INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Easterly ROCMuni High Income Municipal Bond Fund and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to
If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-easterly-rocmuni-high-income-municipal-bond-fund-f-k-a-principal-street-high-income-municipal-fund-class-action-lawsuit-rmjax-rmhvx-rmhix.html
You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@rgrdlaw.com.
CASE ALLEGATIONS: The Easterly ROCMuni Fund commenced operations in September 2017 and, as a mutual fund, it is subject to an extensive regulatory framework designed to safeguard the investing public. The 'Fact Sheet' for the Easterly ROCMuni Fund states that the Easterly ROCMuni Fund '[s]eeks to provide long-term, yield-driven total return relying mostly on fundamental credit analysis by building a diversified high-yield portfolio focusing on overlooked and under-appreciated sectors of the high-yield municipal bond market.' Unlike stocks, whose price is determined through trading on an exchange, mutual fund shares must be priced daily based on the fund's net asset value ('NAV').
The Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit alleges that defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund had marked tens of millions of dollars' worth of its portfolio assets at artificially inflated prices that did not reasonably reflect the fair value of those assets; (ii) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund had implemented a fundamentally flawed pricing and valuation methodology which had systematically inflated the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's NAV and individual asset valuations; (iii) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund was more heavily invested in illiquid assets than disclosed in its Offering Materials; (iv) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's assets were more closely correlated and less diversified than disclosed in its Offering Materials; (v) as a result, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's stated NAV, NAV per share, individual asset valuations, and historical performance were materially overstated; and (vi) consequently, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund was subject to a material undisclosed risk of a sudden collapse in the price of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares.
The Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit further alleges that on June 13, 2025, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund abruptly marked down the value of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares by 30%. The per share NAV of RMHIX was marked down from $6.15 per share the prior day to $4.33 per share; the per share NAV of RMHVX was marked down from $6.19 per share the prior day to $4.36 per share; and the per share NAV of RMJAX was marked down from $6.13 per share the prior day to $4.31 per share. The value of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares continued to plummet in subsequent days, falling to less than $3 per share within a span of just two weeks. The total net assets of the Easterly ROCMuni Fund collapsed from over $230 million as of March 31, 2025 to less than $17 million as of July 8, 2025.
The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud. You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here.
THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery of the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
4 days ago
- Business Wire
SOC INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Sable Offshore Corp. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE: SOC) publicly traded securities between May 19, 2025 and June 3, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period') and/or pursuant and/or traceable to Sable Offshore's registration statement issued in connection with Sable Offshore's May 21, 2025 secondary public offering ('SPO'), have until September 26, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. Captioned Johnson v. Sable Offshore Corp., No. 25-cv-06869 (C.D. Cal.), the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit charges Sable Offshore and certain of Sable Offshore's top executives and underwriters of the SPO with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@ CASE ALLEGATIONS: Sable Offshore operates as an independent oil and gas company. According to the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit, on or about May 21, 2025, Sable Offshore conducted its SPO, issuing 10 million shares of its common stock at the offering price of $29.50 per share for proceeds of $295 million to Sable Offshore. The Sable Offshore class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period and in the SPO's offering documents represented that Sable Offshore had restarted oil production off the coast of California when it had not. The Sable Offshore class action lawsuit further alleges that on May 23, 2025, Eleni Kounalakis, the Lieutenant Governor of California and chair of the California State Lands Commission wrote a letter to Sable Offshore's Vice President of Environmental & Government Affairs, Steve Rusch, stating that a May 19, 2025 Sable Offshore press release 'appears to mischaracterize the nature of recent activities, causing significant public confusion and raising questions regarding Sable's intentions. Your press release also implies that Sable has restarted operations at the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU). However, Commission staff has informed me that the limited volume oil flows are the result of well-testing procedures required by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement prior to restart. These activities do not constitute a resumption of commercial production or a full restart of the SYU.' The May 23 letter was not published on the internet for the general public to view until May 28, 2025, the complaint alleges. On this news, the price of Sable Offshore stock fell more than 15%, according to the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. Then, on June 4, 2025, the complaint alleges that Sable Offshore revealed that '[o]n June 3, 2025, a Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge granted ex parte requests from plaintiffs in Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, et al. (25CV02244) and Environmental Defense Center, et al. v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, et al. (25CV02247) for temporary restraining orders prohibiting Sable Offshore Corp. ('Sable') from restarting transportation of oil through the Las Flores Pipeline System pending the hearing on an order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction scheduled for July 18, 2025.' On this news, the price of Sable Offshore stock fell further, according to the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Sable Offshore publicly traded securities during the Class Period and/or pursuant and/or traceable to the SPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Sable Offshore class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Business Wire
6 days ago
- Business Wire
RXST INVESTOR DEADLINE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that RxSight, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that the RxSight class action lawsuit – captioned Makaveev v. RxSight, Inc., No. 25-cv-01596 (C.D. Cal.) – seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ: RXST) securities and charges RxSight as well as certain of RxSight's executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the RxSight class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@ Lead plaintiff motions for the RxSight class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than September 22, 2025. CASE ALLEGATIONS: RxSight is a commercial-stage medical technology company that engages in the research and development, manufacture, and sale of light adjustable intraocular lenses ('LAL') used in cataract surgery. The RxSight class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) RxSight was experiencing 'adoption challenges' and/or structural issues resulting in declines in sales and utilization; (ii) defendants had overstated the demand for RxSight's products; and (iii) as a result, RxSight was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025. The RxSight class action lawsuit further alleges that on July 8, 2025, RxSight reported preliminary second quarter of 2025 financial results, revealing significant declines in Light Delivery Device ('LDD') sales, LAL utilization, and overall revenue. RxSight also lowered its full year 2025 guidance by approximately $42.5 million at the midpoint, and RxSight's CEO, defendant Ronald Kurtz, disclosed that '[a]doption challenges over the last few quarters have been a primary reason for the LDD stall,' according to the complaint. The RxSight class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of RxSight stock fell nearly 38%. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired RxSight securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the RxSight class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the RxSight class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the RxSight class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the RxSight class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Business Wire
6 days ago
- Business Wire
INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Easterly ROCMuni High Income Municipal Bond Fund and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Class Action Lawsuit - RMJAX; RMHVX; RMHIX
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Easterly ROCMuni High Income Municipal Bond Fund f/k/a Principal Street High Income Municipal Fund (the 'Easterly ROCMuni Fund') (RMJAX; RMHVX; RMHIX) shares between May 5, 2023 and June 12, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until September 22, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. Captioned Victorson v. James Alpha Funds Trust d/b/a Easterly Funds Trust, No. 25-cv-06028 (S.D.N.Y.), the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit charges the Easterly ROCMuni Fund, James Alpha Funds Trust d/b/a Easterly Funds Trust, investment adviser Easterly Investment Partners LLC and its former investment adviser Principal Street Partners, LLC, certain of the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's underwriters, certain of their top executive officers and trustees, as well as others with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: The Easterly ROCMuni Fund commenced operations in September 2017 and, as a mutual fund, it is subject to an extensive regulatory framework designed to safeguard the investing public. The 'Fact Sheet' for the Easterly ROCMuni Fund states that the Easterly ROCMuni Fund '[s]eeks to provide long-term, yield-driven total return relying mostly on fundamental credit analysis by building a diversified high-yield portfolio focusing on overlooked and under-appreciated sectors of the high-yield municipal bond market.' Unlike stocks, whose price is determined through trading on an exchange, mutual fund shares must be priced daily based on the fund's net asset value ('NAV'). The Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit alleges that defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund had marked tens of millions of dollars' worth of its portfolio assets at artificially inflated prices that did not reasonably reflect the fair value of those assets; (ii) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund had implemented a fundamentally flawed pricing and valuation methodology which had systematically inflated the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's NAV and individual asset valuations; (iii) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund was more heavily invested in illiquid assets than disclosed in its Offering Materials; (iv) the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's assets were more closely correlated and less diversified than disclosed in its Offering Materials; (v) as a result, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund's stated NAV, NAV per share, individual asset valuations, and historical performance were materially overstated; and (vi) consequently, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund was subject to a material undisclosed risk of a sudden collapse in the price of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares. The Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit further alleges that on June 13, 2025, the Easterly ROCMuni Fund abruptly marked down the value of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares by 30%. The per share NAV of RMHIX was marked down from $6.15 per share the prior day to $4.33 per share; the per share NAV of RMHVX was marked down from $6.19 per share the prior day to $4.36 per share; and the per share NAV of RMJAX was marked down from $6.13 per share the prior day to $4.31 per share. The value of Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares continued to plummet in subsequent days, falling to less than $3 per share within a span of just two weeks. The total net assets of the Easterly ROCMuni Fund collapsed from over $230 million as of March 31, 2025 to less than $17 million as of July 8, 2025. The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud. You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Easterly ROCMuni Fund shares during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery of the Easterly ROCMuni class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
