attempted to justify the decision to close airspace for all Indian aircraft and said, "Sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations." Meanwhile, the officials also claimed that the measures issued by Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) were for "strategic and diplomatic" reasons. According to the ministry's data, PAA's average daily overflight revenue in 2019 was 508,000 dollars, compared to 760,000 dollars in 2025, meaning the ban is costing Pakistan far more now than during the previous standoff, Dawn reported. Pakistan Airspace Closure Pakistan's airspace is open to all except Indian airlines and aircraft, and the ban has been extended twice and is now set to last until the last week of August. Furthermore, Indian carriers continue unaffected on other international routes, while Pakistani airlines are still barred from entering Indian airspace. India-Pakistan Tensions On April 22, terrorists gunned down 25 Indian citizens and one Nepali citizen in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. The incident sent shockwaves through the nation. The responsibility for the attack was claimed The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), however, later it distanced itself from the incident. After this, New Delhi took several diplomatic measures against Islamabad, and the airspace closure was a part of the same. India banned all Pakistani-operated, owned, or leased aircraft, including military flights, from entering Indian skies from April 30.

Trump believes ‘everybody wants him to run' for the third time
Trump believes ‘everybody wants him to run' for the third time

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump believes ‘everybody wants him to run' for the third time

Donald Trump said he is convinced that Americans want him to serve a third term while hosting Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev at the White House. US President Donald Trump arrives to greet Ilham Aliyev, Azerbaijan's president, not pictured, outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, US. Photographer: Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg(Bloomberg) During the visit, Trump, surrounded by his branded merchandise, held up a 'Trump 2028' hat and quipped: 'You know, you're not allowed to run, but I'm 28 points higher than anybody, and everybody wants me to run.' The joke raised eyebrows for two reasons: first, the U.S. Constitution limits a president to two elected terms; second, Trump has hinted before that he might not be entirely joking. ALSO READ| US military to invade Latin American countries? Donald Trump's action against drug cartels sparks fear Like a recent CNBC interview, he said, 'I'd like to run, I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why?' 'Because people love the tariffs, and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off.' Azerbaijani Prez would like to see Trump in the Oval more Irish Star cited a Reddit thread discussing Trump's past similar comments, even floating a hypothetical workaround. The post details Trump once suggested that Vice President JD Vance could run for president, win, then step down, allowing Trump to take the position again. 'Trump's comments about running again in 2028, despite the constitutional limit, are part of a broader narrative where he has previously suggested ways to circumvent term limits, such as having Vice President JD Vance run and then resign, as reported in April 2025,' the Reddit thread read. Notably, in the video documenting Aliyev's visit, the Azerbaijani leader even joined in the banter, telling Trump he'd like to see him run again. Can Trump run for a third time? Legally, the 22nd Amendment prevents someone from being elected president more than twice. However, it doesn't explicitly bar a two-term president from becoming vice president or assuming the presidency through the line of succession. ALSO READ| Not just Salma Hayek, Donald Trump also asked Emma Thompson out: 'I'd love you to…' The 12th Amendment also states that anyone constitutionally ineligible to be president cannot serve as vice president, but a former two-term president isn't considered constitutionally ineligible, only barred from winning another election for the role.

Man resigns soon after first pay; HR calls it ‘unethical', netizens says ‘nothing wrong'
Man resigns soon after first pay; HR calls it ‘unethical', netizens says ‘nothing wrong'

Mint

time17 minutes ago

  • Mint

Man resigns soon after first pay; HR calls it ‘unethical', netizens says ‘nothing wrong'

An Instagram post by an Indian HR professional has sparked debate online after they claimed an employee resigned just minutes after receiving their first salary. 'Salary credited at 10:00 AM, resignation emailed at 10:05 AM,' the post read. The HR professional said the company's HR team had spent hours on the employee's onboarding, while their team had invested weeks in training them. 'Let's talk about professional ethics. The company welcomed you, trusted you, and gave you a platform to grow. And then—five minutes after your first salary hit your account—you walked away. Was that fair? Was it ethical?' she wrote. Criticising the sudden resignation, the HR professional said such behaviour reflected 'a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability,' and urged workers to be honest if they feel a role or company is not the right fit. 'If something didn't feel right: You could've spoken up. You could've asked for clarity or help. You could've made a conscious exit, not a convenient one. No job is 'easy'. Every role takes commitment, patience, and effort. Growth doesn't come with your first paycheck — it comes with perseverance,' the post read. 'So before pointing fingers at 'culture' or 'role mismatch,' Pause. Reflect. Communicate. Because in the end, your professionalism is defined not by your post — but by your actions.' The post drew mixed responses. Some supported the employee, arguing that salaries are payment for work already completed. 'Could not disagree more. When corporations start putting their employees first, the employees will start putting their companies first,' one LinkedIn user wrote. Another commented: 'Ethics? Let's be clear: salaries are paid for work already done — not for charity, not in advance. If someone resigns after getting paid, it means they fulfilled their obligation for that month.' Others compared the case to sudden layoffs. 'How is it justified to terminate employees in the middle of the month without proper notice or explanation?' one user asked. Another wrote: 'Nothing wrong'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store