
Stars of new thriller The Assassin appear as trailer released
Reeves in tears at PMQs after 'altercations with Starmer and Speaker'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Evening Standard
16 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Wimbledon Order of Play: Day 4 schedule with Emma Raducanu, Carlos Alcaraz, and Aryna Sabalenka in action
Rachel Reeves in tears at PMQs after 'altercations with Starmer and Speaker' as markets rocked by speculation over her future Reeves in tears at PMQs after 'altercations with Starmer and Speaker'


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves insists she's ‘cracking on with the job' as she hugs Starmer after Commons tears
Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves hugged each other as they launched their new plan for the NHS and put behind a troubled week which saw the markets panic with the chancellor's future in question. The united front came after the chancellor's tears in the Commons on Wednesday threatened to plunge the Labour government into turmoil following the chaos of the welfare reform vote. In a bid to ease shattered nerves, the chancellor made a surprise appearance at the launch of the NHS 10-year plan in Stratford, east London, after the prime minister had moved overnight to guarantee her future in the Treasury. Bond markets had reacted badly to Sir Keir refusing to say she was safe in her job during PMQs on Wednesday, where Ms Reeves appeared visibly upset while sitting behind the prime minister. But a grinning Ms Reeves was bullish during the event on Thursday morning, in what was intended to be a confirmation of her close partnership with Sir Keir. As a result, UK government bonds rallied and the pound steadied with reassurances from the prime minister about the chancellor's future. Ms Reeves noticeably rolled her eyes at questions from reporters about her wellbeing and future in the job as Sir Keir insisted that she will be chancellor until the next election. In contrast to his failure to stand up for her in the Commons on Wednesday, the prime minister was effusive about his chancellor at the NHS plan launch. He said she was doing an "excellent" job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the chancellor's "fiscal rules" to maintain discipline over the public finances. Sir Keir said he did not "appreciate" that Ms Reeves was crying behind him at PMQs, as the event is "pretty wired". "It goes from question to question and I am literally up, down, question, looking at who is asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it," he said. He added: "It wasn't just yesterday. No prime minister ever has had side conversations in PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there is a bit more time, but in PMQs it is bang, bang, bang, bang. "That is what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber." Speaking on Wednesday night to the BBC's podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson, Sir Keir provided the markets assurance: 'She will be chancellor by the time this is broadcast, she will be chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the chancellor and I've been working on together.' Alongside the pair at the health plan launch was health secretary Wes Streeting, who many are talking up as a potential replacement for Ms Reeves if she had been sacked . Ms Reeves would not be drawn into answering questions about the "personal matter" which had upset her ahead of Wednesday's PMQs. She told broadcasters: "Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that. "My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the Prime Minister, supporting the Government and that's what I tried to do. "I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that." The chancellor rejected suggestions that her tears were related to a conversation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or another member of government. "People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job," she added. Meanwhile, Sir Keir wanted to refocus a traumatic week for his government on a positive announcement about fixing the NHS. He hoped to put behind him the problems with welfare where his government was forced to abandon massive parts of its reforms leaving a £5bn black hole in their financial plans by removing personal independence payments (PIPs) for the disabled from the bill. The new 10-year plan for the NHS sets out a series of shifts to bring care much closer to people's homes, reducing the reliance on hospitals and A&E. Under the changes, there will be fewer staff working in the NHS than previous projections said were needed, with far more providing care closer to home and fewer working in hospitals. Key reforms include a greatly enhanced NHS app to give patients more control over their care and more data at their fingertips, new neighbourhood health centres open six days a week and at least 12 hours a day, and new laws on food and alcohol to prevent ill health. Sir Keir said: "It's all down to the foundation we laid this year, all down to the path of renewal that we chose, the decisions made by the Chancellor, by Rachel Reeves, which mean we can invest record amounts in the NHS." With junior doctors threatening to strike again over pay, Mr Streeting told NHS staff gathered at the event that Labour rejected the "pessimism" which says the "NHS is a burden, too expensive, inferior to the market".


The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
One year in, Labour is at a low ebb. From now on, let its priority be honesty, honesty, honesty
Rachel Reeves will not be sacked, because she is unsackable. The ever-hysterical bond markets just confirmed that by spinning out of control over her tears, then restoring previous rates as soon as Keir Starmer's serial interviews confirmed heartfelt support after she was seen to be crying during PMQs. Quite right. Joined at the hip, her tough fiscal policy is his. History shows that prime ministers rarely last after sacking their chancellors. The question for both, and all of Labour, is: what next? Every management guru and motivational speaker will tell you that mistakes don't matter – the key to success is what you learn and how adroitly you change. Labour has four long years ahead and, most important of all, a stonking great majority. They are the masters so long as they don't frighten the bond markets that ejected Liz Truss and forced Donald Trump's handbrake tariff U-turn. A change of direction is forced on Starmer and Reeves by circumstances mostly not of their making. Every month that passes reconfirms their dire inheritance and the harsh global economic climate. The Bank of England, wrong so often, delays rate cuts and unwinds quantitative easing at a damagingly faster rate than other central banks, harming public finances, as my colleague Randeep Ramesh pointed out. Everyone knows tax rises are inevitable in the October budget: £6bn lost because of U-turns on disability benefits and winter fuel allowance is only a trivial rounding error in about £1.3tn of spending. How will they do it? Let's hope the government has learned that fiddling with tiny tax rises causes maximum outrage for minimum gain. It's dead right to challenge such things as farmers and family businesses escaping inheritance tax, or the well-off getting winter fuel allowances that might be used, according to the Spectator, for buying the best possible bottle of wine. But confronting older people, disabled people, farmers and small business lobbies with no overarching explanation was political suicide. The only tax rise commanding wide public support is removing VAT relief from private schools to spend on state schools (though you would never guess it from Tory press outrage). Minor taxes have gigantic coverage and wide public awareness, while big spending in tens of billions passes people by, a one-day announcement vanishing into the political ether. Bad comms, some Labour people grumble. Maybe so – but the real lack of messaging comes from the top. Yes, we know about the 'non-negotiable' iron straitjacket and other mean, tough things, but we hear a lot less about purpose, hope, what George HW Bush dismissed sneerily as 'the vision thing' (he was a one-term president). Yet you can detect Labour's priorities when it actually spends taxpayers' money on the good stuff. It's time to remind citizens that their taxes go to things everyone values most – a strong NHS, good schools, safe streets, green energy, public places and parks to be proud of, and, of course, defence. The things that really matter can only be bought through taxation. Let's hear that speech a hundred times from every minister; taxes will rise anyway, so get on the front foot and remind people that taxes are not a 'burden', but the price of civilisation. Britain has paid too little for too long compared with similar countries, and it shows in comparatively worse growth and services. Tell people we are not a high-tax country at all. Bad politics would be trying to sneak through tax rises unexplained, something that would be bound to fail. The Sunak-Hunt government lied through its teeth, promised things it never funded, pencilled in imaginary spending cuts for the future and introduced the unaffordable 4p national insurance cuts bribe that never paid off. Labour has no choice but honesty, after suffering the biggest dip in popularity of any newly elected UK government in 40 years. YouGov finds the greatest reason for defection is 'broken promises or not delivering'. Here's the irony: keeping its tax promises is its greatest risk for non-delivery. But for the best examination of how well or badly Labour's first year has really gone, look at Full Fact's thorough analysis of 62 manifesto pledges. I expected gloom, but was surprised at how relatively positive this diagnosis was. Most of Labour's best outcomes will take years, such as building homes and huge sustainable energy projects. An impatient public may not wait, but the emphasis on long-term investment, green energy, housing, transport and defence is a brave endeavour. A blizzard of policies is emerging from months of reviews. Angela Rayner's announcement this week that her £39bn social and affordable homes programme would have at least 60% for social rent, was widely welcomed. Employment policy now relies, as it always should have done, on encouraging support from newly trained work coaches, not punishing benefit cuts, as did Labour's successful 1997 New Deal. Thursday saw the 10-year NHS plan, with its emphasis on prioritising community over hospital treatment, prevention before sickness, and the white heat of IT technology to drag the NHS into the 21st century. I spent time last week with Wes Streeting, when he spoke of gross health inequality in Blackpool, England's worst area for poverty and sickness, before visiting Whitegate health centre in the town, the kind of specialist health centre every neighbourhood needs. More of these are needed in hard-pressed places. But poverty is not for the NHS to solve. The child poverty taskforce led by Liz Kendall and Bridget Phillipson has to restore faith in Labour's prime purpose to give all children fair life chances. It so happens that Starmer's first year in power on Saturday falls exactly on the 80th anniversary of Clement Attlee's election in 1945. Times were far harder, debt far higher, but look what can be done, driving on regardless. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist