European leaders plan Ukraine talks with Trump before he meets Putin
'I'm going to speak to Vladimir Putin and I'm going to be telling him 'you've got to end this war,'' Trump said at a White House press conference.
As EU foreign ministers began an emergency meeting on Ukraine, Merz announced the initiative to keep Europe at the table.
Merz's office said he would talk to leaders from 'Finland, France, the UK, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, the heads of the European Commission and Council, the secretary general of Nato, as well as the US president and his deputy'.
According to Germany's Bild daily, a first conference call will include the European leaders, Zelenskyy, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen and Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte.
This would be followed by a joint call with Trump and Vice-President JD Vance, the newspaper said.
The idea of a US-Russia meeting without Zelenskyy has raised concerns that a deal could require Ukraine to cede swathes of territory, which the EU has rejected.
Over the weekend, several European leaders pushed Trump to exert more pressure on Russia in a joint statement and warned that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine'.
'Testing Putin'
Before Monday's EU talks, Zelenskyy warned against capitulating to Putin's demands.
'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits. And this is not just a moral position – it is a rational one,' Zelenskyy wrote in a statement published on social media.
'Concessions do not persuade a killer,' he added.
Asked if Zelenskyy could be present at the Alaska summit, US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker responded that 'yes, I certainly think it's possible'.
'Certainly, there can't be a deal that everybody that's involved in it doesn't agree to. And, I mean, obviously, it's a high priority to get this war to end.'
The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, also said any US-Russia deal to end the war had to include Ukraine and the bloc.
'The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously,' she said. 'Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security.'
As a prerequisite to a peace settlement, the Kremlin has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of several regions claimed by Moscow, commit to being a neutral state, shun US and EU military support and be excluded from joining Nato.
Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.
Both sides have meanwhile stepped up aerial assaults, with Ukraine claiming to have hit a facility that produces missile components in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Local authorities said one person was killed in the attack and two were wounded.
Russia's defence ministry said on Monday its forces had captured the village of Fedorivka in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk. The village is northeast of the embattled towns of Pokrovsk and Myrnograd towards which Russia has been advancing.
-Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
8 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
What each side wants from Alaska summit, including those on the sidelines
High stakes: Trump and Putin's summit amid Ukraine tensions. Photo / Getty Images In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its Nato ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies – something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the 'rights and freedoms' of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the 'glorification of Nazism'. It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without the country's involvement. He has called the meeting a 'personal victory' for Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States President Trump promised he would end the war within '24 hours' after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US President, author of the book Trump: The Art of the Deal said that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if it did not halt its offensive. Trump hopes to broker a deal, but expectations for a breakthrough are low. Photo / Mandel Ngan, AFP The US leader initially said there would be some 'land swapping going on' at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders. Trump has said he would 'like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly'. But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a 'listening exercise' for the former reality TV star. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump said, hinting Zelenskyy could take part in a subsequent summit. Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, Europe's leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. 'Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president,' French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Trump yesterday. Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected. -Agence France-Presse
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
How much it cost to cancel iRex ferry contract
KiwiRail has reached a settlement agreement with South Korean shipyard Hyundai Mipo Dockyard (HMD) following the coalition Government's cancellation of the iReX ferry project. Chief financial officer Jason Dale said the state-owned enterprise effected an agreement with Hyundai for a full and final settlement to exit the contracts for two rail-enabled ferries that were signed in 2021. "After constructive negotiations we have concluded a settlement agreement with HMD for a final amount of $144 million. Including previous payments, this brings the total paid to HMD to $222 million and the final cost for the entire iReX project to $671 million." Project iReX was launched to replace KiwiRail's ageing Interislander fleet with two large, rail-enabled ferries. The plan also included major upgrades to port infrastructure at Wellington and Picton. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, Trump rates chances of success ahead of meeting Putin, the haul of stolen gear police want to return, and Baby Shark lawsuit thrown out. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT The ships were due to cost $551 million, with the delivery of the two ferries set to occur in 2025 and 2026. Approved in 2021, the contract was cancelled with Hyundai in December 2023 shortly after the coalition Government came into power, citing Treasury warnings of costs associated with the ferries and required port upgrades ballooning. Minister for Rail Winston Peters said the $144 million final settlement payment was to cover the costs incurred by Hyundai and its global suppliers. "That is only fair as the decision to cancel Project iReX was never a reflection on Hyundai." Around $300 million was originally provisioned to cover the potential cost of exiting the iReX commitments, Peters said, adding that more funding was now available for other Government projects as a result of the lower settlement cost. He also hit out at media reports and the Opposition for suggesting the final settlement could be more than $300 million. "Doomsayers said cancelling the contract would cost the taxpayer the full $551 million contract value, but these are some of the same people who accepted Project iReX ballooning from $1.45 billion when approved in 2021 to Treasury warning it was on course to $4 billion in 2023 thanks to eyes-bigger-than-their-mouths ambitions and absentee management." ADVERTISEMENT Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the settlement ended "yet another sorry chapter in the story of the previous government's mismanagement of the Crown's books". "It signed up to purchase two big new ferries without giving sufficient consideration to the port infrastructure needed to support ships of a much bigger size." She said the cost of the project "had almost quadrupled" by the time of its cancellation in December 2023. "No Government should be advised of billion-dollar blowouts in a major infrastructure programme upon being elected, as was the case after the 2023 general election. "I am pleased that a more pragmatic solution is now in place that will ensure a safe, reliable Cook Strait service at an affordable price." The Government set up a company, Ferry Holdings Ltd, to lead the procurement process of two new ferries by 2029. It is currently in talks with several shipyards to find a preferred build partner for the new ships. The new ferries will be approximately 200m long and 28m wide, with capacity for 1500 passengers and 2.4km of lanes for cars, trucks, and 40 rail wagons each. ADVERTISEMENT The final sailing for the Aratere, which is leaving service to allow for work on port infrastructure upgrades, is on Monday. Labour transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere. (Source: 1News) Cancellation of iReX 'terrible decision-making' - Labour Labour's transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere said the cancellation of the previous contract for the Interislander ferries was "terrible-decision-making" by Finance Minister Nicola Willis. "The $144 million break fee is on top of money already paid to Hyundai, which takes the amount of taxpayer money National has poured down the drain to $222 million. The rest is project management, landside infrastructure and paying to wind down the project – totalling more than half a billion." He accused the Prime Minister and Willis of having "absolutely no clue what they're doing and "just making things worse". "The amount of taxpayer money they've wasted with absolutely nothing to show for it makes a mockery of every time they've said they can't afford something. People are struggling with the cost of living while Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon's economic decisions run aground and sink."
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Here's what Putin really wants from Trump – and it's not peace in Ukraine
By Matthew Chance , chief global affairs correspondent, CNN Russian President Vladimir Putin. Photo: Sergei Guneyev / POOL / AFP Analysis : Alaska is unlikely to have been on many people's bingo cards as the venue for a key summit between the leaders of the United States and Russia. Yet America's biggest, remotest state is where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are now set to meet for one of the most potentially consequential encounters of their presidencies. That's certainly the view from Moscow, where pro-Kremlin propagandists are already flushed with anticipation at the benefits this much-anticipated face-to-face meeting will deliver. Or, more specifically, will deliver for Putin. Firstly, the fact a summit with the US president is being held at all is a massive win for the Kremlin. "No one is talking about Russia's international isolation anymore, or about our strategic defeat," wrote Alexander Kots, a prominent pro-Kremlin military blogger on his popular social media channel. He added that the Alaska meeting had "every chance to become historic". He may be right. A presidential summit allows Putin to be seen back at the top table of international diplomacy, while thumbing his nose at critics and nations who want him shunned if not arrested on charges of war crimes in Ukraine. And a summit in the US state of Alaska, of all places, is red meat to resurgent Russian nationalists who still bluster about the territory being rightfully theirs. Just across the Bering Strait from the Chukotka region in the Russian Far East, Alaska was once a remote possession of the Russian Empire before being sold to the United States in 1867 for what was, even then, a paltry sum of US$7.2 million, about 2 cents an acre. The idea that Moscow got a raw deal still lingers and a visit to "our Alaska," as one prominent Russian state TV host dubbed it, bolsters Putin's nationalist credentials. Video clips of Trump mis-speaking at a White House news conference ahead of the summit, saying he was going to "Russia" to meet Putin, have also been trending on Russian social media with captions saying the US president had finally "admitted it is ours". Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump Photo: AFP / Sputnik / Mikhail Klimentyev For the rest of the world, though, the sole focus of this presidential summit is the war in Ukraine and whether Russia is prepared to make any concessions to end it. The White House has said Trump expects to focus squarely on ending the war in Ukraine, leaving other issues Moscow has said could be up for discussion for another time. On Wednesday (US time), Trump promised "very severe consequences" if Putin doesn't agree to end his war, following a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders. But so far there's been little sign of real compromise from the Kremlin, which regards itself as having the upper hand on the grinding Ukrainian battlefield . As recently as last month, on a phone call with Trump, Putin reportedly reiterated that Russia would "continue to pursue its goals to address the root causes" of the conflict in Ukraine - these "root causes" having previously included long-held Russian grievances that include Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War. On Wednesday, a Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the country's position on Ukraine was "unchanged," state media reported. More likely, Putin is up to something else. Details have emerged of a Russian peace offer reportedly made to US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, before the Alaska summit was hastily arranged. In essence, the proposals involve Kyiv surrendering territory in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, in exchange for a ceasefire, an idea the Ukrainian leadership has firmly ruled out. US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff Photo: AFP / ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS "I am not going to surrender my country because I have no right to do so," said Zelensky ahead of the summit, which he was not invited to. "If we leave Donbas today, our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control, we will clearly open a bridgehead for the preparation of a Russian offensive." But Trump, who is expected to discuss the idea with Putin in Alaska, appears to like the sound of a land-for-peace deal, even one so unpalatable to Ukraine and its European partners. Photo: Vladimir Astapkovich / Sputnik via AFP That clear difference of opinion represents an opportunity for Putin to portray the Ukrainians and the Europeans - not Russia - as the real obstacle to peace, potentially undermining Trump's already shaky support for the Ukrainian war effort. Trump has lost patience with Zelensky before, the Kremlin will have noted, and may do so again. If he were to cut off the remaining US military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv, Ukraine would struggle to continue its fight even with bolstered European support. Ahead of the summit, the White House appeared to downplay expectations of a peace deal, characterising the high-stakes meeting as a "listening exercise." That may suit Putin just fine. It was, after all, the Kremlin who solicited the summit, according to the White House - possibly as a way of heading off a threat of US tariffs and secondary sanctions that Trump said would kick in last week. Keeping Trump talking may be an effective way of pushing back that deadline indefinitely. In comments on Thursday, Putin floated the idea of reaching a deal on nuclear arms with the Trump. More broadly, Putin sees a unique opportunity with Trump to fundamentally reset relations with Washington, and separate Russian ties with the US from the fate of Ukraine, a scenario that would also divide the Western allies. For months, Kremlin officials have been talking up possibilities for economic, technological and space cooperation with the US, as well as lucrative deals on infrastructure and energy in the Arctic and elsewhere. The fact the Kremlin's top economic envoy, Kirill Dmitriev - a key interlocutor with the Trump administration - is part of the Russian delegation to Alaska suggests that more talk of US-Russian deal-making will be on the agenda. And, if Putin gets his way in this summit, the "Ukraine question" may find itself relegated to just one of many talking points between the powerful leaders of two great powers - and not even the most pressing one. -CNN
