logo
Born in Pyongyang, Kim Jong-un's praise song played at 8 years old, say relatives

Born in Pyongyang, Kim Jong-un's praise song played at 8 years old, say relatives

Korea Herald20-02-2025

New book reveals Kim Jong-un's birthplace for first time, based on interviews with aunt and uncle
Born in 1984 in northern Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un was secretly anointed as the future heir to his father, Kim Jong-il, at the age of 8, according to the statements of Kim's aunt and her husband, as detailed in a newly published book. The book also discloses that the initiation of his hereditary succession was outwardly marked by the airing of a glorification song dedicated to him in 1992.
Cheong Seong-chang, director of the Center for Korean Peninsula Strategy at the Sejong Institute, has published a book "Kim Jong-un We Don't Know" to shed light on the untold story of North Korea's elusive leader.
Cheong specifically discloses Kim Jong-un's birthplace for the first time, along with his year of birth and when he was secretly chosen as the successor to Kim Jong-il — critical information that has for so long has remained unclear.
During a book launch event at the Sejong Institute in Seoul on Thursday, Cheong explained that the disclosures came from multiple interviews with Kim Jong-un's maternal aunt, Ko Yong-suk, and his uncle, Ri Kang, in Washington in March 2021.
Ko and Ri were closely connected to Kim Jong-il and a young Kim Jong-un before they decided to flee North Korea in 1998. Their own son was born in the same year as Kim Jong-un.
'Kim Jong-un was born at Special Residence No. 2, located in the Samsok district, in the northeastern part of Pyongyang, on the north bank of the Taedong River. The guesthouse had a medical clinic and a delivery room,' the book details, based on testimonies from Ko and Ri.
Ko and Ri say Kim was born in 1984 and lived in the home of his birth until around 1986, when he moved to Special Residence No. 1 in central Pyongyang. It was only after Kim Jong-un turned 3 or 4 years old that his mother, Ko Yong-hui, told her father, Ko Kyong-taek, that she was living with Kim Jong-il.
Speaking at the event, Cheong explained that Kim Jong-un's move to central Pyongyang was closely tied to the power shift between his grandfather, Kim Il-sung, and his father, Kim Jong-il, marking 1986 as a crucial turning point.
'By around 1985, Kim Jong-il's influence had begun to surpass Kim Il-sung's, effectively shifting the regime into a dual leadership structure. By 1986, Kim Jong-il's power has surpassed that of Kim Il-sung, which means no longer needing to defer to his father,' Cheong said.
'It was around this time that he moved to central Pyongyang with Ko Yong-hui, the woman he cherished most. From that point on, Ko Yong-hui effectively took on the role of his de facto first lady. Until now, the exact moment when Ko Yong-hui secured her status as Kim Jong-il's official partner had remained unclear."
The book adds, 'Kim Jong-un was designated as Kim Jong-il's successor much earlier than widely assumed by the outside world.'
According to testimonies from Ri and Ko, 'Kim Jong-un's praise song 'Footsteps' was performed in front of Kim Jong-il's key confidants at his drinking gathering on Kim Jong-un's eighth birthday,' the book read.
'At the time, Ri Kang directly heard Kim Jong-il say, 'From now on, my successor will be my Jong-un.' He also heard the same remark multiple times afterward,' the book read.
'When Kim Jong-un's uncle questioned whether it was too early to establish him as the successor, Kim Jong-il responded, 'Because he takes after me.' Kim Jong-il repeatedly emphasized Kim Jong-un's boldness while stating that Kim Jong-chol was too gentle to be a successor.'
Cheong also claims Kim Jong-un had already secured a superior position over other power elites and was exercising sole leadership before Kim Jong-il's death in December 2011, based on high-level intelligence and posthumously released footage of Kim Jong-il from the North's Korean Central Television.
In the book, Cheong asserts that Kim Jong-un does not have a son and that Kim Ju-ae is his firstborn, based on several individuals who have interacted with Kim Jong-un — among them Joseph Terwilliger, an American professor who has taught in Pyongyang and who cradled Kim Ju-ae in his arms when she was a baby.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US says NK military deployment, Russia's support in return 'must end'
US says NK military deployment, Russia's support in return 'must end'

Korea Herald

time12 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

US says NK military deployment, Russia's support in return 'must end'

A State Department spokesperson reiterated Thursday that North Korea's troop deployment to Russia and Moscow's support to the North in return "must end." Tommy Pigott, the department's principal deputy spokesperson, made the remarks, after North Korean leader Kim Jong-un vowed to "unconditionally" support Russia over the war against Ukraine during a meeting with Russia's Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang earlier this week. "We continue to be concerned about North Korea's direct involvement in the war," he told a press briefing. "North Korea's military deployment to Russia and any support provided by the Russian Federation to the DPRK in return must end," he added. DPRK is short for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. He also stressed that third countries, like North Korea, "bear responsibility" for their role in the war against Ukraine. During the meeting with Shoigu, Kim said that Pyongyang will "unconditionally support the stand of Russia and its foreign policies in all the crucial international political issues, including the Ukrainian issue," according to the Korean Central News Agency. Kim also said his country will "responsibly" observe the articles of the comprehensive strategic partnership treaty signed in June last year. (Yonhap)

N.Korea says damaged warship moored at pier after putting it in upright position
N.Korea says damaged warship moored at pier after putting it in upright position

Korea Herald

time12 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

N.Korea says damaged warship moored at pier after putting it in upright position

North Korea said Friday it has successfully put in an upright position a warship that was partially capsized during a launch ceremony last month, and the warship is moored at the pier for more restoration works. The 5,000-ton destroyer tipped over and became partially submerged during the launch ceremony held in late May in the northeastern port city of Chongjin. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un ordered the full restoration of the warship before a key party meeting set for late June. In early June, a North Korean team restored the balance of the warship and moored it at the pier by safely conducting its end launching Thursday afternoon, according to the Korean Central News Agency. "The team will start the next-stage restoration after the reexamination by a group of experts into the overall hull of the destroyer," the KCNA said. North Korea said it will carry out detailed restoration work on the destroyer at a drydock in the northeastern port of Rajin, a project that is expected to take seven to 10 days. The South Korean military said Thursday the North Korean warship that had inclined at the Chongjin port returned to an upright position earlier this week, and that the North is expected to begin to drain water from the warship. The North's leader Kim witnessed the warship tipping over during the launch ceremony and condemned it as an intolerable "criminal act." As part of a probe into the warship accident, North Korea has detained some officials, including the vice director of the party's munitions industry department. (Yonhap)

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire

Korea Herald

timea day ago

  • Korea Herald

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The US on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza because it was not linked to the release of hostages, saying it would embolden Hamas militants. All 14 other members of the council voted in favor of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. The resolution before the UN's most powerful body also did not fulfill two other US demands: It did not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea, speaking to the council immediately before the vote, said the resolution would undermine the security of Israel. a close US ally, and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the resolution would only have empowered Hamas. 'Hamas could end this brutal conflict immediately by laying down its arms and releasing all remaining hostages,' he said in a statement. Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon thanked the United States for refusing to abandon the hostages. He said the resolution's failure to make the release of hostages a condition for a ceasefire would have put all the pressure on Israel and handed Hamas 'time, leverage and political cover.' But the US veto of the resolution — its fifth since the start of the war — was roundly criticized by other members of the council, who accused the United States of providing Israel with impunity. The Chinese ambassador to the UN said Israel's actions have 'crossed every red line' of international humanitarian law and seriously violated UN resolutions. 'Yet, due to the shielding by one country, these violations have not been stopped or held accountable," Ambassador Fu Cong said. Britain's UN Ambassador Barbara Woodward, a usual US ally, lashed out at Israel. 'This Israeli government's decisions to expand its military operations in Gaza and severely restrict aid are unjustifiable, disproportionate and counterproductive, and the UK completely opposes them,' she said. Pakistan's Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad said the US veto "will be remembered as a complicity, a green light for continued annihilation. A moment where the entire world was expecting action. But yet again, this council was blocked and prevented by one member from carrying out its responsibility.' Slovenia's UN Ambassador Samuel Zbogar, the coordinator for the council's 10 elected members, stressed that it was never the intention to provoke a veto, and therefore the resolution focused on the humanitarian crisis and the urgent need for unimpeded access to deliver aid. 'Starving civilians and inflicting immense suffering is inhumane and against international law,' he told the council after the vote. 'No war objective can justify such action. We had hoped and expected that this was our shared understanding.' Palestinian UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour said Palestinians are now urging governments to take 'real measures' to pressure Israel to get out of Gaza before it implements what he called an Israeli plan 'to destroy our people." And in the coming days, he said, the Palestinians will head to the 193-member General Assembly, where there are no vetoes, with a similar humanitarian-focused resolution. Unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. The US vetoed the last Security Council resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, also because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands that those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a US proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.' The vote followed a decision by an Israeli and US-backed foundation to pause food delivery in Gaza after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings this week. Israel and the US say the new system was designed to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the UN. The UN has rejected the new system. The UN says its distribution system worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored. Gaza is almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine. The war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and abducting 251. They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by UN agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store