Is this why Trump still hasn't met Anthony Albanese? Shocking details emerge about Albo's big fail while overseas
Anthony Albanese is under fire for his 'passive' approach to the US relationship, after he missed out on opportunities to meet both President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
Albanese was stood up by the US President at the G7 Summit in Canada, and instead met with Trump's senior economic team on Wednesday AEST.
Trump left the summit early due to the Israel-Iran conflict, scotching planned meeting with several world leaders including Albanese, who has only ever spoken to him on the phone.
The cancelled meeting was a crucial blow for Albanese as he tries to shore up the AUKUS deal, now under review by the US, and to negotiate an exemption or easing of tariffs on Australian goods.
There was pressure on the prime minister to negotiate an exemption from the tariffs: a 50 per cent levy on Aussie aluminium and steel products sent to the US, and a baseline 10 per cent levy on other goods.
This week's snub was not the first time Albanese has missed out on talks with his US counterparts. The prime minister refused to meet JD Vance last month during his visit to Rome for the Pope's inauguration.
When asked at the time why he did not meet with Vance, Albanese said he would only meet with Trump, not the vice president.
'I'm the prime minister, I meet the president of the United States, and that will occur at an appropriate time,' he said.
Trump left the summit early due to the Israel-Iran conflict, scotching planned meeting with several world leaders including Albanes
Shadow home affairs minister Andrew Hastie said Albanese wasn't making enough effort to improve relations with what he called Australia's closest ally.
'The prime minister's approach has been passive and lethargic towards the relationship,' he told Sky News.
'This is the wrong approach towards President Trump, who values a personal connection more than formal diplomatic channels.'
It comes after Natalia Barr grilled Foreign Minister Penny Wong over the missed opportunity on Thursday.
'Our prime minister is now eyeing up a trip to the Netherlands next week with hopes he might be able to line up a second date with the president, that's after the president stood him up in Canada,' Barr said.
'Is the PM going to chase him around the world?'
'Can I just put a bit of perspective here, Nat?' Wong replied.
'The president left the G7 because of the war in the Middle East.
'Now, I know we all want to think it's about us, but he left the G7 because of the war in the Middle East and he was unable as a consequence, not only to not have a bilateral meeting with the prime minister, but with (Indian) Prime Minister Modi, (and) with the president of South Korea.'
Albanese might get another chance to meet Trump in person within days.
The White House confirmed this month that Trump will attend the NATO Summit in the Netherlands next week, though his presence may now be in doubt because of the rapidly changing situation in the Middle East.
Asked on Wednesday if he would also attend, Albanese said: 'I'm considering (it).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
28 minutes ago
- Sky News
Will Starmer have to agree to war?
👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 Is Donald Trump about to join Israel in attacks on Iran, and will he ask Keir Starmer to help him out? If he does - would it even be legal? A lot has happened since Beth, Ruth and Harriet last got together, with further significant developments expected before a big NATO summit next week - a gathering we don't even know if the US president will turn up to. So how did we get to the point where we're asking whether the UK will allow its ally - the US - to use its airbases? And how does the current situation compare to the invasion of Iraq in 2003?
Sky News
28 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump's two-week timeline: What next for Iran?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said Donald Trump will make a decision on whether to militarily strike Iran in the next two weeks. That's as diplomatic talks between Western governments and the Iranians ramp up. In today's episode, US correspondents Mark Stone and Martha Kelner unpick why the delay might be, and the competing voices in the ears of the president. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ YouTube channel.
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
Casual threats of annihilation from Trump are not reality TV stunts
The spectacle is as grotesque as it is predictable. Here we have a man whose entire career is built on graft and bluster, a conman who has spent decades swindling contractors, stiffing workers, and peddling conspiracy theories, now playing at empire with the lives of millions. READ MORE: Donald Trump on whether US will strike Iran: 'I may do it' His rhetoric – equal parts mob boss and megalomaniac –would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous. When he boasts of 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran' and casually threatens to assassinate the country's supreme leader, one half-expects him to segue into a plug for Trump Steaks or a rant about 'fake news.' But this is no reality TV stunt. The consequences of Trump's bloodlust are horrifyingly real. The US military, that vast engine of imperial violence, is surging bombers, warships, and God knows what else into the region, while Trump all but dares Tehran to retaliate so he can justify an even greater bloodbath. His demand that Tehran's citizens 'evacuate' carries the unmistakable whiff of nuclear menace – a threat as reckless as it is depraved. READ MORE: Angela Rayner does not rule out following US into war with Iran Of course, the usual suspects are lining up to cheer this madness. The G7, that club of imperialist powers, has dutifully parroted the lie that Iran – not the nuclear-armed Israel, not the US with its endless regime-change wars – is the 'principal source of regional instability'. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party, ever eager to prove its bipartisan commitment to militarism, has offered its full-throated support. Adam Schiff, that perennial windbag of the liberal establishment, has already greenlit further aggression, proving once again that when it comes to war, there is no opposition party in America. The truth is, this war is not about nukes, or terrorism, or any of the other threadbare pretexts trotted out by Washington. It is about oil, about empire, about the desperate flailing of a capitalist system in terminal decay. Trump, that bloated avatar of American decline, is hurtling toward catastrophe because he – like the oligarchs he serves – has no other cards left to play. Alan Hinnrichs Dundee IRAN doesn't want nukes to destroy Israel, it wants nukes to deter the West from doing to Iran what it has done to the rest of the Middle East. Who can blame Iran? Iran is one of the world's oldest countries, and whether they have proxies in other countries or do bad things to their people, the fact is that Iran has had one war in the last 200 years and it was started by Saddam's Iraq. Google how many wars the USA has had in its 320 or so years, then google how many military bases the USA has around the planet. READ MORE: Kelly Given: Israel's aggression makes mockery of self defence claims The fact is, it's the West that is the warmongering terrorist. Israel attacks Iran out of hate, the USA helps due to its liking for other countries' oil. The UK tags along trying to look like a continent, but like Trump, ends up looking incontinent. Scotland AND England need independence from these warmongering British nationalists who keep power and who have sold their souls to the donor at the expense of the voter. They can't feed or heat pensioners, who already have the worst pensions in the developed world, but here we are fighting two proxy wars against Russia and Iran. British nationalism and its unaffordable world stage must go. The UK must return to being independent countries. The days of England's huge Westminster majority controlling everything must be brought to an end. British nationalism is a disease, and there is a cure. Independence. Bill Robertson via email THE US-Israel war against Iran (Trump using 'we' on Tuesday confirms this) is reminiscent of the Iraq war, where the smokescreen of imaginary weapons of mass destruction was really about regime change. Deja vu! Trump and his administration lack the diplomatic nous to prevent wars and genocide. Trump declared there would have been no Ukraine invasion if he had been in power, bravado chest-beating but he has failed to stop it or reign in Israel's war in Iran and genocide in Palestine, so it is unlikely he would have stopped the Ukraine war – not until his good friend Putin had achieved his objectives, just like now. A Wilson Stirlingshire I AM writing in response to Peter Thomson's letter in Wednesday's National. I made no comment on Peter's letter of the 16th in my letter, my comments referred to Leah Gunn Barrett's from the 16th. Norman Robertson via email
