logo
Violence against women and girls is getting worse - as efforts to help victims are failing, watchdog says

Violence against women and girls is getting worse - as efforts to help victims are failing, watchdog says

Yahoo30-01-2025
The Home Office's efforts to address violence against women and girls have not yet improved outcomes for victims, according to the public spending watchdog.
Described as a "significant and growing problem", the National Audit Office (NAO) says one in 12 women can expect to experience some form of gender-based violence each year.
Around one in four women will be a victim of sexual or attempted assault in their lifetime.
Louise*, whose identity we have protected, says she suffered sexual and violent abuse at the hands of her former partner for seven years.
"He was a very jealous and controlling man," she says.
The abuse would come in "different forms", Louise explained. "Sometimes it was straight beatings. Other times it would be restraining and threatening with knives etc. And of course, there was the mental abuse."
It's been a few decades since her traumatising experience, and she says: "It's incredibly depressing to hear things haven't changed or moved on. I find that shocking."
She now has three children who have more awareness about gender-based abuse and "understand things like gaslighting and coercive control".
But she says now the culture has shifted, action needs to be implemented.
"Stop doing more research or yet another report which never gets acted on… We want action. My advice is you need to talk to victims, you need a victim-led solution," Louise says.
Read more from Sky News:
Home Office did not lead 'effective cross-government response'
After multiple high-profile cases of women and girls who died at the hands of abusers, the previous Conservative government introduced the Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy in 2021 and the Domestic Abuse Plan in 2022, both led by the Home Office.
However, a report by the NAO says the department did not lead an "effective cross-government response".
Caroline Harper, who led the report, says this is partly due to the fact the Home Office "struggled to get other government departments on board".
"There hasn't been sufficient focus on prevention," she adds.
She says while "supporting victims is really, really important, it would be much better if they didn't become victims in the first place".
Ministerial oversight group 'only met four times in three years'
The report highlights a ministerial oversight group responsible for setting out the strategy "only met four times in three years".
The prevalence of sexual assault against women aged 16 to 59 in England and Wales was 4.3% in 2023-24, up from 3.4% in 2009-10, the NAO said.
In that same period, incidents of rape and sexual assault against women and girls recorded by police rose from 34,000 to 123,000, although the NAO said this could partly be explained by improved recording of such crimes.
Past focus 'not on measuring outcomes'
Isabelle Younane, head of external affairs at the Women's Aid charity, says: "We really do welcome the intention of government and the strategy of ensuring a strong focus is on prevention and cross-government working."
However, she adds: "We have not yet seen this translate into meaningful outcomes for women and girls on the ground."
Ms Younane says in the past the focus has been on "measuring activities and whether those activities had been completed, not on measuring outcomes".
A Home Office spokesperson highlighted that the NAO report looked at the "previous government's work" and its "failure to deliver systemic change to deal with these devastating crimes".
"We are delivering a step-change in the government's response, as we work to deliver our unprecedented manifesto commitment to halve violence against women and girls in a decade," they added.
* Not her actual name.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge
Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge

A ban on Palestine Action as a terror group is poised to become law after peers backed the Government move at Westminster but faces a legal bid to block it. The House of Lords backed proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000 without a vote. A short time before, a so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128. The ministerial order, which has already been approved by MPs, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. However, it is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to try to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings. The Government crackdown comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police in connection with the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance. Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe. 'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence.' He added: 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action. 'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.' But ministers have faced criticism over the decision to outlaw Palestine Action, with opponents branding the move as 'draconian overreach' and comparing the group to the Suffragettes. The United Nations has also warned against the ban, with experts concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist''. In the Lords, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb opposed the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Her regret motion argued the ban undermined civil liberties, constituted a misuse of anti-terror legislation, suppressed dissent against the UK's policy on Israel, and criminalised support for a protest group, causing 'a chilling effect on freedom of expression'. The legislation approved by the Lords also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion. The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world. The Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian imperial state. Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause. It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.

Murderer cannot be deported because rival gang would kill him
Murderer cannot be deported because rival gang would kill him

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Murderer cannot be deported because rival gang would kill him

A Jamaican murderer has avoided deportation after claiming he will be targeted by a notorious gang if returned home. The killer won a human rights appeal at an immigration court after telling of his 'fear' of the powerful One Order gang on the Caribbean island. The crime syndicate is said to be affiliated with the Jamaica Labour party and is accused of killings, extortion and drug dealing. The Jamaican man claimed his family members had been killed by the One Order, and his sister had to be put into a witness protection programme. The unnamed migrant – who has been in the UK since 1996 and committed murder – has mounted a legal fight for protection in Britain. He argued that Britain must grant him asylum and not deport him back to Jamaica on human rights grounds because he will be 'targeted' by the One Order. The Home Office tried to deport him and he lost an initial appeal against their decision at a first-tier immigration tribunal.. But, he has now won an appeal at the Upper Tribunal, which ruled he could be at risk from the gang if returned. The Upper Tribunal found the lower court 'overlooked' key concerns about potential dangers for him in Jamaica and did not properly assess his 'credibility'. It ruled that his case must be heard again. The case is the latest revealed by The Telegraph where foreign criminals have used Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to claim they would face persecution if deported. Ministers are planning to rewrite rules to make it harder to allow appeals against removal. The One Order gang is said to be responsible for hundreds of killings over its rivalries with other gangs. One of its leaders, Othneil 'Thickman' Lobban, was this year gunned down and killed by police, sparking a violent backlash that closed schools and businesses. The Upper Tribunal, sitting in Cardiff, was told that the unnamed Jamaican migrant seeking asylum 'fears being targeted in Jamaica by the One Order Gang' as 'his family have been targeted there'. He has been in the UK since 1996, mostly without leave to remain. A judgment said he committed murder but did not specify details, other than that he has been through 'offender management' during his rehabilitation and now shows an 'admirable work ethic'. The Jamaican argued that the first-tier tribunal judge had not properly considered key facts about his concerns about the One Order gang, which the Home Office had not disputed. His sister was in a witness protection programme while his brothers had been shot in Jamaica and the family home was attacked. Upper Tribunal Judge Sean O'Brien said the first-tier tribunal was mistaken in its ruling. Judge O'Brien said: 'The [First-tier Tribunal] judge had overlooked the fact that the core elements of the [Jamaican's] account were not challenged by [the Home Office], had misunderstood [his] evidence about [his] family he claimed had been murdered because of gang retribution and when, and had given no apparent consideration to the attempts made to verify that [his] sister remained in Witness Protection. 'I agree therefore that the judge's findings on the credibility of the [Jamaican's] account of events in Jamaica involved the making of an error of law.' Judge O'Brien cast doubt over elements of the migrant's claims and said because he has been away for so long, he may avoid being targeted. But he said because of the previous 'erroneous' and 'unsustainable' ruling, a fresh hearing must be held. 'All in all, I cannot be satisfied that the judge would necessarily have found that the [Jamaican] would not be at risk from the One Order Gang had she taken a permissible approach to credibility', the judge added. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Carney meets with automotive sector CEOs as U.S. trade talks continue
Carney meets with automotive sector CEOs as U.S. trade talks continue

Hamilton Spectator

timea day ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Carney meets with automotive sector CEOs as U.S. trade talks continue

OTTAWA - Prime Minister Mark Carney met with automotive sector CEOs Wednesday morning to discuss U.S. tariffs and ways to protect Canadian supply chains from the trade war with the United States. A spokeswoman for the Prime Minister's Office said the CEOs of Ford Canada, Stellantis Canada and GM Canada met with Carney, along with Brian Kingston of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association. A brief readout from the Prime Minister's Office said the group discussed 'the need to build up a made-in-Canada supply chain as well as diversify our trading partners.' U.S. President Donald Trump has said repeatedly that the U.S. does not need Canadian cars and he wants to see automotive companies move all production to the U.S. The U.S. has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on vehicles manufactured in Canada, with a carve-out for components built in the U.S. through the highly integrated vehicle supply chain. 'I think it's good and useful for the prime minister to be meeting with the Detroit-based automakers … I think we're also hopeful that we're going to have an opportunity to meet with the prime minister as well,' said David Adams, president and CEO of the Global Automakers of Canada, which represents 26 European and Asian auto brands including Toyota and Honda. Adams said one key issue for automakers is the government's zero-emission vehicle mandate, which is set to kick in next year and was the target of recent Conservative attacks in the House of Commons. Canada's auto manufacturers have called on the government to repeal the mandate. Electric vehicles remain more expensive than their gas-powered equivalents, and sales fell in the winter after the federal $5,000 vehicle rebates ran out of funding. Between January and March, zero-emissions vehicles made up only 8.11 per cent of all new vehicle sales in Canada — a drop from the 16.5 per cent recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024 — Statistics Canada data shows. The monthly share of new vehicle sales going to EVs never dropped below 10.65 per cent in 2024 and peaked at 18.29 per cent in December. In April of 2025 — the month for which Statistics Canada has the most recent data — EV sales dropped to 7.53 per cent of all new vehicle sales in Canada. Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin confirmed last month the government was working to bring back an EV rebate of some kind, but wasn't sure yet if it would restore the old program or be something new. The government's EV sales mandate states that at least 20 per cent of new light-duty vehicles offered for sale in 2026 must be zero-emission. That share is supposed to rise each year until it reaches 100 per cent in 2035. 'There's no way that manufacturers are going to be able to meet their targets for 2026,' Adams said. 'My sense of the prime minister is that he's a pretty pragmatic person, and I think he'd be wanting to work with the industry to remove a barrier or an irritant that was both costly and problematic, so that we can frankly focus our efforts on the larger issue at hand, which is the trade relationship with the United States.' Canada and the U.S. are back at the bargaining table after Trump called a halt to trade talks over Canada's plan to impose a digital services tax on multinational tech firms — a plan the Carney government called off Sunday evening. Carney has said he wants a new Canada-U.S. trade deal in place by July 21 and if that deadline isn't met, he'll boost Canadian trade countermeasures. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store