‘We dreamed of the day we'd reach Sargodha': IAF Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh on striking Pak's air base
Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh has confirmed that the Indian Air Force destroyed five Pakistani fighter jets and one surveillance aircraft during Operation Sindoor. Strikes hit major airfields, command centres and radar sites, with minimal civilian damage. Singh credited the S-400 defence system, precise long-range weapons, and full political backing for the operation's success. The high-intensity conflict lasted less than four days before Pakistan sought talks, marking a rare public disclosure of detailed operational results.
Agencies Indian Air Force Chief Amar Preet Singh on Saturday confirmed that the IAF shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one large airborne surveillance aircraft during Operation Sindoor. Speaking at the Air Chief Marshal L.M. Katre Memorial Lecture in Bengaluru, he described it as the largest recorded surface-to-air kill on record.
Speaking in Bengaluru, Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh recalled a moment long imagined by many in uniform. 'Sargodha, we've grown up in our Air Force, dreaming about days like this, someday we'll get a chance to go there. So it just so happens that I got my chance just before I retired… So we took on the airfield there…'
This was Operation Sindoor, India's cross-border mission that Singh has now detailed for the first time.Singh said the IAF brought down five Pakistani fighter aircraft and one large airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) or electronic intelligence (ELINT) plane.'We have five confirmed kills and one large aircraft, which could be either an ELINT aircraft or an AEW&C aircraft, which was taken on at a distance of about 300 kilometres. This is actually the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about,' he told the audience at the Air Chief Marshal L.M. Katre Memorial Lecture.
The strikes targeted critical military infrastructure. At Shahbaz Jacobabad airfield, an F-16 hangar was half destroyed and aircraft inside were damaged. Two command and control centres — Murid and Chaklala — were hit, along with at least six radar sites. Singh said there were indications an AEW&C aircraft and several F-16s under maintenance were present in one of the damaged hangars.Operation Sindoor also struck the headquarters of Jaish-e-Mohammed at Bahawalpur. Singh displayed satellite imagery showing the aftermath.'There's hardly any collateral here… The adjacent buildings are fairly intact… Not only did we have satellite pictures, but also from local media, through which we could get inside pictures.'Long-range precision weapons were used, and Singh emphasised the priority given to avoiding civilian harm.Praising India's air defence, Singh singled out the S-400 missile system.'Our air defence systems have done a wonderful job. The S-400 system, which we had recently bought, has been a game-changer. The range of that system has really kept their aircraft away from their weapons like, those long-range glide bombs that they have, they have not been able to use any one of those because they have not been able to penetrate the system.'Singh credited political leadership for enabling the operation.'A key reason for success was the presence of political will. There were very clear directions given to us. No restrictions were put on us… If there were any constraints, they were self-made… We decided how much to escalate… We had full freedom to plan and execute. Our attacks were calibrated because we wanted to be mature about it… There was a synchronisation between the three forces… The post of CDS made a real difference. He was there to get us together… NSA also played a big role in getting all the agencies…''It was a high-tech war. In 80 to 90 hours of war, we were able to achieve so much damage that it was clear to them that if they continue, they are going to pay for it more and more. So they came forward and sent a message to our DGMO that they wanted to talk. This was accepted on our side…' Singh said.Reflecting on the 2019 Balakot airstrikes, Singh said that while intelligence confirmed heavy militant losses, the IAF had struggled to convince the public due to the lack of imagery.'In Balakot, we could not get anything from inside, and it became a big issue trying to tell our own people… So I'm very happy that this time we were able to take care of that ghost of Balakot that we were able to tell the world what we have achieved.'"People got down to their egos in this war... Once we achieved our objective, we should have looked for all windows of opportunity to stop... Some people very close to me said, 'Aur maarna tha'. But can we continue to be at war?... The nation has taken a good decision," says Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, backing the decision to pause Operation Sindoor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘In Operation Sindoor, we played chess': Army chief on military operation against Pakistan
Army chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi on Saturday opened up on the details of Operation Sindoor against Pakistan and said the first meeting regarding the anti-terror operation was held a day after the Pahalgam terror attack. Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi speaks during the inauguration of 'Agnishodh', the Indian Army Research Cell (IARC), at IIT Madras, in Chennai. (@adgpi/X) Dwivedi said that a meeting of three chiefs of armed forces was held with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on April 23, when a free hand was given to the military to decide the operation. The Army chief took the example of chess to detail the operations conducted against Pakistan from 7 May, saying that the warfare was not anything like the conventional ones. Also Read: Day after Pahalgam, Rajnath said 'enough is enough', forces given free hand: Army chief on Op Sindoor "In Operation Sindoor, we played chess. It means that we did not know the next move the enemy is going to take and what we were going to do. This is what we call a grey zone," Upendra Dwivedi said at an event in IIT Madras in Chennai. "Grey zone means that we are not going for the conventional operations. But we are doing something just short of a conventional operation," he added. The statements by the Army chief on the Operation Sindoor came hours after Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh spoke on the operation and revealed that India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and a large Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) aircraft during the four-day conflict. Army chief Dwivedi said Operation Sindoor taught the armed forces to operate in a grey zone, adding that the military was making chess moves during the operation. Also Read: 'There was political restrictions': IAF chief on Operation Sindoor "Somewhere we were giving them the checkmate and somewhere we were going in for the kill at the risk of losing our own, but that's life is all about," he added. He said that after the Pahalgam terror attack, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told the three service chiefs during a meeting, 'Enough is enough,' and they were clearly told that something had to be done. "That is the kind of confidence, political direction and political clarity we saw for the first time... That is what raises your morale. That is how it helped our army commander-in-chiefs to be on the ground and act as per their wisdom," he added. Meanwhile, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, during an address in Bengaluru, said that India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets using S-400 air defence systems. Apart from the five jets, a large Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) aircraft was also destroyed, Singh said. The Air Chief Marshal also said that the air force faced no restrictions during Operation Sindoor, adding that it had complete freedom to plan and execute the mission. Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7, where India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), days after the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which claimed the lives of 26 people.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles
At the start of 2025 we were led to believe that we were Donald Trump's special friend and that India would probably be the first to conclude a trade tariff agreement with the US. Now we are not just back of the queue, but could be blackballed! A close observer of Trump-India relations has a different take from others for the mysterious fallout. It was not initially about Russian oil, Pakistani perfidy or thwarting Trump's Nobel Peace Prize ambitions. Trump was infuriated with India's dilatory tactics in signing a deal, which goes back to his first presidency. His joint appearance with Modi in Texas in 2019 was meant to help seal an agreement, but talks fell through a day later in New York. Time and again, as in Gujarat February 2020, like the traditional smooth-talking Indian trader, our officials assured that a deal was almost through, without confessing candidly that some portions of the deal concerning agriculture and dairy products were non-negotiable. Unfortunately, Trump is focused on just this sector, since his Republican supporters come from the farm belt. As US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remarked angrily, 'You claim to be such a big country and you can't accept a bushel of American corn.' After being re-elected, President Trump was even willing to overlook past slights. (PM Modi did not call or even telephone Trump during his three visits to the US during the Biden presidency.) But in 2025, once again, despite the head-start in negotiations, the deal has not materialised! Retired IAS officer Subhash Chandra Garg's new book is titled No Minister. The former Finance Secretary does not hold back in recalling riveting encounters with his ministerial bosses, some of whom, in fact, refused to take no for an answer, despite bureaucrats citing the rules and the wishes of the incumbent PM. Garg names P Chidambaram among the naysayers who, as finance minister, threatened then PM Manmohan Singh with his resignation unless his proposal that 60-70 secretary level-posts were allotted to the Indian Revenue Service cadre. In Garg's view, this unbalanced the bureaucratic structure without improving tax collection. Similarly, Andhra CM Chandrababu Naidu, on whom the Vajpayee government was dependent for survival, cornered more than 40 % of the portfolios of Indian projects approved by the World Bank in 1999 and 2000. Despite objections from the government, Naidu forced them to agree to his audacious demand, in disregard of fair Central resource distribution. Similarly, Kamal Nath bullied his way so that 5% of the total pool of government houses in Delhi was part of his discretionary quota, which largely included newly constructed category type VII and VIII bungalows in Moti Bagh. Considering it is an intra-party contest to elect the fairly modest position of secretary (administration) of the Constitution Club, it is surprising that the poll has attracted intense national interest and media scrutiny. In contrast, Rajeev Shukla (Congress) has been elected unopposed as secretary (sports) and Tiruchi Siva (DMK) as secretary (culture) without any rancour. There seems more than meets the eye in the fierce tussle between the two ill-matched adversaries for the post of administrative secretary. The jocular, down-to-earth ex-MP and UP Jat leader Sanjeev Balyan, who only joined the club eight years ago, appears to have been pitch forked into the contest, while Rajiv Pratap Rudy, the suave Bihar MP who has been the guiding spirit behind the club for the last 25 years, is credited with upgrading its facilities, including gyms, saunas, lounges and sports facilities. Balyan's most vocal campaigner is controversial Bihar MP Nishikant Dubey, who is fighting with all the vehemence and caste calculations of a panchayat election and throwing names of powerful central politicians. Pratap, more discreet, is believed to be backed by an influential regional satrap, who has not shown his hand openly. Amidst constant reports of Air India's slipping standards, I am pleased to report my recent personal experience of the airlines, which demonstrates that the staff's spirit of service beyond the call of duty, the hallmark of JRD Tata's original Air India, has not vanished. While flying back from Kenya on an AI flight, the senior air hostess noticed my distress as I rummaged through my carry bag and under the seat for my missing iPad, which had obviously been left behind in Nairobi. I presumed resignedly that recovering my iPad was like looking for a needle in a haystack, but I had not reckoned with the resourcefulness of the very helpful air hostess and the AI Nairobi manager. The latter, with the assistance of his counterpart at the Nairobi airport lounge, located the missing iPad, got it identified through WhatsApp photos and arranged to have it returned to Delhi within a week.
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
‘In Operation Sindoor, we played chess…': Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi says, ‘life is all about…'
Army Chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi on Sunday described the chance faced during Operation Sindoor, saying, "It was like a game of chess, we didn't know what the enemy's next move would be, and we had to adapt our own constantly.' During an address at IIT Madras, he said, 'In Operation Sindoor, we played chess. We did not know what the enemy's next move was going to be, and what we were going to do. This is called the grey zone. Grey zone means that we are not going for the conventional operations. What we are doing is just short of a conventional operation. We were making the chess moves, and he (enemy) was also making the chess moves. Somewhere we were giving them the checkmate and somewhere we were going in for the kill at the risk of losing our own but that's life is all about.' He also inaugurated 'Agnishodh' - the Indian Army Research Cell (IARC) at IIT Madras, marking a significant step towards self-reliance in defence technology. The initiative aims to upskill military personnel in emerging fields such as additive manufacturing, cybersecurity, quantum computing, wireless communication and unmanned systems, fostering a tech-enabled force. Speaking on the Operation, the COAS said, "What happened on 22 April in Pahalgam shocked the nation. On the 23rd, the next day itself, we all sat down. This was the first time that RM (Defence Minister Rajnath Singh) said, "Enough is enough". All three chiefs were very clear that something had to be done. The free hand was given, 'you decide what is to be done.' That is the kind of confidence, political direction and political clarity we saw for the first time. That is what raises your morale. That is how it helped our army commanders-in-chief to be on the ground and act as per their wisdom." In the early hours of May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor – striking nine terror beds across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) – in retaliation to the lethal Pahalgam attack in April, that killed 26 civilians. Touted as the Indian military's biggest and deepest strike yet, 'Operation Sindoor' marked India's first joint operation since the 1971 war. All three defence branches — Army, Navy, and Air Force — coordinated to carry out the strikes on Pakistan to eliminate Jaish-e-Muhammed and Lashkar leadership. "On the 25th, we visited the Northern Command, where we thought, planned, conceptualised and executed the seven targets out of the nine that were destroyed, and a lot of terrorists were killed. On April 29, we met the Prime Minister for the first time. It is important that how a small name Op Sindoor connects the whole nation. That is something which galvanised the whole nation. That is the reason the whole nation was saying why have you stopped? That question was being asked and it has been amply answered," Dwivedi added. The collaboration will also extend to the IIT Madras Research Park, including partnerships with AMTDC and Pravartak Technologies Foundation. On the occasion, Dwivedi addressed the faculty and students on "Operation Sindoor - A New Chapter in India's Fight Against Terrorism," highlighting it as a calibrated, intelligence-led operation reflecting a doctrinal shift. He underlined the role of indigenous technology and precision military action in reinforcing India's proactive security posture. He also lauded the IIT faculty for their contribution to nation-building through academic excellence. (With inputs from agencies)
