
US-Ukraine deal is heavy on symbolism, light on minerals: Andy Home
LONDON - U.S President Donald Trump's minerals deal with Ukraine is a big symbolic win for both sides.
Ukraine gets a long-term commitment for U.S. investment in "a free, sovereign, and secure Ukraine". The United States gets a stake in Ukraine's future resource potential. And Trump gets to prove that he is, to quote White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, "the great deal maker".
Just don't expect a Ukrainian critical minerals rush soon.
Yulia Svyrydenko, Ukraine's deputy prime minister, posted on X that she does not expect the jointly-owned Reconstruction Investment Fund to pay out any dividends in the first 10 years.
DON'T MENTION THE RARE EARTHS
At least everyone has stopped calling it the rare earths deal. The agreement covers all sub-soil resources, including oil, gas and a wide spectrum of metals.
Ukraine has a couple of rare earth deposits, which is not surprising given the size of the country and that rare earths are not as rare as their name suggests.
Deposits that are viable economically and technically are relatively unusual and how promising Ukraine's are is unclear.
Even the best-mapped Novopoltavske field was last surveyed in 1982-1991. It is also inconveniently located just north of Chernihiv in Zaporizhzhia province, which is the wrong side of the front line from a Ukrainian point of view.
So are two of the touted lithium projects. Indeed, about 40% of Ukraine's metal resources are under Russian occupation, according to estimates by Ukrainian think tanks We Build Ukraine and the National Institute of Strategic Studies.
Unlocking the full value of the minerals deal will be impossible without a definitive peace and reconciliation of Ukraine's and Russia's competing territorial claims.
LONG ROAD FROM MINE TO MARKET
Ukraine has other lithium deposits and also hosts reserves of critical minerals such as uranium, titanium and graphite.
But since existing production facilities are not included in the deal and many have been closed since the start of the war anyway, Ukraine will be building a minerals production chain from scratch.
That is a long journey.
The challenge with many of the metals on everyone's critical raw materials list is not getting them out of the ground, although that can be capital-intensive enough, but in refining them into high-purity products ready for the manufacturing process.
Rare earths' separation and processing is notoriously tricky and dominated by Chinese operators, which is another reason why no-one's calling it the rare earths deal any more.
Mined uranium also needs to be enriched before it can be fed into a nuclear power plant and titanium ore needs to be processed into aviation-grade alloy before it can be used to build aircraft.
It's an inconvenient truth that Russia is one of the world's largest titanium processors and accounted for 27% of the enriched uranium supplied to U.S. commercial reactors in 2023.
Russia, however, is explicitly excluded from benefiting from the reconstruction of Ukraine.
PRICE PROTECTION
Market price is another problem.
Ukraine's graphite deposits are both on the right side of the front line and relatively well mapped. The Balakhivske project is at the feasibility study stage, according to the Ukrainian Geological Survey.
There is a ready European market for the material needed for the anode in electric vehicle batteries.
But will mining it in Ukraine be economically viable?
Canadian miner Northern Graphite, the only producer in North America, has announced it is putting its Quebec plant on care and maintenance due to a 50% collapse in the graphite price.
China controls 70% of the global supply chain and can exert huge influence over pricing, in this case flooding the market to undermine potential competitors.
The West's lithium ambitions are being similarly stymied by Chinese over-supply and rock-bottom market prices.
Ukraine will find that private investment will need government help to shield start-ups from price turbulence.
The United States has already understood the need for direct federal action. The Department of Defense is a strategic investor in a domestic rare earths processing project being led by Australia's Lynas Rare Earths.
STAKING THE METALLIC FUTURE
This minerals deal is clearly going to come with a long repayment schedule.
But it is a sign of the times. As the world transitions from a fossil fuel economy to a metallic future, minerals have become the new geopolitical currency.
In this new world order China is the dominant incumbent and the West the challenger.
The United States has just made a strategic move in the great global minerals game. It will not be the last.
Next up is the Democratic Republic of Congo, where another minerals-for-security deal is on the table.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
(Editing by Barbara Lewis)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
22 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Stocks tumble, oil prices jump after Israel attacks Iran
13 June 2025 15:59 LONDON (Reuters)World stock markets tumbled on Friday and oil prices surged as Israel launched a military strike on Iran, sparking a rush into safe havens such as gold, dollar and Swiss escalation adds uncertainty to financial markets at a time of heightened pressure on the global economy from US President Donald Trump's aggressive and erratic trade on Friday Trump urged Iran to make a deal over its nuclear programme, saying that there was still time for the country to prevent further conflict with reaction, which had abated in early European trade, gathered a renewed momentum as the session wore crude oil prices were last up almost 9% at $75.54 per barrel, having jumped as much as 14% during Asian hours. They were set for their biggest one-day jump since 2022, when energy costs spiked after Russia's invasion of oil futures rose almost $6 to $ a classic safe-haven at times of global uncertainty, rose 1% to $3,416 per ounce, bringing it close to the record high of $3,500.05 from launched large-scale strikes against Iran on Friday, saying it had attacked nuclear facilities and missile factories in what could be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran building an atomic said it had no part in the developments mean another major geopolitical tail risk has now become a reality at a time when investors are wrestling with major shifts in US economic and trade policies. TWO-WAY PULL FOR BONDS US Treasuries initially benefited from the rush for safer assets, but as the day wore on focus turn to the inflationary impact of 10-year Treasury yields were last up 2.6 basis points (bps) at 4.38%, having touched a one-month low of 4.31%. Bond yields move inversely to 10-year bond yield touched its lowest level since early March at around 2.42%, before also moving traders were attracted to the dollar as a haven, with the dollar index up 0.8% to 98.50, retracing most of Thursday's sizeable Swiss franc briefly touched its strongest level against the dollar since April 21, before trading 0.5% lower at around 0.8144 per safe haven the Japanese yen fell 0.6% to 144.33 per dollar, giving up earlier gains of 0.3%. The euro was down 0.8% at $1.15, after rising on Thursday to the highest since October 2021. Stock Markets Continue full coverage


Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies ‘man of peace' Trump
US President Donald Trump implored Israel on Thursday not to attack Iran and declared, once again, his goal was to be a peacemaker. Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — one of Trump's closest international allies — brazenly defied his advice by unleashing a major military campaign described as a 'preemptive' strike against Iran's nuclear programme. The attack marks the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a 'man of peace'. Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures for a ceasefire with Ukraine. And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden's term. Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff — who has negotiated in all three crises — had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman. Secretary of State Marco Rubio made clear in a statement the United States was not involved in attacking Iran and warned Tehran not to retaliate against US troops in the region. Hours later, Fox News reported that Trump had said he was aware Israel was going to conduct strikes on Iran before it happened, and that he hoped negotiations could still happen. 'Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see,' Trump said, according to Fox News, which added that Trump also said 'the US is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates.' The president will hold a meeting with the National Security Council on Friday morning. 'It would blow it' Before Israel launched its operation, Trump said: 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it.' He doubled down with a social media post saying he remained 'committed to a diplomatic resolution' on Iran. Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defences. 'We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set,' said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear programme. The question, I think, is whether or not the United States and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximise the time that's put back on the clock,' she said. Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power. Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies — which have also backed diplomacy on Iran. In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no 'nuclear dust' over the region. 'Reckless escalation' Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base. The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the United States casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticising top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers. Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will 'destroy US diplomatic efforts' on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation. 'Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy,' he said. But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the United States should 'back Israel to the hilt, all the way,' and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops. Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action ahead of new US-Iran talks.


ARN News Center
an hour ago
- ARN News Center
Oil jumps nearly 9% after Israel's strikes on Iran
Oil prices jumped nearly 9 per cent on Friday to near multi-month highs after Israel launched strikes against Iran, sparking Iranian retaliation and raising worries about a disruption in Middle East oil supplies. Brent crude futures were up $6.19, or around 8.9 per cent, to $75.55 a barrel at 1019 GMT, after hitting an intraday high of $78.50, the highest since January 27. US West Texas Intermediate crude was up $6.22, or 9.1 per cent, at $74.26 after hitting $77.62, its highest level since January 21. Friday's gains were the largest intraday moves for both contracts since 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine caused a spike in energy prices. Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders on Friday at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon, while Iran has promised a harsh response. US President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal over its nuclear programme, to put an end to the "next already planned attacks". The National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said oil refining and storage facilities had not been damaged and continued to operate. The primary concern was whether the latest developments would affect the Strait of Hormuz, said SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye. The key waterway had been at risk of impact from increased regional volatility previously but had not been affected so far, Hvalbye said. There also was no impact to oil flow in the region so far, he added. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or some 18 to 19 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel. Analysts at consultancy Sparta Commodities said that any significant crude supply disruptions would lead to sour crude grades being marginally priced out of refineries in favour of light sweets. Under a worst case scenario, JPMorgan analysts said on Thursday that closing the strait or a retaliatory response from major oil producing countries in the region could lead to oil prices surging to $120-130 a barrel, nearly double their current base case forecast. "The key question now is whether this oil rally will last longer than the weekend or a week - our signal is that there is a lower probability of a full-blown war, and the oil price rally will likely encounter resistance," said Janiv Shah, analyst at Rystad. "Fundamentals show nearly all Iranian exports going to China, so Chinese discounted purchases would be most at risk here. OPEC+ spare capacity can provide the stabilizing force," he added. In other markets, stocks dived and there was a rush to safe havens such as gold and the Swiss franc. An increase in oil prices would also dampen the outlook for the German economy, the economic institute DIW Berlin said on Friday. It is the only G7 nation that has recorded no economic growth for two consecutive years. "The increased uncertainty speaks in favour of a higher risk premium on the oil price, which is why it is unlikely to fall below $70 on a sustained basis for the time being... Fundamental data is taking a back seat in the current situation," analysts at Commerzbank said in a note.