US space chief warns China, Russia are greatest risks to space defense capabilities
Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman warned Chinese and Russian technologies, especially Beijing's ''kill web,' present the greatest risks to the U.S.'s space defense capabilities.
'The PRC [People's Republic of China] has developed what we've kind of, you know, tongue in cheek, called a 'kill web,' and it's nothing more than a series of hundreds of satellites that are a sensor network that provide real-time updates, targeting quality information of our force,' Saltzman said at Politico's Security Summit on Thursday.
This 'kill web' presents new risks to U.S. forces due to its precise targeting, which can infiltrate forces in range before they can begin to meet military objectives, Saltzman said.
'This is a huge problem. And the Indo-Pacific is where we see this most acutely,' Saltzman said, adding, 'That's why we have to build our capabilities to try to disrupt that so that when we're trying to achieve military objectives, our soldiers, sailors and airmen are safe and not under this umbrella of a very accurate, very long range set of weapons.'
China's space program has significantly increased in recent years and hopes to put astronauts on the moon before 2030. China was excluded from the International Space amid national security concerns, prompting the Asia nation to build its own space station.
Saltzman warned the PRC has shown an 'accelerated ability' to launch payloads like spacecraft or satellites into orbit.
The U.S. space chief then laid out three areas of concern he has over Russia's capabilities.
Months ahead of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Russia demonstrated a 'kinetic kill capability,' which is an anti-satellite missile to destroy a satellite. This invasion, Saltzman said, involved a cyberattack against global communications company Viasat in the ground network.
'We have to remember space capabilities can be negated using ground techniques…cyber techniques,' he said. 'So we have to defend our assets in not just the orbit, but the ground as well.'
Saltzman's third concern related to Russia's jamming efforts and its aim to put a nuclear weapon on orbit.
'The Russians are demonstrating reckless aggressive behaviors with regards to how they intend to contest the space domain that will have far-reaching impacts beyond any localized military effect,' Saltzman said.
It comes as Russia and China pursue a joint initiative to establish an international lunar research station.
The Associated Press contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Putin is preparing for more war, US senators warn, urging swift sanctions and global action
PARIS (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin is stalling at the peace table while preparing a new military offensive in Ukraine, two senior U.S. senators warned Sunday, arguing that the next two weeks could shape the future of a war that has already smashed cities, displaced millions and redrawn Europe's security map. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal spoke to The Associated Press in Paris after meeting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and touring neighborhoods shattered by what they called the worst Russian bombardments since the full-scale invasion began. In Paris for talks with French President Emmanuel Macron — who they say is '100% aligned' with them on the war — the senators warned the window to prevent a renewed assault is closing. A sweeping U.S. sanctions bill could be the West's last chance to choke off the Kremlin's war economy, they said. "What I learned on this trip was he's preparing for more war,' Graham said of Putin. Blumenthal called the sanctions proposed in legislation 'bone-crushing' and said it would place Russia's economy 'on a trade island.' 'It is crunch time for Putin and for the world because Russia is mounting a new offensive,' he said. At the heart of their push is a bipartisan sanctions bill, backed by nearly the entire U.S. Senate but still facing uncertain odds in Washington. It would impose 500% tariffs on countries that continue buying Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports — targeting nations like China and India that account for roughly 70% of Russia's energy trade and bankroll much of its war effort. Graham called it 'the most draconian bill I've ever seen in my life in the Senate." 'The world has a lot of cards to play against Putin,' he said. 'We're going to hit China and India for propping up his war machine.' Peace talks or stalling tactic? Peace talks are scheduled to resume Monday in Istanbul. But Ukrainian officials say Moscow has yet to submit a serious proposal — a delay both senators described as deliberate and dangerous. 'Putin is playing President Trump," Blumenthal said. 'He's taking him for a sucker.' The senator said Putin "is, in effect, stalling and stonewalling, prolonging the conversation so that he can mount this offensive and take control of more territory on the ground.' Graham added: 'We saw credible evidence of a summer or early fall invasion, a new offensive by Putin. ... He's preparing for more war.' Trump has yet to endorse the sanctions bill, telling reporters Friday: 'I don't know. I'll have to see it.' Graham said the legislation was drafted in consultation with Trump's advisers. Graham backed the president's diplomatic instincts but said, "By trying to engage Putin — by being friendly and enticing — it's become painfully clear he's not interested in ending this war.' Blumenthal hoped the bipartisan support for Ukraine at least in the Senate — and the personal testimonies they plan to bring home to Congress and the Oval Office— may help shift the conversation. 'He needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' he said of Putin. A moral reckoning In Kyiv, the senators said, the war's human toll was impossible to ignore. Graham pointed to what Ukrainian officials and Yale researchers estimate are nearly 20,000 children forcibly deported to Russia — calling their return a matter of justice, not diplomacy. Blumenthal described standing at mass grave sites in Bucha, where civilians were executed with shots to the head. The destruction, he said, and the stories of those who survived, made clear the stakes of delay. 'Putin is a thug. He's a murderer." Both said that failing to act now could pull the U.S. deeper into conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Blumenthal said, NATO treaty obligations could one day compel American troops into battle. They see resolve in Europe After a one-hour meeting with Macron in Paris, both Graham, of South Carolina, and Blumenthal, of Connecticut, said they left convinced Europe was ready to toughen its stance. 'This visit has been a breakthrough moment because President Macron has shown moral clarity in his conversations with us,' Blumenthal said. 'Today, he is 100% aligned with that message that we are taking back to Washington.' Blumenthal pointed to the rare bipartisan unity behind the sanctions bill. 'There are very few causes that will take 41 Republicans and 41 Democrats and put them on record on a single piece of legislation,' he said. 'The cause of Ukraine is doing it.' Ahead, Ukrainian military leaders are set to brief Congress and a sanctions vote could follow. 'President Trump said we'll know in two weeks whether he's being strung along,' Graham said. 'There will be more evidence of that from Russia on Monday.'
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Trump fails to sanction Moscow, few expect breakthrough during upcoming Russia-Ukraine talks
As Ukraine and Russia prepare for peace talks scheduled for June 2 in Istanbul, few observers expect a breakthrough. While the U.S. and Ukraine have pushed for an unconditional ceasefire, the Kremlin has rejected it. Instead, Moscow has regularly voiced maximalist demands that are unlikely to be accepted by Kyiv, such as recognition of Russia's illegal annexation of Ukrainian regions and withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the parts of these regions remaining under Kyiv's control. U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with Russia's reluctance to make concessions and its intensifying and deadly attacks on Ukraine. However, he has so far refused to sanction Russia. Jenny Mathers, a lecturer in international politics at the U.K.'s Aberystwyth University, said that "(Russian President Vladimir) Putin is clearly engaged in a balancing act between making gestures towards peace to keep Trump quiet without making any compromises or actually trying to ensure that the peace talks make any real progress." "There are no signs that Russia is willing to consider making any concessions, and every sign that Russia intends to keep pushing ahead on the battlefield to try to take control of as much Ukrainian territory as possible," she told the Kyiv Independent. Read also: 'Trump doesn't know how to deal with gangsters' — US lets Ukraine down, once again During the first round of talks in Istanbul on May 16, the two sides failed to reach agreement on a 30-day ceasefire. The only concrete result of the Istanbul talks was a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner swap completed on May 25 — the biggest prisoner exchange during the war. Ukraine sent a delegation headed by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov to Istanbul, while Russia sent a low-level delegation led by Putin's aide Vladimir Medinsky. Putin did not attend the Istanbul peace talks, despite an invitation from President Volodymyr Zelensky to meet him face-to-face. "The talks did yield a quite sizable exchange of prisoners," Charles Kupchan, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, told the Kyiv Independent. "But the glass was more half empty than half full. Putin refused to send a high-level delegation and seemingly little progress was made on the key issue — attaining a ceasefire and durable settlement." Peter Rough, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute, also argued that the first round "didn't produce a strategic breakthrough and is more interesting procedurally in that it put Russian and Ukrainian negotiators face-to-face." "Russia was just going through the motions of talks — showing up and issuing a set of demands before going home," Mathers said. "It was striking that the team for the talks with Ukraine was composed of more junior people than the team sent for talks with the U.S. weeks earlier — this was almost certainly a calculated insult to the Ukrainians." Read also: 'There we go again' — For war-weary Europe, Trump-Putin call yet another signal to 'wake up' Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said on May 28 that Ukraine had submitted its memorandum on proposed ceasefire terms to Russia. Ukraine's proposed memorandum to Russia includes provisions for a ceasefire on land, in the air, and at sea, to be monitored by international partners, The New York Times (NYT) reported on May 30, citing an unnamed senior Ukrainian official. During the Istanbul talks, Russia also promised to submit a memorandum outlining its ceasefire conditions to Ukraine. However, the Kremlin has been dragging its feet on presenting the document. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced on May 23 that Moscow would present the memorandum immediately after the completion of the prisoner exchange between the two countries. However, the memo was not submitted after the exchange was completed on May 25. Lavrov announced on May 28 that the Russian memorandum would be unveiled during the next round of negotiations set for June 2 in Istanbul. "Russia is dragging its feet for two reasons," Kupchan said. "First, Russia has been advancing on the battlefield, which encourages the Kremlin to keep the war going. Second, Putin has not yet given up on his maximalist war aims and seeks to subjugate as much of Ukraine as possible. He will stop only when Ukraine has the military wherewithal to stop him, which is why Europe and the United States need to keep the arms flowing." Meanwhile, Stefan Wolff, professor of international security at the University of Birmingham, argued that Russia wants "to limit the time that Ukraine has to consider the Russian demands and discuss them with their allies in Europe and the U.S." "Dragging out the negotiations process buys Russia time for further advances on the battlefield and improving and shoring up their position ahead of a ceasefire agreement that will most likely freeze the front lines," he added. Read also: Bracing for more Russian attacks, an anxious Ukraine waits for Trump to do… something During the talks, Russia has consistently stuck to its maximalist demands and refused to make concessions. Putin said in March that Russia would agree to a ceasefire only if there was a ban on Ukrainian mobilization and training of troops and a halt on Western military aid for Kyiv. Experts argue that these conditions are tantamount to demands for Ukraine's surrender. Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's envoy to the United Nations, reiterated the demands on May 30, saying that Russia would only consider a ceasefire if Kyiv stopped receiving Western weapons and halted mobilization. During the Istanbul talks, Russia also demanded that Ukraine recognize the illegally annexed territories as Russian, withdraw from the Kyiv-controlled parts of these regions, and adopt a neutral status, according to a source in the President's Office, who spoke with the Kyiv Independent on conditions of anonymity. Russia illegally annexed Ukraine's Crimea peninsula in 2014. The Kremlin also announced the illegal annexation of Ukraine's Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk oblasts in 2022 despite only partially controlling them. Reuters reported on May 28, citing its sources, that Putin was demanding a written pledge by NATO not to accept more Eastern European members and the lifting of several sanctions as conditions for ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Read also: 'Conditions for Ukraine's surrender' — Why Putin's demands for ceasefire make no sense As Russia remained intransigent, Trump has continued his usual rhetoric, alternating between praise for Putin and frustration with Russia's actions. During a phone call with Trump on May 19, Putin again rejected an unconditional ceasefire. Despite this, Trump said the call "went very well" and once again refused to impose sanctions against Russia. In recent weeks, Trump has repeatedly expressed frustration with Russia. Some of Trump's critical statements followed massive Russian drone and missile strikes from May 24 to May 26 — one of Russia's largest and deadliest aerial attacks during the war. On May 25, Trump said that Putin had gone "absolutely" crazy and warned that if he didn't stop his actions, it could bring about the collapse of Russia. At the same time, Trump also lashed out at Zelensky, saying that he "is doing his country no favors by talking the way he does" — an apparent reference to Zelensky's criticism of Russia and of Washington's failure to crack down on Putin. On May 27, Trump also admitted that "if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia.' Trump has also repeatedly threatened to impose sanctions on Russia but no action followed. The U.S. Senate is considering a bill that would impose 500% tariffs on imports from countries purchasing Russian oil, gas, uranium, and other products. The Senate is expected to "start moving" the bill next week, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on May 30. However, it is still unclear if Trump will back the bill. "Trump appears to be getting frustrated with Putin and may be arriving at the conclusion that Putin is playing for time rather than working with Trump to end the war," Kupchan said. "The massive Russian air attacks that keep coming reinforce the view that Russia is not negotiating in good faith." At the same time, there is no indication that Trump's threats will lead to any action. "One of the constants in Trump's behavior has been his tendency to be sympathetic to Russia's positions and arguments and to regard Putin with respect," Mathers said. "Despite brief expressions of frustration and irritation, Trump always seems to return to his default setting of finding Russia's arguments persuasive and being eager to get rid of obstacles to doing business with and in Russia." Wolff also argued that "for Trump, a deal with Russia, any deal, is really important." "Too much pressure on Putin, in Trump's mind, is probably counter-productive to get a deal done," he added. "By contrast, pressure on Ukraine seems like an easier option, including because the U.S. has, or at least thinks it has, more leverage over Kyiv." Read also: As Russia refuses to accept ceasefire, will Trump pressure Moscow? As Trump remains reluctant to punish Russia, the Kremlin appears to have no incentives to agree to a ceasefire. Analysts are skeptical about the possibility of a breakthrough during the second round of talks. "Russia does not yet seem prepared to make the concessions and compromises needed to get a ceasefire," Kupchan said. "There are as yet no signs that Putin is negotiating in good faith and making a sincere effort to end the war." Michael O'Hanlon, director of research in the Foreign Policy program at the Brookings Institution, said that "we will need to turn up the pressure on Putin in several ways for talks to have any real chance of success." "I don't expect much from June 2," he added. "President Trump is learning that Putin is the problem but hasn't fully accepted or internalized that fact yet." Analysts agree that the main problem is Trump's failure to realize that sanctions would be the only realistic way to push the Kremlin towards a ceasefire. 'Putin seems to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Trump will not impose serious constraints on Russia, so Russia is free to demand preconditions that make a ceasefire impossible,' Richard Betts, professor emeritus of war and peace studies at Columbia University, told the Kyiv Independent. 'This might change if Russia suffers some defeats on the battlefield, or political support for Putin within Russia drops, but there is no evidence yet that either of those conditions is likely to occur soon.' Read also: 'Dangerous and cruel' — Trump's reported Crimea proposal sparks horror among Ukraine's lawmakers We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russian delegation departs to Istanbul for Ukraine talks, Russian news agencies say
Russian news agencies reported on Sunday 1 June that the Russian delegation has left for Istanbul to attend negotiations concerning Ukraine. Source: Kremlin-aligned Russian news agencies RIA Novosti, TASS and Interfax, citing sources Details: A source familiar with the preparation of the negotiations told Interfax that "the Russian delegation flew to Istanbul on Sunday afternoon to attend talks on Ukraine". The source added that the Russian delegation will be ready to begin negotiations on the morning of 2 June. RIA Novosti and TASS have reported the same information. Updated: Sources in the Turkish Foreign Ministry told TASS that the talks between Russia and Ukraine are scheduled for 13:00 on 2 June at the Çırağan Palace in Istanbul. Background: Earlier today, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that the Ukrainian delegation, led by Defence Minister Rustem Umierov, will travel to Istanbul for negotiations with Russia. Before that, Zelenskyy said that as of the evening of Saturday 31 May, neither Ukraine nor its partners had clear information about what the Russians intended to propose at the talks in Istanbul. On 28 May, it emerged that Umierov had handed Russia a document outlining Ukraine's position and was awaiting their "memorandum" in response. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on what conditions Russia will put forward in its draft memorandum for a ceasefire, saying that this should be discussed privately. On 30 May, Peskov said that the Russian delegation will be in Istanbul on Monday morning for peace talks with Ukraine and will show its memorandum there. Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said Russia's reluctance to officially submit its memorandum for negotiations suggests the document contains unrealistic demands and represents an attempt to stall the peace process. It was previously reported that the Russian delegation set to attend the new round of peace talks with Ukraine in Istanbul on 2 June would be the same group that participated in the previous meeting, which Zelenskyy criticised for its low level. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
