Phuket-bound Air India Express returns in 16 minutes after take-off due to technical issue
New Delhi: A Phuket-bound Air India Express flight returned to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport in Hyderabad on Saturday shortly after take-off due to a technical issue. The flight was originally scheduled to land in Phuket at 11.45 am.
Flight IX110, operated by a Boeing 737 Max 8, took off to its destination but returned to Hyderabad with a total airborne time of just 16 minutes, leaving passengers frustrated.
An Air India Express spokesperson said in a statement that shortly after take-off, 'crew on one of our flights exercised abundant caution and elected to return to Hyderabad on account of a technical issue'.
'We arranged an alternative aircraft on priority, provided refreshments to guests during the delay, and the flight has since departed. We regret the inconvenience while reiterating that safety remains the priority in every aspect of our operations,' the spokesperson added.
Passengers took to social media about the tough experience, saying they were left waiting inside the aircraft without any clear communication from the airline.
'@DGCAIndia @AirIndiaX flight iX110 en route Hyderabad to Phuket returns after takeoff. Still no update—we're waiting inside the plane. Frustrating,' an affected passenger posted on X.
Another posted: 'Thank you @AirIndiaX for making me realise to never ever fly with you again… after being redirected and made to go through an unorganised re-security check.'
In an earlier message posted on X, the airline said it apologises for the inconvenience caused due to the disruption of your flight.
'Please note that the delay was due to technical reasons, as ensuring our guest's safety remains our top priority. We are working on resolving the issue and are currently awaiting the updated ETD. Our team will keep you informed and provide the necessary assistance regarding the departure time. We sincerely apologise once again and look forward to providing you with a better experience the next time you fly with us,' said the airline.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Technical snag: Air India cancels Singapore-Chennai flight; offers refunds and hotel stay
Representative image Air India on Sunday cancelled its Singapore to Chennai flight AI349 following a technical issue that required extended maintenance work. The flight, scheduled to be operated using an Airbus A321, was grounded after a pre-departure check flagged the problem. In a statement issued on Sunday, the airline said, 'Flight AI349 scheduled to operate from Singapore to Chennai has been cancelled due to a maintenance task identified prior to departure, which required additional time for rectification.' As per news agency PTI, arrangements are underway to fly the affected passengers to Chennai at the earliest. The airline is offering hotel accommodation and has assured full refunds or complimentary rescheduling, depending on each passenger's preference. Air India also said that its ground staff in Singapore are making "every possible effort" to minimise inconvenience for the passengers caused by this unforeseen disruption. This latest cancellation adds to a spate of recent technical snags reported on Air India aircraft. On Thursday, a Delhi-London flight (AI2017) operated on an ex-Vistara Boeing 787 Dreamliner had to return to the terminal after the pilots suspected a technical issue. 'The cockpit crew decided to discontinue the take-off run following standard operating procedures and brought the aircraft back for precautionary checks,' an Air India spokesperson said. An alternative Dreamliner was later arranged for the journey. Similarly, on July 25, an Air India Express flight bound for Doha was forced to return to Calicut airport due to a fault in the cabin air conditioning system. 188 passengers were on board, and the flight landed safely after two hours in the air. The airline later provided food and water to passengers and arranged a replacement aircraft. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
News18
a day ago
- News18
The Dreamliners' Nightmares Are Increasing In Frequency
Last Updated: The recent spate of glitches in Boeing 787s of several other airlines indicates that the AI-171 crash was just waiting to happen Even after a LatAm Airlines' Boeing 787-800 Dreamliner en route to Santiago in Chile circled over the Pacific for an hour on August 1 before returning to Los Angeles Airport to make an emergency landing due to engine failure, will Boeing and its proxies still blame Indian pilots for the crash of AI 171 in Ahmedabad in June? Flight trackers and video evidence note that when it landed, its Ram Air Turbine (RAT) was clearly deployed—as AI-171's last visual showed too. Just the day before, on July 31, a London-bound Air India Dreamliner flight from Delhi aborted take-off on Thursday after 'technical issues' were detected. The Boeing 787-900 aircraft returned to the parking bay and Air India said it was conducting 'precautionary checks". Such 'precaution" is understandable but given the rising public unease over incidents involving Dreamliners, transparency about these incidents, wherever they happen, must become standard practice. Due to the AI-171 crash and the orchestrated blame game by 787's components suppliers and manufacturer, most Indians know now that the RAT emerges when power fails, and fuel supply cut-off is one of several possible causes. Electrical failure resulting in loss of power to flight control, navigation and other systems can also cause the RAT to deploy. And if this latest RAT deployment on the LatAm flight is not probed transparently the public will, well, smell a rat. Intriguingly, in December 2018, a LatAm Boeing 777-300 on its way from Sao Paulo to London Heathrow had to make an emergency landing at Belo Horizonte. At that time too, the RAT was deployed and 12 of its 14 tyres burst due to its heavy weight as it had been unable to dump fuel. Passengers said there had been a strong smell of burning electricals before the cabin lights and entertainment systems went out. The crew said all navigation equipment had failed too. The testimony of the lone miraculous survivor of the Ahmedabad Dreamliner disaster had also reported that there was a loud bang and a high pitched whine (which was deduced to be the sound the RAT deploying) and the cabin lights had flickered just before the aircraft crashed. Unless he gets sudden amnesia or mysteriously retracts the statements he made to multiple news networks, Boeing cannot swat away the similarities between the 777 and 778 electrical issues. Even before this latest LatAm Dreamliner nightmare, a United Airlines 787-800 bound for Munich returned soon after take-off from Washington Dulles Airport on July 25. Its left engine failed, and the pilots issued a Mayday call, flew in a holding pattern and then landed back at the airport. It was considerably higher in the air than AI-171 when this happened and thus could recoup and land safely. But as the engines were inert, the plane had to be towed off the runway. Not many in India (or indeed anyone apart from aviation watchers) know that in March 2024 Boeing had told airlines with Dreamliners to check pilots' seats as part of a probe into another (!) Latam flight wherein 50 people were hurt when it plunged suddenly in mid-air. Media reported that a cabin crew had 'accidentally" pressed a switch on the seat, pushing the pilot into the control panels, causing the plane's nose to go downwards. But was that the real reason for the fall? Is it a coincidence that among the first of many wildly speculative statements by (mostly) American aviation experts was the allegation that the seat of one the AI-171 pilots moved suddenly, making him fall on the control panel, causing engines to cut out and the plane to crash? The 'experts" were pointing to both pilot error and bad maintenance by Air India. Was this a pre-emptive strike to ward off suspicions that the seats had possibly malfunctioned on a 787 before? Ominously, aviation news sites have reported this week that the US Federal Aviation Authority is taking action after learning that the RATs on some Boeing 787s and Airbus were produced using inferior titanium sourced from China supplied by Spirit AeroSystems. It has issued a notice of proposed rule that if approved would require airlines to inspect the fittings on selected 787-9s and 787-10s. The Boeing whistleblower Sam Salehpour worked for that company. These two recent incidents involving Dreamliners belie statements endlessly pushed after the AI-171 crash that Boeing 787s have a 'flawless" safety and performance record. The aircraft manufacturer has to strongly push that line considering that after many similar assertions of perfection, Boeing's 737-Max had been revealed to have a faulty software which was the real cause of the crashes of Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines, months apart in 2018 and 2019. When Boeing was so confident back then and also had many cheerleaders for its aircraft—till conclusively proven otherwise—what is the probability that it would try the same tactic again in 2025? At that time too, it had the backing of President Trump until the world outcry got too loud and all Boeing 737 Maxes had to be grounded pending safety checks. But eventually the behemoth American corporation negotiated a deal to avoid prosecution for those 346 deaths. This June, Boeing agreed to fork out $1.1billion in a deal with the Department of Justice that includes paying $444.5 million to the victims' families and spending another $445m to 'improve" its compliance, safety and quality programmes. Boeing has already paid $243m of a $487.2m criminal penalty settled in 2021. Some call this blood money. Finding Air India's pilots responsible for the AI-171 crash rather than any design or manufacturing fault would help Boeing too. The US media has also been curiously reticent when it comes to reporting on the two most recent Boeing Dreamliner glitches that appear to indicate that what happened to AI-171 was not the result of any deliberate actions of pilots but a catastrophic failure of aircraft systems which left no time for remedial measures. Why is the US media not analysing the spate of mishaps? Just because none of these led to the same tragic consequences as the Dreamliner called VT-ANB? The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : boeing view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 02, 2025, 14:23 IST News opinion Opinion | The Dreamliners' Nightmares Are Increasing In Frequency Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Hyderabad's Rajiv Gandhi International Airport introduces therapy dogs for passenger comfort
The next time when you walk into Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (RGAI) here, don't be surprised if you're greeted by a friendly puppy or even get a chance to pet one. A passenger who did not want to be identified said, "I was so happy to see them."(Unsplash/representational) The GMR Group, which manages the airport, has introduced a "Therapy Dog Program" aimed at enhancing the passenger experience. The initiative offers calming and joyful interactions, with the belief that the presence of dogs--Toy Poodles in this case-- can ease travel-related anxiety, uplift moods, and create a more welcoming and peaceful airport environment, according to RGIA sources. Currently, the program which features four well-trained Toy Poodles and accompanied by professional handlers, is in its early stages, and future expansion may be considered based on passenger feedback and operational feasibility, they said. "The response has been overwhelmingly positive. Passengers have appreciated the calming presence of the dogs. The initiative has been well-received as a thoughtful and comforting addition to the airport experience," sources told PTI. While the dogs are certified therapy animals and trained for calm behavior, they are always under the supervision of professional handlers. These handlers are equipped to manage any unexpected behavior and ensure the safety and comfort of both the dogs and passengers, they further said. A passenger who did not want to be identified said, "I was so happy to see them." "It already feels like I'm beginning to heal. A truly wonderful initiative. Please keep up the amazing work. And a special thanks to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport for helping fund and facilitate this incredible effort." Having a pet dog brings so much joy and the initiative was a thoughtful and heartwarming one which deserves true appreciation, the passenger added. Importantly, the dogs are only allowed to interact with passengers who willingly approach them, minimizing stress triggers. They are stationed at key touch points in both domestic and international departure areas from Friday to Monday, (1500 hours-1900 hours) for approximately four hours. The city airport witnessed a passenger traffic of 29.5 million during the last financial year.
