Study Reveals Over Half Of Americans Are Open To A Car Subscription Instead Of Purchasing
A new study suggests drivers are increasingly open to a subscription model for their next vehicle, which would upend car ownership. Rather than purchasing, financing, or leasing a car, drivers have become curious about the scheme many use to get a new phone every 12 to 24 months. Almost half of the respondents say that if tariffs increase car prices dramatically, they would explore the option diligently.
The concept is nothing new; a car subscription model has been floated several times, most often by Silicon Valley startups looking to "disrupt" car ownership. Other models, like Zipcar, a subsidiary of car rental company Avis, allow drivers to share their vehicles with those who don't own vehicles for a nominal rental fee.
Extreme Terrain notes that "nearly one in two Americans" are open to a car subscription model instead of buying or leasing their next vehicle. Another ten percent are interested only if insurance and vehicle maintenance are included. Forty-six percent are "more likely" to explore a car subscription if tariffs cause vehicle prices to spike.
Automakers may be to blame for this, too. Twenty-two percent of drivers are fatigued by the ever-expanding required subscriptions for things like navigation, in-car WiFi, and remote start, and feel that a subscription that includes the car is a better choice. Twenty percent say they'd be willing to pay "over $600 per month" for a subscription, too. Almost 75 percent of respondents say the lack of a long-term financial commitment makes a vehicle subscription attractive, with two-thirds saying they'd want the option to cancel at any time. Over half (58 percent) say the ability to swap vehicles based on need interests them.
Toyota (57 percent) and Honda (50 percent) are the brands most respondents are interested in, with Subaru a distant third (31 percent). BMW, Lexus, Hyundai, Nissan, Audi, Ford, Jeep, Mercedez-Benz, General Motors, Kia, Mazda, and Volkswagen all rank between 20 and 27 percent. Unsurprisingly, the car company most often associated with disruption and technology-over-tradition, Tesla, ranked dead last - but did rank highest amongst Gen Z and Millennial respondents.
Thirty-six percent of respondents want an ICE vehicle, while 28 percent would prefer a hybrid. Twenty-two percent had no preference, and only 14 percent said they'd want an electric vehicle via subscription. Gen X was most interested in ICE vehicles (47 percent), while baby boomers (41 percent) and Gen Z (33 percent) were most interested in hybrids.
Succinctly, people are viewing the vehicle subscription as a monthly fee to rent a car with more benefits. Though most say they'd pay $600 per month for an all-in subscription, many (20 percent) also say they'd want to switch vehicles every six months. Respondents also noted they wanted to be able to change vehicles at any time based on need. This sounds like a flat fee for long-term rentals with the ability to swap your vehicle out anytime.
Three percent would want to swap vehicles monthly, and 36 percent would be happy to subscribe to the same vehicle for a full year. Thirty-one percent say they'd be happy keeping the same car indefinitely via a subscription. Only 26 percent of respondents said they would want access to luxury vehicles, suggesting they want a daily driver that costs about the same as a leased or financed vehicle without the responsibility.
A car subscription is a novel concept, but it is untenable for whatever company owns the cars. Six hundred dollars per month is $20 per day, and for a "daily driver" vehicle like a RAV4, which currently rents for double that amount via Avis for a 30-day rental period, that cost doesn't make much sense. A subscription model might work for entry-level vehicles, but it's hard to see how it would actually work for most drivers or the company that owns the vehicles.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
35 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why Gen Z and Millennials Are Feeling the Most Car Buying Pressure
The United States is a land where its people rely on cars for their everyday transportation needs; however, purchasing a new or used vehicle can often feel like an extensive financial cross-examination rather than a straightforward and effortless transaction at dealerships and car lots. If you have been to your local dealerships, scrolled the options on car-buying websites, or curiously poked around at the newest cars on the websites of any automaker these days, you are probably more than aware that new cars today are very expensive. According to the latest data from Kelley Blue Book and Cox Automotive, the average cost of a new car in the U.S. reached an astonishing $48,883 as of June 2, 2025; a high price tag that can discourage even the most enthusiastic car buyers. However, recent findings from Bank of America indicate that younger buyers are significantly influencing current trends in the auto market, although their motivations are not always driven by sound financial reasoning. When the Trump administration announced a 25% tariff on imported cars and car parts in late March, BofA researchers and analysts saw that some concerned buyers rushed to purchase vehicles before the tariffs could translate into higher sticker prices. The bank saw a sharp spike in car loan applications in late March and April, with sales data peaking at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) of 17.8 million. However, a deeper dive into its data reveals that Gen Z and younger Millennials were much more active in this pre-tariff buying spree than older demographics. From March to May 2025, Bank of America found that large payments (those over $2,000) to car dealers and finance companies were steadily rising among these younger age groups in comparison to older buyers. What this shows is that younger consumers seemed more motivated to lock in prices before tariffs made vehicles even more expensive than they already were. Unlike Baby Boomers or Gen Xers, many Gen Z and Millennial buyers are either purchasing their first or second car, and they're entering the market at an unaffordable time by all kinds of metrics. According to Bank of America payments data, the median monthly car payment has jumped over 30% since 2019, outpacing the rise in new and used vehicle prices. This data point proves that a car can be a financial ballast for young people who have to balance monthly costs like rent, groceries, student loans, and other miscellaneous subscription-based services they may be in for. Today, one in five U.S. households pays more than $1,000 a month ($12,000 per year) just for their car payments, which can be a massive financial burden for younger buyers. In fact, between June 2024 and May 2025, a significantly higher share of younger buyers saw their monthly car payments climb. Bank of America data shows that Gen Z and younger Millennial car buyers accounted for the biggest year-over-year increase in the percentage of households who paid more than $500 per month for their cars, with some paying $1,000 or more. However, the financial data isn't entirely age-related; it's also tied to income. Many younger buyers tend to earn less money and fall into the lower or middle-income brackets, meaning their margins and budgets are tighter than most. According to the report, lower-income buyers also showed increased activity in the pre-tariff rush, further underscoring how policy shifts like tariffs can hit the most vulnerable groups hardest. Nonetheless, young people are committed to car ownership because they need to get around, even if it means buying a car at a time when cars are more expensive than ever and loans are harder to get. According to data from The New York Federal Reserve, the likelihood of getting turned down for a car loan reached 33.5% in February 2025, the highest level on record. According to Bank of America payments data, the median monthly car payment has jumped over 30% since 2019, outpacing the rise in new and used vehicle prices. This data point proves that a car can be a financial ballast for young people who have to balance monthly costs like rent, groceries, student loans, and other miscellaneous subscription-based services they may be in for. Today, one in five U.S. households pays more than $1,000 a month ($12,000/year) just for their car notes, which can be a massive financial burden for younger buyers. In fact, between June 2024 and May 2025, a significantly higher share of younger buyers saw their monthly car payments climb. Bank of America data shows that Gen Z and younger Millennial car buyers accounted for the biggest year-over-year increase in the percentage of households who paid more than $500 per month for their cars, with some paying $1,000 or more. However, the financial data isn't entirely age-related; it's also tied to income. Many younger buyers tend to earn less money and fall into the lower or middle-income brackets, meaning their margins and budgets are tighter than most. According to the report, lower-income buyers also showed increased activity in the pre-tariff rush, further underscoring how policy shifts like tariffs can hit the most vulnerable groups hardest. Nonetheless, young people are committed to car ownership because they need to get around, even if it means buying a car at a time when cars are more expensive than ever and loans are harder to get. According to data from The New York Federal Reserve, the likelihood of getting turned down for an auto loan reached 33.5% in February 2025-the highest level on record. Although personal finance is a central fixation for some social media-addled Gen Z and younger Millennials, this data from one of America's largest financial institutions shows that many in these age groups are in situations fit for a Caleb Hammer or Dave Ramsay clip floating around on their feeds. What this research means for Gen Z and Millennials is that they are buying more, paying more, and doing it at a time when the deck feels increasingly stacked against them. However, as I have previously mentioned, this highlights just how important it is to approach car buying responsibly and plan financially. It's truly important to take a step back, let the temptation simmer, and examine your financial situation and set a budget that you can actually comfortably afford. By being diligent, you can protect yourself from potential hurdles and make a decision that won't wreck you or your credit. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix
Scott Galloway, the podcaster and New York University professor, explained his view on June 13 that the last significant battle in the streaming industry was a showdown between Netflix and Hollywood - and Netflix emerged victorious. By expanding production globally, taking advantage of broadband technology, and capitalizing on inexpensive funding, Netflix (NFLX) was able to make large-scale investments similar to Amazon's strategy, Galloway explained, leaving competitors unable to keep pace. The outcome? A major shift in value from traditional studios and entertainment talent to Netflix's investors and subscribers. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Netflix's newest version operates as more than just a subscription-based platform - it now combines both subscriptions and advertising in its business model. And nearly 94 million people have chosen Netflix's ad-supported plan since it was introduced fewer than three years ago, according to Galloway. Netflix has proven itself to be a master of adaptation in the media landscape. It started as a mail-order DVD business, toppling the giant Blockbuster. Then it evolved into a streaming powerhouse, upending Hollywood's dominance. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Now, after a decade without major changes, Netflix is transforming once more, Galloway wrote. The company is introducing AI-driven content recommendations, mobile-friendly vertical videos, and a refreshed visual design to take on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. And once again, the streaming service faces a new challenge. Shutterstock Having won the last streaming war, Netflix now confronts a new threat, Galloway explained in his "No Mercy / No Malice" newsletter. In fact, this prominent challenger is in the ring with all streaming services. "The next streaming war?" Galloway wrote. "YouTube takes on the world." "This year, more people in the U.S. watched YouTube on TVs than on mobile devices - a first," he continued. "YouTube is now the No. 1 distributor of TV content, according to Nielsen. And for the past three months, YouTube registered the largest share of TV viewing (12%) among media companies; Netflix accounted for 7.5%." More on the U.S. economy: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security YouTube is essentially public access television scaled to the internet, but with vastly superior production quality, observed Galloway. His Markets podcast co-host Ed Elson notes that Gen Z sees YouTube - owned by Alphabet (GOOGL) - as an algorithm-driven force shifting influence away from established brands and toward individual creators. The biggest disruptor to Hollywood, Galloway argues, isn't Netflix chairman's Reed Hastings - it's MrBeast, the YouTube star who has perfected parasocial relationships. In 2023 alone, MrBeast amassed over a billion hours of watch time, surpassing the top Netflix shows. "But just as individual content creators disrupted Hollywood, AI may disrupt content creators," Galloway wrote. While Netflix is expected to invest around $18 billion in content this year, YouTube effectively operates with a content budget of zero, instead sharing ad revenue with its creators. MrBeast has revealed that producing a single video typically costs him $2.5 million. Yet in a striking shift, an AI-generated muzak channel recently surpassed him, becoming the fastest-growing channel on YouTube this month. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy Galloway argues that the rise of Netflix, YouTube and the competition for streaming audiences has cost us something vital: a shared cultural experience. In 1983, the final episode of M.A.S.H. was a national event, drawing 106 million viewers - nearly half of America, he recalls. By contrast, last year's most-watched scripted TV finale, "Yellowstone," reached just 13 million people, a mere 4% of the country. The shift from scheduled programming to unlimited, on-demand content has fragmented American culture, Galloway suggests - and this fact reflects the loss of two key societal pillars: collective experiences and a shared identity. "Without shared stories, we don't laugh together, love/hate the same heroes/villains, or believe in the same facts when we argue," Galloway wrote. "We lose our empathy, our ability to see each other as human." "It's hard to demonize someone you watched 'Cheers' with every Thursday night; it's easy to hate someone whose cultural references are completely foreign to your feed." Related: Scott Galloway makes major prediction on world economy; 401(k) impact seen The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Visa Stock Plunges: Here's Why This Analyst Is Bullish
Visa (NYSE:V) was amongst several payment processor stocks taking a hit in Friday's trading as crypto's ongoing march toward mainstream adoption has sparked concerns about the implications for the group. Confident Investing Starts Here: Specifically, the Wall Street Journal reported that major retailers are seriously looking into using stablecoins as a way to sidestep the high fees tied to traditional card payments. Companies like Walmart and Amazon have apparently explored creating their own U.S.-based stablecoins, a shift that could potentially save them billions in processing costs by moving away from the conventional banking and card network infrastructure. If either Walmart or Amazon were to launch such a payment system, it could pose a major threat to traditional financial institutions, especially regional and community banks. These retailers not only have enormous customer and employee bases, but also access to massive amounts of consumer data and far fewer regulatory hurdles than banks. That combination has long made them powerful, and potentially disruptive, players in the financial space. Stablecoins are digital tokens typically pegged one-to-one with a government-issued currency like the dollar. They're backed by reserves such as cash or U.S. Treasurys and are currently used mainly for storing value or trading other cryptocurrencies. Whether these retail-led stablecoin projects move forward will likely depend on the outcome of the Genius Act, a bill that would lay the groundwork for stablecoin regulation in the U.S. The legislation recently passed a key procedural step but still needs to clear both the Senate and the House. So, credit card use might get switched to crypto, marking a continuation of sorts as Visa's growth has long been powered by people switching from cash to cards, historically accounting for about two-thirds of its volume growth. For Mizuho's Dan Dolev, an analyst who covers both crypto and payment platforms, a big issue he recently mulled revolved around how much 'US cash conversion runway' remains. Dolev's deep dive into different spending categories suggests that Visa's slower-than-expected growth compared to overall U.S. consumer spending since the pandemic isn't necessarily a sign of weakness. Instead, it's mainly because Americans have been spending more in areas that don't typically rely on cards, like rent or healthcare, and less in card-heavy areas like travel or dining. The good news is this trend is beginning to reverse. More importantly, Dolev believes there's still a lot of untapped potential for card adoption in the U.S. While consensus estimates put card penetration at 80 to 90%, the analyst thinks the real figure is closer to 75%. 'This leaves room for another decade of solid top-line growth domestically. Plus, V's performance in Canada & Nordics offers evidence of above-PCE growth, even when card penetration is >90%,' Dolev said. But whether stablecoin adoption changes all that remains to be seen. All told, for now, Dolev rates V shares as Outperform (i.e., Buy), while his $425 price target makes room for 12-month returns of 20%. (To watch Dolev's track record, click here) The rest of the analyst community remains firmly in V's corner too; the stock claims a Strong Buy consensus rating, based on a mix of 24 Buys and 4 Holds. The average price target stands at $388.85, implying shares will climb 10.5% higher in the months ahead. (See Visa stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.