logo
In May crackdown on ‘foreigners', only Bengali-origin Muslims sent to Assam detention centre

In May crackdown on ‘foreigners', only Bengali-origin Muslims sent to Assam detention centre

Scroll.in4 hours ago
On May 24, the Matia detention centre began to fill up as the Assam police launched a drive to round up alleged illegal immigrants in the state. Over the next few days, reports appeared of Bengali-origin Muslims held at the centre being taken to India's border with Bangladesh and being forced to cross over at gunpoint.
Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma told the Assembly that 303 'foreigners' had been pushed into Bangladesh. But he did not disclose their identities.
Scroll filed a Right to Information query with the office of the Inspector-General of Prisons, Assam, asking for information on the number of detainees at the Matia centre, details of their cases, and when they were admitted inside. We also asked for detailed information on those who had been released, deported or 'pushed' into Bangladesh since April 2025.
The Assam government's reply to our questions was incomplete. It did not share any information about those forced to cross the border into Bangladesh. However, it gave us a list of those detained at the Matia detention centre between May 27 and July 8.
All 53 of them are Muslims.
The RTI response
Most of those rounded up in that crackdown were declared foreigners like the 51-year-old teacher from Morigaon, Khairul Islam, who was arrested and then forced out of Indian territory.
Declared foreigners are typically long-term residents with families and properties in Assam, who have failed to prove that they are Indian citizens before the state's foreigners tribunals.
Islam was forced out even though his case, challenging the foreigners tribunal order, was pending in the Supreme Court.
Similarly, Shona Bhanu, a 59-year-old resident of Barpeta, was expelled from Indian territory. Both had told Scroll that they were first kept at the Matia camp before being taken to the no man's land between India and Bangladesh.
However, the Assam government does not seem to have acknowledged these arrests, let alone their being expelled from India.
The Assam prisons department informed Scroll that 53 declared foreigners were arrested and admitted in the camp on May 27, 28 and 29and July 8, all of them Muslims.
However, the RTI reply has no record of Islam and Bhanu being admitted to the camp in May.
Moreover, when Scroll put together an Assam government affidavit in the Supreme Court and the information from the RTI response, it became clear – in the last nearly 12 months, only Muslim declared foreigners have faced arrest and incarceration in Assam.
The CAA model
Foreigner tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies unique to Assam, which rule on citizenship cases. They have been accused of arbitrariness and bias, and declaring people foreigners on the basis of minor spelling mistakes, a lack of documents or lapses in memory. Many of the appeals to FT orders are pending in the higher courts.
In the last five decades, Assam's foreigners tribunals have declared 1.6 lakh people as non-citizens, of whom 69,559 are Hindus.
In recent years, several declared foreigners had been released from imprisonment after the Supreme Court and the Gauhati High Court ruled against their prolonged incarceration.
But that changed in August 2024.
The Assam government began a renewed crackdown on declared foreigners, who were arrested and sent to the Matia detention centre.
By September 2024, the number of detained declared foreigners at Matia, the largest detention centre in India, had increased by four times to 72.
However, all the newly arrested declared foreigners, who were sent to the detention centre in August, were Muslims, according to the Assam government affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on February 3 this year.
The admission list at the Matia centre, which is maintained by the camp authorities and was seen by Scroll, also showed that only Muslim declared foreigners were admitted following the crackdown.
As is evident from the RTI response from the Assam prisons headquarters, the May crackdown leading to 'pushbacks' followed the same pattern.
The decision to spare Hindu declared foreigners is in line with the Assam government's implementation of the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act, which had triggered fierce protests from Assamese nationalists in 2019 .
For instance, in July 2024, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party government asked the state's border police not to forward cases of non-Muslims who had entered India illegally before 2014 to foreigners tribunals.
As Scroll had reported, this was a clear sign of the Assam government putting in place a citizenship regime that excludes Muslims.
Last month, too, the Assam Government asked district authorities and members of the foreigners tribunals to drop cases against the members of six non-Muslim communities who are granted amnesty under CAA.
While Assamese nationalists were opposed to all immigrants, whether Hindu or Muslim, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has raised the alarm against 'Muslim infiltration'. 'In Assam, we are fearlessly resisting the ongoing, unchecked Muslim infiltration from across the border, which has already caused an alarming demographic shift. In several districts, Hindus are now on the verge of becoming a minority in their own land.'
No Rohingyas
In May, Scroll had reported that all the Rohingya detainees had been expelled from the detention centre even though their cases were pending in the courts.
The Assam prison headquarters' reply confirms that there are no Rohingya inmates at Matia. As of July 23, of the 110 inmates at Matia, three are 'convicted foreigners', 80 declared foreigners and 27 Chin refugees.
But on April 24 this year, there were 103 Rohingya refugees – 37 of them children – at the Matia camp, according to the lists maintained by the detention centre, which were accessed by Scroll.
The department said there is 'no record available pertaining' to whether the refugees were deported or pushed across into Bangladesh.
Scroll had reported that they were expelled from the detention centre without following due process.
Sarma had announced that several inmates of the Matia detention centre in Assam, including Rohingya refugees, were 'pushed back' into Bangladesh as part of a countrywide 'operation' by the Indian government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elvish Yadav's father reacts to Gurugram firing incident, ‘definitely a threat…'
Elvish Yadav's father reacts to Gurugram firing incident, ‘definitely a threat…'

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

Elvish Yadav's father reacts to Gurugram firing incident, ‘definitely a threat…'

Elvish Yadav, who recently gained popularity through Laughter Chefs Season 2, is back in the news after his house in Gurugram's Sector 57 was reportedly attacked early Sunday morning. 'So far, we haven't received any kind of threat or phone call. I spoke to Elvish, and he said he is fine,' Elvish's father told reporters, as reported by the Times of India. Elvish's dad also said, 'There was definitely a threat to life, if we had been outside, anything could have happened.' Yadav was not at home when the shooting happened around 5.30 am. However, some family members were inside but no one was injured in the incident, they said. Meanwhile, 'Bhau gang' claimed responsibility for the firing. After getting information, a police team reached the spot and collected forensic evidence, and are scanning CCTV footage from the area. The attackers shot more than two dozen rounds at the YouTuber's home in Sector 57 and fled from the spot. The bullets struck the ground and first floors of the house, the police said. In a post on social media, gangsters Neeraj Faridpur and Bhau Ritoliya, members of 'Bhau gang', claimed responsibility for the attack. "...the bullets that were fired at Elvish Yadav's house today were fired by us. He has ruined many houses by promoting betting apps. Other social media influencers promoting betting may face bullets or calls,' read the post shared by Ritoliya. Elvish Yadav has frequently found himself at the center of controversy. He faced legal trouble alongside singer Fazilpuriya for featuring snakes in the music video of the song 32 Bore. Yadav is also involved in an ongoing case where he is accused of supplying snake venom at a rave party in Noida. However, the Supreme Court has granted a stay on the trial court proceedings. In 2024, YouTuber Maxtern (Sagar Thakur) filed a complaint against Yadav after a video emerged showing Yadav allegedly assaulting him. Thakur later withdrew the complaint. That same year, Yadav was summoned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for questioning in a money-laundering investigation related to the snake venom case. (This is a developing story)

Siddaramaiah behind conspiracy to defame Dharmasthala: BJP leader R Ashoka
Siddaramaiah behind conspiracy to defame Dharmasthala: BJP leader R Ashoka

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Siddaramaiah behind conspiracy to defame Dharmasthala: BJP leader R Ashoka

Amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the investigation into the Saujanya case and the reputation of Dharmasthala, Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka has launched a strong attack on Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, accusing him of enabling a campaign to malign the religious shrine. Karnataka leader of opposition R Ashoka. Speaking to reporters in Hubballi on Sunday, Ashoka alleged that the Chief Minister is 'behind the conspiracy to defame Dharmasthala.' He further claimed that "a gang of Urban Naxals with Leftist ideology" is responsible for spreading false narratives against the temple, The Hindu reported. (Also Read: DK Shivakumar slams 'conspiracy' to malign Dharmasthala, calls for action against slander: Report) 'A gang of Urban Naxals with Leftist ideology is spreading slander against the holy place. I think of them as the 'Dandupalya gang' of dangerous Urban Naxals. The Chief Minister is responsible for letting loose such people among the citizens. Before he came to power, they were wandering for food in the jungles of Karnataka. Now, they are everywhere. They are spreading ill-will against Hindus and holy places like Dharmasthala,' he said. The BJP leader also criticised the rhetoric being used by certain groups. 'Some people are saying that they will drive a JCB (earthmover) into the Dharmasthala temple. Siddaramaiah is the reason for this, as he is the one who has invited the fanatic and Communist Naxals who were in the forests to the urban areas with a red carpet. They are spreading slander against Hindu temples because they have nothing else to do,' he added according to the publication. He added that the core concern is not individuals but the sanctity of the temple itself. 'Dharmadhikari Veerendra Heggade's reputation is not the issue. For us, Dharmasthala Manjunath Swamy is important. It is already clear that the Congress government is behind the whole episode. We will fight this issue in the Assembly session,' he said. (Also Read: Dharmasthala case: No human remains found in latest excavation, SIT probe continues)

Protests in Bengal's Siliguri over SC order to relocate stray dogs in Delhi-NCR
Protests in Bengal's Siliguri over SC order to relocate stray dogs in Delhi-NCR

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Protests in Bengal's Siliguri over SC order to relocate stray dogs in Delhi-NCR

Animal lovers in Siliguri staged a protest on Monday against the recent Supreme Court directive mandating that stray dogs in Delhi-NCR be shifted to shelter homes within eight weeks. The protests followed the Supreme Court's August 11 order directing authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs.(Vipin Kumar/ANI File Photo for representation) The demonstrators expressed strong opposition, calling the ruling "inhuman" and urging the court to reconsider its decision. Holding placards and raising slogans, protestors gathered in Siliguri and argued that stray dogs are "voiceless creatures," and deserve compassion rather than displacement. "Dogs are voiceless creatures. They haven't done anything wrong to anyone... You can spare criminals, so why can't you spare dogs? Shame on you... This verdict is inhuman... This verdict should be taken back," said Anisha Paul, one of the protestors. A day ago similar protest had erupted in Chennai as well. The protests in Chennai came days after similar demonstrations in the national capital. On Friday, Delhi Police registered four FIRs in connection with protests held by dog lovers without prior permission on August 11 and 12 in the New Delhi district. Police said the demonstrations in Delhi were organised despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), formerly Section 144 of the CrPC, which is currently in force as part of security measures ahead of Independence Day. According to officials, the protests turned unruly when police attempted to disperse the demonstrators, leading to clashes at some sites. "Those who refused to leave the protest sites despite repeated requests were detained. Legal action will be taken against all those found violating the law," the Delhi Police said. One viral clip from the protests shows the Station House Officer of Tughlaq Road police station being manhandled by protesters, while another video shows a confrontation between a woman sub-inspector and a female demonstrator inside a bus. The protests followed the Supreme Court's August 11 order directing authorities to ensure that all localities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad are free of stray dogs. The court had ruled that captured animals should not be released back onto the streets. On August 14, a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its order on petitions seeking a stay on the directive. The bench said it would pass an interim order after hearing arguments from all sides. At the outset, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Delhi government, said there was a "loud vocal minority" opposing the order, while a "silent suffering majority" supported action. "In a democracy, there is a vocal majority and one who silently suffers. We had seen videos of people eating chicken, eggs, etc., and then claiming to be animal lovers. It was an issue to be resolved. Children were dying... Sterilisation did not stop rabies; even if you immunised them, that did not stop mutilation of children," Mehta submitted. Citing World Health Organisation data, the Solicitor General said 37 lakh dog bites were reported in 2024, with 305 rabies deaths, most among children under 15 years of age. "Dogs do not have to be killed... they have to be separated. Parents cannot send children out to play. Nobody is an animal hater," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store