Many Ukrainian aid groups stop work after Trump's halt on foreign assistance
'They're going to feel the effect of this next week,' Boyechko said in an interview. 'This is just extremely harmful because you have millions of people in front-line areas near Kherson and Kharkiv who have been living without light for a long time. For them, firewood has been the only source of heat and a way to prepare food.'
Advertisement
Ivona Kostyna, chair of Veteran Hub, an organization that supports veterans and their families, said that the organization had stopped two major programs: one that works with Ukrainian employers on employment policies for veterans, and another that provides space for veterans.
'It is on pause, but in fact for us, 90 days of pause means losing our team, our space, our clients' trust,' she said. The sudden stop in funding 'undermines the reliability of the partnership,' Kostyna said.
After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 set off, by some accounts, the largest refugee crisis in Europe since World War II, European nations shouldered most of the burden of taking in refugees who fled Ukraine. The United States, for its part, helped to limit the flow of refugees by funding humanitarian programs that assisted internally displaced people.
Advertisement
An Agency for International Development spokesperson in Washington confirmed Tuesday to The New York Times that all programs and grants without a waiver approved by the secretary of state had been paused for 90 days, while the audit is continuing. The State Department said in a statement that the aid freeze was justified by the need to 'refocus on American national interests' and that it would no longer 'blindly dole out money with no return for the American people.'
US Embassy officials in Ukraine requested exemptions to preserve aid for the country, according to Yaroslav Yurchyshyn, a Ukrainian lawmaker. The Financial Times first reported the request. In an interview, Yurchyshyn said discussions about granting waivers for Ukrainian assistance were continuing.
Continuing the aid, Yurchyshyn said, will counter 'the narrative of totalitarian countries that democracies are unstable partners, and you can never be sure democracies will help you.'
The Trump administration's threat to indefinitely cut all aid also has some groups fearing retribution if they speak out against the freeze.
Ukraine also has numerous media projects that survive on grants, allowing them to stay independent. Dozens of media organizations in Ukraine are now calling for support.
Bogdan Logvynenko, a founder at Ukrainer, which publishes articles about Ukraine in foreign languages, said he did not expect that financing from the United States would resume after the 90-day audit was completed. 'Our only chance is ourselves,' he said in a plea for public donations.
Ukrainian independent media currently receive more than 80 percent of their funding from the United States, Logvynenko said.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Changing jobs? How to protect your 401(k) from hidden fees
If you're not careful, 401(k) fees can eat away at your retirement savings. Here's what to know. A U.S. Government Accountability Office study reported that 41% of American workers are unaware that 401(k) plans carry fees. Yet these fees can cost a workers thousands (and thousands) of dollars throughout their working years, leaving them with smaller retirement accounts than expected. It's common to lose track of fees when deciding whether to roll your existing 401(k) over or leave it where it is. However, it's essential to know how much you're paying in 401(k) fees and the effect they'll have on your retirement account. Here's what you need to know about 401(k) fees when changing jobs, where to find them, and how to control them. If you're not changing jobs, these tips can help you take control of an existing 401(k) and the amount you're paying out in fees. 401(k) fees add up If you're changing jobs, it's possible that your old employer paid your retirement account fees on your behalf while you worked there. However, once you move on from the job, it's unlikely that the company will continue to cover those fees. If that's the case, your old retirement account may be exposed to fees you know nothing about. Let's say one of the fees you're suddenly responsible for paying is a $4.55 monthly non-employee account maintenance fee. You could lose $17,905 in fees throughout your career. More: Americans believe this is the No. 1 obstacle to saving for retirement Get a copy of your 401(k) fee schedule Whether it's an old account managed by a former employer or an account you're opening with your new employer, you need to know exactly where to find fee information. A fee schedule is typically buried deep in the 401(k) plan document, making it difficult to find. Knowing what to look for is the key. Your employer must provide documents detailing how much you're paying in fees. The fee-specific document is often called the 401(a)(5) fee disclosure, although it may have another name. If you don't have a copy somewhere at home, you can typically find it on your plan's website or through your company's human resources department. What to look for 401(k) plans label their fees with a variety of names. Here are some of the most common names: As you review the Participant Fee Disclosure, note any terms that suggest a fee. How to know if you're paying too much All 401(k) plans charge fees, and you can't avoid paying them. However, there are steps you can take to keep your costs to a minimum. 401(k) fees usually range from 0.5% to 2% or more of plan assets annually. If the fees associated with your retirement account are more than 0.5%, you're probably paying too much. The chunk of money going to fees each year represents money you could have kept in your retirement account and allowed to grow. What you can do to control 401(k) fees While you won't find a prospectus that covers your 401(k) as a whole, you will find individual prospectuses for each fund in your 401(k). A prospectus is a document that gives you detailed information about each investment, including objectives, expected outcomes, risks, and fees. Most plan administrators provide these documents online. If not, contact your 401(k) administrator or HR department. You may not be able to eliminate fees entirely, but here's what you can do to reduce them: 401(k) fees may not actually be "hidden," but they can definitely be a challenge to find. Knowing how to find them could be your superpower, your way of redirecting money once spent on fees toward investments. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know
The Republican governors of three states are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington at the request of the administration of President Donald Trump, who has portrayed the city as awash in crime. The announcements on Aug. 16 of troops from hundreds of miles away in West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio came a day after DC officials and the Trump administration negotiated a deal to keep Mayor Muriel Bowser's appointed police chief, Pamela Smith, in charge of the police department after DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit to block the federal takeover of the department. Trump, a Republican, said this week he was deploying hundreds of DC National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the Democratic-led city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency. Justice Department data, however, showed violent crime in 2024 hit a 30-year low in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement he was deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to D.C. in "a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation." The statement said he also was providing equipment and specialized training. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster responded to a Pentagon request by announcing that 200 of his state's National Guard troops would be sent. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police members in the coming days, adding none of them were "currently serving as law enforcement officers in the state." After the announcements, Mayor Bowser posted on X: "American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican." Troops to other cities? The National Guard serves as a militia that answers to the governors of the 50 states except when called into federal service. The DC National Guard reports directly to the president. Trump, who has suggested he could take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities, has sought to expand the powers of the presidency in his second term, inserting himself into the affairs of major banks, law firms and elite universities. In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials. South Carolina's McMaster said his troops would immediately return to South Carolina if needed to respond to a possible hurricane or other natural disaster. Hurricane Erin, now northeast of Puerto Rico, has become a catastrophic Category 5 storm that could bring ocean swells to the U.S. East Coast early next week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said. National Guard troops often respond to natural disasters and rarely police US civilians. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for West Virginia's Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to D.C. late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. The White House said on Aug. 16 that DC National Guard members have conducted patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station. The White House said the National Guard troops are not making arrests now and that they may be armed. It is not clear how the administration could deploy National Guard troops elsewhere. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law with the Los Angeles deployments. (Reporting by AJ Vicens in Detroit, Richard Cowan in Washington and Bhargav Acharya in Toronto; Editing by Donna Bryson, Matthew Lewis, Paul Simao and William Mallard)
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio acknowledges Trump-Putin summit left US ‘long ways off' peace deal
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday acknowledged the Trump administration is far away from reaching any kind of peace deal between Russia and Ukraine after President Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rubio insisted progress was made at the Alaska summit, which the president declared a 10 out of 10 because of how well he got along with Putin. At the same time, Rubio in a Sunday morning interview in ABC's 'This Week' didn't mince words in discussing how much work still needed to be done. 'We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remain some big areas of disagreement,' Rubio told ABC's Martha Raddatz. 'So we're still a long ways off. We are not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We are not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Zelensky will be accompanied by European leaders in a sign of their support for Ukraine. Trump's talk of land being swapped between Ukraine and Russia has raised alarms in European capitols, where his words have been seen as a sign that Ukraine might need to give up territory to Russia to reach a peace deal. Rubio brushed off the fact that Trump has not announced tougher actions against Russia after the summit, telling Raddatz that wasn't the aim of the meeting after she noted that Trump had suggested tougher penalties for Moscow could be coming without progress. Rubio, one of two U.S. officials who was in attendance for the Trump-Putin meeting, also said it would not be possible to reach a deal between Russia and Ukraine without Zelensky being at the table. The secretary of State suggested there is much people on the outside do not know about the talks, suggesting Putin could have signaled some concessions to Trump. 'I think we made some real progress. You talked about not knowing what was discussed. These peace deals, these peace agreements and negotiations, they don't work when they're conducted in the media, either through leaks or through lies,' he said. 'And usually, they're both the same thing, lying leaks. Okay? They don't work if you do it that way.' Responding in part to criticism that Trump was too friendly toward Putin at the summit and afterwards, Rubio also said peace would not be realized through insults. Peace deals don't work out, Rubio said, 'if you go out and say aggressive and abrasive things about one side or the other, because then they just walk away.' Asked specifically if Putin had offered any concessions, Rubio said he would not name any publicly but suggested there would need to be a give and take on both sides. He also made it clear that Trump had asked Putin for concessions. 'So, of course, concessions were asked. But what utility would there be of me going on a program and tell you, we've wagged our finger at Putin and told him, you must do this and you must do that. It's only going to make — it's only going to make it harder and less likely that they're going to agree to these things,' he said. 'So, these negotiations, as much as everyone would love it to be a live, pay-per-view event, these discussions only work best when they are conducted privately in serious negotiation in which people who have to go back and respond to constituencies, because even totalitarian governments have constituencies they have to respond to, people have to go back and defend these agreements that they make.'
